The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title I
CONSTRUCTION OF STATUTES

Chapter 1
DEFINITIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 1.04

1.04 Statutory construction; amendatory acts passed at the same session.—Acts passed during the same legislative session and amending the same statutory provision are in pari materia, and full effect should be given to each, if that is possible. Language carried forward unchanged in one amendatory act, pursuant to s. 6, Art. III of the State Constitution, should not be read as conflicting with changed language contained in another act passed during the same session. Amendments enacted during the same session are in conflict with each other only to the extent that they cannot be given effect simultaneously.

History.—s. 1, ch. 74-153.

F.S. 1.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 1.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 1.04

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 1.04

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 1.04.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 1.04 (2012) (Cohen), discussing General Allotment Act of 1887 . . . See Cohen § 1.04; F. Hoxie, A Final Promise: The Campaign To Assimilate 18-19 (2001). . . . Cohen § 1.04, at 71. . . .

CONSTANCE S. v. SAUL,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 583 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . the Commissioner's listings, referring specifically to Listing 11.14 for peripheral neuropathy and 1.04 . . .

IN RE N. JAFFE,, 932 F.3d 602 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Williams now claims post-judgment interest brings her total claim against Jaffe to $1.04 million. . . .

MILWAUKEE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE, INC. v. MILWAUKEE HEALTH CARE, LLC,, 929 F.3d 489 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 1.04 cmt a. Nicholson argues the "common principal" was MHC. . . .

TWYFORD, Jr. v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,, 929 F.3d 512 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Specifically, the ALJ determined that Twyford's physical "condition [did] not meet the requirements of Listing 1.04 . . .

DIAZ, Jr. v. BERRYHILL,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 382 (M.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . On July 18, 2018, an ALJ concluded that Diaz's severe impairments met the requirements of Listing 1.04 . . . Listing 1.04 provides that persons suffering from the following constellation of spinal; disorders are . . . per se disabled. 1.04 Disorders of the spine (e.g., herniated nucleus pulposus, spinal arachnoiditis . . .

MOJBEL, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 385 F. Supp. 3d 199 (W.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listings 1.00(B)(2)(b) and 1.04 in reaching his conclusion . . .

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MICHIGAN, v. BENSON,, 373 F. Supp. 3d 867 (E.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . ) For the Democrats to win one-half of all House districts, it would have taken a uniform swing of -1.04% . . .

IN RE CYR, v. Le, 602 B.R. 315 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . A, § 1.04, Sched. A). The BHT is identified as an irrevocable trust. Exh. . . .

A. HASTRICH, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 366 F. Supp. 3d 388 (W.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listings 1.02 and 1.04 in reaching her conclusion. . . .

CONETTA, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 365 F. Supp. 3d 383 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Here, the ALJ addressed the 1.04 listing by noting Conetta's obesity and stating that "[b]ecause the . . . In this case, the ALJ's determination at step three that Conetta did not meet or equal listing 1.04(A . . . Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1, § 1.04(A) (bracketing added). . . . While Conetta argues that certain medical findings suggest that he did meet listing 1.04(A), see Pl. . . . The lack of nerve root compression alone is enough to support the finding that 1.04 was not met. B. . . .

INSALACO, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 366 F. Supp. 3d 401 (W.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listings 1.04, 4.05, 13.10, 12.04, and 12.08 in reaching . . .

RIVERA, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 368 F. Supp. 3d 626 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . He then argued that "she could meet listing 1.04" (id. ), or - alternatively - would have an RFC limited . . . surgical arthrodesis of a major weight-bearing joint, with inability to ambulate effectively"), and 1.04 . . . P, App. 1, Listings 1.02, 1.03, 1.04. . . .

YORK, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 357 F. Supp. 3d 259 (W.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . The ALJ's Consideration of Listing 1.04 Plaintiff argues that the ALJ erred when he found that plaintiff's . . . spinal impairments did not meet the requirements of Listing 1.04. . . . P, App. 1, Listing 1.04(c). . . . "In the absence of an explanation of the conflicting evidence as to Listing 1.04[ ], this Court cannot . . . On remand, the ALJ is directed to reassess whether plaintiff is disabled pursuant to Listing 1.04, with . . .

