Weyerhaeuser Co., a Washington Corp. v. Int'l Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local 21, 733 F.2d 645 (9th Cir. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Weyerhaeuser Co., a Washington Corp. v. Int'l Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local 21, 733 F.2d 645 (9th Cir. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nlpc v. East Coast Lightning Equipment (ca9, 2020-05-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Nlpc v. East Coast Lightning Equipment (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
9th Cir. · 2020 · confidence medium
Because “[f]urther proceedings remain in the district court that could result in a second appeal if the instant order is affirmed,” Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Int’l Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union, Local 21, 733 F.2d 645, 646 (9th Cir. 1984) (order), the district court’s decision is not final.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In re Gross
9th Cir. · 2002 · confidence medium
ORDER ** “A contempt order is not a final order under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 prior to the imposition of sanctions.” Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Int’l Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union, 733 F.2d 645, 645 (9th Cir.1984).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Matter of U.S. Abatement Corp.
5th Cir. · 1994 · confidence medium
Cf. Petroleos Mexicanos v. Crawford Enter., Inc., 826 F.2d 392 , 398 (5th Cir.1987); Nasco, Inc. v. Calcasieu Television & Radio, Inc., 752 F.2d 157, 159 (5th Cir.1985); accord Blalock Eddy Ranch v. MCI Telecommunications Corp., 982 F.2d 371, 374 (9th Cir.1992); Dove v. Atlantic Capital Corp., 963 F.2d 15, 17 (2d Cir.1992); Bernard v. American Cyanamid Co. (In re Tetracycline Cases), 927 F.2d 411, 412 (8th Cir.1991); Combs v. Ryan's Coal Co., 785 F.2d 970 , 977 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 853 , 107 S.Ct. 187 , 93 L.Ed.2d 120 (1986); Motorola, Inc. v. Computer Displays Int'l, 739 F.2d 1…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States Abatement Corp. v. Mobil Exploration & Producing U.S. Inc.
5th Cir. · 1994 · confidence medium
Cf. Petroleos Mexicanos v. Crawford Enter., Inc., 826 F.2d 392 , 398 (5th Cir.1987); Nasco, Inc. v. Calcasieu Television & Radio, Inc., 752 F.2d 157, 159 (5th Cir.1985); accord Blalock Eddy Ranch v. MCI Telecommunications Corp., 982 F.2d 371, 374 (9th Cir.1992); Dove v. Atlantic Capital Corp., 963 F.2d 15, 17 (2d Cir.1992); Bernard v. American Cyanamid Co. (In re Tetracycline Cases), 927 F.2d 411, 412 (8th Cir.1991); Combs v. Ryan’s Coal Co., 785 F.2d 970 , 977 (11th Cir.), cert,. denied, 479 U.S. 853 , 107 S.Ct. 187 , 93 L.Ed.2d 120 (1986); Motorola, Inc. v. Computer Displays Int’l, 739 F…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Guy O. Dove, Iii, Spargos Mining Nl v. Atlantic Capital Corporation
2d Cir. · 1992 · confidence medium
See, e.g., Don’s Porta Signs v. City of Clearwater, 829 F.2d 1051 , 1053 n. 7 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 981 , 108 S.Ct. 1280 , 99 L.Ed.2d 491 (1988); Petroleos Mexicanos v. Crawford Enterprises, 826 F.2d 392 , 398 (5th Cir.1987); Motorola v. Computer Displays Int’l, 739 F.2d 1149, 1154 (7th Cir.1984); Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Int’l Long *18 shoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union, Local 21, 733 F.2d 645, 645 (9th Cir.1984); United States Steel v. Fraternal Ass’n of Steel Haulers, 601 F.2d 1269, 1273 (3d Cir.1979); SEC v. Naftalin, 460 F.2d 471, 475 (8th Cir.1972).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Petroleos Mexicanos v. Crawford Enterprises, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1987 · confidence medium
See Nasco, Inc. v. Calcasieu Television & Radio, Inc., 752 F.2d 157, 159 (5th Cir.1985) (appealable adjudication of contempt must entail both a finding and sanction); United States v. Hankins, 565 F.2d 1344, 1352 (5th Cir.1978) (criminal contempt finding not appealable without sanction); see also Motorola, Inc. v. Computer Displays Int'l, 739 F.2d 1149, 1154 (7th Cir.1984) (a civil contempt decision is final only “if it includes both a finding of contempt and the imposition of a sanction.”) (emphasis in original); Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Int’l Longshoremen’s Union, 733 F.2d 645, 645 (9th C…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) ca5 1987
5th Cir. · 1987 · confidence medium
