Annotations, Discussions, Cases:
Cases Citing Statute 1.02
Total Results: 199
612 F.3d 1160, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15669
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 29, 2010 | Docket: 737
Cited 1837 times | Published
See Arthur W. Campbell, The Law of Sentencing § 1:2 (2009). The American tradition thus embraced four
711 F.2d 989, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25132
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 8, 1983 | Docket: 956462
Cited 521 times | Published
bring this action under the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, 2, and the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15, 18, 19,
350 F.3d 1181, 2003 WL 22682603
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 14, 2003 | Docket: 599937
Cited 258 times | Published
one of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 2 , when it entered into settlement agreements
754 So. 2d 657, 2000 WL 193226
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2000 | Docket: 1523509
Cited 128 times | Published
by the Governor under s. 922.06. Fla. S.B. 10-A, § 1-2 (2000). Governor Bush signed the bill on January
773 So. 2d 7, 2000 WL 1260014
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2000 | Docket: 1291730
Cited 77 times | Published
Constitution: (1) proposal by Legislature, section 1; (2) revision commission, section 2; (3) initiative
119 F.3d 888
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 2023562
Cited 51 times | Published
...y drop a defendant from the case without obtaining a Rule 21 order if the defendant has not responded to the original complaint with an answer. See generally 3 Moore's Federal Practice, §§ 15.10, 15.11 (3d ed.1997); 4 Moore's Federal Practice, § 21.02[b] (3d ed.1997) (discussing the interrelationship of Rules 15 and 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure)....
223 F.3d 1231
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 30, 2000 | Docket: 1072040
Cited 47 times | Published
of the laws." U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1. 2 Reeves v. Wilkes, Civ. Action
355 So. 2d 180
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1978 | Docket: 1714870
Cited 46 times | Published
without due process of law ..." U.S.Const. amend. XIV § 1 [2] "The right of the people to be secure in their
334 F.3d 1011, 30 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1943, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12477, 2003 WL 21403477
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 19, 2003 | Docket: 76140
Cited 45 times | Published
...Our decision in Powhatan concerned the general rule, that unpaid employer
contributions are not assets of an ERISA plan, and we had no occasion to consider in that case
the effect of contrary plan language, which, as we have stated supra, is the exception to the rule.
6
A at § 1.02 (emph asis added)....
...According to the H alls, unpaid contributions,
because they are unpaid, are not yet “held” or “acquired” by the Fund, and
therefor e canno t be assets o f the fun d.
We cannot accept the full extent of the Halls’ interpretation of § 1.02....
...Dictionary 24 (7th ed. 1999). Thus, even property which has not yet formally been
transferred to the Plan’s physical control, but which the Plan owns or controls in a
contractu al sense b y virtue o f the Ag reemen t, has been “acquired ” by the P lan.
Section 1.02 is not conclusive of the Plan’s treatment of unpaid employer
contributions.
The F und arg ues that th e Agre ement es tablishes b y its langu age that u npaid
employer contributions are assets of the Fund....
341 So. 2d 765
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1976 | Docket: 2461646
Cited 45 times | Published
1 at 63; and Fla.Laws 1868, Ch. 1637, Subch. 3, § 1, 2 at 63. [6] Fla.Laws 1892, Ch. 2377-94 at 773-76
919 So. 2d 392, 2006 WL 20584
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2006 | Docket: 1678633
Cited 44 times | Published
duty to provide education under article IX, section 1. 2. The Constitution Revision Commission The majority
390 So. 2d 53
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1980 | Docket: 92386
Cited 40 times | Published
either parent. NOTES [1] U.S.Const. Amend. XIV, § 1. [2] Art. I, § 2, Fla. Const. [3] Art. I, § 21, Fla
908 So. 2d 459, 2005 WL 1580639
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2005 | Docket: 1397399
Cited 39 times | Published
subsidiary or affiliated system companies of [CSX]." Id. § 1.2. In the indemnification provision, KUA specifically
170 So. 887, 126 Fla. 251, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1449
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1936 | Docket: 3264395
Cited 38 times | Published
provided for by Section 5108 C.G.L., Chapter 11854, Section 1, 2, Acts 1927, if no petition for rehearing has
253 So. 3d 689
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2018 | Docket: 7619140
Cited 35 times | Published
certain others in equity. See, e.g., 1 Dobbs § 1.2, at 11; id., § 4.1(1), at 556; id.
568 So. 2d 24, 1990 WL 141444
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1990 | Docket: 1526662
Cited 29 times | Published
as a court within the meaning of article V, section 1.[2] 1A Nichols' The Law of Eminent Domain § 4.104
334 So. 2d 661
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1976 | Docket: 1309624
Cited 28 times | Published
...not enacted in compliance with Florida Statute 166.041. Dade County contends that Section 166.041 provides a minimum standard to be followed by municipalities when enacting ordinances and it is therefore inapplicable. Dade County also maintains that Section 1.02 in its own Charter constitutes its controlling procedural requirements....