BONILLA- BUKHARI, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 357 F. Supp. 3d 341 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . The ALJ considered Listings 1.02, 1.04, and 3.03, in determining that Bonilla-Bukhari did not exhibit . . .

EPHRAIN S. v. A. BERRYHILL,, 355 F. Supp. 3d 738 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . In reaching that conclusion, the ALJ specifically considered listing 1.04, for disorders of the spine . . .

L. KUHANECK, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 357 F. Supp. 3d 241 (W.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listings 1.04, 12.04, and 12.06 in reaching her conclusion . . .

JAMES E. v. A. BERRYHILL,, 357 F. Supp. 3d 700 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . On this form, the Agency doctors indicated that they had considered listings 1.04 ("Spine Disorders") . . . Here, on the Explanation form, the Agency doctors did explicitly consider three listings (1.04, 12.08 . . . For example, counsel never argued that plaintiff met listings 1.04 or 11.14 and never requested that . . . Plaintiff argues that the ALJ provided a perfunctory analysis of Listing 1.04; failed to engage in a . . .

WORLD FUEL SERVICES, INC. v. NAMBE PUEBLO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,, 362 F. Supp. 3d 1021 (D.N.M. 2019)

. . . Corp. contends that it enjoys Nambe Pueblo's sovereign immunity, see Motion at 2; Federal Charter § 1.04 . . .

PRITCHETT CONTROL, INC. v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, 361 F. Supp. 3d 530 (D. Md. 2019)

. . . Seemingly diametrically at odds with the "Pritchett only-no exceptions" installation provisions in § 1.04 . . .

DYE, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 351 F. Supp. 3d 386 (W.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listings 1.02(a), 1.04, 12.04, 12.08, and 12.09 in reaching . . .

ALLEN, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 351 F. Supp. 3d 327 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listings 1.04, 12.04, and 12.06 in reaching his conclusion . . .

GURULE v. LAND GUARDIAN, INCORPORATED, 912 F.3d 252 (5th Cir. 2018)

. . . See , e.g. , Texas Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.04(a) ("A lawyer shall not ... charge, or collect . . .

COLON MEDINA, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 351 F. Supp. 3d 295 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listing 1.04 in reaching his conclusion, as well as considering . . .

ZELLWEGER, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 354 F. Supp. 3d 921 (N.D. Ill. 2018)

. . . P, App'x 1, § 1.04. . . . Subsection A of Listing 1.04 further requires "[e]vidence of nerve root compression characterized by . . . Id. § 1.04; R. 19. . . . However, the criteria of listing 1.04 are not satisfied in this case. . . . Indeed, the sole medical record that the ALJ referenced in finding Listing 1.04 not met-Dr. . . .

MERKEL, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 350 F. Supp. 3d 241 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listings 1.02, 1.04, 12.04, 12.06, and 12.15 in reaching . . .

SMITH, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 337 F. Supp. 3d 216 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listings 1.04, 2.02, 1.00, 2.00, 4.00-6.00, 8.00, 11.00 . . .

E. KING, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 350 F. Supp. 3d 277 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listing 1.04 in reaching his conclusion. . . .

MARTES, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 344 F. Supp. 3d 750 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . The ALJ considered Listings 1.02 and 1.04, determining that Martes did not exhibit the necessary medical . . .

J. KRUPCZYK, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 342 F. Supp. 3d 352 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listings 1.02, 1.03, and 1.04 in reaching his conclusion . . . finding that Plaintiff's lumbar and cervical spine impairments did not meet the criteria of Listing 1.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BAKER,, 342 F. Supp. 3d 1189 (D.N.M. 2018)

. . . Regarding nullification, the Defendants ask the Court to modify Tenth Circuit Pattern Instructions §§ 1.03, 1.04 . . .

PUEBLO OF JEMEZ, a v. UNITED STATES, 350 F. Supp. 3d 1052 (D.N.M. 2018)

. . . See Cohen's Handbook, supra note 8, § 1.04 at 72-75. . . . See Cohen's Handbook, supra note 8, § 1.04 at 72-75. . . .

