green
Positive treatment
18.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State of Florida v. L. C.
Although only two of the three were black, Officer Bass not unreasonably surmised that the BOLO might be in error on that point, events having transpired in the dark of night."), and Bussey v. State, 528 So. 2d 955, 956-57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (holding there was reasonable suspicion where the tipster identified two black males at the apartment complex and stated that one was wearing a white shirt and brown shorts and officers observed a male and the defendant at the scene and the defendant "matched the BOLO description, except for a slight discrepancy in the color of his shorts," which were blue…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
ROD LEE BRUCE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
L.O. v. State, 44 So. 3d 1290, 1293 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). ‘“Value’ is an essential element of grand theft that must be proven by the State beyond and to the exclusion of every reasonable doubt.” Tindal v. State, 145 So. 3d 915, 919 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (quoting Sanchez v. State, 101 So. 3d 1283, 1286 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Jonavon D. Gaines v. State
See M.M. v. State, 80 So.3d 1125, 1126-27 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (holding that BOLO stating that “two white males had just robbed the victim at gunpoint and fled the area on foot” lacked sufficient specificity to provide the officer with reasonable suspicion to stop the juvenile); L.O. v. State, 44 So.3d 1290, 1293-94 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (holding that BOLO description of two black males, one wearing a black shirt and black pants and one wearing a red shirt and black pants, did not provide the requisite founded suspicion for the'juvenile’s detention); Sanders v. State, 666 So.2d 1035, 1036-3…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
R.M. v. State
L.O. v. State, 44 So.3d 1290, 1293-94 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Ross v. State, 419 So.2d 1170, 1170 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Torres v. State
“Tn reviewing a motion for judgment of acquittal, we apply a de novo standard of review.’ ” L.O. v. State, 44 So.3d 1290, 1293 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (quoting Romero v. State, 901 So.2d 260, 264 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sanchez v. State
State v. Davis, 849 So.2d 398 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (finding that nervous behavior and profuse sweating on a cold evening contributed to reasonable suspicion); see also L.O. v. State, 44 So.3d 1290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). • Evasive driving.
Marilyn BLOCH, Appellant,
v.
Teresa DILORENZO, Appellee
v.
Teresa DILORENZO, Appellee
4D09-3803.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct 13, 2010.
Marilyn Bloch, Pembroke Pines, pro se., Kathy M. Klock of Fowler White Burnett, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Warner, Polen, Levine.
Published
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s order confirming an arbitration award and dismissing appellant’s “counterclaim.” Appellant’s contract with appellee included a provision requiring arbitration of any disputes. The parties arbitrated, and the arbitrators entered their findings and award. The “counterclaim,” opposing the award and arbitration proceeding, was filed six months after the entry of the award. Not only was this pleading untimely, see § 682.13(2), Florida Statutes, but it also failed to raise grounds upon which the award could be vacated. See § 682.13(1), Fla. Stat.
WARNER, POLEN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.