Florida Statute 1.2 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title I
CONSTRUCTION OF STATUTES

Chapter 1
DEFINITIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 1.02

1.02 Legal time.—In all laws, statutes, orders, rules and regulations of this state, relating to the time of performance of any act by any officer or department of this state, whether in the legislative, executive or judicial branches, or relating to the time within which any rights shall accrue or determine, or within which any act shall or shall not be performed, by any person subject to the jurisdiction of this state, it shall be understood and intended that the said time shall be the United States standard time of the zone within which the act is to be performed or the right shall accrue or determine.

History.—s. 1, ch. 3916, 1889; RS 1307; GS 1739; s. 1, ch. 6938, 1915; RGS 2954; CGL 4681.

F.S. 1.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 1.02 on CourtListener

Amendments to 1.02

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 1.02

Total Results: 199

United States v. Irey

612 F.3d 1160, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15669

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 29, 2010 | Docket: 737

Cited 1837 times | Published

See Arthur W. Campbell, The Law of Sentencing § 1:2 (2009). The American tradition thus embraced four

Quality Foods De Centro America, S.A. And Duroparts De El Salvador, S.A. v. Latin American Agribusiness Development Corporation, S.A.

711 F.2d 989, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25132

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 8, 1983 | Docket: 956462

Cited 521 times | Published

bring this action under the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, 2, and the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15, 18, 19,

Joseph MacUba v. Matthew Deboer, Michael Youseff, Charlotte Commissioners, Individually and in Their Official Capacities

193 F.3d 1316, 15 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1181, 45 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1251, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 27986, 1999 WL 982404

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 29, 1999 | Docket: 238261

Cited 327 times | Published

Jan Winters. See Charlotte County (Fla.) Code § 1-2-80(H).9 Winters assigned Forgey the task of filling

Valley Drug Co. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

350 F.3d 1181, 2003 WL 22682603

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 14, 2003 | Docket: 599937

Cited 258 times | Published

one of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 2 , when it entered into settlement agreements

United States v. Teresita Sorrels v. NCL (Bahamas), LTD

796 F.3d 1275, 2015 A.M.C. 2525, 98 Fed. R. Serv. 81, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13541

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 4, 2015 | Docket: 2681467

Cited 128 times | Published

habitability, and maintenance purposes.” ASTM F1166-07 at § 1.2. The district court abused its discretion.

Sims v. State

754 So. 2d 657, 2000 WL 193226

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2000 | Docket: 1523509

Cited 128 times | Published

by the Governor under s. 922.06. Fla. S.B. 10-A, § 1-2 (2000). Governor Bush signed the bill on January

Head v. Medford

62 F.3d 351, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24150, 1995 WL 472369

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 25, 1995 | Docket: 317376

Cited 98 times | Published

process of law....” U.S. Const.Amend. XIV, § 1. 2 . The district court determined that

Armstrong v. Harris

773 So. 2d 7, 2000 WL 1260014

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2000 | Docket: 1291730

Cited 77 times | Published

Constitution: (1) proposal by Legislature, section 1; (2) revision commission, section 2; (3) initiative

Joseph Richard Redner v. Charles S. Dean, Sheriff of Citrus County, Florida, Robert A. Butterworth

29 F.3d 1495, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23252, 1994 WL 419484

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 26, 1994 | Docket: 167120

Cited 72 times | Published

County Adult Entertainment Ordinance”. Section 1-2. Authority. The Adult Entertainment Ordinance

United States v. Madera

528 F.3d 852, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 11078, 2008 WL 2151267

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 23, 2008 | Docket: 28603

Cited 57 times | Published

Constitution: 1) the Non-Delegation Doctrine, Art. I, § 1; 2) the ex post facto clause, Art. I, § 9, cl. 3;

21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1625, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23936c, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 294 Harry L. Hunt v. Hawthorne Associates, Inc., Eastern Air Lines Variable Benefit Retirement Plan for Pilots Trust Administrative Committee of the Eastern Airlines Variable Benefit Retirement Plan for Pilots

119 F.3d 888

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 2023562

Cited 51 times | Published

credited to the account of a participant. See § 1.2 ("Accrued Benefit"). An annuity unit is a unit

Thigpen v. Bibb County, Georgia

223 F.3d 1231

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 30, 2000 | Docket: 1072040

Cited 47 times | Published

of the laws." U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1. 2 Reeves v. Wilkes, Civ. Action

Taylor v. State

355 So. 2d 180

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1978 | Docket: 1714870

Cited 46 times | Published

without due process of law ..." U.S.Const. amend. XIV § 1 [2] "The right of the people to be secure in their

ITPE Pension Fund v. Roger Hall

334 F.3d 1011, 30 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1943, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12477, 2003 WL 21403477

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 19, 2003 | Docket: 76140

Cited 45 times | Published

provisions of this instrument.” R2-44, Ex. 2, Ex. A at § 1.02 (emphasis added). According to the Halls, unpaid

United States v. Anthony Chotas

968 F.2d 1193, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 18791, 1992 WL 181753

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 18, 1992 | Docket: 837839

Cited 45 times | Published

defendants. See U.S.S.G., Ch. 1, Pt. A, at § 1.2-1.3; United States v. Rolande-Gabriel,

Adams v. State

341 So. 2d 765

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1976 | Docket: 2461646

Cited 45 times | Published

1 at 63; and Fla.Laws 1868, Ch. 1637, Subch. 3, § 1, 2 at 63. [6] Fla.Laws 1892, Ch. 2377-94 at 773-76

Bush v. Holmes

919 So. 2d 392, 2006 WL 20584

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2006 | Docket: 1678633

Cited 44 times | Published

duty to provide education under article IX, section 1. 2. The Constitution Revision Commission The majority

United States v. Eugene Donald Schaltenbrand

930 F.2d 1554, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 9299, 1991 WL 63745

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 13, 1991 | Docket: 151349

Cited 41 times | Published

for whom action is to be taken,” id. § 1(2), and the “agent” is “[t]he one who is to act.”

Kendrick v. Everheart

390 So. 2d 53

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1980 | Docket: 92386

Cited 40 times | Published

either parent. NOTES [1] U.S.Const. Amend. XIV, § 1. [2] Art. I, § 2, Fla. Const. [3] Art. I, § 21, Fla

American Home Assur. v. NAT. RR CORP.

