No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Strong
v.
Strong
Unpublished
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-10931
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOE EARL STRONG,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:94-CR-11-1-A
--------------------
February 16, 2000
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-10931
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOE EARL STRONG,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:94-CR-11-1-A
--------------------
February 16, 2000
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Joe Earl Strong (#13096-077) appeals the district court’s order that the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release run consecutively to a sentence that was to be imposed in No. 4:98-CR-217-Y for criminal conduct that was the basis of the revocation. Strong has not shown that the district court’s order that his revocation sentence run consecutively was plainly erroneous. See United States v. McCullough, 46 F.3d 400, 401 n.1 (5th Cir. 1995); U.S.S.G. Ch.7, Pt.B, intro. comment.; U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3, comment. (n.6). AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.