Books, Inc. v. United States, 388 U.S. 449 (1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Books, Inc. v. United States, 388 U.S. 449 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
117 citation events across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wagonheim v. Maryland State Board of Censors (md, 1969-10-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Wagonheim v. Maryland State Board of Censors (2×)
Md. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Redrup v. New York, supra and Books, Inc. v. United States, 388 U.S. 449 (1967) (per curiam), noted in 19 Case W.
cited Cited "see" State v. VON CLEEF
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Books, Inc. v. United States, 358 F. 2 d 935, 939 (1 Cir. 1966), reversed per curiam on other grounds 388 U.S. 449 , 87 S.Ct. 2098 , 18 L.Ed. 2 d 1311 (1967).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Marks v. United States
SCOTUS · 1977 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Books, Inc. v. United States, 358 F. 2d 935 (CA1 1966), rev’d per curiam, 388 U. S. 449 (1967); United States v. 35 Mm.
examined Cited "see, e.g." Vernon Walker Huffman v. United States, Dennis Eugene Pryba v. United States (4×)
D.C. Cir. · 1972 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare his dissent in Avansino v. New York, 388 U.S. 446 , 87 S.Ct. 2093 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1967) with his concurrence in Books, Inc. v. United States, 388 U.S. 449 , 87 S.Ct. 2098 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1311 (1967) 14 See also United States v. Reidel, 402 U.S. 351, 357 , 91 S.Ct. 1410 , 28 L.Ed.2d 813 (1971): "It is urged that there is developing sentiment that adults should have complete freedom to produce, deal in, possess, and consume whatever communicative materials may appeal to them and that the law's involvement with obscenity should be limited to those situations where children are involved or…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Luros v. United States (2×)
8th Cir. · 1968 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Mr. Justice Harlan’s dissent in Avansino v. New York, 388 U.S. 446 , 87 S.Ct. 2093 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1967) and his concurrence in Books, Inc. v. United States, 388 U.S. 449 , 87 S.Ct. 2098 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1311 (1967).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." ca8 1968 (2×)
8th Cir. · 1968 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Mr. Justice Harlan's dissent in Avansino v. New York, 388 U.S. 446 , 87 S.Ct. 2093 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1967) and his concurrence in Books, Inc. v. United States, 388 U.S. 449 , 87 S.Ct. 2098 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1311 (1967).
Books, Inc.
v.
United States
323.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 12, 1967.
388 U.S. 449
Stanley Fleishman for petitioner., Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Robert S. Erdahl and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States.
Clark, Roth, Enterprises, Inc, Day.
Cited by 55 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.

The Chief Justice would grant the petition and set the case for oral argument. Mr. Justice Clark would grant the petition and affirm. Mr. Justice Harlan concurs in the reversal on the basis of the reasoning set forth, in his opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and Manual Enterprises, Inc. v. Day, 370 U. S. 478.