Mutter v. State, 785 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Mutter v. State, 785 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Courtney MUTTER
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 4D01-524.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 9, 2001.
785 So. 2d 670
Courtney Mutter, Century, pro se., Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan Odzer Hugentu-gler, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
Gross, Shahood, Stevenson.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion to correct sentence, in which he sought relief pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), without prejudice to his filing, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, a timely,[1] sworn motion raising his claim, if indeed he received a guidelines sentence.

STEVENSON, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.
1

See Jenkins v. State, 771 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).