Florida Statute 682.13 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2024 Florida Statutes (including 2025 Special Session C)

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 682
ARBITRATION CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 682.13

682.13 Vacating an award.—

(1) Upon motion of a party to an arbitration proceeding, the court shall vacate an arbitration award if:

(a) The award was procured by corruption, fraud, or other undue means;

(b) There was:

1. Evident partiality by an arbitrator appointed as a neutral arbitrator;

2. Corruption by an arbitrator; or

3. Misconduct by an arbitrator prejudicing the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding;

(c) An arbitrator refused to postpone the hearing upon showing of sufficient cause for postponement, refused to hear evidence material to the controversy, or otherwise conducted the hearing contrary to s. 682.06, so as to prejudice substantially the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding;

(d) An arbitrator exceeded the arbitrator’s powers;

(e) There was no agreement to arbitrate, unless the person participated in the arbitration proceeding without raising the objection under s. 682.06(3) not later than the beginning of the arbitration hearing; or

(f) The arbitration was conducted without proper notice of the initiation of an arbitration as required in s. 682.032 so as to prejudice substantially the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding.

(2) A motion under this section must be filed within 90 days after the movant receives notice of the award pursuant to s. 682.09 or within 90 days after the movant receives notice of a modified or corrected award pursuant to s. 682.10, unless the movant alleges that the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or other undue means, in which case the motion must be made within 90 days after the ground is known or by the exercise of reasonable care would have been known by the movant.

(3) If the court vacates an award on a ground other than that set forth in paragraph (1)(e), it may order a rehearing. If the award is vacated on a ground stated in paragraph (1)(a) or paragraph (1)(b), the rehearing must be before a new arbitrator. If the award is vacated on a ground stated in paragraph (1)(c), paragraph (1)(d), or paragraph (1)(f), the rehearing may be before the arbitrator who made the award or the arbitrator’s successor. The arbitrator must render the decision in the rehearing within the same time as that provided in s. 682.09(2) for an award.

(4) If a motion to vacate is denied and no motion to modify or correct the award is pending, the court shall confirm the award.

History.—s. 12, ch. 57-402; s. 12, ch. 67-254; s. 729, ch. 97-102; s. 24, ch. 2013-232.

Note.—Former s. 57.22.

F.S. 682.13 on Google Scholar

F.S. 682.13 on CourtListener

Amendments to 682.13

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 682.13

Total Results: 196

American Postal Workers Union, Afl-Cio v. United States Postal Service

823 F.2d 466, 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2263, 8 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 648, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 10360

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 4, 1987 | Docket: 2028453

Cited 66 times | Published

which is 90 days. See Fla.Stat.Ann. § 682.13(2) (West Supp.1987). We must disagree with the

Middlesex Mutual Insurance Company v. Stuart Levine

675 F.2d 1197, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19416

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 10, 1982 | Docket: 434644

Cited 66 times | Published

this case. 25. The similarity between Fla.Stat. 682.13(1) and 9 U.S.C. 10(b) of the United States

Schnurmacher Holding, Inc. v. Noriega

542 So. 2d 1327, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 232, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 399, 1989 WL 47676

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1989 | Docket: 486008

Cited 62 times | Published

none of the statutorily enumerated grounds of section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes (1985), existed for vacating

BDO Seidman, LLP v. Bee

970 So. 2d 869, 27 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 343, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 19230, 2007 WL 4245481

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2007 | Docket: 2566202

Cited 36 times | Published

the "evident partiality" of the arbitrators. See § 682.13(1)(b), Fla. Stat.; 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)(2). The trial

Moser v. Barron Chase Securities, Inc.

783 So. 2d 231, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 195, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 628, 2001 WL 326778

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2001 | Docket: 1259650

Cited 30 times | Published

affecting the merits of the controversy." Last, section 682.13 provides a list of criteria upon which an award

Shotts v. OP Winter Haven, Inc.

86 So. 3d 456, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 665, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 2764, 2011 WL 5864830

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 2011 | Docket: 60307687

Cited 29 times | Published

judicial review in circuit court permitted by section 682.13 will not permit a judicial review of such a

Bland v. Health Care and Retirement Corp.

927 So. 2d 252, 2006 WL 1235910

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2006 | Docket: 2041918

Cited 26 times | Published

appeal except as provided by Florida law. See § 682.13(1)(a)-(e), Fla. Stat. (2001); Schnurmacher Holding

Ricardo Lozano v. Maryland Casualty Company, a Foreign Corporation

850 F.2d 1470, 11 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1297, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10154, 1988 WL 72418

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 1, 1988 | Docket: 982688

Cited 24 times | Published

arbitrator within the meaning of Fla.Stat.Ann. § 682.13(l)(b); material questions of fact precluded summary

Complete Interiors, Inc. v. Behan

558 So. 2d 48, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 119, 1990 WL 1219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1990 | Docket: 125262

Cited 22 times | Published

Timoney, 524 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes (1987) sets forth the

Clarence H. Hand v. International Chemical Workers Union, International Chemical Workers Union Local No. 328, and Arizona Chemical Co.

712 F.2d 1350, 114 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2254, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25135

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 8, 1983 | Docket: 378776

Cited 16 times | Published

vacation of an arbitration award. Fla.Stat. Ann. § 682.13(2). In the absence of guidance from the Supreme

Bankers & Shippers Insurance Company v. Gonzalez

234 So. 2d 693, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1970 | Docket: 1354097

Cited 16 times | Published

the appellant to vacate the award pursuant to § 682.13, Fla. Stat., F.S.A., entered its judgment dismissing

LeNeve v. via South Florida, LLC

908 So. 2d 530, 2005 WL 1750621

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2005 | Docket: 1724865

Cited 15 times | Published

of the five statutory grounds set forth in section 682.13(1)(a)-(e), Florida Statutes (2002). See Commc'ns

Sunkist Soft Drinks, Inc., Del Monte Corporation, Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.

