The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title I
CONSTRUCTION OF STATUTES

Chapter 2
COMMON LAW IN FORCE; REPEALED STATUTES

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 2

COMMON LAW IN FORCE; REPEALED STATUTES

2.01 Common law and certain statutes declared in force.

2.04 Repealed statute not revived by implication.

2.01 Common law and certain statutes declared in force.—The common and statute laws of England which are of a general and not a local nature, with the exception hereinafter mentioned, down to the 4th day of July, 1776, are declared to be of force in this state; provided, the said statutes and common law be not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States and the acts of the Legislature of this state.

History.—s. 1, Nov. 6, 1829; RS 59; GS 59; RGS 71; CGL 87.

2.04 Repealed statute not revived by implication.—No statute of this state which has been repealed shall ever be revived by implication; that is to say, if a statute be passed repealing a former statute, and a third statute be passed repealing the second, the repeal of the second statute shall in no case be construed to revive the first, unless there be express words in the said third statute for this purpose.

History.—Nov. 2, 1829; RS 62; GS 62; RGS 74; CGL 90.

F.S. 2 on Google Scholar

F.S. 2 on Casetext

Amendments to 2

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 2

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 2.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BARNES, v. AHLMAN,, 140 S. Ct. 2620 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Decl. of Joseph Balicki in No. 8: 20-cv-00835, Doc. 44-10, ¶ 2 (CD Cal., May 12, 2020) (Balicki Decl. . . . for a stay "must demonstrate (1) 'a reasonable probability' that this Court will grant certiorari, (2) . . .

J. TRUMP, v. SIERRA CLUB,, 140 S. Ct. 2620 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, ---- - ----, 140 S.Ct. 1, 2, 204 L.Ed.2d 1170 (2019) (opinion concurring in part and dissenting . . .

LITTLE, v. RECLAIM IDAHO,, 140 S. Ct. 2616 (U.S. 2020)

. . . relief, the State must show (1) a "reasonable probability" that this Court will grant certiorari, (2) . . .

CALVARY CHAPEL DAYTON VALLEY v. SISOLAK,, 140 S. Ct. 2603 (U.S. 2020)

. . . ECF Doc. 38-2, § 11. . . . While "houses of worship" may admit "no more than fifty persons," ECF Doc. 38-2, § 11, many favored facilities . . . measure, courts will uphold it unless (1) there is no real or substantial relation to public health, or (2) . . . distinguishing four categories of laws: (1) laws that expressly discriminate against religious organizations; (2) . . .

P. BARR, v. PURKEY, 140 S. Ct. 2594 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, ----, --- L.Ed.2d ----, 2020 WL 3964985 (2020), ante, at 2, (BREYER, J., dissenting); see also . . .

RAYSOR, v. DESANTIS,, 140 S. Ct. 2600 (U.S. 2020)

. . . case "could and very likely would be reviewed here upon final disposition in the court of appeals," (2) . . .

J. TRUMP, v. MAZARS USA, LLP, J. v. AG,, 140 S. Ct. 2019 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Madison , 1 Cranch 137, 176, 5 U.S. 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803). . . . Parliament; and I believe there is no writer on the other side of the Atlantic" who thought otherwise. 2 . . . Ante , at 2035 - 2036. 2 The opinion in McGrain lacks any foundation in text or history with respect . . . See, e.g., 2 Hinds § 1596, at 1043-1045 (President James Buchanan). . . . I, § 2, cl. 5; § 3, cl. 6. . . . whether the President: (1) "may have engaged in illegal conduct before and during his tenure in office," (2) . . .

J. TRUMP, v. R. VANCE, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 2412 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Ante , at 2420, and n. 2. . . . Saladino eds. 2003); Americanus No. 4, in id. , at 359. 2 The sole authority that the President cites . . . Cl. 2. . . . II, § 2, cl. 1. . . . Cl. 2. . . . II, § 2, cl. 1. . . . II, § 2, cl. 2, decides whether to recognize foreign governments, Zivotofsky v. . . . II, § 2, cl. 2, oversees the work of the State Department and intelligence agencies, and exercises important . . . VI, cl. 2. . . . Amar & Kalt, The Presidential Privilege Against Prosecution, 2 Nexus 11, 14 (1997). . . . Brief for Respondent Vance 2. . . . Madison , 1 Cranch 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803), presided as Circuit Justice for Virginia. . . . at 34, even when the President is under investigation, see Nixon , 418 U.S. at 706, 94 S.Ct. 3090. 2 . . .

