Bogan v. State, 462 So. 2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Bogan v. State, 462 So. 2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Yates v. State (fladistctapp, 2002-08-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Yates v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bogan v. State, 462 So.2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
cited Cited "see" Mills v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bogan v. State, 462 So.2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (holding that written sentence must conform to oral pronouncement).
cited Cited "see" Driver v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bogan v. State, 462 So.2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
cited Cited "see" Brammer v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bogan v. State, 462 So.2d 115 (Fla.2d DCA 1985).
cited Cited "see" Wilson v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bogan v. State, 462 So.2d 115 (Fla.2d DCA 1985).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Krug v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Walker v. State, 593 So.2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); see also Bogan v. State, 462 So.2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anthony Charles BOGAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
84-3, 84-4.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan 18, 1985.
462 So. 2d 115
Per Curiam.
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and L.S. Alperstein, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James H. Dysart, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of appellant's probation in case numbers 82-7926-A and 82-10378-A, having found the evidence sufficient to support the trial court's determination that appellant committed both of the probation violations alleged. We agree with appellant's assertion, however, that the court's written order sentencing appellant to three and one-half years concurrent imprisonment on each count departs from its oral pronouncement imposing a three-year concurrent sentence on each count. Because the written judgment and sentence must not vary from the oral pronouncement, Alphonse v. State, 430 So.2d 538 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), we remand this case to the trial court with directions to conform the written sentence with its oral pronouncement.

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

OTT, A.C.J., FRANK, J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.