Capodilupo v. State, 985 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). · Go Syfert
Capodilupo v. State, 985 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John CAPODILUPO
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 3D08-1291.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jun 25, 2008.
985 So. 2d 1168
John Capodilupo, in proper person., Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.
Salter, Schwartz, Shepherd.
Published
Pinpoint authority: bottom 25%
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b)(1) (discussing what constitutes newly discovered evidence, for the purposes of filing a rule 3.850 motion outside of the two-year time window); Major v. State, 814 So.2d 424, 431 (Fla.2002) (“[N]either the trial court nor counsel has a duty to advise a defendant that the defendant’s plea in a pending case may have sentence enhancing consequences on a sentence imposed for a crime committed'in the future.”); Bolyea v. State, 508 So.2d 457, 459 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1987) (“A probationer, whether or not incarcerated as a condition of probation, is ‘in custody’ for purposes of rule 3.850 and may seek postconviction relief pursuant to that rule.”).