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . VI, cl. 2. . . . See Act of May 2, 1890, § 30, 26 Stat. 94. . . . No. 101-216, pt. 2, p. 47 (1989). . . . Act of May 2, 1890, § 31, 26 Stat. 96. . . . Act of Mar. 2, 1917, 39 Stat. 986. . . . "not raised previously on direct appeal" and thus was "waived for further review." 2018 OK CR 1057 ¶2, . . .

OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SCHOOL, v. MORRISSEY- BERRU St. v., 140 S. Ct. 2049 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Act of Uniformity, 2 & 3 Edw. 6, ch. 1. . . . See Act of Uniformity, 1 Eliz., ch. 2. . . . Act of Uniformity, 1662, 14 Car. 2, ch. 4. . . . Uddin as Amicus Curiae 2. . . . 2:1, 3). . . .

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, v. PENNSYLVANIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 2367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 5000A(f)(2) ; §§ 4980H(a), (c)(2). . . . Ibid. ; see 26 U.S.C. § 4980H(c)(2) ; 42 U.S.C. § 18011. . . . ; 26 C.F.R. § 54.9815-2713A(c)(2)." . . . See, e.g. , supra, at 2401, n. 2. Section 300gg-13(a)(4) includes no such exemption. . . . See 5 U.S.C. § 706(2) (empowering courts to "hold unlawful and set aside agency action"). . . .

B. CHIAFALO, v. WASHINGTON, 140 S. Ct. 2316 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See § 29A.56.320(2). . . . II, § 1, cl. 2 ; see supra , at 2320. . . . Roane (Sept. 2, 1819), in 8 Writings of James Madison 450 (G. . . . II, § 1, cl. 2, provides an express grant of "power to appoint an elector." Ante, at 2324. . . . Stat. §§ 32-713(2), 32-714(4) (2016) ; Wash. Rev. Code §§ 29A.56.084, 29A.56.090(3) (2019). . . .

P. BARR, v. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF POLITICAL CONSULTANTS, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . TCPA, § 2, ¶¶3, 6, 105 Stat. 2394, note following 47 U.S.C. § 227. . . . TCPA § 2, ¶12. . . . See § 227(b)(2)(C). . . . There, the Court invalidated part of § 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789. 1 Cranch 137, 179-180, 2 L.Ed . . . Lessee of Dudley , 2 Pet. 492, 526, 7 L.Ed. 496 (1829) ; see also Dorchy v. . . . But it is fairly unusual for the remainder of a law not to be operative. 2 We next apply those general . . . Town of Gilbert , 576 U.S. 155, 163-164, 135 S.Ct. 2218, 192 L.Ed.2d 236 (2015) ). (2) The exception . . . Madison , 1 Cranch 137, 177, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803). . . .

ESPINOZA, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See Brief for Petitioners 31-45; Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 1-2, 25; Brief for Center for . . . Brief for Pioneer Institute, Inc., as Amicus Curiae 5-17; Brief for Cato Institute as Amicus Curiae 2; . . . downplay it in contravention of Ramos , see Brief for Respondents 16-23; post , at 2293 - 2294, n. 2 . . . Hankton , 2012-0375, p. 19 (La.App.4Cir. 8/2/13), 122 So.3d 1028, 1038 ). . . . VI, § 2 (1851) ; Okla. Const., Art. II, § 5 (1907); Ore. Const., Art. I, § 5 (1857); S. D. . . . Flathead Cty.), Exh. 3, pp. 2, 5-6. . . . VI, cl. 2. . . . Madison , 1 Cranch 137, 178, 5 U.S. 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803). . . . power of the Parliament of England prevails shall that be permitted.' " McDaniel , 435 U.S. at 631, n. 2, . . . nature or designed to induce religious belief.' " 540 U.S. at 716, 124 S.Ct. 1307 ; see id. , at 719, n. 2, . . . A Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom (1779), in 2 The Papers of Thomas Jefferson 545 (J. . . .