908 So. 2d 459, 2005 WL 1580639

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2005 | Docket: 1397399

Cited 39 times | Published

subsidiary or affiliated system companies of [CSX]." Id. § 1.2. In the indemnification provision, KUA specifically

State v. City of Orlando

170 So. 887, 126 Fla. 251, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1449

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1936 | Docket: 3264395

Cited 38 times | Published

provided for by Section 5108 C.G.L., Chapter 11854, Section 1, 2, Acts 1927, if no petition for rehearing has

Duty Free World v. Miami Perfume Junction

253 So. 3d 689

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2018 | Docket: 7619140

Cited 35 times | Published

certain others in equity. See, e.g., 1 Dobbs § 1.2, at 11; id., § 4.1(1), at 556; id.

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Gonzalez-Gorrondona

833 F. Supp. 1545, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5004, 1993 WL 401875

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1993 | Docket: 354774

Cited 34 times | Published

unfounded."); but see 1987 Fla. Laws 1685, ch. 245, § 1(2) (June 30, 1987) ("The Legislature further finds

Shotts v. OP Winter Haven, Inc.

86 So. 3d 456, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 665, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 2764, 2011 WL 5864830

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 2011 | Docket: 60307687

Cited 29 times | Published

for this agreement appear to be provided in section 1.2 of the Limitation of Liability. The benefit for

JCC, Inc. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

63 F.3d 1557, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26075, 1995 WL 514512

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 15, 1995 | Docket: 418795

Cited 29 times | Published

§ 4, 10 and § 1.2 of the Commission’s regulations, 17 C.F.R. § 1.2. As EDCO was acting as

DEPT. OF AGR. & CONSUMER SERV. v. Bonanno

568 So. 2d 24, 1990 WL 141444

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1990 | Docket: 1526662

Cited 29 times | Published

as a court within the meaning of article V, section 1.[2] 1A Nichols' The Law of Eminent Domain § 4.104

United States v. Madera

474 F. Supp. 2d 1257, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3029, 2007 WL 141283

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2007 | Docket: 35763

Cited 28 times | Published

Constitution: (1) the Non-Delegation Doctrine, Art. I, § 1; (2) the Ex Post Facto Clause, Art I, § 9, cl. 3; (3)

JORDAN CHAPEL FREEWILL BAPTIST CH. v. Dade County

334 So. 2d 661

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1976 | Docket: 1309624

Cited 28 times | Published

inapplicable. Dade County also maintains that Section 1.02 in its own Charter constitutes its controlling

Walton County v. Stop Beach Renourishment

998 So. 2d 1102, 2008 WL 4381126

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2008 | Docket: 2527289

Cited 27 times | Published

the easement." Restatement (Third) of Property § 1.2(1) (2000). More specifically, the littoral rights

APA Excelsior III L.P. v. Premiere Technologies, Inc.

476 F.3d 1261, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 2269, 2007 WL 286258

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 2, 2007 | Docket: 226607

Cited 26 times | Published

Merger [with Premiere] .... * * * SECTION 1.02 IRREVOCABLE PROXY. The Stockholder hereby irrevocably

Berry v. CSX Transp., Inc.

709 So. 2d 552, 1998 WL 85601

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1998 | Docket: 1682130

Cited 26 times | Published

scientific sophistication on the part of judges." Id. at § 1-2.3. "Whereas Frye require[s] judges to survey the

Armbrister v. Roland International Corp.

667 F. Supp. 802, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7642

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1987 | Docket: 2028919

Cited 26 times | Published

injury to the plaintiff. See 15A C.J.S. Conspiracy § 1(2) (1967); Renpak v. Oppenheimer, 104 So.2d 642, 646

Movie & Video World, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners

723 F. Supp. 695, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12310, 1989 WL 120556

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1989 | Docket: 1197703

Cited 25 times | Published

entertainment establishments. Rules of Construction of Section 1-2 of the Palm Beach County Code shall govern. F

Marriott Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County

383 So. 2d 662, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16695

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1980 | Docket: 1512405

Cited 25 times | Published

by ordinance. The Dade County, Florida, Charter § 1.02(A) provides: The Board shall ... decide which actions

Gfc v. Sg

686 So. 2d 1382, 1997 WL 24244

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1997 | Docket: 1259776

Cited 24 times | Published

crime in many jurisdictions. 2 C.J.S. Adultery § 1-2 (1972). Society was *1385 so scornful of bringing

Concord Florida, Inc. v. Lewin

341 So. 2d 242

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1976 | Docket: 1393617

Cited 24 times | Published

Code). The pertinent portion of said Code is Section 1.02(1) which provides that: "The provisions of this

City of Miami v. Keton

115 So. 2d 547

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1959 | Docket: 1750955

Cited 24 times | Published

must be accomplished in the manner provided by Section 1.02(b), Metropolitan Charter, and Section 16, Article

United States v. Mason

510 F. Supp. 2d 923, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37122, 2007 WL 1521515

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 22, 2007 | Docket: 2452545

Cited 21 times | Published

Constitution: (1) Non-delegation doctrine, Art. I, Section 1; (2) Ex Post Facto Clause, Art. I, Section 9, Clause

METROPOLITAN DADE CTY. BD. OF CTY. COMM'RS v. Rockmatt Corporation

231 So. 2d 41

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1970 | Docket: 1708529

Cited 21 times | Published

of such businesses was under subsection 12 of section 1.02(A) of the Dade County Home Rule Charter, conferring

Quirk v. Anthony

563 So. 2d 710, 1990 WL 52319

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1990 | Docket: 1682967

Cited 20 times | Published

Stat. (Supp. 1984) (corresponds to Ch. 84-41, § 1(2), Laws of Fla.). It is undisputed that Mr. Dignam

City of St. Petersburg v. Calbeck

114 So. 2d 316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1959 | Docket: 1277862

Cited 20 times | Published

surrounding circumstances. 27 C.J.S. Disorderly Conduct § 1(2). In 4 Fla.Jur. 597, Breach of the Peace and Related

State v. Aiuppa

298 So. 2d 391

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1974 | Docket: 1438950

Cited 19 times | Published

definition of what material is obscene found in § 1(2) of Ch. 73-120, Laws of Florida, 1973, is sufficient

Cable Holdings of Georgia, Inc., D/B/A Smyrna Cable Tv v. Home Video, Inc., Wometco Cable Tv of Georgia, Inc., and S.M. Landress

825 F.2d 1559, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11527

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 31, 1987 | Docket: 487355

Cited 18 times | Published

1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. § 1, 2). Moreover, Cable Holdings alleged that the merger

Jones v. State

658 So. 2d 122, 1995 WL 385753

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1995 | Docket: 1525134

Cited 17 times | Published

generally Bench Book for United States District Judges § 1.02-2 to -5 (3d ed. 1986); Randall B. Bateman, Federal

Gorss Motels, Inc. v. Safemark Systems, LP

931 F.3d 1094

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 26, 2019 | Docket: 15976843

Cited 16 times | Published

declaratory rulings. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2 (a) ("The Commission may ... issue

Cardenas v. State

867 So. 2d 384, 2004 WL 351171

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2004 | Docket: 1722639

Cited 15 times | Published

presumption of impairment to .08 percent. See ch. 93-124, § 1-2, 4, Laws of Fla. [8] DUI and DUBAL were originally

STATE, DEPT. OF COM., ETC. v. Matthews Corp.