L. RICHARDSON, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 339 F. Supp. 3d 107 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listings 1.04 and 11.00 in reaching her conclusion. . . .

SUNOCO PARTNERS MARKETING TERMINALS L. P. v. U. S. VENTURE, INC. U. S., 339 F. Supp. 3d 803 (N.D. Ill. 2018)

. . . (Id. at § 1.04 ("At such time, MCE shall execute a bill of sale ... to effectuate the conveyance of ownership . . . (See Equilon Contract §§ 1.02, 1.04, 1.10.) No such provisions appear in the butane supply section. . . .

BIRO, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 335 F. Supp. 3d 464 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listings 1.02, 1.03, 1.04, 12.02, 12.04, 12.06, 12.09 . . .

LLOYD, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 335 F. Supp. 3d 472 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listings 1.02 and 1.04 in reaching his conclusion. . . .

KELSEY, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 335 F. Supp. 3d 437 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listings 1.02 and 1.04 in reaching his conclusion, as . . .

CANEDO, v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE CO., 341 F. Supp. 3d 1116 (S.D. Cal. 2018)

. . . A, §§ 1.01 and 1.04.) . . .

M. BARCO, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 330 F. Supp. 3d 913 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of listings 1.04, 12.04, and 12.06 with respect to Plaintiff's . . .

M. REITHEL, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 330 F. Supp. 3d 904 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listings 1.04, 11.14, 12.04, and 12.0 in reaching his . . .

A. PLESSINGER, II, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 900 F.3d 909 (7th Cir. 2018)

. . . Listing 1.04 requires a spinal disorder, such as degenerative disc disease or spinal stenosis"resulting . . . P, App. 1, § 1.04. Dr. . . .

UNITED STATES v. KING MOUNTAIN TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., 899 F.3d 954 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . See Cohen's Handbook § 1.04. . . .

IN RE ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 390 F. Supp. 3d 1102 (N.D. Cal. 2018)

. . . associations for glyphosate and NHL for those who were exposed to glyphosate for greater than ten days-2.36 (1.04 . . . Eriksson (2008) reported a higher odds ratio-2.36 (1.04, 5.37)-for those who used glyphosate for greater . . .

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. CHUN CHIN YUNG,, 317 F. Supp. 3d 879 (E.D. Pa. 2018)

. . . See Note § 1.04; see also Mortgage § 2.1. . . . See Note § 1.04. . . . See Note § 1.04. . . . See Note §§ 1.01, 1.04. . . .

DESERT SURVIVORS, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR,, 321 F. Supp. 3d 1011 (N.D. Cal. 2018)

. . . For the Pine Nut subpopulation, the IPM found a positive growth rate of 1.04. Id . at BSSG 84326. . . .

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION v. MONEX CREDIT COMPANY,, 311 F. Supp. 3d 1173 (C.D. Cal. 2018)

. . . agreement, contract, or transaction that results in 'physical delivery' within the meaning of section 1.04 . . .

ARCELORMITTAL USA LLC, AK v. UNITED STATES,, 302 F. Supp. 3d 1366 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2018)

. . . Commerce calculated a final weighted-average dumping margin of 1.04 percent for NLMK. . . . Because the 1.04 percent dumping margin calculated for NLMK was less than the 2.0 percent de minimis . . .

J. RIDGE, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 294 F. Supp. 3d 33 (E.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . severe impairments (degenerative disc disease and arthritis ) "d[id] not meet the listing in section 1.04 . . . The ALJ began this step by establishing the Section 1.04 requirements: in order to meet this listing, . . . satisfy these listing parameters" and that plaintiff, therefore, "does not meet the listing in section 1.04 . . . impairments, and provide an explanation as to why it meets or fails to meet the criteria of Section 1.04 . . . not meet the criteria of Section 1.02, but plaintiff challenges only the determination as to Section 1.04 . . .

