Smith v. State, 310 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). · Go Syfert
Search
Smith v. State, 310 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
71 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gill v. State (fladistctapp, 1989-09-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Gill v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1989 · confidence medium
See Stranigan v. State, 457 So.2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Odom v. State, 310 So.2d 770, 771 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Hoyt
Fla. Palm Beach Cty. Ct. · 1985 · confidence medium
In dicta, one court has indicated that “specific performance of a plea bargain is not available to a defendant in the absence of a clear showing of irrevocable prejudice. . .” Odom v. State, 310 So.2d 770, 771 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); see, Barker v. State, 259 So.2d 200, 204 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972).
cited Cited "see" Ennis v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); § 921.161(1), Fla. Stat. (1977).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Ruth v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Odom v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975) (specific performance requires a clear showing of irrevocable prejudice).
Gregory Lee SMITH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
74-519, 74-522.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Apr 9, 1975.
310 So. 2d 770
Per Curiam.
Cited by 57 opinions  |  Published

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and Edwin E. Taylor, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Sarasota, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. The judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by F.S. § 921.161(1), Grine v. State, Fla.App.2d 1974, 301 So.2d 122.

Remanded for correction of judgment and sentence; otherwise affirmed.

McNULTY, C.J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.