358 So. 2d 256, 23 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 998

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1978 | Docket: 1311568

Cited 15 times | Published

rule was patterned essentially after 29 C.F.R. § 1.2(a) (1977), which in turn implements the Davis Bacon

Mark S. Mais v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc.

768 F.3d 1110, 61 Communications Reg. (P&F) 309, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 18554, 2014 WL 4802457

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 29, 2014 | Docket: 1392074

Cited 14 times | Published

express consent exception. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2(a) (“The Commission may, in accordance with section

Miller's Ale House, Inc. v. Boynton Carolina Ale House, Inc.

702 F.3d 1312, 105 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1345, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 26049, 2012 WL 6629202

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 20, 2012 | Docket: 1084512

Cited 14 times | Published

McCarthy on Trademarks & Unfair Competition § 1:2 (4th ed. 2012). On the other hand, it creates a

Jacksonville Newspaper Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Union No. 57 v. Florida Publishing Co.

340 F. Supp. 993, 80 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2286, 16 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 972, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14070

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1972 | Docket: 1003732

Cited 14 times | Published

reference. The present controversy centers around Section #1(2) of the written contract: 1(2). It is further

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Gibraltar Monetary Corp.

575 F.3d 1180, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 16598, 2009 WL 2150900

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 21, 2009 | Docket: 1544221

Cited 13 times | Published

should be held vicariously liable under 17 C.F.R. § 1.2 for Gibraltar Monetary Corporation, Inc.'s ("GMC")

Walker v. CASH REGISTER AUTO INS.

946 So. 2d 66, 2006 WL 3751489

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2006 | Docket: 1771761

Cited 13 times | Published

became effective July 1, 2002. See Ch. 2002-77, § 1-2, at 908-09, Laws of Fla. The primary purpose of

Hall v. State

752 So. 2d 575, 2000 WL 44045

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2000 | Docket: 1103195

Cited 12 times | Published

57.081, 57.085, Fla. Stat. (1999); ch. 96-106, § 1, 2, at 93-95. Quite importantly, these amendments

United States v. Campanella D'Angelo

819 F.2d 1062, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7861

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 22, 1987 | Docket: 107092

Cited 12 times | Published

insufficient to support a conviction under 18 U.S.C.App. § 1?02(a)(1). 3 He argues that the evidence

State v. City of Orlando

170 So. 887, 127 Fla. 280

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1936 | Docket: 3269764

Cited 12 times | Published

provided for by Section 5108 C.G.L., Chapter 11854, Section 1, 2, Acts 1927, if no petition for rehearing has

Maxwell Bldg. Corp. v. Euro Concepts, LLC

874 So. 2d 709, 2004 WL 1196895

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2004 | Docket: 1473659

Cited 11 times | Published

became effective July 1, 2002. See Ch.2002-77, § 1-2 at 908-09, Laws of Fla. The primary purpose of section

Shaktman v. State

529 So. 2d 711, 1988 WL 26257

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1988 | Docket: 2515793

Cited 11 times | Published

undetected. J. Carr, The Law of Electronic Surveillance § 1.2(b) (2d ed. 1987). "[E]lectronic surveillance is

Pinellas County v. Lake Padgett Pines

333 So. 2d 472

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1976 | Docket: 1687249

Cited 10 times | Published

373, enacted by the 1974 Legislature, Ch. 74-114, § 1(2), Laws of Florida, provided for creation of Regional

Payton Hlt. Care v. Est. of Campbell

497 So. 2d 1233

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1986 | Docket: 1239656

Cited 9 times | Published

relating to the operation of the Nursing Home." Section 1.2 of Article II provides that Southeastern's staff

White Construction Co. v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

633 F. Supp. 2d 1302, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29467, 2009 WL 961135

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2009 | Docket: 1266875

Cited 8 times | Published

Martin Marietta breached its implied duties. Section 1.2 of the MSA simply grants Martin Marietta the

O'Neal v. Fla. a & M University Ex Rel. Bd. of Trustees

989 So. 2d 6, 2008 WL 2276307

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2008 | Docket: 1665272

Cited 8 times | Published

in certain others in equity. See, e.g., 1 Dobbs § 1.2, at 11; id., § 4.1(1), at 556; id., § 4.1(3), at

Geffken v. Strickler

778 So. 2d 975, 2001 WL 81761

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2001 | Docket: 1290478

Cited 8 times | Published

57.081, 57.085, Fla. Stat. (1999); ch. 96-106, § 1, 2, at 93-95. The legislative history of these amendments

Gray v. State

742 So. 2d 805, 1999 WL 461922

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1999 | Docket: 470118

Cited 8 times | Published

[1] See Art. I, § 1; Art. II, § 1; Art. III, § 1. [2] Art. I, § 10, Fla. Const.; Art. I, § 9, Art.

Morley Music Co. v. Cafe Continental, Inc.

777 F. Supp. 1579, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16919, 1991 WL 247170

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1991 | Docket: 2112962

Cited 8 times | Published

derived. 1 Melville B. Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 1.02 at 1-30 (1991). 14. Acting on that authority, the

Mansur v. Eubanks

368 So. 2d 645

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1979 | Docket: 1389259

Cited 8 times | Published

immediately afterward, that it be securely closed. See § 1.2.10.11 of the National Fuel Code, adopted by § 17

Coral Lakes Community Ass'n v. Busey Bank, N.A.

30 So. 3d 579, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1799, 2010 WL 567251

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2010 | Docket: 1639454

Cited 7 times | Published

reasonably discoverable by the mortgagee. Ch. 2008-175, § 1-2, at 2034-35, Laws of Fla. Thus, instead of being

Hialeah Automotive, LLC v. Basulto

22 So. 3d 586, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 566, 2009 WL 187584

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2009 | Docket: 60267074

Cited 7 times | Published

coercion, or unconscionability.” 1 Domke, supra, § 1:2, at 1-6. The First District has explained: Although

Alachua County v. State

737 So. 2d 1065, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 212, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 803, 1999 WL 311324

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1999 | Docket: 1709611

Cited 7 times | Published

charge," Alachua County, Fla. Ordinance *1068 97-12 § 1.02(G) (Aug. 12, 1997), and the rental value of the

Feltman v. Board of County Commissioners of Metropolitan Dade County (In Re S.E.L. Maduro (Florida), Inc.)