See Nasco, Inc. v. Calcasieu Television & Radio, Inc., 752 F.2d 157, 159 (5th Cir.1985) (appealable adjudication of contempt must entail both a finding and sanction); United States v. Hankins, 565 F.2d 1344, 1352 (5th Cir.1978) (criminal contempt finding not appealable without sanction); see also Motorola, Inc. v. Computer Displays Int'l, 739 F.2d 1149, 1154 (7th Cir.1984) (a civil contempt decision is final only "if it includes both a finding of contempt and the imposition of a sanction.") (emphasis in original); Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Int'l Longshoremen's Union, 733 F.2d 645, 645 (9th Cir.1984)…
cited Cited "see" In re: Jessica Arlene Nelson
9th Cir. BAP · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See 22 Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Int’l Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union, 23 Local 21, 733 F.2d 645, 645 (9th Cir. 1984); see also Donovan v. 24 Mazzola, 761 F.2d 1411, 1417 (9th Cir. 1985).
cited Cited "see" In re: Jessica Arlene Nelson
9th Cir. BAP · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See 22 Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Int’l Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union, 23 Local 21, 733 F.2d 645, 645 (9th Cir. 1984); see also Donovan v. 24 Mazzola, 761 F.2d 1411, 1417 (9th Cir. 1985).
discussed Cited "see" In re: H Granados Communications, Inc.
9th Cir. BAP · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Int’l Longshoremen’s & 22 Warehousemen’s Union, 733 F.2d 645, 645 (9th Cir. 1984); see 23 also Donovan v. Mazzola, 761 F.2d 1411, 1417 (9th Cir. 1985). 24 Upon entry of the Sanctions Award, the Contempt Order merged 25 into the earlier order.
cited Cited "see" Rediger Investment Corp. v. H Granados Communications, Inc. (In Re H Granados Communications, Inc.)
9th Cir. BAP · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Int’l Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union, 733 F.2d 645, 645 (9th Cir.1984); see also Donovan v. Mazzola, 761 F.2d 1411, 1417 (9th Cir.1985).
cited Cited "see" In re: Brett Gordon Pekrul
9th Cir. BAP · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See 12 Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Int'l Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, 13 733 F.2d 645, 645 (9th Cir. 1984); Donovan v. Mazzola, 761 F.2d 14 1411, 1417 (9th Cir. 1985).
WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, a Washington Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN’S AND WAREHOUSEMEN’S UNION, LOCAL 21, Defendant-Appellant
83-4125.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
May 14, 1984.
733 F.2d 645
Dean E. Peterson, Weyerhaeuser Co., Tacoma, Wash., for plaintiff-appellee., Robert K. Udziela, Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O’Leary & Conboy, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellant., ORDER FOR PUBLICATION
Farris, Fletcher, Jameson.
Cited by 18 opinions  |  Published

The International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union (the Union) appeals from the district court’s order finding it in contempt for continuing to violate a previous injunction upheld by this court. The district court stayed its decision on sanctions pending this appeal. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292 (1982).

A contempt order, is not a final order under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 prior to the imposition of sanctions. See Steinert v. United States, 571 F.2d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir.1978) (dicta); Western Pacific Railroad Corp. v. Western Pacific Railroad Company, 216 F.2d 513, 515 (9th Cir.1954). See also United States v. Hankins, 565 F.2d 1344, 1352 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440[*646] U.S. 909, 99 S.Ct. 1218, 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979); S.E.C. v. Naftalin, 460 F.2d 471, 475 (8th Cir.1972).

The order is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292, as an appeal from an order continuing an injunction. It is not an order continuing an injunction because the district court has not yet imposed sanctions. Cf. Sanders v. Monsanto Co., 574 F.2d 198, 199 (5th Cir.1978) (denial of contempt order appealable under section 1292 when no further action necessary in district court).

Further proceedings remain in the district court that could result in a second appeal if the instant order is affirmed. The contempt order may be reviewed effectively on appeal from the final judgment Flanagan v. United States, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1051, 1055, 79 L.Ed.2d 288 (1984). We lack jurisdiction over this appeal.