10 F.3d 753, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 33979, 1993 WL 512839

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 30, 1993 | Docket: 1033410

Cited 15 times | Published

application of Fla.Stat. 682.13(1) to the conduct of a neutral arbitrator. Fla.Stat. 682.13 differs from

Barr v. Florida Bd. of Regents

644 So. 2d 333, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10479, 1994 WL 588160

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1994 | Docket: 1249083

Cited 14 times | Published

to vacate the arbitration award, pursuant to section 682.13(1)(b) and (c), Florida Statutes, which provides:

Boyhan v. Maguire

693 So. 2d 659, 1997 WL 227445

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1997 | Docket: 435367

Cited 13 times | Published

appeal, Boyhan seeks to invoke the language of section 682.13(b),[2] which requires the court to vacate an

PRUDENTIAL-BACHE SECURITIES v. Shuman

483 So. 2d 888, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 557

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1986 | Docket: 1511968

Cited 12 times | Published

ground for vacating or modifying the award. See § 682.13(1), Fla. Stat. (1983); Lake County Education Association

Applewhite v. SHEEN FINANCIAL RESOURCES

608 So. 2d 80, 1992 WL 295449

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1992 | Docket: 1732412

Cited 11 times | Published

exceeded their powers, and thus pursuant to section 682.13(1)(c) the trial court should have vacated this

ST. JOHNS CTY. DIST. SCH. BD. v. Timoney

524 So. 2d 1129, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1159, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1921, 1988 WL 45224

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1988 | Docket: 1701592

Cited 10 times | Published

682.12, 682.13, 682.14, Fla. Stat. (1987). [3] § 682.13(1)(a-e), Fla. Stat. (1987).

LAKE COUNTY EDN. ASS'N v. School Bd. of Lake County

360 So. 2d 1280, 99 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2493, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15938

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1978 | Docket: 1474889

Cited 10 times | Published

reasonableness of School Board's policies and rules." Section 682.13, Florida Statutes (1975), provides the exclusive

Affiliated Marketing, Inc. v. Dyco Chem. & Coatings, Inc.

340 So. 2d 1240

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1976 | Docket: 1299621

Cited 10 times | Published

is hereby set aside and vacated pursuant to F.S. 682.13(e)(3) and a rehearing before the Arbitrator is

Communications Workers v. School Bd.

888 So. 2d 96, 2004 WL 2727447

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2004 | Docket: 1697167

Cited 9 times | Published

that the arbitrator exceeded his powers under section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes. For the following reasons

JJF of Palm Beach v. State Farm

634 So. 2d 1089

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1994 | Docket: 1472941

Cited 9 times | Published

DOWNEY, Senior Judge, concur. NOTES [1] See § 682.13, Fla. Stat. (1993). [2] See § 682.14, Fla.Seat

Zac Smith & Co. v. Moonspinner Condo. Ass'n, Inc.

534 So. 2d 739, 1988 WL 115379

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1988 | Docket: 1707675

Cited 9 times | Published

the claim for costs was merely overlooked. Section 682.13(1)(d), Florida Statutes, provides that the

McDonald v. Hardee County School Bd.

448 So. 2d 593, 17 Educ. L. Rep. 310, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12655

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1984 | Docket: 429312

Cited 9 times | Published

law but only upon one of the statutory grounds. § 682.13, Fla. Stat. (1981); Dairyland Insurance Co. v

Davenport v. Dimitrijevic

857 So. 2d 957, 2003 WL 22400695

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2003 | Docket: 1759435

Cited 8 times | Published

award except upon those grounds set forth in section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes (2002). See Schnurmacher

VERZURA CONST. v. Surfside Ocean, Inc.

708 So. 2d 994, 1998 WL 130801

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1998 | Docket: 1528297

Cited 8 times | Published

statutory grounds specifically enumerated in section 682.13, Florida Statutes (1993). Thus, because Verzura's

City of Tallahassee v. Big Bend PBA

703 So. 2d 1066, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7609, 1997 WL 345585

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1997 | Docket: 1704210

Cited 8 times | Published

confirming an arbitrator's award pursuant to section 682.13(4), Florida Statutes (1995), without entering

Preferred Mut. Ins. Co. v. Davis

629 So. 2d 259, 1993 WL 517243

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1993 | Docket: 1264322

Cited 8 times | Published

except upon one of the five grounds set forth in section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes. That statute, pertaining

Raymond, James & Associates, Inc. v. Wieneke

591 So. 2d 956, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10870, 1991 WL 224558

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1991 | Docket: 541268

Cited 8 times | Published

authority granted to trial courts for that purpose. § 682.13-.14, Fla. Stat. (1989). Accordingly, the trial

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 323 v. Coral Electric Corp.

576 F. Supp. 1128, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24943

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1984 | Docket: 211497

Cited 8 times | Published

contains the same time requirements. Fla.Stat. § 682.13(2) (West Supp.1983).[8] Plaintiff reasons that

Polley v. Gardner

98 So. 3d 648, 2012 WL 4009774, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15372

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2012 | Docket: 60312500

Cited 7 times | Published

and failed to meet the statutory criteria. See § 682.13, Fla. Stat. (2011). As such, the entry of final

IUBAC Local Union No. 31 v. Anastasi Bros. Corp.

600 F. Supp. 92, 120 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2854, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21324

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1984 | Docket: 2224140

Cited 7 times | Published

the Florida statute governing arbitration. Section 682.13(2) Florida Statutes (1983). The failure of

American Service Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wilson

323 So. 2d 645, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18970

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1975 | Docket: 1258058

Cited 7 times | Published

appellee's motion to confirm the award was barred by § 682.13(1)(c), in that by refusing to consider medical

Lopez & Roque Tile Co. Inc. v. Clearwater Dev. Corp.

291 So. 2d 126, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7873

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1974 | Docket: 1350931

Cited 7 times | Published

the merits of the controversy. * * * * * *" F.S. 682.13, F.S.A. provides that upon application of a party

Kendall Imports, LLC v. Diaz

215 So. 3d 95, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1117

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2017 | Docket: 4578722

Cited 6 times | Published

to arbitrate made on or after July 1, 2013.” § 682.013, Fla. Stat. (2016); see also CT Miami, 201 So

Fi-Evergreen Woods, LLC v. Robinson

135 So. 3d 331, 2013 WL 5493462, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15627

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2013 | Docket: 60239567

Cited 6 times | Published

Florida Arbitration Act applies prospectively. See § 682.013(3), Fla. Stat. (2013) ("The Revised Florida Arbitration

Soler v. Secondary Holdings, Inc.

771 So. 2d 62, 2000 WL 1580838

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2000 | Docket: 46581

Cited 6 times | Published

upon the grounds specified in Florida Statute § 682.13. Soler argues that the trial court lacked the

Harris v. Haught

435 So. 2d 926

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1983 | Docket: 1697557

Cited 6 times | Published

Code, Chapter 682, Florida Statutes (1981). Section 682.13 provides five grounds on which a trial court

Lee v. Marcus

396 So. 2d 208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1981 | Docket: 2139907

Cited 6 times | Published

by fraud or corruption within the meaning of Section 682.13(1)(a), (b), Florida Statutes (1979). The foundation

Dairyland Insurance Company v. Hudnall

279 So. 2d 905, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8034

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1973 | Docket: 1522187

Cited 6 times | Published

were the three grounds asserted in the motion. Section 682.13 of Chapter 682 Fla. Stat., F.S.A., the Florida

Carter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.