205 B.R. 987, 37 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1048, 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 227, 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 182, 30 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 469

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Feb 25, 1997 | Docket: 2517585

Cited 7 times | Published

Escrow Account. Trustee's Exhibit C. Pursuant to section 1.2.2 of the APA, the monies deposited by I.T.O.

Stanley v. United States

574 F. Supp. 474, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12217

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1983 | Docket: 1480355

Cited 7 times | Published

liberties. L. Tribe, American Constitutional Law § 1-2, at 3 n. 7 (1978) (relying on 14 The Papers of Thomas

Cenac v. Florida State Bd. of Accountancy

399 So. 2d 1013, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19992

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1981 | Docket: 1167406

Cited 7 times | Published

violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, 2 (1975), as well as violation of appellant's right

Florida Board of Pharmacy v. Webb's City, Inc.

219 So. 2d 681, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2476

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1969 | Docket: 2467464

Cited 7 times | Published

decision of the trial court holding invalid Section 1(2) (f) of Chapter 67-521, Laws of Florida, which

State v. McInnes

153 So. 2d 854

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1963 | Docket: 1327798

Cited 7 times | Published

exceeding ten years. As amended Laws 1957, c. 57-254, § 1."[2] An analysis of the foregoing statute clearly reveals

Dade County v. American Re-Ins. Co.

467 So. 2d 414, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 922

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1985 | Docket: 1680561

Cited 6 times | Published

increased to twelve per cent per annum. See ch. 82-42, § 1-2, Laws of Fla. [5] Although the date the trial court

Loubna Elkaousi Mendoza v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security

851 F.3d 1348, 2017 WL 1208415, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 5739

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 3, 2017 | Docket: 4668176

Cited 5 times | Published

marriage. 8 C.F.R. § 204.2(a)(l)(ii); see 8 C.F.R. § 1.2 (defining “director” to include -district director)

Dennis v. Kline

120 So. 3d 11, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9614, 2013 WL 3014115

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 2013 | Docket: 60233880

Cited 5 times | Published

Trawick’s Redfearn Wills & Admin. in Florida, § 1.2 (2010-11 ed.)), rev. granted, 103 So.3d 138 (Fla

Dzikowski v. United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Cummings)

381 B.R. 810, 100 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7072, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94079, 2007 WL 4800642

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2007 | Docket: 1864110

Cited 5 times | Published

claim from and after the petition claim. (CP 204 § 1.2). The IRS and Tim Givens Building & Remodeling,

Najjar v. Reno

97 F. Supp. 2d 1329, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8185, 2000 WL 726358

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 31, 2000 | Docket: 2517687

Cited 5 times | Published

enumerated in section 1(2) of this Act." ISA §§ 1, 22, 64 Stat. 987, 1006, 1008 (1950). Section 1(2)(C) of the

Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Hagan

750 So. 2d 83, 1999 WL 1082472

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1999 | Docket: 1736665

Cited 5 times | Published

2d 1200 (1994); 38 Am.Jur.2d, Fright and Shock, § 1, 2.; Comment Restatement of Torts (Second) § 436A

Perkins v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVICES

452 So. 2d 1007

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1984 | Docket: 474429

Cited 5 times | Published

necessary to implement the workfare pilot project" and § 1(2)(h) authorizes imposition of sanctions for non-compliance

Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Curtiss

327 So. 2d 82, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14644

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1976 | Docket: 1364179

Cited 5 times | Published

extinguished by the settlement. ..." Ch. 75-108, § 1(2)(b), (d) (emphasis added). Under § 1(4)(b), enforcement

Thomas v. City of West Palm Beach

299 So. 2d 11

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1974 | Docket: 1499197

Cited 5 times | Published

the Plumbing Code (chapter 36). (Ord.No. 983-67, § 1, 2-13-67.)" "Sec. 27-22. Same Authority of building

Willingham v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

377 F. Supp. 1254, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7912

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1974 | Docket: 2213671

Cited 5 times | Published

00; for diabetes, in § 9.08 and for arthritis, in § 1.02. We note that epilepsy may be satisfactorily demonstrated

Apthorp v. Detzner

162 So. 3d 236, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2461, 2015 WL 733322

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2015 | Docket: 60247455

Cited 4 times | Published

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice, § 1:2 (2015 ed.) (acknowledging the appellate court’s

Timoney v. City of Miami Civilian Investigative Panel

990 So. 2d 614, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13452, 2008 WL 4058028

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2008 | Docket: 1688245

Cited 4 times | Published

of police and the public; ... (Ord. No. 12188, § 1, 2-14-02) [emphasis added]. [3] Sec. 11.5-31. Procedures

Miller v. Hayman

766 So. 2d 1116, 2000 WL 1175682

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2000 | Docket: 1697850

Cited 4 times | Published

Am. Jur.2d, Abatement, Survival, and Revival, § 1. [2] Our holding is limited to costs awarded under

Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Barnett Bank of Marion County, NA

524 So. 2d 439, 5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 879, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 774, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1158, 1988 WL 23644

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1988 | Docket: 1701557

Cited 4 times | Published

Law of Secured Transactions in Personal Property, § 1.02 at 53 (1980). [12] U.C.C. 1-102(2)(c) (§ 671.102(2)(c)

Carr v. Crosby Builders Supply Company, Inc.

283 So. 2d 60, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6588

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1973 | Docket: 1490325

Cited 4 times | Published

Stat. 1971, repealed Fla.Laws 1972, ch. 72-1 § 1. [2] Fla. Standard Jury Instr. in Civil Cases, Instr

Rudolph F. Matzer & Associates, Inc. v. Warner

348 F. Supp. 991, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11666

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1972 | Docket: 1856819

Cited 4 times | Published

the meaning of applicable regulations. 41 C.F.R. § 1-2.404-2(a) (1969). The Court of Appeals held, further

Compucredit Holdings Corp. v. Akanthos Capital Management, LLC

661 F.3d 1312, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 22662, 2011 WL 5419663

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 10, 2011 | Docket: 1022121

Cited 3 times | Published

pleadings is affirmed. AFFIRMED. NOTES [1] 15 U.S.C. § 1. [2] We recite the facts in the light most favorable

Red-Eyed Jack, Inc. v. City of Daytona Beach

165 F. Supp. 2d 1322, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21588, 2001 WL 1044897

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2001 | Docket: 2385575

Cited 3 times | Published

calendar days from the date of submittal." Art. 3 § 1.2 provides the following general procedure for the

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Sidoti

178 F.3d 1132, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13610, 1999 WL 407022

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 21, 1999 | Docket: 64065934

Cited 3 times | Published

§ 4, and CFTC Rule 1.2, codified at 17 C.F.R. § 1.2; 2. Wuensch individually with liability for Trinity’s

Chemical Bank v. First Trust of New York (In Re Southeast Banking Corp.)

