green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Total Benefit Services, Inc. v. Group Insurance Administration, Inc.
The number of firms in the relevant market and their market shares are relevant to this inquiry: See Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 575 F.2d 564, 571 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Idris Ibrahim Siddiqi v. Spencer Leak, in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Cook County Department of Corrections
See Kastenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 575 F.2d 564, 574 (5th Cir.1978) (failure to comply did not deprive party of’ substantial justice), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979); 9 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2552.
discussed
Cited "see"
Leroy J. Matherne, Cross-Appellant v. Charles C. Wilson, Cross-Appellees
See Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 575 F.2d 564, 574 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979); see also Wright & Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure § 2552 at 632 (1971) (noting that Rule 51 is “salutary”). 57 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America v. S. Don Huckaby
See United States v. Hankins, 565 F.2d 1344, 1352 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Special Investigation No. 281
See Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 , 96 S.Ct. 1569 , 48 L.Ed.2d 39 (1976). *196 The dentist asserts that the trial judge “ignored what the individual appellant argued was the implicit import of United States v. Hankins, 565 F.2d 1344 , opinion clarified, 581 F.2d 431 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 [ 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 ] (1979).” We do not ignore it.
cited
Cited "see"
Hornsby Oil Company, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Champion Spark Plug Company, Inc., Cross-Appellee
See Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 575 F.2d 564 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Toyota Motor Corp.
See United States v. Hankins, 581 F.2d 431 , 438 n. 11 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Howard R. Myers v. Norfolk Livestock Market, Inc.
See Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 575 F.2d 564, 575 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. First State Bank
See, United States v. Hankins, 5 Cir., 1978, 565 F. 2d 1344 , 1350, cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979); United States v. Carpenter, 5 Cir., 1970, 425 F.2d 264, 265 ; Baldridge v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 406 F.2d 526, 527 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. First State Bank Of Clute
See, United States v. Hankins, 5 Cir., 1978, 565 F.2d 1344 , 1350, cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979); United States v. Carpenter, 5 Cir., 1970, 425 F.2d 264, 265 ; Baldridge v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 406 F.2d 526, 527 . 3 Compliance is not the only issue, however.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dabbs
(2×)
"Because defendants did not file a motion for a change of venue prior to trial, they waived any objection to venue and may not raise it for the first time on appeal." United States v. Bustos-Guzman, 685 F.2d 1278, 1280 (11th Cir.1982); see also United States v. Hankins, 581 F.2d 431 , 438 n. 11 (5th Cir.1978) ("It is elementary that venue can be waived if not timely raised."), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979); Kitchen v. United States, 532 F.2d 445, 446 (5th Cir.1976) ("Defects relating to venue are waived unless asserted prior to trial."); United States v. Dr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas Ex Rel. Schmidt v. Thomas
See, e.g., United States v. Hankins, 581 F.2d 431, 435 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979) (applying Mississippi law); In re Perrin, 2 B.R. 316, 319 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1980) (applying New York law); Moore v. Moore, 255 Ala. 393 , 51 So.2d 683, 689 (1951); Sibert v. Shaver, 111 Cal.App.2d 833 , 245 P.2d 514, 519 (1952); Moorman v. Moorman, 226 Ind. 192 , 79 N.E.2d 112, 114 (1948); Malden Trust Co. v. Brooks, 291 Mass. 273 , 197 N.E. 100 , 106 (1935); C.B. & T.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cranfill v. Scott & Fetzer Co.