998 So. 2d 1102, 2008 WL 4381126
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2008 | Docket: 2527289
Cited 27 times | Published
...[10] We recognize that the littoral rights to access, use, and view are different from so-called "true easements" in that littoral rights are incidental to littoral ownership and do not require a separate act of creation. See Jon W. Bruce, The Law of Easements and Licenses in Land § 1.02 (1995)....
709 So. 2d 552, 1998 WL 85601
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1998 | Docket: 1682130
Cited 26 times | Published
scientific sophistication on the part of judges." Id. at § 1-2.3. "Whereas Frye require[s] judges to survey the
476 F.3d 1261, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 2269, 2007 WL 286258
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 2, 2007 | Docket: 226607
Cited 26 times | Published
.... . the Stockholder shall
vote (or cause to be voted) the Shares and the Other
Securities [in Xpedite] in favor of the Merger [with
Premiere]. . . .
***
SECTION 1.02 IRREVOCABLE PROXY....
667 F. Supp. 802, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7642
District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1987 | Docket: 2028919
Cited 26 times | Published
injury to the plaintiff. See 15A C.J.S. Conspiracy § 1(2) (1967); Renpak v. Oppenheimer, 104 So.2d 642, 646
383 So. 2d 662, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16695
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1980 | Docket: 1512405
Cited 25 times | Published
...Town of Monticello, 159 Fla. 134, 31 So.2d 905 (1947). To a large extent, the language of the charter of the municipality or, as in this case, the county, determines what action may be taken by resolution and what must be done by ordinance. The Dade County, Florida, Charter § 1.02(A) provides: The Board shall ......
115 So. 2d 547
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1959 | Docket: 1750955
Cited 24 times | Published
...re charter. In conclusion, appellant points out that it does not question the power of Dade County under the metropolitan charter to repeal any part of the city charter, but it contends that such repeal must be accomplished in the manner provided by Section 1.02(b), Metropolitan Charter, and Section 16, Article III of the Constitution, none of which has been complied with....
686 So. 2d 1382, 1997 WL 24244
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1997 | Docket: 1259776
Cited 24 times | Published
crime in many jurisdictions. 2 C.J.S. Adultery § 1-2 (1972). Society was *1385 so scornful of bringing
341 So. 2d 242
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1976 | Docket: 1393617
Cited 24 times | Published
...aforementioned instruction amounted to a "negligence per se" charge. The Miami Beach Fire Code is one paragraph which adopts the Dade County Fire Prevention and Safety Code (hereinafter referred to as the Code). The pertinent portion of said Code is Section 1.02(1) which provides that: "The provisions of this Code shall apply equally to new and existing conditions except that existing conditions not in strict compliance with the terms of this Code shall be permitted to continue where the excepti...
231 So. 2d 41
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1970 | Docket: 1708529
Cited 21 times | Published
...d for in the county's ordinance, and averred that the action of the Commission was denial of the special permits which the plaintiff had requested. See footnote 2. The defendants averred their regulation of such businesses was under subsection 12 of section 1.02(A) of the Dade County Home Rule Charter, conferring authority to "Establish, co-ordinate, and enforce zoning and such regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public," and subsection 16 of that section of the charter, empow...
114 So. 2d 316
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1959 | Docket: 1277862
Cited 20 times | Published
surrounding circumstances. 27 C.J.S. Disorderly Conduct § 1(2). In 4 Fla.Jur. 597, Breach of the Peace and Related
563 So. 2d 710, 1990 WL 52319
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1990 | Docket: 1682967
Cited 20 times | Published
Stat. (Supp. 1984) (corresponds to Ch. 84-41, § 1(2), Laws of Fla.). It is undisputed that Mr. Dignam
298 So. 2d 391
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1974 | Docket: 1438950
Cited 19 times | Published
definition of what material is obscene found in § 1(2) of Ch. 73-120, Laws of Florida, 1973, is sufficient
825 F.2d 1559, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11527
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 31, 1987 | Docket: 487355
Cited 18 times | Published
1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. § 1, 2). Moreover, Cable Holdings alleged that the merger
658 So. 2d 122, 1995 WL 385753
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1995 | Docket: 1525134
Cited 17 times | Published
...The trial bench needs a concise outline to assist it in: (1) addressing the necessary issues, (2) announcing the necessary conclusions of law with supporting findings of fact, and (3) providing the defendant the appropriate advice. See generally Bench Book for United States District Judges § 1.02-2 to -5 (3d ed....
...Caution should be used in denying the right to represent one's self on the defendant's failure to pass an informal bar exam. These questions may, however, be helpful in convincing a defendant that self-representation could be a mistake. Additional questions can be located in the Bench Book for United States District Judges, § 1.02-2 to -5 (3d ed....