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, v. BOOKING. COM B. V., 140 S. Ct. 2298 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, ----, 137 S.Ct. 1744, 1751, 198 L.Ed.2d 366 (2017) (slip op., at 2) (quoting B&B Hardware, Inc . . . They are: (1) " 'fanciful' " terms, such as "Kodak" (film); (2) " 'arbitrary' " terms, such as "Camel . . . See 1 McCarthy § 7:17.50 ; 2 id ., § 12:39.50. . . . See 2 McCarthy § 12:14 - 12:16 (describing types of consumer surveys). . . . Stroh Brewing Co. , 124 F.3d 137, 149 (CA2 1997) ; 2 McCarthy § 12:2. . . . Distinctiveness is often expressed on an increasing scale: Word marks "may be (1) generic; (2) descriptive . . . Reply Brief 9; Brief for Respondent 2; see Estate of P. D. Beckwith, Inc. v. . . . Brief for Petitioners 43-44; Brief for Respondent 2; see Bayer Co. v. . . . weaker a mark, the fewer are the junior uses that will trigger a likelihood of consumer confusion." 2 . . . See, e.g. , 2 J. . . .

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, v. ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2082 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . §§ 2271, 2272, 2371, 7110(g)(2). . . . III The upshot is: (1) The messages at issue here belong to American speakers; (2) clearly identified . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . S., at ----, 136 S.Ct., at (THOMAS, J., concurring) (slip op., at 2). . . . (quoting 3 Blackstone, Commentaries *2). . . . S., at ----, 139 S.Ct., at (THOMAS, J., concurring) (slip op., at 2). . . . Doe 2 . . . . Doe 2's account raises obvious questions. . . . . § 40:1061.10(A)(2)(a). . . . No. 31, pp. 2-3; see, e.g., App. 48-55, 64-82. . . . Doe 2 The District Court found that Doe 2 tried in good faith to get admitting privileges within 30 miles . . . Doe 2 could not meet that requirement because, as we have said, Doe 2 does not do in-hospital work, and . . . Stat. § 40:1061.10(A)(2)(a). . . . facial, pre-enforcement challenge does not adequately demonstrate that the three relevant doctors (Does 2, . . . S. ----, ---- - ----, 136 S.Ct. 2292, 195 L.Ed.2d 665 (2016) (THOMAS, J., dissenting) (slip op., at 2- . . .

SEILA LAW LLC, v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, 140 S. Ct. 2183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . §§ 5565(a), (c)(2); 12 CFR § 1083.1(a), Table (2019). . . . (A)(iii), 2(B). . . . House of Representatives, p. 2 (Sept. 17, 2019). . . . United States , 357 U.S. 349, 356, 78 S.Ct. 1275, 2 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1958). . . . cl. 2. . . . I, § 7, cl. 2; Art. II, § 3. . . . II, § 2, cl. 2. . . . See Act of Sept. 2, 1789, ch. 12, 1 Stat. 65. . . . See § 2, 1 Stat. 65-66. . . . II, § 1, cl.1); see ante, at 2198 n.2, n. 2. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . §§ 1182, 1229a(e)(2)(A). . . . The District Court dismissed the petition, holding that §§ 1252(a)(2) and (e)(2) and clear Ninth Circuit . . . I, § 9, cl. 2. In INS v. St. . . . Uhl , 239 U.S. 3, 36 S.Ct. 2, 60 L.Ed. 114 (1915), left no doubt. . . . J.); Ex parte Milligan , 4 Wall. 2, 116, 131, 18 L.Ed. 281 (1866). . . . Argued March 2, 2020 Decided June 25, 2020 Deputy Solicitor General Edwin S. . . . I, § 9, cl. 2. . . . ch. 2. . . . I, § 9, cl. 2. . . . Acts ch. 2, pp. 6-7. . . . Holloway , 2 Serg. . . .