224 So. 2d 802

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1969 | Docket: 1248023

Cited 6 times | Published

filing objections to the award as provided in section 682.13 does not apply to a void award. 3 Fla.Jur.

Wells v. Halmac Development, Inc.

189 So. 3d 1015, 2016 WL 1445437, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5586

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2016 | Docket: 3053139

Cited 5 times | Published

remanded with directions. 1 . Section 682.13(1) provides: (1) Upon motion of a party

Jossfolk v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

110 So. 3d 110, 2013 WL 1136315, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4443

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2013 | Docket: 60230175

Cited 5 times | Published

challenge the arbitration award is through section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes,2 within the Arbitration

Marr v. Webb

930 So. 2d 734, 2006 WL 1196455

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2006 | Docket: 1469024

Cited 5 times | Published

Bradstreet, 727 So.2d 372 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)). Section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes (2005), enumerates five

Episcopal Diocese of Central Florida v. Prudential Securities, Inc.

925 So. 2d 1112, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5079, 2006 WL 888096

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2006 | Docket: 1516925

Cited 5 times | Published

Holding v. Noriega, 542 So.2d 1327 (Fla. 1989); § 682.13, Fla. Stat. (2005). A court *1115 must consider

Loewenstein, Inc. v. Draheim

898 So. 2d 1129, 2005 WL 715732

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2005 | Docket: 1448295

Cited 5 times | Published

setting aside an arbitration award pursuant to section 682.13(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2004). Because this

Soler v. Secondary Holdings, Inc.

832 So. 2d 893, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18563, 2002 WL 31828448

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2002 | Docket: 1700065

Cited 5 times | Published

exceeded the scope of his jurisdiction. We agree. Section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes, sets forth the only grounds

American Reliance Ins. Co. v. Devecht

820 So. 2d 378, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6911, 2002 WL 1021367

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2002 | Docket: 1362417

Cited 5 times | Published

vacate, modify, or clarify the award pursuant to section 682.13, Florida Statutes. In the absence of such a

Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. v. Ulrich

692 So. 2d 915, 1997 WL 119745

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1997 | Docket: 1524592

Cited 5 times | Published

1995), modified, 85 F.3d 519 (11th Cir.1996); § 682.13, Fla.Stat. (1995); Schnurmacher Holding, Inc.

Mason v. Porsche Cars of North America

621 So. 2d 719, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5842, 1993 WL 177731

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1993 | Docket: 1265856

Cited 5 times | Published

demonstrating why the award should not be confirmed. See § 682.13, Fla. Stat. (1991). A former statute providing

Sorren v. Kumble

578 So. 2d 836, 1991 WL 65959

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1991 | Docket: 440589

Cited 5 times | Published

procured by ... undue means." 9 U.S.C. § 10; see also § 682.13(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1989). It is well settled that

Int'l Medical Centers v. Sabates

498 So. 2d 1292, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2349

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1986 | Docket: 1699741

Cited 5 times | Published

aside the award based on arbitrator misconduct. Section 682.13(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1983), requires vacation

Toiberman v. Tisera

998 So. 2d 4, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2373

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2008 | Docket: 1701394

Cited 4 times | Published

one of the statutorily enumerated grounds in section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes (2007), of the Florida

RDC Golf of Florida I, Inc. v. Apostolicas

925 So. 2d 1082, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3696, 2006 WL 664207

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2006 | Docket: 2525009

Cited 4 times | Published

of the five statutory grounds set forth in section 682.13(1)(a)-(e), Florida Statutes (2004). See Commc'ns

Poole and Kent Co. v. GUSI ERICKSON CONST. COMPANY

759 So. 2d 2, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12707, 1999 WL 766005

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1999 | Docket: 1422808

Cited 4 times | Published

award in favor of Gusi must be vacated under section 682.13(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1997) (providing an

Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Wood

676 So. 2d 464, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5540, 1996 WL 283695

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1996 | Docket: 1318119

Cited 4 times | Published

5, 1994, a final judgment was entered under section 682.13(c) and 682.14(1)(b) granting Wood $128,193

Kintzele v. JB & Sons, Inc.

658 So. 2d 130, 1995 WL 405274

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1995 | Docket: 439471

Cited 4 times | Published

that the arbitrators had "exceeded their powers." § 682.13(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (1993). But the amount of the

SERV. STATION AID, INC. v. Turnberry Assoc.

629 So. 2d 204, 1993 WL 469338

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1993 | Docket: 303537

Cited 4 times | Published

vacated because the arbitrator made an error of law. § 682.13, Fla. Stat. (1991); Schnurmacher Holding, Inc

Mount Dora v. CENTRAL FLORIDA POLICE BENEV. ASS'N., INC.

600 So. 2d 520, 1992 WL 126558

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1992 | Docket: 539181

Cited 4 times | Published

present case exceeded his powers in violation of section 682.13(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1989). Appellee argued

Fridman v. Citicorp Real Estate, Inc.

596 So. 2d 1128, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2500, 1992 WL 45700

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1992 | Docket: 1296007

Cited 4 times | Published

accordance with the provisions set forth in section 682.13(3), Florida Statutes (1989).[1] Upon receipt

Haskell v. Forest Land and Timber Co., Inc.

426 So. 2d 1251, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18610

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1983 | Docket: 1683714

Cited 4 times | Published

award within the 90-day time period set out in § 682.13, Florida Statutes (1981). We accordingly directed

Lake v. Martin Marietta Corp.

538 F. Supp. 725, 113 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2522, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13613

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1982 | Docket: 2142660

Cited 4 times | Published

actions to vacate arbitration awards. See Fla.Stat. § 682.13. This approach has not been adopted by this court

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Allen

356 So. 2d 1287

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1978 | Docket: 1478421

Cited 4 times | Published

that the arbitrators exceeded their powers. See: § 682.13(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (1975). Travelers may not raise

Newport Motel, Inc. v. COBIN RESTAURANT. INC.