931 F.3d 1094
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 26, 2019 | Docket: 15976843
Cited 16 times | Published
declaratory rulings. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2 (a) ("The Commission may ... issue
358 So. 2d 256, 23 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 998
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1978 | Docket: 1311568
Cited 15 times | Published
rule was patterned essentially after 29 C.F.R. § 1.2(a) (1977), which in turn implements the Davis Bacon
867 So. 2d 384, 2004 WL 351171
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2004 | Docket: 1722639
Cited 15 times | Published
presumption of impairment to .08 percent. See ch. 93-124, § 1-2, 4, Laws of Fla. [8] DUI and DUBAL were originally
946 So. 2d 66, 2006 WL 3751489
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2006 | Docket: 1771761
Cited 13 times | Published
became effective July 1, 2002. See Ch. 2002-77, § 1-2, at 908-09, Laws of Fla. The primary purpose of
170 So. 887, 127 Fla. 280
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1936 | Docket: 3269764
Cited 12 times | Published
provided for by Section 5108 C.G.L., Chapter 11854, Section 1, 2, Acts 1927, if no petition for rehearing has
819 F.2d 1062, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7861
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 22, 1987 | Docket: 107092
Cited 12 times | Published
insufficient to support a conviction under 18 U.S.C.App. § 1?02(a)(1). 3 He argues that the evidence
752 So. 2d 575, 2000 WL 44045
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2000 | Docket: 1103195
Cited 12 times | Published
57.081, 57.085, Fla. Stat. (1999); ch. 96-106, § 1, 2, at 93-95. Quite importantly, these amendments
529 So. 2d 711, 1988 WL 26257
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1988 | Docket: 2515793
Cited 11 times | Published
undetected. J. Carr, The Law of Electronic Surveillance § 1.2(b) (2d ed. 1987). "[E]lectronic surveillance is
874 So. 2d 709, 2004 WL 1196895
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2004 | Docket: 1473659
Cited 11 times | Published
became effective July 1, 2002. See Ch.2002-77, § 1-2 at 908-09, Laws of Fla. The primary purpose of section
333 So. 2d 472
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1976 | Docket: 1687249
Cited 10 times | Published
373, enacted by the 1974 Legislature, Ch. 74-114, § 1(2), Laws of Florida, provided for creation of Regional
497 So. 2d 1233
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1986 | Docket: 1239656
Cited 9 times | Published
relating to the operation of the Nursing Home." Section 1.2 of Article II provides that Southeastern's staff
742 So. 2d 805, 1999 WL 461922
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1999 | Docket: 470118
Cited 8 times | Published
[1] See Art. I, § 1; Art. II, § 1; Art. III, § 1. [2] Art. I, § 10, Fla. Const.; Art. I, § 9, Art.
777 F. Supp. 1579, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16919, 1991 WL 247170
District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1991 | Docket: 2112962
Cited 8 times | Published
...limited time to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries. It is from this clause that the federal authority to enact copyright and patent legislation is derived. 1 Melville B. Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 1.02 at 1-30 (1991)....
368 So. 2d 645
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1979 | Docket: 1389259
Cited 8 times | Published
immediately afterward, that it be securely closed. See § 1.2.10.11 of the National Fuel Code, adopted by § 17
989 So. 2d 6, 2008 WL 2276307
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2008 | Docket: 1665272
Cited 8 times | Published
in certain others in equity. See, e.g., 1 Dobbs § 1.2, at 11; id., § 4.1(1), at 556; id., § 4.1(3), at
778 So. 2d 975, 2001 WL 81761
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2001 | Docket: 1290478
Cited 8 times | Published
57.081, 57.085, Fla. Stat. (1999); ch. 96-106, § 1, 2, at 93-95. The legislative history of these amendments
574 F. Supp. 474, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12217
District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1983 | Docket: 1480355
Cited 7 times | Published
liberties. L. Tribe, American Constitutional Law § 1-2, at 3 n. 7 (1978) (relying on 14 The Papers of Thomas
399 So. 2d 1013, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19992
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1981 | Docket: 1167406
Cited 7 times | Published
violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, 2 (1975), as well as violation of appellant's right
153 So. 2d 854
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1963 | Docket: 1327798
Cited 7 times | Published
exceeding ten years. As amended Laws 1957, c. 57-254, § 1."[2] An analysis of the foregoing statute clearly reveals
737 So. 2d 1065, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 212, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 803, 1999 WL 311324
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1999 | Docket: 1709611
Cited 7 times | Published
...ed by electric utilities within the county rights-of-way." Thus, Alachua County essentially concedes its argument by failing to contest that there is no nexus between its alleged "reasonable rental charge," Alachua County, Fla. Ordinance *1068 97-12 § 1.02(G) (Aug....