C. LIU, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 140 S. Ct. 1936 (U.S. 2020)

. . . an "accounting for profits" was historically a "form of equitable restitution." 534 U.S. at 214, n. 2, . . . Carson , 4 Cranch 2, 21, 2 L.Ed. 531 (1807) (holding that an order requiring restitution could not apply . . . See, e.g. , SEC, Report Pursuant to Section 308(C) of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, p. 3, n. 2 (2003 . . . that seek "to eliminate profit from wrongdoing ... are often called 'disgorgement' or 'accounting.' " 2 . . . , 717-718, n. 14, 94 S.Ct. 2578, 41 L.Ed.2d 418 (1974) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also 2 . . .

KANSAS v. C. BOETTGER v., 140 S. Ct. 1956 (U.S. 2020)

. . . burn their [property], though no Money or Venison, or other valuable Thing shall be demanded." 27 Geo. 2, . . . Dialogue , 2 Pet. 1, 18, 7 L.Ed. 327 (1829) ; see also Elonis , supra, at 760-763, 135 S.Ct. 2001 (THOMAS . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 701(a)(2) ). The majority then upheld the injunction on two grounds. . . . directs that agency actions be "set aside" if they are "arbitrary" or "capricious," 5 U.S.C. § 706(2) . . . (D DC), pp. 2, 19. . . . See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1611(b)(2)-(4) ; 8 CFR § 1.3(a)(4)(vi) (2020) ; 45 CFR § 152.2(4)(vi) (2019). . . . See also 8 U.S.C. § 1103(g)(2). . . .

BOSTOCK, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA v. Jr. Co- R. G. G. R. v., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 2000e-2(a)(1). In Mr. . . . Wales 116 Oysters are of distinct sexes. b. with regard to plants (see FEMALE a . 2, MALE a . 2). 1567 . . . . § 658a(2) (Congressional Budget and Fiscal Operations; Federal Mandates) • 2 U.S.C. § 1311(a)(1) (Congressional . . . Accountability; Extension of Rights and Protections) • 2 U.S.C. § 1503(2) (Unfunded Mandates Reform) . . . 1st Sess., § 2 (1999); H.R. 217, 107th Cong., 1st Sess., § 2 (2001); S. 16, 108th Cong., 1st Sess., . . . . § 2000e-2(a)(1). . . . The full phrasing of the statute is provided above in footnote 2. . . . Code § 2-1402.11(a)(1) (2019 Cum. Supp.) . . . Stat. § 378-2(a)(1)(A) (2018 Cum. Supp.) . . . Stat., ch. 775, §§ 5/1-103(Q), 5/2-102(A) (West 2018) (prohibiting discrimination because of "sex, .. . . .

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, v. COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION LLC, v., 140 S. Ct. 1837 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 200.3(b)(2)(i) (2019). . . . . §§ 1246(a)(2), (e). . . . See §§ 5(a)(2), 8(c)(2), 114 Stat. 2529, 2533; Pub. . . . NPS, Appalachian Trail Superintendent's Compendium 2 (2019). . . . See 30 U.S.C. § 185(c) ; see also n. 2, supra . . . .

L. BAXTER v. BRACEY,, 140 S. Ct. 1862 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Barreme , 2 Cranch 170, 179, 2 L.Ed. 243 (1804) (Marshall, C. J.); Miller v. . . .

ROGERS, v. GREWAL,, 140 S. Ct. 1865 (U.S. 2020)

. . . County of Westchester , 701 F.3d 81, 89 (C.A.2 2012). . . . Const., Amdt. 2. . . . Statute of Northampton 1328, 2 Edw. 3, ch. 3. . . . have Arms for their Defence suitable to their Conditions, and as allowed by Law." 1 Wm. & Mary, ch. 2, . . . id. , at 412, n. 2 (E. . . .

ANDRUS v. TEXAS, 140 S. Ct. 1875 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Exh. 13, p. 2. . . . Ann., Art. 37.071, § 2(b)(1). . . . Ann., Art. 37.071, § 2(e)(1). . . . Ann., Art. 37.071, § 2(e)(1). . . . App. to Pet. for Cert. 8, n. 2; cf. . . .

J. LOMAX, v. ORTIZ- MARQUEZ,, 140 S. Ct. 1721 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), 1915A(b) ; 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c). . . .

ST. HUBERT v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 1727 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . §§ 2244(b)(2), (3) ; § 2255(h). . . . inmate must make a threshold "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," § 2253(c)(2) . . .

