Chace v. Martin Mem'l Med. Ctr., Inc., 125 So. 3d 817 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Chace v. Martin Mem'l Med. Ctr., Inc., 125 So. 3d 817 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY and PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. v. DEBORAH NEFF, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF DOROTHY MILINKOVICH (fladistctapp, 2021-07-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY and PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. v. DEBORAH NEFF, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF DOROTHY MILINKOVICH
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2021 · confidence medium
“A trial court’s denial of a motion for mistrial and a motion for new trial based on improper closing arguments are reviewed for abuse of discretion.” Whitney v. Milien, 125 So. 3d 817, 818 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY and PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. v. MYRON KAPLAN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Sheila Kaplan (2×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2021 · confidence medium
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Calloway, 201 So. 3d 753, 759 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (quoting Whitney v. Milien, 125 So. 3d 817, 818 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) THE LAS OLAS HOLDING CO. v. MICHAEL DEMELLA a/p/r of the ESTATE OF ALANNA DEMELLA
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · confidence medium
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Calloway, 201 So.3d 753, 759 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (quoting Whitney v. Milien, 125 So.3d 817, 818 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Boatright
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · confidence medium
“A trial court’s denial of a motion for mistrial and a motion for new trial based on improper closing arguments are reviewed for abuse of discretion.” Calloway, 201 So.3d at 759 (quoting Whitney v. Milien, 125 So.3d 817, 818 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) General Employees Insurance Co. v. Isaacs
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
“The standard of review for an order denying a motion for new trial or denying a remittitur is abuse of discretion.” Whitney v. Milien, 125 So.3d 817, 819 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Odom
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
“Because the award of compensatory damages must be vacated, we also vacate the award of punitive damages.” Webb, 93 So.3d at 339-40 . b) Closing Comments During the Punitive Phase “A trial court’s denial of a motion for mistrial and a motion for new trial based on improper closing arguments are reviewed for abuse of discretion.” Whitney v. Milien, 125 So.3d 817, 818 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Calloway (2×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
“A trial court’s denial of a motion for mistrial and a motion for new trial based on improper closing arguments are reviewed for abuse of discretion;” Whitney v. Milien, 125 So.3d 817, 818 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, as successor by merger to Lorillard Tobacco Company v. Kathleen Gafney, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Frank Eugene Gafney
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
“Send a Message” Arguments “A trial court’s denial of a motion for mistrial and a motion for new trial based on improper closing arguments are reviewed for abuse of discretion.” Whitney v. Milien, 125 So.3d 817, 818 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Whitney v. Milien
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
We deny Appellant’s motion for rehearing en banc and for certification to the Florida Supreme Court, but grant her motion for rehearing to clarify that we, in fact, considered the Special standard when we stated “[u]pon review of the entire record on appeal, we do not find that ‘the “totality of all errors and improprieties” are “pervasive enough to raise doubts as to the overall fairness of the trial court proceedings.”’” Whitney v. Milien, 125 So.3d 817, 818 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (quoting Bocher v. Glass, 874 So.2d 701, 704 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)).
Jennifer B. CHACE, Gregory R. Chace and Nancy Smythe, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
v.
MARTIN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Medical Savings Insurance Company, a corporation, and Florida Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Association
No. 4D10-4060.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 13, 2013.
125 So. 3d 817
Philip M. Burlington of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach, Jeffrey M. Liggio of Liggio Benrubi, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Louis M. Silber of Silber, Valente & Davis, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants., Markham R. Leventhal and Michael N. Wolgin of Jorden Burt LLP, Miami, for appellee Florida Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association.
Ciklin, Levine, Warner.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a non-final order denying the appellants’ motion to join a third party in the litigation below. The order is not one of the appealable non-final orders found in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3) and is not otherwise appealable. Nor do we find a writ of certiorari to be appropriate were we to treat this appeal as a petition for one. See Karr v. Palm Peterbilt-GMC Trucks, Inc., 551 So.2d 1278, 1278-79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) (Warner, J., specially concurring) (noting that a petition for writ of certiorari directed at an order denying a motion to amend to add a party should be denied where an adequate remedy on plenary appeal is available). Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Dismissed.

WARNER, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.