219 So. 2d 681, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2476
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1969 | Docket: 2467464
Cited 7 times | Published
decision of the trial court holding invalid Section 1(2) (f) of Chapter 67-521, Laws of Florida, which
467 So. 2d 414, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 922
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1985 | Docket: 1680561
Cited 6 times | Published
increased to twelve per cent per annum. See ch. 82-42, § 1-2, Laws of Fla. [5] Although the date the trial court
377 F. Supp. 1254, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7912
District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1974 | Docket: 2213671
Cited 5 times | Published
...[20] Record at 16. [21] Record at 15. [22] Record at 13. [23] 20 C.F.R. Subpart P, App. at 323-38 (1973). The criteria for establishing a mental impairment appear in § 12.00 of the appendix; for epilepsy, in § 11.00; for diabetes, in § 9.08 and for arthritis, in § 1.02....
452 So. 2d 1007
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1984 | Docket: 474429
Cited 5 times | Published
necessary to implement the workfare pilot project" and § 1(2)(h) authorizes imposition of sanctions for non-compliance
299 So. 2d 11
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1974 | Docket: 1499197
Cited 5 times | Published
the Plumbing Code (chapter 36). (Ord.No. 983-67, § 1, 2-13-67.)" "Sec. 27-22. Same Authority of building
327 So. 2d 82, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14644
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1976 | Docket: 1364179
Cited 5 times | Published
extinguished by the settlement. ..." Ch. 75-108, § 1(2)(b), (d) (emphasis added). Under § 1(4)(b), enforcement
750 So. 2d 83, 1999 WL 1082472
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1999 | Docket: 1736665
Cited 5 times | Published
2d 1200 (1994); 38 Am.Jur.2d, Fright and Shock, § 1, 2.; Comment Restatement of Torts (Second) § 436A
348 F. Supp. 991, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11666
District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1972 | Docket: 1856819
Cited 4 times | Published
the meaning of applicable regulations. 41 C.F.R. § 1-2.404-2(a) (1969). The Court of Appeals held, further
524 So. 2d 439, 5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 879, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 774, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1158, 1988 WL 23644
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1988 | Docket: 1701557
Cited 4 times | Published
...417, 206 A.2d 49 (1965); White and Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 22-5 (2d ed. 1980). [10] See Nat'l Surety Co. v. State Nat'l Bank of Frankfort, 454 S.W.2d 354 (Ky. 1970). [11] See McAtee v. U.S. Fidelity & Guar. Co., 401 F. Supp. 11 (N.D.Fla. 1975); Williams, 1 Florida Law of Secured Transactions in Personal Property, § 1.02 at 53 (1980)....
283 So. 2d 60, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6588
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1973 | Docket: 1490325
Cited 4 times | Published
Stat. 1971, repealed Fla.Laws 1972, ch. 72-1 § 1. [2] Fla. Standard Jury Instr. in Civil Cases, Instr
766 So. 2d 1116, 2000 WL 1175682
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2000 | Docket: 1697850
Cited 4 times | Published
Am. Jur.2d, Abatement, Survival, and Revival, § 1. [2] Our holding is limited to costs awarded under
156 F.3d 1114
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 28, 1998 | Docket: 74755
Cited 3 times | Published
creditors); see also 1 David G. Epstein et ah, Bankruptcy § 1-2, at 3, § 1-7, at 12 (West 1992) (describing these
119 F.3d 888, 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1625, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 20761, 1997 WL 437161
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 766056
Cited 3 times | Published
...y drop a defendant from the case without obtaining
a Rule 21 order if the defendant has not responded to the original complaint with an answer. See
generally 3 Moore's Federal Practice, §§ 15.10, 15.11 (3d ed.1997); 4 Moore's Federal Practice,
§ 21.02[5][b] (3d ed.1997) (discussing the interrelationship of Rules 15 and 21 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure)....
139 F.3d 1368, 1998 WL 207890
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 29, 1998 | Docket: 422506
Cited 3 times | Published
8 Ga.Code. Ann. § 1-2-10 (1990). Defendants argue that under § 1-2-10, plaintiffs cannot proceed
25 Misc. 2d 920, 208 N.Y.S.2d 365
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1960 | Docket: 295141
Cited 2 times | Published
services, restaurants serving the general public. Section 1.2 of the ordinance established "performance standards"
832 So. 2d 141, 2002 WL 31422852
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2002 | Docket: 1336172
Cited 2 times | Published
protection of the laws." U.S. Const. amend. IV, § 1. [2] Title I of the ADA provides that "No covered
291 So. 2d 82
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1973 | Docket: 1505595
Cited 2 times | Published
...he properties (of whatever nature), rights, capacities, privileges, powers, franchises and immunities, and be subject to all of the liabilities, obligations and duties of the former governments from and after the effective date of this charter... . "Section 1.02....
