Rowe v. State, 839 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Rowe v. State, 839 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Padilla v. State (fladistctapp, 2003-07-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" Padilla v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rowe v. State, 839 So.2d 916 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
cited Cited "see" Karo v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rowe v. State, 839 So.2d 916 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
Roy R. ROWE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
2D02-4138.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Mar 14, 2003.
839 So. 2d 916
Kelly.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

[*917] KELLY, Judge.

Roy Rowe challenges the trial court's order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Rowe argues that his sentence as a habitual felony offender is illegal based on Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).[1] We affirm the decision of the trial court because the statute under which Rowe was sentenced, section 775.084(4)(a)(2), Florida Statutes (2001), was not affected by the amendments contained within chapter 99-188. Rowe is therefore not entitled to relief under Taylor.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN and COVINGTON, JJ., concur.

1 Taylor held that chapter 99-188, Laws of Florida was unconstitutional because it was enacted in violation of the single subject rule.