Braswell v. State, 804 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Braswell v. State, 804 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: PATRICIA DAGAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA (fladistctapp, 2019-04-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) PATRICIA DAGAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · confidence medium
See Hendrix v. State, 224 So. 3d 823, 824 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (holding that a snapout cannot serve as a written competency order); Gray v. State, 198 So. 3d 780 , 782–83 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (holding that a snapout cannot serve as a written judgment or sentence); Phillips v. State, 198 So. 3d 789, 790 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016), Zaborowski v. State, 126 So. 3d 405 , 407 n.2 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013), Thar v. State, 8 So. 3d 1204 , 1205 n.1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009), and Cochrane v. State, 997 So. 2d 1221, 1223 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (Altenbernd, J., concurring) (each noting this court's longstanding discouragement of th…
cited Cited "see" Akridge v. Crow
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Braswell v. State, 804 So.2d 523 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
cited Cited "see" Sutton v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Braswell v. State, 804 So.2d 523 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cochrane v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Braswell v. State, 804 So.2d 523 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (holding that memorandum-of-sentence form or snapout was insufficient to serve as a revocation of probation order); Monroe v. State, 760 So.2d 289 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (explaining that record contained no revocation order where trial court used a memo of sentence). [3] Another sentencing document has a similar mark, and I cannot conclude that the mark was made or not made by Judge Nelson. [4] See § 943.05(1) (creating Division of Criminal Justice Information Systems within the Department of Law Enforcement).
Larry BRASWELL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
2D00-4013.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec 28, 2001.
804 So. 2d 523
Green.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Howardene Garrett, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Sr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

GREEN, Acting Chief Judge.

The defendant, Larry Braswell, asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress and in revoking probation. We affirm without comment the trial court's order denying Braswell's motion to suppress. However, we reverse the revocation of probation.

The trial judge revoked Braswell's probation using a memo-of-sentence form, after finding that he committed numerous probation violations. Braswell correctly argues on appeal that the use of a memo of sentence is inadequate to revoke probation. In Monroe v. State, 760 So.2d 289, 289 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), this court explained that the use of a memo of sentence or snapout is inadequate to serve as a formal order of revocation. See also Monroe v. State, 784 So.2d 1163 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Grantham v. State, 735 So.2d 525 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Peterson v. State, 730 So.2d 830 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We therefore[*524] reverse and remand for entry of a formal written order revoking Braswell's probation and imposing sentence.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CASANUEVA and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.