716 F. Supp. 2d 1237, 2010 WL 2164183
District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 28, 2010 | Docket: 1929991
Cited 2 times | Published
and conditions hereof." (Cr. Agr. § 2.1(c)). Section 1.2 states that "hereof . . . shall refer to this
935 So. 2d 521, 2006 WL 1459775
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2006 | Docket: 1671163
Cited 2 times | Published
of the Charter. That section would provide: Section 1.2. Rural Boundary and Rural Area a. There is hereby
561 So. 2d 681, 1990 WL 62895
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1990 | Docket: 1481008
Cited 2 times | Published
compensation and severance payments contemplated by section 1.2, quoted above. Timmeny moved for summary judgment
20 B.R. 778, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 4130
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 14, 1982 | Docket: 1425753
Cited 2 times | Published
...Considering the foregoing, this Court is satisfied that Newman was a "terminated member" under the Plan and because disability benefits under the Plan were available only to "active members", Newman is not entitled to the relief he seeks. This conclusion is based on the following: Section 1.02 of the Plan, page 3-A, sets forth the classes of members under it. According to § 1.02(a), "active members" are those who are "in service" and who have not reached [their] Normal Retirement Date." "Service" is defined in § 1.02(a), page 3, and in § 1.01(A)(a), page 3-2, as "employment as an employee" with Eli Witt....
...Because the Plaintiff has not worked for the company in more than six years and because he is now only 53 years of age, the Plaintiff is clearly not an "active member" under the Plan. Instead, the Plaintiff is a "terminated member" under the Plan. § 1.02(b) defines a "terminated member" as a former active member who is not in service, who is entitled to non-forfeitable benefits under the Plan, and who has not reached his normal [or early] retirement dates....
167 B.R. 261
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: May 12, 1994 | Docket: 1604099
Cited 2 times | Published
set forth in the PMI Loan. (See PMI Exh. 6 at Section 1.2.) Under the PMI Loan, one method by which the
658 So. 2d 1069, 1995 WL 385684
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1995 | Docket: 439132
Cited 2 times | Published
construction and excavation may not occur. Id. at § 1.2. The Board, however, has the discretion to grant
258 B.R. 36, 45 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 980, 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 159, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 1641, 37 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 74, 2000 WL 33128671
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2000 | Docket: 1496942
Cited 2 times | Published
...Class 2 Claims-Allowed Secured Claims-This class consists of the claim of Wisne. III. Class 3 Claims-Allowed Unsecured Claims-This class consists of Old Kings' unliquidated, unsecured claim. IV. Class 4 Interests-This class consists of interests of holders of common stock of Debtor. *41 (Doc. 66.) 32. Section 1.02 of the Plan defines an Allowed Claim with respect to any class as a claim: (i) that has been allowed by a Final Order, (ii) that (x) either is scheduled, other than a Claim that is scheduled as disputed, contingent or unliquidated or (y)...
...ates and defines. Old Kings points out that because the claim is contingent and unliquidated and because Debtor has appealed the Court's Order Overruling Objection to Old King's Amended Proof of Claim, the claim is not an allowed claim as defined by Section 1.02 of the plan....
18 B.R. 411, 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 2429
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Dec 10, 1981 | Docket: 1734386
Cited 2 times | Published
32 Am.Jur.2d, Factors and Commission Merchants, § 1, 2, 17-23. "The law regulating the transactions of
140 So. 2d 321
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1962 | Docket: 427606
Cited 2 times | Published
Barrett & Seago, Partners and Partnerships, Ch. 9, § 1.2. The appellant must be considered as having "voluntarily"
208 So. 3d 724, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14069
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2016 | Docket: 4423581
Cited 1 times | Published
comply with the publication requirements of Section 1.02(B) of the Charter. . This Court takes judicial
364 F. Supp. 1302, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11899
District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1973 | Docket: 66089809
Cited 1 times | Published
at the definition of obscenity contained in Section 1(2) of the state law: Material is obscene if considered
625 So. 2d 907, 1993 WL 407931
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1993 | Docket: 474091
Cited 1 times | Published
enacted by the legislature in 1967. Ch. 67-308, § 1(2)(c), Laws of Fla. Thus, whatever right section 3
44 B.R. 798, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 4517
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Nov 30, 1984 | Docket: 1818995
Cited 1 times | Published
...in a contest between Swig and a state law attachment creditor that levies on Engine 093 and Swig, the attaching creditor's claim to title would have priority over Swig's claim of title. E. Transfer of Ownership of Engine 093 28. Pursuant to Section 11.02 of the Master Lease, Air Florida was required to promptly notify FSA in writing that Engine 929 had been destroyed and to "replace such Engine as soon as reasonably possible" by duly conveying to the owner of the destroyed engine (Swig) title to a replacement engine free and clear of all liens....
...d at the time (the existence of which we need not address here), Air Florida would have been entitled to retain the insurance proceeds it received with respect to Engine 929, but even then only if it "shall have fully performed the terms of Section 11.02," and in particular, conveyed a replacement engine to Swig....