156 F.3d 1114

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 28, 1998 | Docket: 74755

Cited 3 times | Published

creditors); see also 1 David G. Epstein et ah, Bankruptcy § 1-2, at 3, § 1-7, at 12 (West 1992) (describing these

Pacheco De Perez v. AT&T Co.

139 F.3d 1368, 1998 WL 207890

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 29, 1998 | Docket: 422506

Cited 3 times | Published

8 Ga.Code. Ann. § 1-2-10 (1990). Defendants argue that under § 1-2-10, plaintiffs cannot proceed

Hunt v. Hawthorne Associates, Inc.

119 F.3d 888, 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1625, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 20761, 1997 WL 437161

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 766056

Cited 3 times | Published

units” credited to the account of a participant. See § 1.2 ("Accrued Benefit”). An annuity unit is a unit of

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Palm Beach Mall, LLC

177 So. 3d 37, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14520, 2015 WL 5712341

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2015 | Docket: 60251187

Cited 2 times | Published

Count II, Wells Fargo argued that, pursuant to section 1.2(a) of the Guaranty, Simon was liable for PBM’s

Holderbaum v. Carnival Corp.

87 F. Supp. 3d 1345, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182319, 2015 WL 728362

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2015 | Docket: 64300568

Cited 2 times | Published

(See Edmond Depo., D.E. 82-1 at 193-95, 216.) Section 1.2.3.2 of the IMO’s International Safety Management

In Re Fontainebleau Las Vegas Contract Litigation

716 F. Supp. 2d 1237, 2010 WL 2164183

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 28, 2010 | Docket: 1929991

Cited 2 times | Published

and conditions hereof." (Cr. Agr. § 2.1(c)). Section 1.2 states that "hereof . . . shall refer to this

Seminole County v. City of Winter Springs

935 So. 2d 521, 2006 WL 1459775

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2006 | Docket: 1671163

Cited 2 times | Published

of the Charter. That section would provide: Section 1.2. Rural Boundary and Rural Area a. There is hereby

State v. Rendon

832 So. 2d 141, 2002 WL 31422852

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2002 | Docket: 1336172

Cited 2 times | Published

protection of the laws." U.S. Const. amend. IV, § 1. [2] Title I of the ADA provides that "No covered

In Re Yates Development, Inc.

258 B.R. 36, 45 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 980, 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 159, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 1641, 37 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 74, 2000 WL 33128671

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2000 | Docket: 1496942

Cited 2 times | Published

of common stock of Debtor. *41 (Doc. 66.) 32. Section 1.02 of the Plan defines an Allowed Claim with respect

BD., CTY. COM'RS, SARASOTA v. Webber

658 So. 2d 1069, 1995 WL 385684

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1995 | Docket: 439132

Cited 2 times | Published

construction and excavation may not occur. Id. at § 1.2. The Board, however, has the discretion to grant

PMI Investment, Inc. v. Rose (In Re Prime Motor Inns, Inc.)

167 B.R. 261

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: May 12, 1994 | Docket: 1604099

Cited 2 times | Published

set forth in the PMI Loan. (See PMI Exh. 6 at Section 1.2.) Under the PMI Loan, one method by which the

Tavormina v. Timmeny

561 So. 2d 681, 1990 WL 62895

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1990 | Docket: 1481008

Cited 2 times | Published

compensation and severance payments contemplated by section 1.2, quoted above. Timmeny moved for summary judgment

Newman v. Eli Witt Co. (In Re Eli Witt Co.)

20 B.R. 778, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 4130

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 14, 1982 | Docket: 1425753

Cited 2 times | Published

This conclusion is based on the following: Section 1.02 of the Plan, page 3-A, sets forth the classes

M & B Printing Equipment Corp. v. Atlantic National Bank (In Re M & B Printing Equipment Corp.)

18 B.R. 411, 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 2429

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Dec 10, 1981 | Docket: 1734386

Cited 2 times | Published

32 Am.Jur.2d, Factors and Commission Merchants, § 1, 2, 17-23. "The law regulating the transactions of

City of Jacksonville Beach v. Albury

291 So. 2d 82

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1973 | Docket: 1505595

Cited 2 times | Published

after the effective date of this charter... . "Section 1.02. Territory of Consolidated Government. The consolidated

Frates v. Nichols

140 So. 2d 321

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1962 | Docket: 427606

Cited 2 times | Published

Barrett & Seago, Partners and Partnerships, Ch. 9, § 1.2. The appellant must be considered as having "voluntarily"

Brechner v. INC. VIL. OF LAKE SUCCESS

25 Misc. 2d 920, 208 N.Y.S.2d 365

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1960 | Docket: 295141

Cited 2 times | Published

services, restaurants serving the general public. Section 1.2 of the ordinance established "performance standards"

City of Miami v. Airbnb

260 So. 3d 478

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2018 | Docket: 8346786

Cited 1 times | Published

rental or lease basis for limited periods of time.” § 1.2 (emphasis added). Generally speaking, therefore

High Point, LLLP v. National Park Service

850 F.3d 1185, 2017 WL 908200, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4080

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 8, 2017 | Docket: 4615524

Cited 1 times | Published

Park Service later responded that under 36 C.F.R. § 1.2(a)(3), ownership of the marshlands makes no difference

Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners v. an Accountable Miami-Dade

208 So. 3d 724, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14069

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2016 | Docket: 4423581

Cited 1 times | Published

comply with the publication requirements of Section 1.02(B) of the Charter. . This Court takes judicial

Estate of Michelle Evette McCall v. United States

134 So. 3d 894, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 104, 2014 WL 959180, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 933

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2014 | Docket: 402403

Cited 1 times | Published

guarantee in article II, section 3 and article V, section 1; (2) the right to trial by jury under article I

Estate of Michelle Evette McCall v. United States

642 F.3d 944, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10705, 2011 WL 2084069

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 27, 2011 | Docket: 1778405

Cited 1 times | Published

separation of powers in Article II, § 8 and Article V, § 1; (2) the right to trial by jury under Article I, §

Danner Construction Co., Inc. v. Hillsborough Cty.

