Rumph v. State, 527 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). · Go Syfert
Rumph v. State, 527 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James W. RUMPH
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 87-1301.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 8, 1988.
527 So. 2d 270
James W. Rumph, pro se., No appearance for appellee.
Joanos, Smith, Zehmer.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion is facially insufficient to raise any fundamental error. The procedural error complained of occurred during trial and should have been raised on appeal from the judgment of conviction.

SMITH, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.