...Air Florida's duty to convey title to a replacement engine for Engine 929 is a duty to sell goods to Swig in exchange for valuable consideration (the insurance proceeds received by Air Florida and the other rights generally of Air Florida under the User Lease). 31. The Court holds that Sections 11.02 and 12.03(B) of the Master Lease clearly evidence the general intent of the parties that Air Florida must convey title to a replacement engine as quickly as possible when a leased engine is destroyed and that if Air Florida promptly notifies FSA...
...r to the commencement on July 3, 1984 of Air Florida's Chapter 11 case and that in any event Air Florida is estopped by its conduct from asserting that title was not so transferred. 32. The Court holds further that, in light of the requirement under Section 1.02 of the Master Lease that title to a replacement engine be transferred free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and in light of the fact that Lockheed Finance Corporation ("Lockheed") is a record lienholder and Heleasco is a record le...
...1½ years and that it ought to be deemed to have transferred title to it to Swig. However, the Court holds that when Engine 880 was damaged, it did not suffer an "Event of Loss" as defined in Section 1.12 of the Master Lease and as used in Section 11.02 thereof, and therefore Section 11.02 with respect to replacing engines did not apply....
913 So. 2d 1260, 2005 WL 3054154
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2005 | Docket: 1331449
Cited 1 times | Published
effective on Tuesday, July 6. See Miami City Code § 1-2 (stating rules for computation of time). The fact
247 B.R. 523, 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 164, 43 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1834, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 378, 2000 WL 390416
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2000 | Docket: 1826781
Cited 1 times | Published
...In support of this proposition the Disbursing Agent relies on the Order of Confirmation of the Joint Plan which, according to the Disbursing Agent, operates as a complete bar of any and all claims of Textron. The particular provisions of the Joint Plan relied on by the Disbursing Agent provides: *527 Pursuant to Article I, section 1.02, the Textron Claim is defined as follows: The RH Class 9 Claim and the RHP Class 5 Claim of Textron against each of Roger Harloff and Harloff Packing, as joint and several obligors, under the Textron Loan documents, which Claim is (I) in...
140 So. 817, 103 Fla. 1204
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1932 | Docket: 3266264
Cited 1 times | Published
in question stopped under the provisions of Section 1 (2) of the act; (c) that this Court acquired jurisdiction
103 Fla. 1204, 140 So. 817
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1932 | Docket: 60189090
Cited 1 times | Published
in question stopped under the provisions of Section 1 (2) of the act; (c) that this Court acquired jurisdiction
531 F. Supp. 1155, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12029
District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1982 | Docket: 2237275
Cited 1 times | Published
and Magneto, Inc. in violation of Sherman Act Section 1. (2) Plaintiff was terminated as an ASD pursuant
260 So. 3d 478
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2018 | Docket: 8346786
Cited 1 times | Published
rental or lease basis for limited periods of time.” § 1.2 (emphasis added). Generally speaking, therefore
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2015 | Docket: 2863188
Published
Count II, Wells Fargo argued that, pursuant to section 1.2(a) of the Guaranty, Simon was liable for PBM’s
227 So. 2d 331, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5090
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1969 | Docket: 64511798
Published
as authorized by Florida law. (Ord.No. C-2010, § 1, 2-18-64)” The similar state statute provides: “F
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 28, 1998 | Docket: 394827
Published
see also 1 David G. Epstein et al., Bankruptcy § 1-2, at 3, § 1-7, at 12 (West 1992) (describing these
Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Sep 21, 2011 | Docket: 3256730
Published
2011.See s. 2, Ch. 2011-109, Laws of Fla. 3 Section 1(2)(a), Ch. 2011-109, Laws of Fla. 4 See s. 1, Ch
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2016 | Docket: 4423920
Published
comply with the publication requirements of Section 1.02(B) of the Charter. 4 This Court takes judicial
239 So. 2d 247, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2480
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1970 | Docket: 64516522
Published
election 1970. Laws of Florida (1970) Ch. 70-80, § 1(2), requires the resignation of the holder of an *250office
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2022 | Docket: 65346486
Published
action. Cf. 1 W. LAFAVE, SUBSTANTIVE CRIMINAL LAW § 1.2(c) (2d ed. 2003) (observing that “many crimes are
190 So. 2d 594, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4930
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1966 | Docket: 64498224
Published
requirements of title and notice, as set out in § 1.02(b) of the Metro Charter.2 See 62 C.J.S. Municipal
204 So. 3d 39, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14746
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2016 | Docket: 4468662
Published
Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice, § 1:2 (2016 ed.) (acknowledging the appellate court’s
22 So. 3d 665, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16130, 2009 WL 3485968
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2009 | Docket: 1639885
Published
...enforced to regulate the various land use categories in the Plan. Specifically, the Development Code provides: "This Land Development Code is enacted pursuant to the requirements and authority of Section 163.3202, Florida Statutes. . . ." Dev. Code § 1.02....