608 F.3d 809, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 11803, 2010 WL 2301117

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 9, 2010 | Docket: 534159

Cited 1 times | Published

that the county’s ordinance conflicts with Section 1.2 The majority is also correct in noting that

Manorcare Health Services, Inc. v. Stiehl

22 So. 3d 96, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11756, 2009 WL 2568264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2009 | Docket: 1063068

Cited 1 times | Published

for this agreement appear to be provided in section 1.2 of the Limitation of Liability. The benefit for

Payne v. City of Miami

913 So. 2d 1260, 2005 WL 3054154

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2005 | Docket: 1331449

Cited 1 times | Published

effective on Tuesday, July 6. See Miami City Code § 1-2 (stating rules for computation of time). The fact

USA Interactive v. Dow Lohnes & Albertson, P.L.L.C.

328 F. Supp. 2d 1294, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15608, 2004 WL 1769263

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2004 | Docket: 92564

Cited 1 times | Published

full interest in Jovon to a proposed trust.[51] Section 1.2(B) of the shareholder agreement provides that

Schvaneveldt v. MASTEC NORTH AMERICA, INC.

306 F. Supp. 2d 1177, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2242, 2004 WL 305594

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2004 | Docket: 2389687

Cited 1 times | Published

other half in the form of Defendant's stock. Section 1.2(d) of the Agreement treats Defendant's stock

In Re Harloff

247 B.R. 523, 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 164, 43 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1834, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 378, 2000 WL 390416

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2000 | Docket: 1826781

Cited 1 times | Published

Agent provides: *527 Pursuant to Article I, section 1.02, the Textron Claim is defined as follows: The

State v. Saylor

625 So. 2d 907, 1993 WL 407931

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1993 | Docket: 474091

Cited 1 times | Published

enacted by the legislature in 1967. Ch. 67-308, § 1(2)(c), Laws of Fla. Thus, whatever right section 3

F/S Airlease II, Inc. v. Air Florida, Inc. (In Re Air Florida, Inc.)

44 B.R. 798, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 4517

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Nov 30, 1984 | Docket: 1818995

Cited 1 times | Published

further that, in light of the requirement under Section 1.02 of the Master Lease that title to a replacement

Anderson Engines, Inc. v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.

531 F. Supp. 1155, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12029

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1982 | Docket: 2237275

Cited 1 times | Published

and Magneto, Inc. in violation of Sherman Act Section 1. (2) Plaintiff was terminated as an ASD pursuant

Smyl, Inc. v. Gerstein

364 F. Supp. 1302, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11899

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1973 | Docket: 66089809

Cited 1 times | Published

at the definition of obscenity contained in Section 1(2) of the state law: Material is obscene if considered

State Ex Rel. Davis v. A. C. L. R. R. Co.

140 So. 817, 103 Fla. 1204

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1932 | Docket: 3266264

Cited 1 times | Published

in question stopped under the provisions of Section 1 (2) of the act; (c) that this Court acquired jurisdiction

State ex rel. Davis v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

103 Fla. 1204, 140 So. 817

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1932 | Docket: 60189090

Cited 1 times | Published

in question stopped under the provisions of Section 1 (2) of the act; (c) that this Court acquired jurisdiction

Gustavo Bojorquez, etc. v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2025 | Docket: 70463023

Published

of such certificate or permit.” Ch. 2012-247, § 1(2), Laws of Fla. And it said that, subject to PTC

Village of Palmetto Bay, Florida v. Miami-Dade County, Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2024 | Docket: 69435416

Published

determined that the Bridge Resolution violated section 1.02 of the Miami-Dade Charter, which provides that

SAVE CALUSA INC. v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2023 | Docket: 66777661

Published

merely directory.” Miami-Dade County, Fla., Code § 1-2(h) (2021); see also Fla. Tallow Corp. v. Bryan

Kojo Khayrallah v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2022 | Docket: 65346486

Published

action. Cf. 1 W. LAFAVE, SUBSTANTIVE CRIMINAL LAW § 1.2(c) (2d ed. 2003) (observing that “many crimes are

United States v. Matthew William Wheeler

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 21, 2021 | Docket: 60665563

Published

Lowenfels, Bromberg & Lowenfels on Securities Fraud § 1:2 (2d ed.). USCA11 Case: 17-15003 Date Filed:

James Clay v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 16, 2021 | Docket: 59735195

Published

regulations” in certain circumstances. 25 C.F.R. § 1.2. But of course, the Settlement Act is a statute—not

BB INLET PROPERTY, LLC v. 920 N. STANLEY PARTNERS, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2020 | Docket: 16955849

Published

of another.’” Id. (RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF PROP. § 1.2 cmt. a. (AM. LAW INST. 2000)). Upland owners

Darnell Perkins Washington v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2019 | Docket: 15916401

Published

establishing entitlement to immunity. See Ch. 2017-72, § 1-2, Laws of Fla. Now, once a defendant makes a prima

Antoinette Tynes v. State of Florida

262 So. 3d 851

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 2018 | Docket: 8462706

Published

overcome a defendant’s claim of immunity. Ch. 2017-72, § 1-2, Laws of Fla. Now, after the defendant makes a prime

City of Miami v. Airbnb

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2018 | Docket: 8382968

Published

rental or lease basis for limited periods of time.” § 1.2 (emphasis added). Generally speaking, therefore

Luria v. ADP, Inc. (In re Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortg. Corp.)

593 B.R. 862

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2018 | Docket: 65790985

Published

Id. at 1301. Doc. 157, Ex. C (MSA Annex C § 1.2). Doc. 157, Ex. C (MSA at Annex C, § 1). This

MSPA Claims 1, LLC v. Infinity Auto Ins. Co.

344 F. Supp. 3d 1377

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2018 | Docket: 64321470

Published

the assignee must be approved by the Client" (id. § 1.2), here referring to FHCP. B. Plaintiff Lacks Standing

RONALD HIGHT, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA

253 So. 3d 1137

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2018 | Docket: 7619144

Published

the bill into law on June 9, 2017. Ch. 2017-72, § 1-2, Laws of Fla. The amendment shifted the burden

Bailey v. State

246 So. 3d 555

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2018 | Docket: 6862846

Published

Legislature amended section 776.032(4). See Ch. 2017-72, § 1-2, Laws of Fla. As amended, the statute now provides

Downs v. Ledoux-Nottingham

219 So. 3d 244, 2017 WL 2200229, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7179

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2017 | Docket: 6066361

Published

1 . U.S. Const., Art. IV, § 1. 2 . Pub. L. 96-611, §§ 6-10, 96 Stat.

