Barry v. State, 626 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Barry v. State, 626 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Fannin v. State (fladistctapp, 2000-02-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Fannin v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Barry v. State, 626 So.2d 270 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (reversed October 29, 1993, and remanded for re-sentencing within guidelines), appeal after remand, Barry v. State, 654 So.2d 1229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (reversed and remanded for resentencing to single fifteen-year mandatory minimum with concurrent sentences for all other counts); see also Timonere v. State, 631 So.2d 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (reversed and remanded for re-sentencing within guidelines), appeal after remand, Timonere v. State, 666 So.2d 197 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (reversed repeated stacking of minimum mandatories, remanded for resent…
cited Cited "see" Miller v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Poulsen v. State, 610 So.2d 710 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), and Jenkins v. State, 626 So.2d 270 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
cited Cited "see" Lastinger v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jenkins v. State, 626 So.2d 270 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); see also, Williams v. State, 629 So.2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John Henry BARRY
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 92-00343.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct 29, 1993.
626 So. 2d 270
Richard J. Sanders, Gulfport, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
Altenbernd, Danahy, Parker.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his convictions and sentences arising out of a large-scale cocaine smuggling operation contending there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions, an erroneous denial of a motion to suppress, and an invalid departure sentence imposed without contemporaneous reasons. We find no error in the issues raised relating to his convictions. There is, however, reversible error in the trial court’s imposing a departure sentence without providing contemporaneous reasons for departure at the sentencing hearing. See Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1829 (Fla.1990), modified by State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991); see also Hall v. State, 598 So.2d 230 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Accordingly, we affirm his convictions but reverse his sentences and remand for resen-tencing within the guidelines.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.