Beasley v. Beasley, 463 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Beasley v. Beasley, 463 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Hagy v. Hagy (fladistctapp, 1992-05-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" Hagy v. Hagy
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beasley v. Beasley, 463 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).
cited Cited "see" Titus Bros. Roofing Co. v. Blank
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beasley v. Beasley, 463 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).
cited Cited "see" Chisholm v. Chisholm
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beasley v. Beasley, 463 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).
cited Cited "see" Carter v. Carter
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beasley v. Beasley, 463 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). [Emphasis in original].
discussed Cited "see" Thomas v. Thomas
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beasley v. Beasley, 463 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). *670 In Bei v. Harper, 475 So.2d 912, 914-15 (Fla.2d DCA 1985), the Second District noted: ... [T]hat appellant has the burden to submit to the appellate court a record adequate to support the appeal.
cited Cited "see" Bei v. Harper
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beasley v. Beasley, 463 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Gordon v. Burke, 429 So.2d 36 (Fla. 2d DCA), petition for review denied, 438 So.2d 832 (Fla. 1983); Starks .
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Bolick
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Haynes, 463 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA), petition for review denied, 475 So.2d 694 (Fla.1985); State v. Sherrod, 383 So.2d 752 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).
In re the Marriage of Ronald Wayne BEASLEY, Appellant,
v.
Corrie Gail BEASLEY, Appellee.
83-1327.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb 21, 1985.
463 So. 2d 1248
Dauksch.
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published

Thomas W. Gibson of Trickel, Leigh, Gibson & Martin, Orlando, for appellant.

James P. Curry of Curry, Taylor & Carls, Orlando, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal in a marriage dissolution case. Although appellant presents a compelling argument for the reversal or modification of an alimony award he has not furnished this court with a transcript of the evidence taken at trial which led to the court's decision. Financial affidavits, without supporting testimony, are not sufficient for our review of a case. Unless this court is provided with all of the evidence which was before the trial court, either by a transcript of testimony or a stipulated statement, then we cannot fault and reverse a trial judge for a purported error.

Appeals such as this shall be subject to summary dismissal in the future, and motions for attorney's fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes, will be favorably entertained.

AFFIRMED.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and SHARP, JJ., concur.