J. THOLE, v. U. S. BANK N. A, 140 S. Ct. 1615 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See ERISA §§ 502(a)(2), (3), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132(a)(2), (3). . . . See ERISA §§ 502(a)(2), (3), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132(a)(2), (3). . . . See ERISA § 502(a)(2), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(2). . . . Brief for Petitioners 2. . . . Ante, at 1622, n. 2. . . .

GE ENERGY POWER CONVERSION FRANCE SAS, CORP. SAS, v. OUTOKUMPU STAINLESS USA, LLC,, 140 S. Ct. 1637 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Section 2 of that chapter provides that an arbitration agreement in writing "shall be ... enforceable . . . save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract." 9 U.S.C. § 2. . . . Article II(2) provides that "[t]he term 'agreement in writing' shall include an arbitral clause in a . . . States acceded to the New York Convention, and Congress enacted implementing legislation in Chapter 2 . . . We do not address whether Article II(2) requires a signed agreement. . . . even the parties find common ground on the point, see Tr. of Oral Arg. 7, 49; Brief for Respondents 2. . . .

FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, LLC, III v. LLC, v. LLC, n De De La El Y v., 140 S. Ct. 1649 (U.S. 2020)

. . . II, § 2, cl. 2 (emphasis added). . . . II, § 2, cl. 2. . . . II, § 2, cl. 2. . . . II, § 2, cl. 2. . . . II, § 2, cl. 2. . . .

NASRALLAH, v. P. BARR,, 140 S. Ct. 1683 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 1252(a)(2)(C), federal law limits the scope of judicial review. . . . See 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(i). . . . to a "final order of removal." §§ 1252(a)(2)(C)-(D). . . . See § 1227(a)(2)(A)(i). . . . or 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), (B), (C), or (D) of this title, or any offense covered by section 1227(a)(2)( . . . Argued March 2, 2020 Decided June 1, 2020 Eugene R. . . .

BANISTER, v. DAVIS,, 140 S. Ct. 1698 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See § 2244(b)(2). . . . See 2 R. Hertz & J. . . . Id., at 2. . . . Proc. 60(c)(2). . . . See post, at 1716, and n. 2. . . .

OPATI, v. REPUBLIC OF SUDAN,, 140 S. Ct. 1601 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Third, in § 1083(c)(2) of the NDAA, a provision titled "Prior Actions," Congress addressed existing lawsuits . . . Then, in §§ 1083(c)(2) and (c)(3) of the very same statute, Congress allowed certain plaintiffs in "Prior . . . equally evident steps: (1) It expressly authorized punitive damages under a new cause of action; and (2) . . .

WEXFORD HEALTH, v. GARRETT, 140 S. Ct. 1611 (U.S. 2020)

. . . District Courts-Civil Cases Commenced, by Basis of Jurisdiction and Nature of Suit (2019) (Table C-2) . . . Ngo , 548 U.S. 81, 91, n. 2, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) ; Porter v. . . .

LUCKY BRAND DUNGAREES, INC. v. MARCEL FASHIONS GROUP, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1589 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims to Plaintiffs' Complaint in No. 1:05-cv-06757 (SDNY), Doc. 40-2, . . . two suits-that is, where they share a " 'common nucleus of operative fact[s].' " Brief for Respondent 2, . . .

KELLY, v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 1565 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 2C:30-2 (West 2016) (prohibiting the unauthorized exercise of official functions). . . .

UNITED STATES, v. SINENENG- SMITH, 140 S. Ct. 1575 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England *2); see also Ferber , supra, at 767, 102 S.Ct. 3348 . . . "2. . . .

GOOGLE LLC, v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2737 (U.S. 2020)

. . . 10 pages, is to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 2 . . .

MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS, v. UNITED STATES v. v. v., 140 S. Ct. 1308 (U.S. 2020)

. . . GAO Redbook 2-4. . . . GAO Redbook 2-36, n. 39. . . . See § 1341(b)(2), 124 Stat. 209, 42 U.S.C. § 18061(b)(2) ("[T]he Secretary ... shall include" a formula . . . See GAO Redbook 2-1 to 2-5. . . . 22 to 2-24, 2-54 to 2-58. . . . The Federal Circuit addressed the question in passing in a footnote, 892 F.3d 1311, 1320, n. 2 (2018) . . .