BRUSH, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 294 F. Supp. 3d 241 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . The ALJ gave "special consideration ... to Listing 1.04 Disorders of the spine ," see 20 C.F.R. pt. 404 . . . P, app. 1 § 1.04 ("Listing § 1.04"), but concluded that Brush did not meet or equal the listing because . . . Having found that Brush could not meet Listing §§ 1.04, 12.04, or 12.06, the ALJ next assessed Brush's . . .

B. MIDDLETON, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 299 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . plaintiff's record show that her back and neck impairments meet the standard set forth in Medical Listing 1.04 . . . Medical Listing 1.04 reads: 1.04 Disorders of the spine (e.g., herniated nucleus pulposus, spinal arachnoiditis . . .

L. BANKS v. A. BERRYHILL,, 713 F. App'x 528 (8th Cir. 2018)

. . . the record for Banks’s contentions that her back impairment met or equaled the criteria for Listings 1.04 . . . (A) and 1.04(C). . . . P, app. 1 § 1.04(A), (C). . . .

PEROZZI, Jr. v. A. BERRYHILL,, 287 F. Supp. 3d 471 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . The ALJ specifically considered Listing 1.04, Disorders of the Back, see 20 C.F.R. pt. 404, subpt. . . . P, app. 1, § 1.04 ("Listing 1.04"), and Listing 4.04, Ischemic Heart Disease, see id. § 4.04 ("Listing . . . He contends (1) that the ALJ should have found that he met Listing 1.04, Pl. . . . P, App. 1, § 1.04. . . . P, App. 1, § 1.04. . . .

W. MCMAHON, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 713 F. App'x 693 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . (ALJ) erred in providing only a “boilerplate” analysis of whether McMahon’s impairments met Listing 1.04 . . .

FOOKS, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 284 F. Supp. 3d 305 (E.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . (Id. ) The ALJ went on to conclude that plaintiff's "spinal impairment does not meet listing 1.04, because . . .

J. BIESTEK, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 880 F.3d 778 (6th Cir. 2017)

. . . Al, § 1.04(A). . . . Al, § 1.04(A). . . . .

REPAT, INC. v. INDIEWHIP, LLC R. M. LLC, 281 F. Supp. 3d 221 (D. Mass. 2017)

. . . Cfi 1 Milgrim on Trade Secrets § 1.04 (2017) (“Courts can be expected to be reluctant to find an absence . . .

MENDOZA, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 287 F. Supp. 3d 387 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . The ALJ specifically considered Listing Sections 1.04 (disorders of the spine ), 12.03 (psychotic disorders . . . With respect to Listing 1.04, the ALJ found no evidence that Mendoza's degenerative disc disease caused . . .

IN RE WRIGHT v. A., 578 B.R. 570 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . 105, 329, 330, 362, 504, 542 and Rules 2016, and 2017 as well as Texas Rules of Professional Conduct 1.04 . . . (d) and 1.04(f). . . .

CUNNINGHAM, v. SUDS PIZZA, INC. s S., 290 F. Supp. 3d 214 (W.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . (lodestar multiplier of 1.04 in FSLA class action). 24. . . .

HALLORAN, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 290 F. Supp. 3d 307 (M.D. Pa. 2017)

. . . his determination that Plaintiff did not meet the requirements of Impairment Listings 1.02, 1.03, or 1.04 . . . Step Three Because the parties' specific arguments focus on Listing 1.04 and ambulation considerations . . . Listing 1.04 addresses the requirements for establishing disability based on disorders of the spine. . . . P, App. 1, § 1.04. . . . First, Listing 1.04 does not require consistent physical examination findings. See 20 C.F.R. . . .

IN RE ROYCE HOMES, LP, v. LP,, 578 B.R. 748 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . . § 1.04(6) (west). . . .

F. SCULLY, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 282 F. Supp. 3d 628 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . The ALJ specifically considered Listing 1.04, disorders of the spine, see 20 C.F.R. pt. 404, subpt. . . . P, app. 1, § 1.04 ("Listing 1.04"), but found that "the medical evidence fail[ed] to establish that [ . . . (B) and 1.04(C), we assume he is arguing only that he meets the requirements of Listing 1.04(A). . . . Listing 1.04(A). . . . Mar. 27, 2017) (substantial evidence supported finding that plaintiff did not meet Listing 1.04(A) where . . .

