No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arthur Debose
v.
State
v.
State
20-1594.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Apr 14, 2021.
Published
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed April 14, 2021.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1594
Lower Tribunal No. F11-13229B
________________
Arthur DeBose,
Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Appellee.
An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Miguel M. de la O, Judge.
Arthur DeBose, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest-
Turken, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.
State of Florida
Opinion filed April 14, 2021.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1594
Lower Tribunal No. F11-13229B
________________
Arthur DeBose,
Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Appellee.
An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Miguel M. de la O, Judge.
Arthur DeBose, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest-
Turken, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Tundidor v. State, 221 So. 3d 587, 605 (Fla. 2017)
(“[T]he error is harmless if the record conclusively shows that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence using a corrected scoresheet.”)
(citation omitted); Kablitz v. State, 979 So. 2d 969, 972 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
(Defendant “alleges errors in his scoresheet. However, as to these, we conclude that the state has shown that the same sentence would have been imposed had the corrections been made.”) (citing State v. Anderson, 905 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2005)).
[*2]