281 So. 2d 234, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7639

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1973 | Docket: 1261841

Cited 4 times | Published

appears to be settled that under the provisions of § 682.13(1)(e), Fla. Stat., F.S.A., an award of arbitration

Travelers Insurance Co. v. Luckett

279 So. 2d 885, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8021

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1973 | Docket: 1522165

Cited 4 times | Published

appellant. [4] Ch. 682, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. [5] § 682.13(1), Fla. Stat., F.S.A. provides for the following

Nash v. Florida Atlantic University Board of Trustees

213 So. 3d 363, 2017 WL 697748, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2407

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2017 | Docket: 60263502

Cited 3 times | Published

exceeded his authority within the meaning of section 682.13, Florida Statutes, is an issue of law subject

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 824 v. Verizon Florida, LLC

803 F.3d 1241, 204 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3367, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 17551, 2015 WL 5827517

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 7, 2015 | Docket: 2865027

Cited 3 times | Published

original award was “subject to change” pursuant to Section 682.13(l)(d) of the Florida Statutes, which states:

Wells v. Castro

117 So. 3d 1233, 2013 WL 3455607, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11051

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2013 | Docket: 60232592

Cited 3 times | Published

vacate an arbitration award are made pursuant to section 682.13, Florida Statutes (2012),1 and motions to modify

Nucci v. STORM FOOTBALL PARTNERS

82 So. 3d 180, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3838, 2012 WL 751966

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2012 | Docket: 400990

Cited 3 times | Published

asked the trial court to vacate the award. See § 682.13(1). He argued to the trial court that the Partners

Jaylene, Inc. v. Steuer Ex Rel. Paradise

22 So. 3d 711, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16884, 2009 WL 3787239

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2009 | Docket: 1639623

Cited 3 times | Published

that existing Florida law provides for such. Section 682.13, Florida Statutes (2008), authorizes a narrow

Three Palms Pointe, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

250 F. Supp. 2d 1357, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3875, 2003 WL 1192860

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2003 | Docket: 2225682

Cited 3 times | Published

379 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (citing Florida Statute § 682.13 while confirming an appraisal award); also Allstate

NATIONBANC SECURITIES, INC. v. Aron

787 So. 2d 881, 2001 WL 193744

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2001 | Docket: 1744909

Cited 3 times | Published

modify, correct, or vacate it under either section 682.13 or section 682.14, and the relevant section

Chandra v. Bradstreet

727 So. 2d 372, 1999 WL 110691

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1999 | Docket: 1438936

Cited 3 times | Published

arbitration award only upon the grounds stated in section 682.13: 682.13 Vacating an award. (1) Upon application

Moya v. Board of Regents

629 So. 2d 282, 1993 WL 524110

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1993 | Docket: 1263994

Cited 3 times | Published

provided in §§ 682.13 and 682.14. [3] See Fla. Stat. § 682.13 (1991). [4] See Fla. Stat. § 682.14 (1991). [5]

Inversiones Y Procesadora Tropical Inprotsa, S.A. v. Del Monte International GMBH

921 F.3d 1291

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 23, 2019 | Docket: 14980967

Cited 2 times | Published

confirm the award." (quoting Fla. Stat. § 682.13 )); Computer Task Grp. ,

Lake City Fire & Rescue Association, etc. v. City of Lake City, Florida

240 So. 3d 128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2018 | Docket: 6327833

Cited 2 times | Published

decision is limited to the grounds set forth in section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes. Schnurmacher Holding

Publix Supermarkets, Inc. v. Faith Conte, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Susan L. Moore

169 So. 3d 1265, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11399

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 2015 | Docket: 2679158

Cited 2 times | Published

provisions. However, there are cases interpreting section 682.13 which hold that the partiality of an arbitrator

Talel Corp. v. Shimonovitch

84 So. 3d 1192, 2012 WL 1108437, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5185

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2012 | Docket: 60306621

Cited 2 times | Published

should have vacated the arbitrator’s award under section 682.13(l)(d), Florida Statutes (2008), and directed

JONATHAN M. FRANTZ, MD, PA v. Shedden

974 So. 2d 1193, 2008 WL 465543

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2008 | Docket: 1717701

Cited 2 times | Published

right to seek vacation of an award pursuant to section 682.13, Florida Statutes (2004), or to appeal an award

Martin Daytona v. Strickland Const. Serv.

941 So. 2d 1220, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19308, 2006 WL 3327079

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 2006 | Docket: 1523653

Cited 2 times | Published

did not move to vacate the award pursuant to section 682.13(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2005), or move to

Murton Roofing Corp. v. FF Fund Corp.

930 So. 2d 772, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7691, 2006 WL 1330203

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2006 | Docket: 1749568

Cited 2 times | Published

to vacate the arbitration award pursuant to section 682.13, Florida Statutes (2005), and Murton moved

State v. FIRST FLORIDIAN AUTO INS.

803 So. 2d 771, 2001 WL 1436287

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2001 | Docket: 1784854

Cited 2 times | Published

justify vacating the arbitration award under section 682.13, Florida Statutes (1999), we affirm. I. "Whether

City of Miami Beach v. TURCHIN/CRS

641 So. 2d 471, 1994 WL 440757

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 1994 | Docket: 1152085

Cited 2 times | Published

final and conclusive judgment. In addition, section 682.13(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1993), expressly provides

DADE COUNTY POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION v. City of Homestead

642 So. 2d 24, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7903, 1994 WL 416977

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1994 | Docket: 549782

Cited 2 times | Published

the arbitrator exceeded his power pursuant to section 682.13(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1993). The award followed

Okun v. Litwin Securities Inc.

619 So. 2d 995, 1993 WL 152515

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1993 | Docket: 1382102

Cited 2 times | Published

to vacate the arbitration award pursuant to Section 682.13, Florida Statutes (1991). The motion to vacate

Keyes Co. v. Gomez

590 So. 2d 954, 1991 WL 240088

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 1991 | Docket: 1512645

Cited 2 times | Published

Ed.2d 1424, 1428 (1960). On the authority of section 682.13(1)(c) or 682.14(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1989)

Burt v. Duval County School Bd.

481 So. 2d 55, 29 Educ. L. Rep. 900

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1985 | Docket: 549004

Cited 2 times | Published

raise ... the defense made available to it in Section 682.13(1)(e),"[1] because the teachers "did submit

Koch v. WALLER & CO., INC.

439 So. 2d 1041

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1983 | Docket: 1265515

Cited 2 times | Published

arbitration hearing without raising the objection." Section 682.13(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1981). The latter

INDUSTRIAL FIRE & CAS. v. Coquemard

332 So. 2d 636

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1976 | Docket: 307146

Cited 2 times | Published

merits of the controversy which it may not do. See § 682.13, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. and Bankers & Shippers Insurance

Guzman v. Am. Sec. Ins. Co.

