Smith v. State, 785 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Smith v. State, 785 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bush v. State (fla, 2006-12-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Bush v. State
Fla. · 2006 · confidence medium
See, e.g., Mattern v. State, 829 So.2d 937, 937 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (stating that venue lies in the county where the prisoner is housed); Burks v. State, 789 So.2d 430, 430 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (same); Smith v. State, 785 So.2d 1237, 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (same); but see Harris v. State, 713 So.2d 1106, 1106 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (stating that venue lies in Leon County).
discussed Cited "see" Cunningham v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Smith v. State, 785 So.2d 1237, 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) ("Any complaint Appellant has concerning how the Department interprets his sentences must be addressed by filing an administrative complaint with the [D]epartment, and then, if necessary, by filing a petition for writ of mandamus against the Department in the circuit court where he is incarcerated.").
cited Cited "see" Warner v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. State, 785 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
cited Cited "see" Nelson v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. State, 785 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Antonio L. SMITH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
4D01-413.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 23, 2001.
785 So. 2d 1237
Per Curiam.
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published

Antonio L. Smith, Century, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's summary denial of Appellant's rule 3.800(a) motion to allow for jail time credit already ordered by the trial court pursuant to his negotiated guilty plea, but with which the Department of Corrections apparently has refused to credit him. Any complaint Appellant has concerning how the Department interprets his sentences must be addressed by filing an administrative complaint with the department, and then, if necessary, by filing a petition for writ of mandamus against the Department in the circuit court where he is incarcerated. See Taylor v. State, 677 So.2d 75 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Killings v. State, 567 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Green v. State, 698 So.2d 575, 576 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), cause dismissed, 705 So.2d 901 (Fla.1997). Our affirmance is without prejudice to his doing so.

DELL, STONE, and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.