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2016 | Docket: 4468912
Published
Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice, § 1:2 (2015 ed.) (acknowledging the appellate court’s
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 29, 1999 | Docket: 395533
Published
Jan Winters. See Charlotte County (Fla.) Code § 1-2- 80(11).9 Winters assigned Forgey the task of filling
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 29, 1999 | Docket: 395540
Published
Jan Winters. See Charlotte County (Fla.) Code § 1-2-80(11).9 Winters assigned Forgey the task of filling
776 F. Supp. 1561, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19346, 1991 WL 220606
District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1991 | Docket: 2210402
Published
...On each individual construction project, the department must also suggest what types of race-conscious measures, if any, should be utilized on the project in light of the number and types of Black-owned firms likely to be available to participate in the project. § 1.02....
179 So. 2d 245, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3748
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1965 | Docket: 64494423
Published
* * * As stated in [8] Am.Jur., Boundaries, Section 1.02, page 819: ‘The object of a resurvey is to furnish
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 21, 2021 | Docket: 60665563
Published
Lowenfels, Bromberg & Lowenfels on Securities Fraud § 1:2 (2d ed.). USCA11 Case: 17-15003 Date Filed:
344 F. Supp. 3d 1377
District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2018 | Docket: 64321470
Published
the assignee must be approved by the Client" (id. § 1.2), here referring to FHCP. B. Plaintiff Lacks Standing
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 10, 2011 | Docket: 2905475
Published
issued in 2005. 1 15 U.S.C. § 1. 2 We recite the facts in the light most
593 B.R. 862
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2018 | Docket: 65790985
Published
Id. at 1301. Doc. 157, Ex. C (MSA Annex C § 1.2). Doc. 157, Ex. C (MSA at Annex C, § 1). This
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 27, 2011 | Docket: 1357517
Published
separation of powers in Article II, § 3 and Article V, § 1; (2) the
246 So. 3d 555
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2018 | Docket: 6862846
Published
Legislature amended section 776.032(4). See Ch. 2017-72, § 1-2, Laws of Fla. As amended, the statute now provides
Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Mar 3, 1977 | Docket: 3255626
Published
In 1976 the city adopted a home rule charter. Section 1.02, Art. I of the new charter provides that all
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 16, 2021 | Docket: 59735195
Published
regulations” in certain circumstances. 25 C.F.R. § 1.2. But of course, the Settlement Act is a statute—not
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2020 | Docket: 16955849
Published
of another.’” Id. (RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF PROP. § 1.2 cmt. a. (AM. LAW INST. 2000)). Upland owners
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 9, 2010 | Docket: 2907266
Published
that the county’s ordinance conflicts with Section 1.2 The majority is also correct in noting that
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 9, 2010 | Docket: 470419
Published
that the county’s ordinance conflicts with Section 1.2 The majority is also correct in noting that
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2025 | Docket: 70463023
Published
of such certificate or permit.” Ch. 2012-247, § 1(2), Laws of Fla. And it said that, subject to PTC
178 F.3d 1132
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 21, 1999 | Docket: 2037450
Published
§ 4, and CFTC Rule 1.2, codified at 17 C.F.R. § 1.2; 2. Wuensch individually with liability
178 F.3d 1132
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 21, 1999 | Docket: 395370
Published
§ 4, and CFTC Rule 1.2, codified at 17 C.F.R. § 1.2; 2. Wuensch individually with liability
Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jun 1, 1989 | Docket: 3257156
Published
the total millage shall not exceed 1 mill." Section 1(2)(b), Art. V, Ch. 87-498, Laws of Florida, states:
225 So. 2d 186, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5408
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1969 | Docket: 64510692
Published
require or authorize him to collect public money”. Section 1(2) of the 1957 Act, now F.S. § 219.01(2), F.S.A
216 F.3d 1314
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 7, 2000 | Docket: 395936
Published
” U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1. 2 protection claims constitute
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 29, 2010 | Docket: 2907044
Published
See Arthur W. Campbell, The Law of Sentencing § 1:2 (2009). The American tradition thus embraced four
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2019 | Docket: 15916401
Published
establishing entitlement to immunity. See Ch. 2017-72, § 1-2, Laws of Fla. Now, once a defendant makes a prima
797 F. Supp. 2d 1280, 2011 WL 2784238
District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2011 | Docket: 2019053
Published
monument must submit an application to the Board. Id. § 1.2. As a condition for approval, Commissioners may
Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jul 14, 1998 | Docket: 3255099
Published
"State Requirements for Educational Facilities." Section 1.2(46) of the publication defines "Impact or Service
132 So. 2d 334, 1961 Fla. LEXIS 2014
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1961 | Docket: 60198116
Published
does no more than implement Chapter 159 and Section 1.02(E) of the resolution, which was authorized by
Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jul 11, 2001 | Docket: 3258854
Published
with procedures set forth in Chapter 2001-01, section 1(2), Laws of Florida. 3. When showing autopsy photographs
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 4, 2016 | Docket: 3025600
Published
movement in the history of the United States.” Id. at § 1(2). 2 So significant to the Civil
Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jan 20, 1987 | Docket: 3256281
Published
) Section 1(5), Ch. 81-405, Laws of Florida. Section 1(2) of the act recognizes that "the property comprising
57 Fla. 101
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1909 | Docket: 60406306
Published
(3rd ed.) § 17, 71; Joyce on Law of Nuisances, § 1, 2, 368; Graves v. Shattuck, 35 N. H. 257, 69 Am.