COUNTY OF AMADOR, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR K. K., 872 F.3d 1012 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . Cohen s Handbook § 1.04, at 72. . Skidmore v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MUSSELWHITE,, 709 F. App'x 958 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . R. 1.04(b), that rule must be read in conjunction with Local Rules 1.03(d) and 1.01(c), which state, . . . R. 1.03(d); 1.04(b). . . . of Defendants’ earlier filed case to Judge Dalton appears to have been inconsistent with Local Rule 1.04 . . .

R. DANIELS, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 270 F. Supp. 3d 764 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . In making this finding, the ALJ considered “Listing 1.04(A) (disorders of the spine),” “Listing 1.02( . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 709 F. App'x 859 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . Plaintiff’s arguments that her impairments met Listings 1,02 and 1.04 are waived because she failed to . . .

TRANCYNGER, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 269 F. Supp. 3d 106 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . The ALJ looked specifically at Listing 1.04, disorders of the spine, and Listing 1.02, major dysfunction . . . alternative listing which the ALJ did not consider, we address the ALJ’s decision based on listings 1.02 and 1.04 . . . As to the section 1.04 listing—a disorder of the spine, such as osteoarthritis—this listing requires . . . or lumbar spinal stenosis resulting in pseudo-claudication. 20 C.F.R, pt. 404, subpart P, app. 1 § 1.04 . . .

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. KAMELI, LLC,, 276 F. Supp. 3d 852 (N.D. Ill. 2017)

. . . The First American Project’s land was appraised at a value of $1.04 million. See Defs.’ Concl. . . .

IN RE DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INCORPORATED, 870 F.3d 345 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . The trial was held in September and October 2016, and the jury returned a $1.04 billion verdict, which . . .

UNITED STATES v. EDWARDS,, 266 F. Supp. 3d 1290 (D.N.M. 2017)

. . . United States quotes two Tenth Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions: Tenth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 1.04 . . . The United States specifically cites to Tenth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 1.04 and 1.20. . . . See Motion in Limine at 3 (“Tenth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 1.04 states that it is the jury’s . . . Committee of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS CRIMINAL 1.04 . . .

USOV, v. MARC LAZAR, INC., 263 F. Supp. 3d 436 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . marquise pink stone polished down by the time of the sale to a 2.03 carat marquise pink diamond; a 1.04 . . .

LEHMAN, v. NELSON Jr. A. G. D. v. Jr. A. G. IBEW D., 862 F.3d 1203 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . Section 1.04 of the Pension Plan defines “contribution” as “the payment made or to be made to the Fund . . .

JAHNSEN, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 265 F. Supp. 3d 992 (D. Alaska 2017)

. . . The ALJ considered Listings 1.02 (major dysfunction of any joint), 1.04 (disorders of the spine), 12.04 . . .

E. ROSE, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 256 F. Supp. 3d 1079 (C.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . that those impairments did not meet or equal a Listing, stating that he had considered Listings 1.02, 1.04 . . .

IN RE HARRIS- NUTALL,, 572 B.R. 184 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . See Engagement Letter § 1.04 (“Because Client is in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding, all attorneys . . .

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO, a v. BARBOAN, a k a, H. H. H. R. W. H. H. A. A. B. G. L. L. L. A. J. J. C. G. LLC USA H. Jr. A. R. B. E. A. D. C. C. V. J. R. M. R. Jr. P. Ty A. L. A. L. Jr. A. B. Jr C. Jr. K. M. C. K. GPA LLC,, 857 F.3d 1101 (10th Cir. 2017)

. . . Cohen, Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 1.04 (Nell Jessup Newton, et al. eds., 2012 ed.). . . .

SFF- TIR, LLC GST GST LLC M. v. C. STEPHENSON, Jr. A. III TIR, LLC CEP LLC LLC LLC,, 250 F. Supp. 3d 856 (N.D. Okla. 2017)

. . . took effect, thereby not having an effect on the merger or the merger mechanics as Merger Agreement § 1.04 . . . Merger Agreement § 1.04. . . . Merger Agreement § 1.04. The merger took place as contracted. . . .

