A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 388 U.S. 452 (1967). · Go Syfert
Search
A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 388 U.S. 452 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
144 citation events across 23 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re the Tax Appeal of O.W. Ltd. Partnership (hawapp, 1983-08-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" In Re the Tax Appeal of O.W. Ltd. Partnership
Haw. App. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sullivan v. United States, 363 F.2d 724 (8th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 905 , 87 S. Ct. 1683 , 18 L.Ed.2d 622 (1967), reh’g denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S. Ct. 2104 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1378 (1967); 3 S. Gard, Jones on Evidence § 16:17 (6th ed. 1972); 30 Am.
examined Cited "see" Luros v. United States (3×)
8th Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 388 U.S. 452 , 87 S.Ct. 2104 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1314 (1967); Books, Inc. v. United States, 388 U.S. 449 , 87 S.Ct. 2098 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1311 (1967); Aday v. United States, 388 U.S. 447 , 87 S.Ct. 2095 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1967).
examined Cited "see" ca8 1968 (3×)
8th Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See A. Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 388 U.S. 452 , 87 S.Ct. 2104 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1314 (1967); Books, Inc. v. United States, 388 U.S. 449 , 87 S.Ct. 2098 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1311 (1967); Aday v. United States, 388 U.S. 447 , 87 S.Ct. 2095 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1967). 22 Nor did the government offer any competent evidence outside of the books themselves to demonstrate their pruriency.
A QUANTITY OF COPIES OF BOOKS Et Al.
v.
KANSAS
865.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 12, 1967.
388 U.S. 452
Stanley Fleishman for petitioners., Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, for respondent.
Kansas, Clark, Roth, Massachusetts.
Cited by 58 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Kansas is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.

The Chief Justice would grant the petition and set the case for oral argument in light of A Quantity of Books v. Kansas, 378 U. S. 205. Mr. Justice Clark would grant the petition and affirm the judgment. Mr. Justice Harlan adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.