Swain v. Florida Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 414 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Swain v. Florida Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 414 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Russell v. Wanicka (fladistctapp, 1988-04-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Russell v. Wanicka
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1988 · confidence medium
City of Tallahassee v. One Yellow 1979 Fiat, 414 So.2d 1100, 1101-02 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re Forfeiture of Following Described Property: Al. Bev. Seized From Saul's Elks Club
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1983 · confidence medium
As we have held, forfeiture proceedings are civil in nature, and "[n]either conviction nor acquittal in the companion criminal case is relevant to the civil forfeiture proceeding." City of Tallahassee v. One Yellow 1979 Fiat, etc., 414 So.2d 1100, 1102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Cobb
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1983 · confidence medium
As we have held, forfeiture proceedings are civil in nature, and “[njeither conviction nor acquittal. in the companion criminal case is relevant to the civil forfeiture proceeding.” City of Tallahassee v. One Yellow 1979 Fiat, etc., 414 So.2d 1100, 1102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
cited Cited "see" Fowler v. City of Tallahassee
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See City of Tallahassee v. In re the Forfeiture of One Yellow 1979 Fiat 2-Door Sedan, 414 So.2d 1100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
Michael SWAIN
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION
No. AK-454.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 21, 1982.
414 So. 2d 1100
Michael Swain, pro se., No appearance for appellee.
Booth, McCord, Smith.
Published
PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus has been treated as an appeal of final agency action of the Florida Parole and Probation Commission. See Daniels v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 401 So.2d 1351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). The action of the Commission declining to review the issues raised by appellant at his § 947.173, Fla. Stat. (1981), review is affirmed in part and reversed in part. We therefore remand this cause for consideration of appellant’s claim pertaining to new information, that the federal district court for the Southern District of Florida invalidated one of appellant’s convictions. See § 947.16(4), Fla.Stat. (1981).

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C. J., and McCORD and BOOTH, JJ., concur.