neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.2 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Willie SEALS
v.
STATE of Florida
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 91-0232.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 13, 1992.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Farmer, Letts, Polen.
Published
PER CURIAM.
We find no reversible error as to appellant’s several points regarding his conviction. However, we reverse appellant’s sentence because the trial court failed to enter a written statement of the reasons for its departure from the recommended guidelines sentence until approximately six (6) days after its oral pronouncement of those reasons. State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706, 709 (Fla.1991). See Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990). We remand for resentenc-ing with no possibility of departure from the guidelines. Owens v. State, 598 So.2d 64 (Fla.1992); Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990).
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART> and REMANDED.
LETTS, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.