GEORGIA, v. PUBLIC. RESOURCE. ORG, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1498 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Argued December 2, 2019 Decided April 27, 2020 Anthony B. Askew, Lisa C. Pavento, Warren J. . . . OCGA § 28-9-2(c) (2018). . . . Compendium § 313.6(C)(2). . . . See OCGA §§ 21-2-131, 16-6-2, 16-6-18, 16-15-9 (available at www.legis.ga.gov). . . . See §§ 21-2-131, 16-6-2, 16-6-18, 16-15-9 (available at https://store.lexisnexis.com/products/official . . . V, § 2, ¶4. . . .

NEW YORK STATE RIFLE PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK,, 140 S. Ct. 1525 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See 883 F.3d 45 (C.A.2 2018). . . . Brief for Respondents 2. A prominent brief supporting the City went further. . . . Sheldon Whitehouse et al. as Amici Curiae 2-3, 18 (internal quotation marks omitted). . . . Penal Law Ann. §§ 400.00(2)(a), (b), (f). In this case, only premises licenses are at issue. . . . to continue to possess a gun in the home after that time must file a renewal application. § 5-28(a). 2 . . . Id. , at 47-48 (emphasis added). 2 The City vigorously defended its law. . . .

J. TRUMP, v. MAZARS USA, LLP,, 140 S. Ct. 2716 (U.S. 2020)

. . . pages, are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 2 . . .

J. TRUMP, v. DEUTSCHE BANK AG,, 140 S. Ct. 2716 (U.S. 2020)

. . . pages, are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 2 . . .

BARTON, v. P. BARR,, 140 S. Ct. 1442 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See §§ 1227(a)(2)(B)(i), (C). . . . offense. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i). . . . or section 1227(a)(2) ." . . . of " a § 1227(a)(2) offense, or "removable by reason of " a § 1182(a)(2) or § 1227(a)(2) offense. . . . See §§ 1227(a)(2)(A)(i)-(v), (a)(2)(B)(i). . . .

COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII, v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND,, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (U.S. 2020)

. . . 12)(A), as amended by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (Clean Water Act) § 2, . . . See generally 2 Van Nostrand's Scientific Encyclopedia 2600 (10th ed. 2008) (defining "Hydrology"). . . . See, e.g. , In re Bethlehem Steel Corp. , 2 E. A. . . . that may prove relevant (depending upon the circumstances of a particular case): (1) transit time, (2) . . . waters, a permit may be required if the course that the discharge takes is (1) a "conveyance" that is (2) . . . Memorandum to EPA Region IX Regional Counsel 2-3 (Dec. 13, 1973). . . . . §§ 1252(a), 1254(a)(5), 1282(b)(2), 1288, 1314(a), 1329 ; ante , at 1470 - 1472. . . .

ROMAG FASTENERS, INC. v. FOSSIL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1492 (U.S. 2020)

. . . and 1114 of this title, and subject to the principles of equity, to recover (1) defendant's profits, (2) . . .

ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, v. A. CHRISTIAN,, 140 S. Ct. 1335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 9621(d)(2)(A). . . . No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc. , 338 Mont. 259, 269, 165 P.3d 1079, 1086 (2007). . . . No. 2 , 338 Mont. at 269, 165 P.3d at 1086-1087. . . . VII, §§ 2 (1)-(2); Mont. Rules App. Proc. 6(6), 14(1), 14(3) (2019). . . . No. 2 , 338 Mont. at 273, 165 P.3d at 1089. . . . Court has two options on remand: (1) enter a stay to allow the landowners to seek EPA approval or (2) . . . that the period allowed for bringing a CERLCA claim against them has long since passed under § 113(g)(2) . . . It specifies procedures for sharing proposals and counterproposals among this group. §§ 9622(e)(2)-(3 . . . liability under § 122(e)(3), and it declined to bring suit within the period prescribed by § 113(g)(2) . . . See, e.g., §§ 9619(d), 9624(b)(2). Conspicuously, it made a different choice here. . . .

