Aitken v. Gajadha, 636 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Aitken v. Gajadha, 636 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 7743417.
Delores Ann AITKEN and Glen Aitken
v.
Merline GAJADHA, Delbert Erdman, Jeffrey Dale Davis and M. Josephine Davis
No. 93-0078.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 23, 1994.
636 So. 2d 766
Gary W. Roberts, Gary W. Roberts, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants., G. Bart Billbrough and Geoffrey B. Marks, Walton Lantaff Schroeder & Carson, Miami, for appellees-Merline Gajadha and Delbert Erdman.
Klein, Pariente, Warner.
Published

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We withdraw our prior opinion and substitute the following in its place.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration of attorney’s fees under section 768.79, Florida Statutes (1989), in light of Schmidt v. Fortner, 629 So.2d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Contra: Bridges v. Newton, 556 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Affirmed as to the denial of the award under section 45.061, Florida Statutes (1989).

.WARNER, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.