21 Fla. 258
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1885 | Docket: 60403026
Published
Hicks & Bro.; description of property, parts of section, 1, 2, 9, Brooklyn, valuation, 800, 20.00 aid.” Neither
195 So. 2d 232, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5332
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1967 | Docket: 64499819
Published
variance from Ordinance No. 6871, Article XXVII, Section 1 (2) to permit relocation of liquor license from
957 F. Supp. 1244, 1997 WL 117683
District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1997 | Docket: 66011704
Published
recommendation of the Pardon Attorney. According to Section 1-2.108 of the United States Attorneys Manual, “[t]he
231 So. 2d 41, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6884
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1970 | Docket: 64513046
Published
of such businesses was under subsection 12 of section 1.02(A) of the Dade County Home Rule Charter, conferring
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2023 | Docket: 66777661
Published
...“Parent” is statutorily defined as “the mother, a man presumed to be the father,
a man legally determined to be the father, a man who has been adjudicated to be the father by a
court of competent jurisdiction, a man who has acknowledged his paternity under applicable law,
or an adoptive mother or father.” 4 Id. § 101.024(a) (West 2019)....
...e was not presumed to be
D.D.’s father, he had not been legally determined to be the father, he had not been adjudicated to
be D.D.’s father, and he did not acknowledge his paternity under applicable law. See id.
§ 101.024(a)....
...paternity”), 160.302(a) (West 2022) (setting forth requirements for valid acknowledgment of
paternity); see also id. § 160.312(a)(1) (West 2022) (requiring vital statistics unit to prescribe forms
for acknowledgment of paternity). Appellant does not argue that Sections 101.024 and 107.013 of
5
The record indicates that during the first nine months of the case, the trial court conducted the adversary
hearing, a status hearing, and an initial permanency hearing....
...he argue that due process mandates greater protection than those statutes provide.
We hold that the trial court did not deprive Appellant of a right to court-appointed counsel
and, therefore, did not deprive Appellant of procedural due process. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN.
§§ 101.024, 107.013(a)(1), (3), (4)....
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2018 | Docket: 8382968
Published
rental or lease basis for limited periods of time.” § 1.2 (emphasis added). Generally speaking, therefore
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2024 | Docket: 69435416
Published
determined that the Bridge Resolution violated section 1.02 of the Miami-Dade Charter, which provides that
262 So. 3d 851
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 2018 | Docket: 8462706
Published
overcome a defendant’s claim of immunity. Ch. 2017-72, § 1-2, Laws of Fla. Now, after the defendant makes a prime
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 20, 2012 | Docket: 2903716
Published
McCarthy on Trademarks & Unfair Competition § 1:2 (4th ed. 2012). On the other hand, it creates a
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 2, 2010 | Docket: 2906754
Published
be illegal.” 15 U.S.C. § 1. 2 distributors and by engaging
68 So. 2d 824, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1800
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1953 | Docket: 64484939
Published
the provisions of the Ordinances of the City.” Section 1.02, Code, City of Lake Wales-. (Emphasis supplied
253 So. 3d 1137
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2018 | Docket: 7619144
Published
the bill into law on June 9, 2017. Ch. 2017-72, § 1-2, Laws of Fla. The amendment shifted the burden
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 7, 2015 | Docket: 2899897
Published
violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1; (2) conspiracy to monopolize, in violation of § 2
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 74098
Published
...the amended complaint simply replicated the allegations and
prayers for relief contained in the original complaint. For
example, as before, Count I was titled “Failure to Provide
Practice, §§ 15.10, 15.11 (3d ed. 1997); 4 Moore’s Federal
Practice, § 21.02[5][b] (3d ed....
768 F.2d 1248
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 16, 1985 | Docket: 66209074
Published
in the best interest of the Indians.” 25 C.F.R. § 1.2. On January 16, 1981, the Department took title
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 15, 2012 | Docket: 2904197
Published
laws.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(20); accord 8 C.F.R. § 1.2. 2 This area of the law is plagued
139 F.3d 1368
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 29, 1998 | Docket: 422523
Published
this state. Ga. Code. Ann. § 1-2-10 (1990). Defendants argue that under § 1-2-10, plaintiffs cannot proceed