377 F. Supp. 3d 1362

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2019 | Docket: 64324190

Cited 1 times | Published

modify or clarify an award pursuant to § 682.13. Section 682.13 allows the Court to vacate an award upon

Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1579 v. City of Gainesville

264 So. 3d 375

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2019 | Docket: 14554415

Cited 1 times | Published

of a party to the arbitration proceeding. § 682.13(1)(a)-(f), Fla. Stat. In the absence of

Israel v. Costanzo

216 So. 3d 644, 2017 WL 1363955, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5063

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2017 | Docket: 60265458

Cited 1 times | Published

Noriega, 542 So.2d 1327, 1328 (Fla. 1989) (“Section 682.13(1) sets forth the only grounds upon which an

Laquer v. Falcone

165 So. 3d 19, 2015 WL 1810318

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2015 | Docket: 2651478

Cited 1 times | Published

within the 90-day statutory period, pursuant to section 682.13(2), Florida Statutes (2013). The'trial court

Visiting Nurse Association of Florida, Inc. v. Jupiter Medical Center

154 So. 3d 1115, 2014 WL 6463506

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2014 | Docket: 2593363

Cited 1 times | Published

The district court then acknowledged that section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes (2009), clearly does not

Village at Dolphin Commerce Center, LLC v. Construction Service Solutions, LLC

143 So. 3d 942, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7703, 2014 WL 2116361

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2014 | Docket: 60242398

Cited 1 times | Published

Statutes do not provide for such. Pursuant to section 682.13, Florida Statutes, the authority of the trial

Anderson v. Maronda Homes, Inc. of Florida

98 So. 3d 127, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12199, 2012 WL 3046821

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2012 | Docket: 60312169

Cited 1 times | Published

Stat. (2005). Ms. Anderson moved to vacate. See § 682.13. She asserted that the arbitrator exceeded his

SEIU Florida Public Services Union v. City of Boynton Beach

89 So. 3d 960, 2012 WL 1317617, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6055

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2012 | Docket: 60308857

Cited 1 times | Published

in ss. 682.13 and 682.14.” (emphasis added). Section 682.13(2) provides that an application to vacate an

State Farm Florida Insurance v. Gonzalez

76 So. 3d 34, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19530, 2011 WL 6057875

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2011 | Docket: 60304492

Cited 1 times | Published

grounds are known or should have been known.” § 682.13(2), Fla. Stat. (2008). . Olympus’ insurance

Jmc v. Vna

72 So. 3d 184

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2011 | Docket: 437962

Cited 1 times | Published

gone through arbitration. VNA contends that section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes (2009) provides a list

Felger v. Mock

65 So. 3d 625, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11572, 2011 WL 3055397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2011 | Docket: 60301757

Cited 1 times | Published

arbitration panel for a second arbitration. See § 682.13(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (2009) (“Upon application of

Bloch v. DiLorenzo

44 So. 3d 1290, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15548, 2010 WL 3984691

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2010 | Docket: 1059854

Cited 1 times | Published

award. Not only was this pleading untimely, see § 682.13(2), Florida Statutes, but it also failed to raise

Manorcare Health Services, Inc. v. Stiehl

22 So. 3d 96, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11756, 2009 WL 2568264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2009 | Docket: 1063068

Cited 1 times | Published

appeal, except as provided by Florida law. See § 682.13(1)(a)-(e), Fla. Stat. (2005); Schnurmacher Holding

Cunningham v. MBNA America Bank, N.A.

8 So. 3d 438, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2736, 2009 WL 875691

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2009 | Docket: 1654512

Cited 1 times | Published

manner under the Florida Arbitration Code. See § 682.13.1 Apparently, the trial court did not consider

Raynor v. Florida State Lodge

987 So. 2d 152, 2008 WL 2725835

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2008 | Docket: 1723955

Cited 1 times | Published

powers. The circuit court based its decision on section 682.13(1)(c), Florida Statutes, which provides that

Regalado v. Cabezas

959 So. 2d 282, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5312, 2007 WL 1062974

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 2007 | Docket: 64851251

Cited 1 times | Published

grounds *285enumerated in section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes (2005). Id. Section 682.13(1) provides, in relevant

Della Penna v. Zabawa

931 So. 2d 155, 2006 WL 1288601

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 2006 | Docket: 425870

Cited 1 times | Published

vacate an award. 9 U.S.C.A. § 10(a)(1)-(4). Section 682.13, Florida Statutes, recognizes essentially the

BRANDON JONES SANDALL v. Beasley & Hauser

925 So. 2d 1142

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2006 | Docket: 1517018

Cited 1 times | Published

prejudicing the rights of any party ...." [e.s.] § 682.13(1), Fla. Stat. (2005). The client doctors based

Avatar Properties, Inc. v. NCJ Inv. Co.

848 So. 2d 1259, 2003 WL 21554924

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2003 | Docket: 1712328

Cited 1 times | Published

itself of the statutory procedure for making it. Section 682.13(1)(e), Florida Statutes, requires a court to

Dadeland Square, Ltd. v. Gould

763 So. 2d 524, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9405, 2000 WL 1021891

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2000 | Docket: 1681789

Cited 1 times | Published

Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award pursuant to section 682.13(1)(a) and (b), Florida Statutes (1997). Gould's

Dadeland Square, Ltd. v. Gould

763 So. 2d 524, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9405, 2000 WL 1021891

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2000 | Docket: 1681789

Cited 1 times | Published

Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award pursuant to section 682.13(1)(a) and (b), Florida Statutes (1997). Gould's

Lee v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

594 So. 2d 783, 1992 WL 5996

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1992 | Docket: 1485397

Cited 1 times | Published

with a motion to vacate the award pursuant to section 682.13(1)(d), Florida Statutes (1989), which in pertinent

Hymowitz v. Drath

567 So. 2d 540, 1990 WL 142512

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1990 | Docket: 1380532

Cited 1 times | Published

arbitrators exceeded their statutory powers under section 682.13(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1987), we reverse

Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Roe

515 So. 2d 1370, 1987 WL 2128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1987 | Docket: 1468448

Cited 1 times | Published

contract nor moved to vacate the award pursuant to section 682.13 Florida Statutes (1985), the award of damages

Metropolitan Dade County v. Molloy

456 So. 2d 1280, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2106, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15300

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1984 | Docket: 1732135

Cited 1 times | Published

prejudice which satisfies the requirements of section 682.13(1)(d), Florida Statutes (1981), which would

Department of Transportation v. MacAsphalt, Inc.

429 So. 2d 1281, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19075

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1983 | Docket: 64596462

Cited 1 times | Published

that found in the general arbitration statute. § 682.13, Florida Statutes. If the latter suggestion were

Sanders v. Grand Union Co.

