State v. Appelbaum, 366 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 1979). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Appelbaum, 366 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Meneses v. State (fladistctapp, 1979-07-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Meneses v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Duzinski v. American Baseball Cap, Inc., 366 So.2d 443 (Fla.1979). 4 On the merits, the state, citing Hand v. State, 334 So.2d 601 (Fla.1976), and Peel v. State, 150 So.2d 281 (Fla.2d DCA 1963), argues that the alleged misstatements and suppressions of the prosecutor were in effect irrelevant since they followed the nolo plea and were apparently unrelated to its entry.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Shoei Safety Helmet Corp. v. Conlee
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also American Baseball Cap, Inc. v. Duzinski, 359 So.2d 483 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert. discharged, 366 So.2d 443 (Fla. 1979).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Seminole Tribe Of Florida v. Butterworth
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Appelbaum, 366 So.2d 443 (Fla.1979) ("The statute... regulates the conduct of bingo....").
cited Cited "see, e.g." Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Appelbaum, 366 So.2d 443 (Fla.1979) (“The statute. . . regulates the conduct of bingo.... ”).
cited Cited "see, e.g." General Tire & Rubber v. HICKORY SPRINGS MFG.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also American Baseball Cap Inc. v. Duzinski, 359 So.2d 483 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert. denied, 366 So.2d 443 (Fla. 1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Florida
v.
Dorothy APPELBAUM
No. 53828.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan 4, 1979.
366 So. 2d 443
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Randy Schwartz, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Janet Reno, State’s Atty., and Milton Robbins, Asst. State’s Atty., Miami, for appellant., Leonard Robbins, North Miami Beach, for appellee.
Adkins, Alderman, Boyd, England, Hatchett, Overton, Sundberg.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
OVERTON, Justice.

This case is before us on direct appeal from the County Court, Dade County, which held that Section 849.093, Florida Statutes (1977), was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution.

The statute invalidated below regulates the conduct of bingo and guest games. We have recently considered its constitutionality and held that it does not violate the due process and equal protection clauses of the Florida and United States Constitutions. Carroll v. State, 361 So.2d 144 (Fla.1978).

Although not all of the arguments raised by the appellant were discussed in Carroll, supra, we find the additional arguments to be without merit and specifically find the statute is neither vague nor overbroad.

Accordingly, the decision of the court below is reversed and the cause remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. SUNDBERG, J., dissents.