CATTANO, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 686 F. App'x 408 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . Cattano did not meet all of the requirements for Listing 1.04, for disorders of the spine, because he . . .

KRASH, v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 248 F. Supp. 3d 600 (M.D. Pa. 2017)

. . . determination concerning the plaintiffs impairments, the undersigned specifically reviewed section 1.04 . . .

IN RE BRASKEM S. A. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 246 F. Supp. 3d 731 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . . ¶ 83 (quoting Braskem, EBITDA grows 17% to R$1.04 billion in 2Q10 6-7, Aug. 10, 2010, http://www.braskemri . . .

W. TURNER, v. A. BERRYHILL, 244 F. Supp. 3d 852 (S.D. Ind. 2017)

. . . to Listing 1.04. . . . To establish that his impairment met or medically equaled the severity of Listing 1.04 (Disorders of . . . P, App’x 1 § 1.04. . . . I specifically considered listing 1.04. . . . Turner provides no substantive evaluation of the evidence in conjunction with Listing 1.04. . . .

JONES, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 681 F. App'x 252 (4th Cir. 2017)

. . . all relevant evidence in concluding that Jones’ impairments did not meet or equal those of Listing 1.04 . . . P, app. 1 § 1.04; Radford v. Colvin, 734 F.3d 288, 291 (4th Cir. 2013). . . . ALJ found that Jones’ back impairments did not meet or medically equal the requirements of Listing 1.04 . . . P, app. 1 § 1.04. . . . substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s finding that Jones’ impairments do not meet or equal Listing 1.04 . . .

MALONE, v. W. COLVIN,, 238 F. Supp. 3d 151 (D. Mass. 2017)

. . . rendered her disabled for employment: This individual meets the criteria of musculoskeletal Listing 1.04 . . . The ALJ indicated that Malone’s coccydy-nia did not meet the requirements of Listing 1.04, disorders . . . Grafs opinion that Malone met criteria for mus-culoskeletal Listing 1.04, disorders of the spine. . . . that Malone was disabled because her physical conditions met the criteria for musculo-skeletal Listing 1.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MYERS,, 236 F. Supp. 3d 702 (E.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . The Federal short term rate is currently 1.04%. . . .

PARRISH, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 237 F. Supp. 3d 520 (S.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . impairment or a combination of impairments that met or equaled a listed impairment, including Listings 1.04 . . .

A. BIRD, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 847 F.3d 911 (7th Cir. 2017)

. . . P, Appendix 1, Listing 1.04 (disorders of the spine). . . .

SYED, v. M- I, LLC, a a, 853 F.3d 492 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . Pratt & Sons, Law of Financial Privacy ¶ 1.04[2][F] (2014). . . . .

MERIDIAN ENGINEERING COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 130 Fed. Cl. 147 (Fed. Cl. 2016)

. . . Hadley-concluded that either the $1.50 indirect rate or the $1.04 direct rate should be used to calculate . . . For this reason, either the $1.50 indirect rate or the $1.04 direct rate should be used to calculate . . .

CAMPFIELD, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 228 F. Supp. 3d 87 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . Id. § 1.04. . . . Finally, Plaintiffs spinal impairments do not meet or equal listing 1.04. Id. at 14. . . . App. 1, § 1.04. . . . App. 1, § 1.04. Dr. . . . Akhtar’s diagnosis satisfied listing 1.04, Dr. . . .

L. PATTERSON, v. W. COLVIN,, 662 F. App'x 634 (10th Cir. 2016)

. . . Listing 1.04(A) Mr. . . . Listing 1.04 applies to [disorders of the spine (e.g., herniated nucleus polposus, spinal arachnoiditis . . . P, App. 1, § 1.04 (emphasis omitted). In determining Mr. . . . The medical reports do not document one of the elements of Listing 1.04(A)—nerve root compression. . . . Patterson did not meet his burden to establish that he satisfied Listing 1.04(A). . . .