541 F. Supp. 621, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13088

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1982 | Docket: 2131942

Cited 1 times | Published

actions to vacate arbitration awards. Fla.Stat. § 682.13(2) (1981). Plaintiff maintains, however, that

Norman J. Martinez v. Ring-Central, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2024 | Docket: 69021750

Published

by corruption, fraud, or other undue means[.]” § 682.13(2), Fla. Stat. (2022). If one of these statutory

The Ferraro Law Firm, P.A., etc. v. Royal Merchant Holdings, LLC, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2024 | Docket: 68848625

Published

of the party to the arbitration proceeding.” § 682.13(1)(b)3., Fla. Stat. “Although an arbitrator need

Michael Fisten v. Julie Brown

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2024 | Docket: 68268115

Published

after the movant receives notice of the award[.]” § 682.13(2), Fla. Stat. (2022). If a party moves to vacate

The School Board of Broward County, Florida v. Gregory Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2024 | Docket: 68268128

Published

the Board moved to vacate the award under section 682.13, Florida Statutes (2022), and argued the ordered

F.R. ALEMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. EAC CONSULTING, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2023 | Docket: 64902135

Published

the parties to the arbitration proceeding.”); § 682.13(1)(d), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“Upon motion of a party

DAVID C. METALONIS v. BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2022 | Docket: 65745128

Published

arbitrator exceeded the arbitrator’s powers[.]” § 682.13(1)(d), Fla. Stat. (2022). Florida courts interpret

METRO DADE FIREFIGHTERS, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS, LOCAL 1403 v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2022 | Docket: 65389424

Published

evidence and questions of law de novo. Id. Section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes, sets forth the only grounds

ANTHONY PERERA v. BOBBY GENOVESE

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2022 | Docket: 63654668

Published

the arbitrator exceeded his powers. Because section 682.13, Florida Statutes (2019), requires a court

CAROL F. JOHNSON v. HEARTLAND OF FORT MYERS, FL, LLC

257 So. 3d 634

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2018 | Docket: 8146140

Published

however, would not be wholly unreviewable. See § 682.13, Fla. Stat. (2016) (setting forth grounds for

NATIONAL MILLWORK, INC. v. ANF GROUP, INC. and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

253 So. 3d 1261

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2018 | Docket: 7935062

Published

limited and specifically enumerated situations. § 682.13, Fla. Stat. Those situations include an arbitration

City of Miami v. Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 20

248 So. 3d 273

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2018 | Docket: 7061978

Published

to vacate in the circuit court pursuant to section 682.13(1)(d), Florida Statutes, claiming the Arbitrator

Florida Capital Group, Inc. v. Bishop

240 So. 3d 108

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2018 | Docket: 6318522

Published

2 section 682.13, Florida Statutes, see § 682.12, Fla. Stat

BOARDWALK PROPERTIES MNGMNT. INC. v. EMERALD CLINTON, LLC, etc. and EMERALD PALMS GP, LLC, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2017 | Docket: 6171815

Published

arbitration award can be vacated is governed by section 682.13(1)(d), Florida Statutes (2016), 1 which states

Managed Care Insurance Consultants, Inc. v. United Healthcare Insurance Co.

228 So. 3d 588, 2017 WL 4417735

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2017 | Docket: 6163548

Published

award, one of the statutory grounds listed in section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes (2015), must be present

MANAGED CARE INS. CONSULTANTS v. UNITED HEALTHCARE INS. CO.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2017 | Docket: 6122336

Published

award, one of the statutory grounds listed in section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes (2015), must be present

Balaguer v. Physicians for the Hand, LLC

199 So. 3d 375, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12415, 2016 WL 4376724

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2016 | Docket: 4121053

Published

instant case exceeded her powers pursuant to section 682.13(l)(d), Florida Statutes, which governs vacating

Ross v. Prospectsplus!, Inc.

182 So. 3d 802, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 187, 2016 WL 56467

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2016 | Docket: 3026119

Published

award for any of the reasons enumerated in section 682.13. The circuit court accommodated her request

CT Miami, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Latinoamerica Miami, Inc.

201 So. 3d 85, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13468

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2015 | Docket: 2757119

Published

at ⅜ sup was drafted and signed in, 2009. See § .682.013, Fla. Stat. (2015) (providing that the 2013 Revised

Nestor v. Ward

163 So. 3d 582, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5037, 2015 WL 1578710

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2015 | Docket: 2647541

Published

the arbitration proceeding. *585 § 682.13(1), Fla. Stat. (2014); see also Schnurmacher

Jomar Properties, L.L.C., and Accredited Surety And Casualty Company, Inc.

154 So. 3d 515, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 443, 2015 WL 159055

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2015 | Docket: 2624234

Published

arbitration showed evident partiality under section 682.13(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2008), is without

Hound Mounds, Inc. and Geoffrey Bodle v. Adrian Finch

153 So. 3d 368, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20460, 2014 WL 7150482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2014 | Docket: 2616022

Published

the franchise in May 2010. See § 682.013(2), Fla. Stat. (2013) (unless the parties agree

Green Earth Technology Solutions, Inc. v. Geltech Solutions, Inc. and Fireice Gel, Inc.

150 So. 3d 1200, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18432, 2014 WL 5834408

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2014 | Docket: 2595482

Published

one of the enumerated statutory grounds under section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes.” Talel Corp. v

Visiting Nurse Association of Florida, Inc. v. Jupiter Medical Center, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2014 | Docket: 401077

Published

The district court then acknowledged that section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes (2009), clearly does not

Heart Surgery Center v. Bixler

128 So. 3d 169, 37 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 360, 2013 WL 6097322, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18522

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2013 | Docket: 60237003

Published

Mock’s contention and vacated the award under section 682.13(l)(c), Florida Statutes. Id. Upon review, however

Spivey v. Teen Challenge of Florida, Inc.

122 So. 3d 986, 2013 WL 5584237, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16284

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2013 | Docket: 60234835

Published

arbitrate made on or after July 1, 2013.’,’ Id. § 682.013(1). It "does not affect an action or proceeding

Carvajal v. Banc of America Investment Serv., Inc.