Samantha Helfrich, individually and etc. v. City of Jacksonville and the Board of etc.

204 So. 3d 39, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14746

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2016 | Docket: 4468662

Published

Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice, § 1:2 (2016 ed.) (acknowledging the appellate court’s

Samantha Helfrich, individually and etc. v. City of Jacksonville and the Board of etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2016 | Docket: 4468912

Published

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice, § 1:2 (2015 ed.) (acknowledging the appellate court’s

Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners v. an Accountable Miami-Dade

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2016 | Docket: 4423920

Published

comply with the publication requirements of Section 1.02(B) of the Charter. 4 This Court takes judicial

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Pamela Ciccone, etc.

190 So. 3d 1028, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 118, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 630, 2016 WL 1163361

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2016 | Docket: 3047814

Published

the case individually.” Newberg on Class Actions § 1:2 (5th ed.); see also 67A C.J.S. Parties § 23 (“The

Gogoleva v. Soffer

187 So. 3d 268, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2230, 2016 WL 626131

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2016 | Docket: 3036707

Published

C6-APV, on November 22, 2012 (“Accident”). Section 1.2 of the Release also included a provision that

Rosa and Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development v. Target Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 4, 2016 | Docket: 3025600

Published

movement in the history of the United States.” Id. at § 1(2). 2 So significant to the Civil

PMI, by and through its special servicer, Orix Capital Markets, LLC v. Palm Beach Mall, LLC, Simon Property Group, LP., a/k/a Simon Property Group, L.P., d/b/a DeBartolo Realty Partnership, LTD. and Simon Palm Beach, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2015 | Docket: 2863188

Published

Count II, Wells Fargo argued that, pursuant to section 1.2(a) of the Guaranty, Simon was liable for PBM’s

Duty Free Americas, Inc. v. The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 7, 2015 | Docket: 2899897

Published

violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1; (2) conspiracy to monopolize, in violation of § 2

Ronald Colbert v. United States

785 F.3d 1384, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 7511, 2015 WL 2119080

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 7, 2015 | Docket: 2655214

Published

Department of Personnel Management.... (AFA § 1.2). The Government argues that, in light of the need

8330 Tokyo Valentino, LLC v. City of Miami

990 F. Supp. 2d 1327, 2013 WL 6869393, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182178

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2013 | Docket: 65996627

Published

“Specified Anatomical Areas” as herein defined in Section 1.2 of this Code. Such establishment may or may not

Miller's Ale House, Inc. v. Boynton Carolina Ale House, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 20, 2012 | Docket: 2903716

Published

McCarthy on Trademarks & Unfair Competition § 1:2 (4th ed. 2012). On the other hand, it creates a

Odulene Dormescar v. U.S. Attorney General

690 F.3d 1258, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 17158

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 15, 2012 | Docket: 462137

Published

§ 1101 (a)(20); accord 8 C.F.R. § 1.2. 2 . This area of the law is plagued

Odulene Dormescar v. U.S. Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 15, 2012 | Docket: 2904197

Published

laws.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(20); accord 8 C.F.R. § 1.2. 2 This area of the law is plagued

CompuCredit Holdings Corporation v. Akanthos Capital Management, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 10, 2011 | Docket: 2905475

Published

issued in 2005. 1 15 U.S.C. § 1. 2 We recite the facts in the light most

Smith v. Williams

819 F. Supp. 2d 1264, 52 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1045, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109173, 2011 WL 4459184

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2011 | Docket: 2016079

Published

Administrator is defined as the Employer (id. at § 1.2), which in turn is defined as Orion Bancorp, Inc

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Sep 21, 2011 | Docket: 3256730

Published

2011.See s. 2, Ch. 2011-109, Laws of Fla. 3 Section 1(2)(a), Ch. 2011-109, Laws of Fla. 4 See s. 1, Ch

Basile v. Aldrich

70 So. 3d 682, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13243, 2011 WL 3696309

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2011 | Docket: 2352242

Published

Trawick’s Redfeam Wills and Administration in Florida, § 1.2 (2010-11 ed.), “[t]he Legislature created the Florida

American Civil Liberties Union of Florida Inc. v. Dixie County Florida

797 F. Supp. 2d 1280, 2011 WL 2784238

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2011 | Docket: 2019053

Published

monument must submit an application to the Board. Id. § 1.2. As a condition for approval, Commissioners may

Estate of Michelle Evette McCall v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 27, 2011 | Docket: 1357517

Published

separation of powers in Article II, § 3 and Article V, § 1; (2) the

Benny Jacobs v. Tempur-Pedic International, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 2, 2010 | Docket: 2906754

Published

be illegal.” 15 U.S.C. § 1. 2 distributors and by engaging

United States v. William Irey

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 29, 2010 | Docket: 2907044

Published

See Arthur W. Campbell, The Law of Sentencing § 1:2 (2009). The American tradition thus embraced four

Danner Construction Co., Inc. v. Hillsborough Cty.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 9, 2010 | Docket: 2907266

Published

that the county’s ordinance conflicts with Section 1.2 The majority is also correct in noting that

Danner Construction Co., Inc. v. Hillsborough Cty.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 9, 2010 | Docket: 470419

Published

that the county’s ordinance conflicts with Section 1.2 The majority is also correct in noting that

Citizens for Smart Growth v. Peters

716 F. Supp. 2d 1215, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54284, 2010 WL 1817332

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 3, 2010 | Docket: 2403903

Published

historical, current, and planned growth." Id. at Section 1.2, "Need for the Action," AR 7250. FDOT referred

Keene v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

22 So. 3d 665, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16130, 2009 WL 3485968

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2009 | Docket: 1639885

Published

Section 163.3202, Florida Statutes....” Dev. Code § 1.02. The Development Code further provides: It is the

Scottsdale Insurance v. Lock Towns Community Mental Health Center, Inc.

