Neuschatz v. Rabin, 760 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Neuschatz v. Rabin, 760 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the purchaser at a foreclosure sale is entitled to possession of the premises from the time title vests in the purchaser.”
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Upland Ventures, Inc. v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee for Ace Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2007-Sl2 Asset Backed (fladistctapp, 2025-08-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Upland Ventures, Inc. v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee for Ace Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2007-Sl2 Asset Backed
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2025 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the purchaser at a foreclosure sale is entitled to possession of the premises from the time title vests in the purchaser.
cited Cited "see" Adolphus Munden v. State of Florida
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Willis v. State, 760 So. 2d 1018, 1020 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Susan NEUSCHATZ, Appellant/Cross-Appellee
v.
Edward D. RABIN, Appellee/Cross-Appellant
No. 4D99-3367.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jun 14, 2000.
760 So. 2d 1018
Laura P. Riddle of Schwartz & Riddle, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant/cross-ap-pellee., Robert Garven, Coral Springs, for appel-lee/cross-appellant.
Farmer, Gross, Taylor.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 77%
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of foreclosure. Based on the contract found by the trial court there was legal consideration to support the note and mortgage. See Bayshore Royal Co. v. Doran Jason Co. of Tampa, Inc., 480 So.2d 651, 656 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). On the cross-appeal, we reverse that portion of the September 28, 1999 Amended Final Judgment of Foreclosure withholding issuance of the writ of possession until the third-party action is resolved. The purchaser at a foreclosure sale is entitled to possession of the premises from the time title vests in the purchaser. See Martorano v. Spicola, 110 Fla. 55, 59, 148 So. 585, 586 (1933); 37 Fla. Jur.2d, Mortgages and Deeds of Trusts § 314 (1996). While cross-appellant did not pursue a theory of reformation at trial, those factors that the court could have taken into consideration in ruling on a reformation are proper for the court to consider in any action for a deficiency judgment.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part, and remanded.

FARMER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.