122 So. 3d 393, 2013 WL 3927684, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12009

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2013 | Docket: 60234667

Published

their powers,” the court is to vacate the award. § 682.13(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (2012). Accordingly, we reverse

American Federation of State v. Miami-Dade County Public Schools

95 So. 3d 388, 2012 WL 3101617, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12356

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2012 | Docket: 60311199

Published

establish one of the five grounds set forth in section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes (2007), which provides:

Quesada v. City of Tampa

96 So. 3d 924, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10892, 2012 WL 2614918

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2012 | Docket: 60311594

Published

investigation of the facts constitutes misconduct under section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes (2011), and that he has

Jupiter Medical Center, Inc. v. Visiting Nurse Ass'n of Florida

72 So. 3d 184, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14565, 2011 WL 4056293

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2011 | Docket: 60303215

Published

gone through arbitration. VNA contends that section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes (2009) provides a list

BDO Seidman, LLP v. Bee

24 So. 3d 1278, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 34, 2010 WL 21068

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2010 | Docket: 1152651

Published

under any of the limited grounds enumerated in section 682.13, Florida Statutes (2008). Packard v. Ripple

AFSCME Florida Council 79 v. State, Department of Corrections

23 So. 3d 748, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16874, 2009 WL 3786537

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2009 | Docket: 1657420

Published

be vacated only upon the grounds stated in Section 682.13," Harris v. Haught, 435 So.2d 926, 928 (Fla

Commercial Interiors Corp. of Boca Raton v. Pinkerton & Laws, Inc.

19 So. 3d 1062, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14718, 2009 WL 3149098

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2009 | Docket: 60254560

Published

examination of this question by considering section 682.13, Florida Statutes (2007), which deals with

Byars v. Thomas

939 So. 2d 1110, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15493, 2006 WL 2683636

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2006 | Docket: 64847337

Published

vacated the arbitration award. Pursuant to Section 682.13(l)(e), Florida Statutes (2005), a trial “court

Brandon Jones Sandall Zeide Kohn Chalal & Musso, P.A. v. Beasley & Hauser, P.A.

925 So. 2d 1142, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5962, 2006 WL 1083552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2006 | Docket: 64843719

Published

prejudicing the rights of any party .... ” [e.s.] § 682.13(1), Fla. Stat. (2005). The client doctors based

Glick v. Retamar

922 So. 2d 1108, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3994, 2006 WL 708375

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2006 | Docket: 64842821

Published

Alternatively to Vacate the Award Pursuant to F.S. Section 682.13.” Final judgment was entered on July 6, 2005

Loewenstein, Inc. v. Draheim

914 So. 2d 1106, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18814, 2005 WL 3180083

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2005 | Docket: 64840969

Published

Aid, Inc., 651 So.2d 1173 (Fla.1995); see also § 682.13(3), 682.20(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (2005). Reversed

Robert W. Baird & Co. v. Sunamerica Securities, Inc.

399 F. Supp. 2d 1314, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31392, 2005 WL 3146827

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2005 | Docket: 2342539

Published

682.11 (relating to arbitrators' authority), Section 682.13(c) (relating to vacating an award), and Section

Expressway Companies v. Precision Design, Inc.

882 So. 2d 1016, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10496, 2004 WL 1570350

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2004 | Docket: 64832852

Published

657 So.2d at 60 (emphasis in original); see also § 682.13(e), Fla. Stat. (2003)(“But the fact that the relief

Corpion v. Jenne

869 So. 2d 660, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4097, 2004 WL 626117

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2004 | Docket: 64829188

Published

authority to vacate the award is governed by section 682.13, Florida Statutes (2000). The circuit court

Schneider v. Cristol

847 So. 2d 1104, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8982, 2003 WL 21396692

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2003 | Docket: 64823457

Published

vacate, modify or clarify the award pursuant to section 682.13, Florida Statutes, an arbitrator’s award must

Smith v. Corley

835 So. 2d 364, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 513, 2003 WL 159139

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2003 | Docket: 64820081

Published

1999), rev. denied, 741 So.2d 1134 (Fla.1999). Section 682.13 of the Florida Statute (1999) sets forth the

Deen v. Oster

814 So. 2d 1065, 2001 WL 1577073

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2002 | Docket: 1717804

Published

misconduct prejudicing the rights of any party." § 682.13(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2000). This section requires

State Department of Insurance v. First Floridian Auto & Home Insurance

803 So. 2d 771, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16265

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2001 | Docket: 64811390

Published

justify vacating the arbitration award under section 682.13, Florida Statutes (1999), we affirm. I. “Whether

Simmons v. City of Avon Park

788 So. 2d 1076, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7539, 2001 WL 584421

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2001 | Docket: 64806548

Published

arbitrator’s order to the trial court pursuant to section 682.13, Florida Statutes (1999). The trial court found

City of Tampa v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1464

788 So. 2d 1030, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3207, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 738

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2001 | Docket: 64806545

Published

showing, the award cannot be vacated under section 682.13(l)(c). 542 So.2d at 1329. We find that the

City of Tampa v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1464

779 So. 2d 648, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3203, 2001 WL 246862

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2001 | Docket: 64804258

Published

showing, the award cannot be vacated under section 682.13(l)(c). 542 So.2d at 1329. We find that the

City of Tampa v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1464

779 So. 2d 647, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3205, 2001 WL 246861

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2001 | Docket: 64804257

Published

showing, the award cannot be vacated under section 682.13(l)(c). 542 So.2d at 1329. We find that the

Brooks v. City of Tallahassee

778 So. 2d 1051, 166 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2639, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1751, 2001 WL 137411

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2001 | Docket: 64803927

Published

not exceed her authority as contemplated by section 682.13(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1999), we reverse

Baird v. Camp City of Orlando, Inc.

760 So. 2d 285, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6892, 2000 WL 731370

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2000 | Docket: 64797956

Published

vacating or modifying or correcting the award.... Section 682.13 requires a court to vacate an arbitration award

Flavio Development Corp. v. Laguna East Club Condominium Ass'n

756 So. 2d 186, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3960, 2000 WL 346122

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2000 | Docket: 64796895

Published

arbitration award must be vacated in accordance with section 682.13(l)(d), Florida Statutes (1997), which provides

Paul v. School Board of Miami-Dade County

751 So. 2d 762, 164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2256, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2005, 2000 WL 227957

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2000 | Docket: 64795228

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 682.13, Fla. Stat. (1997); Galbreath v. School Bd. of Broward County, 446

Open Bible Community Church v. Paragon Construction Ultd., Inc.

751 So. 2d 188, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1372, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 409

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2000 | Docket: 64794995

Published

prejudice substantially the rights of a party. § 682.13(1)(d), Fla.Stat. (1997). Based upon our careful

Alterman v. Martin-Busutil

716 So. 2d 849, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11104, 1998 WL 552798

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 1998 | Docket: 64782481

Published

Wofford, 55 So.2d 102, 105 (Fla.1951)). See also § 682.13(1), Fla. Stat. (1997). The case upon which appellant

City of Tallahassee v. Big Bend Police Benevolent Ass'n

710 So. 2d 214, 158 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2377, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4872, 1998 WL 217079

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1998 | Docket: 64780770

Published

arbitrator was violative of any of the provisions of section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes (1995), we affirm. The

Cochran v. Broward County Police Benevolent Association, Inc.