442 F. Supp. 2d 1287, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57041, 2006 WL 2349176

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2006 | Docket: 2229306

Published

the standpoint of the insured." CGL Policy, Section 1.2 Section II, titled "Who is an Insured," defines

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jul 11, 2001 | Docket: 3258854

Published

with procedures set forth in Chapter 2001-01, section 1(2), Laws of Florida. 3. When showing autopsy photographs

William T. Thigpen, Jr. v. Larry Justice

216 F.3d 1314

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 7, 2000 | Docket: 395936

Published

” U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1. 2 protection claims constitute

Macuba v. County of Charlotte, FL

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 29, 1999 | Docket: 395533

Published

Jan Winters. See Charlotte County (Fla.) Code § 1-2- 80(11).9 Winters assigned Forgey the task of filling

Macuba v. County of Charlotte, FL

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 29, 1999 | Docket: 395540

Published

Jan Winters. See Charlotte County (Fla.) Code § 1-2-80(11).9 Winters assigned Forgey the task of filling

CFTR v. Trinity Financial Group

178 F.3d 1132

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 21, 1999 | Docket: 2037450

Published

§ 4, and CFTC Rule 1.2, codified at 17 C.F.R. § 1.2; 2. Wuensch individually with liability

CFTR v. Trinity Financial Group

178 F.3d 1132

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 21, 1999 | Docket: 395370

Published

§ 4, and CFTC Rule 1.2, codified at 17 C.F.R. § 1.2; 2. Wuensch individually with liability

Chemical Bank v. First Trust

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 28, 1998 | Docket: 394827

Published

see also 1 David G. Epstein et al., Bankruptcy § 1-2, at 3, § 1-7, at 12 (West 1992) (describing these

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jul 14, 1998 | Docket: 3255099

Published

"State Requirements for Educational Facilities." Section 1.2(46) of the publication defines "Impact or Service

De Perez v. AT&T Company

139 F.3d 1368

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 29, 1998 | Docket: 422523

Published

this state. Ga. Code. Ann. § 1-2-10 (1990). Defendants argue that under § 1-2-10, plaintiffs cannot proceed

Gillyard v. State

704 So. 2d 165, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13934, 1997 WL 777699

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1997 | Docket: 64778261

Published

United States District Court Judges, vol. 1 section 1.02(C) (Federal Judicial Center, 4th ed.1996).

Hunt v. Hawthorn Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 74098

Published

units” credited to the account of a participant. See § 1.2 (“Accrued Benefit”). An annuity unit is a unit of

United States v. Doe

957 F. Supp. 1244, 1997 WL 117683

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1997 | Docket: 66011704

Published

recommendation of the Pardon Attorney. According to Section 1-2.108 of the United States Attorneys Manual, “[t]he

Florida College of Business v. Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges & Schools

954 F. Supp. 256, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20423, 1996 WL 775111

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1996 | Docket: 973855

Published

cannot show that it satisfies the requirements of Section 1-2-100(a).[1] FLORIDA began its Cosmetology Program

Doty v. City of Tampa

947 F. Supp. 468, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17681, 1996 WL 683649

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1996 | Docket: 66008992

Published

substantive due process, U.S. Const, amend. XIV § 1, (2) a denial of Doty’s “day in court,” U.S. Const

Capeletti Bros., Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County

776 F. Supp. 1561, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19346, 1991 WL 220606

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1991 | Docket: 2210402

Published

to be available to participate in the project. § 1.02. These suggestions are then forwarded to a three

Rush v. Department of State

748 F. Supp. 1548, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13629, 1990 WL 157769

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1990 | Docket: 1792478

Published

classifying the documents. D. Section 1.2, Classification Authority Section 1.2 of Executive Order 12356 enumerates

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jun 1, 1989 | Docket: 3257156

Published

the total millage shall not exceed 1 mill." Section 1(2)(b), Art. V, Ch. 87-498, Laws of Florida, states:

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jan 20, 1987 | Docket: 3256281

Published

) Section 1(5), Ch. 81-405, Laws of Florida. Section 1(2) of the act recognizes that "the property comprising

Florida, Department of Business Regulation v. United States Department of the Interior

768 F.2d 1248

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 16, 1985 | Docket: 66209074

Published

in the best interest of the Indians.” 25 C.F.R. § 1.2. On January 16, 1981, the Department took title

Heidig v. Heckler

608 F. Supp. 135, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23595

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1985 | Docket: 66165349

Published

purview of 20 C.F.R. Section 404 Appendix 1 section 1.02 and 10.04. Those sections state: 1.02 Active

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Mar 3, 1977 | Docket: 3255626

Published

In 1976 the city adopted a home rule charter. Section 1.02, Art. I of the new charter provides that all

In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor

239 So. 2d 247, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2480

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1970 | Docket: 64516522

Published

election 1970. Laws of Florida (1970) Ch. 70-80, § 1(2), requires the resignation of the holder of an *250office

Metropolitan Dade County Board of County Commissioners v. Rockmatt Corp.

231 So. 2d 41, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6884

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1970 | Docket: 64513046

Published

of such businesses was under subsection 12 of section 1.02(A) of the Dade County Home Rule Charter, conferring

State v. Williams

227 So. 2d 331, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5090

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1969 | Docket: 64511798

Published

as authorized by Florida law. (Ord.No. C-2010, § 1, 2-18-64)” The similar state statute provides: “F

Haslett v. State

225 So. 2d 186, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5408

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1969 | Docket: 64510692

Published

require or authorize him to collect public money”. Section 1(2) of the 1957 Act, now F.S. § 219.01(2), F.S.A

Crossroads Lounge, Inc. v. City of Miami

195 So. 2d 232, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5332

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1967 | Docket: 64499819

Published

variance from Ordinance No. 6871, Article XXVII, Section 1 (2) to permit relocation of liquor license from

State ex rel. Lehman v. Buchanan

190 So. 2d 594, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4930

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1966 | Docket: 64498224

Published

requirements of title and notice, as set out in § 1.02(b) of the Metro Charter.2 See 62 C.J.S. Municipal

Gibson v. Wright

179 So. 2d 245, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3748

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1965 | Docket: 64494423

Published

* * * As stated in [8] Am.Jur., Boundaries, Section 1.02, page 819: ‘The object of a resurvey is to furnish

Sanibel-Captiva Taxpayers' Ass'n v. County of Lee

132 So. 2d 334, 1961 Fla. LEXIS 2014

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1961 | Docket: 60198116

Published

does no more than implement Chapter 159 and Section 1.02(E) of the resolution, which was authorized by

State ex rel. Ervin v. Mellick

68 So. 2d 824, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1800

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1953 | Docket: 64484939

Published

the provisions of the Ordinances of the City.” Section 1.02, Code, City of Lake Wales-. (Emphasis supplied

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Yarbrough

57 Fla. 101

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1909 | Docket: 60406306

Published

(3rd ed.) § 17, 71; Joyce on Law of Nuisances, § 1, 2, 368; Graves v. Shattuck, 35 N. H. 257, 69 Am.

Florida Savings Bank & Real Estate Exchange v. Smith

21 Fla. 258

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1885 | Docket: 60403026

Published

Hicks & Bro.; description of property, parts of section, 1, 2, 9, Brooklyn, valuation, 800, 20.00 aid.” Neither