D. ARRINGTON, v. W. COLVIN,, 216 F. Supp. 3d 217 (D. Mass. 2016)

. . . Ar-rington’s impairments met or equaled Listing 1.02 regarding-major dysfunction of a joint, or Listing 1.04 . . . Arrington met or medically equaled Listing 1.02 entitled “Major dysfunction of a joint(s)” or Listing 1.04 . . . whether the claimant meets or equals listing 1.02 regarding major dysfunction of a joint, or listing 1.04 . . . 1,04 Regarding Disorders of the Spine In order to be considered presumptively disabled under Listing 1.04 . . . Accordingly, the ALJ’s determination that the plaintiff did not meet or medically equal Listing 1.04 . . .

REYNARD, v. W. COLVIN,, 220 F. Supp. 3d 529 (D. Vt. 2016)

. . . disc disease and compression fractures equals the severity of the listed musculoskeletal impairment in 1.04 . . . The musculoskeletal listing identified by the ALJ, listing 1.04, provides specific criteria to determine . . . over time suggest functional impairments of at least equal medical significance as those listed in 1.04 . . . that the plaintiff was disabled because his limitations equaled the severity of impairments listed in 1.04 . . . Reynard’s impairments equaled the severity of listing 1.04. . . .

STOCKETT, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 216 F. Supp. 3d 440 (D.N.J. 2016)

. . . During the hearing, Plaintiffs counsel requested that the ALJ consider Listing 1.04 [R. 46]. . . . In determining that Plaintiffs impairments did not meet or medically equal those in Listing 1.04, the . . . We have specifically reviewed Listings 1.04.” [R. 29]. 64. . . . The ALJ continued: “The claimant’s impairment of degenerative disc disease does not meet Listing 1.04 . . .

SAEZ, v. W. COLVIN,, 216 F. Supp. 3d 497 (M.D. Pa. 2016)

. . . Plaintiff contends the ALJ erred at step three when he found that Plaintiff did not meet or equal listing 1.04 . . . Listing 1.04 provides: Disoi’ders of the spine (e.g., herniated nucleus pulposus, spinal arach-noiditis . . . that she has “provided clear and irrefutable proof [that she] meets the medical listing of Section 1.04 . . .

WILSON, v. W. COLVIN,, 213 F. Supp. 3d 478 (W.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . The ALJ gave particular consideration to Listings 1.02 (Dysfunction of a major joint), 1.04 (Disorders . . .

NUSRATY, v. W. COLVIN,, 213 F. Supp. 3d 425 (E.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . The ALJ considered Listings 1.02, pertaining to a major dysfunction of a joint; 1.04, pertaining to disorders . . .

C. WELLS, v. W. COLVIN,, 208 F. Supp. 3d 1162 (D. Colo. 2016)

. . . because plaintiff has not shown his impairment is medically equivalent to the requirements of Listing 1.04 . . . Section 1.00 addresses disorders of the musculoskeletal system, and section 1.04 thereunder deals specifically . . .

P. HASE, Jr. v. W. COLVIN,, 207 F. Supp. 3d 1174 (D. Or. 2016)

. . . ALJ erred at Step Three when he found Plaintiffs impairments did not meet or medically equal Listing 1.04 . . . Listing 1.04(A) provides a claimant meets the listing if he meets the following criteria: 1.04 Disorders . . . P., App. 1, § 1.04(A). It is undisputed that Plaintiff has at least one herniated disk. . . .

WITT M. v. NATION- WIDE HORSE TRANSPORTATION, INC., 197 F. Supp. 3d 1146 (S.D. Iowa 2016)

. . . . § 1.04(2)(a). . . .

STIMSON, v. W. COLVIN,, 194 F. Supp. 3d 986 (N.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . of a joint), 1.03 (reconstructive surgery or surgical arthrodesis of a major weight-bearing joint), 1.04 . . . With respect to listings 1.02, 1.04, 3.02, and 14.09, the ALJ simply described the requirements of the . . . impairments would have satisfied the requirements for disability in Step Three under listing 1.03 or 1.04 . . . It is unclear from Stimson’s Motion whether he seeks to establish disability under listing 1.03 or 1.04 . . . , as he mentions only listing 1.04 initially but discusses only listing 1.03. . . . .