693 So. 2d 134, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5133, 1997 WL 249128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1997 | Docket: 2548857

Published

ground for vacating an arbitration award under section 682.13, Florida Statutes (1993). According to Schnurmacher

Breakstone v. Lehr

649 So. 2d 352, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 949, 1995 WL 46448

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1995 | Docket: 64753811

Published

conclusively that none of the factors specified in section 682.13, Florida Statutes (1993), support vacating

City of Opa-Locka v. Dade County Police Benevolent Ass'n

610 So. 2d 518, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11768, 1992 WL 348426

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 1992 | Docket: 64692804

Published

award should be vacated in accordance with section 682.-13(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1991), which provides

Sachs v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

584 So. 2d 211, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8509, 1991 WL 158558

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1991 | Docket: 64660873

Published

order. Sachs nei*212ther moved to vacate, see § 682.13(2), Fla. Stat. (1989), nor moved to modify, see

Laniewicz v. Rutenberg Construction Co.

580 So. 2d 203, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3763, 1991 WL 61806

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1991 | Docket: 64658977

Published

DCA), rev. denied, 570 So.2d 1303 (Fla.1990); § 682.13(1)(c), Fla.Stat. (1989). *205Therefore, the lower

McBro, A Division of McCarthy Bros. Co. v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc.

576 So. 2d 1360, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2742, 1991 WL 45219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1991 | Docket: 64657583

Published

1978), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 346 (Fla.1979); § 682.13(l)(c), Fla.Stat. (1987); compare Cuevas v. Potamkin

Carpet Concepts of St. Petersburg, Inc. v. Architectural Concepts, Inc.

559 So. 2d 303, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2081, 1990 WL 35385

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1990 | Docket: 1751565

Published

prejudice substantially the rights of a party." § 682.13(1)(d), Fla. Stat. (1987). Architectural Concepts

Hialeah Park, Inc. v. Ocala Breeders' Sales Co.

528 So. 2d 1227, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1613, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2931, 1988 WL 70758

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1988 | Docket: 64636209

Published

result of the arbitrator improprieties listed in Section 682.13(1), Florida Statutes (1987). Merritt-Chapman

Noriega v. Schnurmacher Holding, Inc.

528 So. 2d 28, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1303, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2273, 1988 WL 53059

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1988 | Docket: 64635865

Published

arbitrator exceeded his powers in contravention of section 682.13(1)(c). See SAC Constr. Co. v. Milam Dairy Assocs

Allen v. McCall

521 So. 2d 182, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 401, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 495, 1988 WL 8120

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1988 | Docket: 64633127

Published

arbitration proceeding itself, not in the court. § 682.13, Fla.Stat. (1985) (if arbitration award vacated

City of Miami v. Aparicio

503 So. 2d 966, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 736, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12039

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1987 | Docket: 64625720

Published

subject to being vacated, as urged, under Section 682.-13(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1985). We have not

Sentry Insurance A Mutual Co. v. Czinner

483 So. 2d 500, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 467, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6467

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1986 | Docket: 64617469

Published

partiality on the part of the neutral arbitrator. § 682.13, Fla.Stat. (1983). Under these circumstances,

Austin v. Stovall

475 So. 2d 1014, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2205, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15978

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1985 | Docket: 64614338

Published

failure to move timely to vacate the award, see § 682.13, Fla.Stat. (1983), does not preclude the defendants

Orange County Classroom Teachers' Ass'n v. School Board of Orange County

455 So. 2d 634, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1938, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14970

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1984 | Docket: 64606727

Published

vacated pursuant to section 682.13(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1983).3 Section 682.13(3) provides: In vacating

Webb v. Park East Properties, Inc.

441 So. 2d 1091, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22529

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1983 | Docket: 64601326

Published

Haught, 435 So.2d 926 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), and section 682.13, Florida Statutes (1981). LETTS, GLICKSTEIN

McGhee v. Ogburn

707 F.2d 1312, 32 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 346, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26428, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,712

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 24, 1983 | Docket: 66193401

Published

by the Florida Arbitration Code, Fla.Stat.Ann. § 682.13 (West Supp.1983), for petitions to vacate arbitration

Yanakakis v. Pacre Corp. (In re Pacre Corp.)

21 B.R. 759, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 3902

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jun 17, 1982 | Docket: 65778214

Published

682 of the Florida Statutes. Florida Statutes § 682.13(1) sets forth quite specifically the grounds for

Harper v. Continental Can Co.

411 So. 2d 1002, 113 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3206, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19695

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1982 | Docket: 64588893

Published

within the 90 day limitations period provided by section 682.13, Florida Statutes (1981), a provision of the

Haskell v. Forest Land & Timber Co.

408 So. 2d 811, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18966

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1982 | Docket: 64587343

Published

discussion is whether the appellee complied with § 682.13 Fla.Stat.1 The appellee argues that Rule of Civil

Watson v. Duval County School Board

408 So. 2d 1053, 2 Educ. L. Rep. 621, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21301

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1981 | Docket: 64587393

Published

SMITH, Jr., C. J., and THOMPSON, J., concur. . Section 682.13 provides, in pertinent part: —Vacating an award

Manatee Education Ass'n v. School Board of Manatee County

400 So. 2d 185, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20387

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1981 | Docket: 64583445

Published

as was the posture of Lake County, supra. Section 682.13(l)(c), Fla.Stat. (1979). Appellee bargained

South Carolina Insurance v. Gonzalez

386 So. 2d 829, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17318

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1980 | Docket: 64577655

Published

Subsequently, pursuant to the provisions of Section 682.13(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1979), the appellees

Simpson v. Robinson

376 So. 2d 415

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1979 | Docket: 1734230

Published

jointly. Robinson and Lundquist, pursuant to Section 682.13, Florida Statutes (1977), moved to vacate the

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Lowry ex rel. Lowry

360 So. 2d 439, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 22430

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1978 | Docket: 64565242

Published

Construction Co., 201 So.2d 242 (Fla.3d DCA 1967); Section 682.13, Florida Statutes (1975).

Gendron v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

245 So. 2d 914, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6966

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1971 | Docket: 64519573

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed, see F.S.A. § 682.13.

Moon-Gate Homes, Inc. v. Segal

240 So. 2d 161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1970 | Docket: 64516933

Published

grounds argued for reversal are insufficient. See § 682.13(2), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and Sydney Paper Co. v