See, e.g., Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 575 F.2d 564, 572-73 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979); Dart Industries, Inc. v. Plunkett Co. of Oklahoma, 704 F.2d 496, 499 (10th Cir.1983); Kaiser v. General Motors Corp., 396 F.Supp. 33, 39-40 (E.D.Pa.1975), aff'd. mem., 530 F.2d 964 (3d Cir.1976); Colorado Pump & Supply Co. v. Febco, Inc., 472 F.2d 637, 639 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 987 , 93 S.Ct. 2274 , 36 L.Ed.2d 965 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brooks v. Derwinski
Settling what previously may have been an open question, a more recent case from this Circuit reversed a district court’s ruling that the 30-day time limit was jurisdictional and held that “§ 2000e-16(e) is subject to equitable tolling.” Mondy v. Secretary of the Army, 845 F.2d 1051, 1054 (D.C.Cir.1988); see also id. at 1054 n. 5 (noting that “jurisdictional” language in Richardson and Hofer v. Campbell, 581 F.2d 975 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979), was dictum with no independent reasoning).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of George Sinadinos, a Witness Before the Special March 1983 Grand Jury
See, e.g., United States v. Hankins, 565 F.2d 1344, 1351 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donaldson v. Tennessee Valley Authority
See also Hofer v. Campbell, 581 F.2d 975, 977-78 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979) (claimant who sought reconsideration nine months after decision in his case could not then file suit in district court; following Clark)', Chickillo v. Commanding Officer, Naval Air Engineering Center, 406 F.Supp. 807, 809-10 (E.D.Pa.1976), aff'd, 547 F.2d 1159 (3d Cir.1977) (nearly seven months after receiving final decision, claimant simultaneously filed suit in district court and sought administrative reconsideration; the district court followed Clark and dismi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donaldson v. Tennessee Valley Authority
See also Hofer v. Campbell, 581 F.2d 975, 977-78 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert.denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979) (claimant who sought reconsideration nine months after decision in his case could not then file suit in district court; following Clark); Chickillo v. Commanding Officer, Naval Air Engineering Center, 406 F.Supp. 807, 809-10 (E.D.Pa.1976), aff'd, 547 F.2d 1159 (3d Cir.1977) (nearly seven months after receiving final decision, claimant simultaneously filed suit in district court and sought administrative reconsideration; the district court followed Clark and dismiss…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
George Pierce and Jeff Pierce, Individually and D/B/A Pierce Sales, a Partnership v. Ramsey Winch Company, a Foreign Corp.
See, e.g., Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 575 F.2d 564, 569 (5th Cir.1978) (“The district court, however, adequately instructed the jury on the general question____ Given the repetitive nature of [defendant’s] proof, and counsel’s argument, the jury can hardly have failed to grasp the idea [embodied in defendant’s requested jury instruction].”), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fishman v. Estate of Wirtz
See, e.g., Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 575 F.2d 564, 574 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979); Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of California, 411 F.2d 897, 909-10 (9th Cir.), rev’d on other grounds, 396 U.S. 13 , 90 S.Ct. 30 , 24 L.Ed.2d 13 (1969); Standard Oil Co. of California v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 219-20 (9th Cir.1957).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Weyerhaeuser Company, a Washington Corporation v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, Local 21
See also United States v. Hankins, 565 F.2d 1344, 1352 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 *646 U.S. 909, 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979); S.E.C. v. Naftalin, 460 F.2d 471, 475 (8th Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Graphic Products Distributors, Inc. v. Itek Corporation, Individually and D/B/A Itek Graphic Products, Defendants
See, e.g., Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 575 F.2d 564, 571 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979); Burdett Sound, Inc. v. Altec Corp., 515 F.2d 1245, 1249 (5th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Andrew E. Hill and J.E. Pinkerton, United States of America v. Dennis Juren, United States of America v. Edward W. Cromey
See also United States v. Hankins, 581 F.2d 431 , 438 n. 11 (5th Cir.1978) (jurisdiction to enforce an IRS summons grounded in 26 U.S.C. § 7402 (a) and § 1345), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979); NLRB v. Hanes Hosiery Div. —Hanes Corp., 384 F.2d 188, 191-92 (4th Cir.1967) (same as British Auto Parts), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 950 , 88 S.Ct. 1041 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1141 (1968); United States v. Nanlo, Inc., 519 F.Supp. 723, 724-25 (D.Mass.1981) (jurisdiction to enforce FTC order requiring company to file financial report grounded in 15 U.S.C. §§ 49 and 50 and §§…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of Grand Jury Witness Charles Joseph Battaglia. Charles Joseph Battaglia, Witness v. United States
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Hankins, 565 F.2d 1344, 1351 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jot-Em-Down Store (Jeds) Inc., Formerly Farm Supply Center of Houston, Inc. v. Cotter and Company
Compare Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 514 F.2d 690 (1975), modified 575 F.2d 564 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1218 , 59 L.Ed.2d 457 (1979); Terrell v. Household Goods Carriers’ Bureau, 494 F.2d 16 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 487 , 95 S.Ct. 246 , 42 L.Ed.2d 260 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kestenbaum
v.
Falstaff Brewing Corp.
v.
Falstaff Brewing Corp.
No. 78-800.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1979.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.