THRYV, INC. v. CLICK- TO- CALL TECHNOLOGIES, LP,, 140 S. Ct. 1367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . within 3 months after- "(1) receiving a preliminary response to the petition under section 313; or "(2) . . . See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1252(a)(2)(C), (D). . . . litigant challenges the Director's reasonable likelihood of success determination under § 314(a), or (2) . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . III, § 2. See J. Thayer, Evidence at the Common Law 86-90 (1898) (Thayer); W. . . . IV, § 3 (1789), in 2 id., at 789; N. J. Const., Art. XXII (1776), in 5 id., at 2598; N. Y. . . . Denton , 2 Johns.Cas. 275, 277 (N. Y. 1801) ; Commonwealth v. . . . Charlton 1, 2 (Ga. Super. Ct. 1811); see also Respublica v. . . . LXXXII, Art. 2, § 1, p. 226 (1824). 2 J. . . . See, e.g., 2 J. . . . LXXXII, Art. 2, § 1, p. 226 (1824); 2 J. . . . Hankton , 2012-0375, p. 19 (La.App.4Cir. 8/2/13), 122 So.3d 1028, 1038. . . . Rich, 2 Modern Constitutional Law § 30:27 (2011). . . . Code § 35-37-1-1(b)(2) ; Utah Code § 78B-1-104 (2019). . . .

BABB, v. WILKIE,, 140 S. Ct. 1168 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 2302(a)(2)(A). . . . Webster's Third New International Dictionary 905 (def. 4(a)(2)) (1976); 4 Oxford English Dictionary 521 . . . That reasoning obviously has no application here. 2. In Gross v. . . . See 5 U.S.C. § 2301(b)(2) ("Federal personnel management should be implemented consistent with the .. . . . American Heritage Dictionary 59 (def. 2) (1969). . . . . § 28(b)(2), 88 Stat. 74-75. Instead, the Court principally relies on Texas v. . . . See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(m) (providing that an employer is liable if an employee establishes that a protected . . . characteristic was a motivating factor in an employment action); § 2000e-5(g)(2)(B) (limiting the remedies . . .

KANSAS, v. GLOVER, 140 S. Ct. 1183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Mehrer is a certified law enforcement officer employed by the Douglas County Kansas Sheriff 's Office. 2. . . . See, e.g. , 2 T. Neuman et al., National Coop. Hwy. . . . National Hwy. and Traffic Safety Admin., Research Note: Driver License Compliance Status in Fatal Crashes 2 . . . compare the likelihoods that someone other than the registered owner is driving (1) a family minivan and (2) . . .

HALPRIN v. DAVIS,, 140 S. Ct. 1200 (U.S. 2020)

. . . In re Halprin , 788 Fed.Appx. 941, 942, n. 2 (2019) (per curiam ). . . . Section 2244(b)(2)(B) provides in pertinent part: "A claim presented in a second or successive habeas . . .

VF JEANSWEAR LP v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 140 S. Ct. 1202 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 2000e-2(a)(1). . . . , "if no longer employed, [the] date of termination, and reason for termination." 2017 WL 2861182, *2 . . .

REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE,, 140 S. Ct. 1205 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Wis., Apr. 2, 2020). . . . As of April 2, Wisconsin had 1,550 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 24 deaths attributable to the disease . . . After holding an evidentiary hearing, the District Court issued a preliminary injunction on April 2. . . . First, the District Court extended the deadline for voters to request absentee ballots from April 2 to . . . [an] absentee ballot [on April 2] who will not be receiving it in time to put it in the mail by April . . .

BUCHWALD CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC v. SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE,, 140 S. Ct. 2638 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 2, 2020 The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed on April 2, 2020, pursuant to Rule 46.1 . . .

BROWN v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2638 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 2, 2020. . . .

MOSS v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2638 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 2, 2020 The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46 of the Rules . . .

CITGO ASPHALT REFINING COMPANY, v. FRESCATI SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD., 140 S. Ct. 1081 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Kirby, Pty Ltd. , 543 U.S. 14, 31, 125 S.Ct. 385, 160 L.Ed.2d 283 (2004) ; see also 2 T. . . . Schoenbaum, Admiralty & Maritime Law § 11:2, p. 7 (6th ed. 2018) ("[F]ederal maritime law includes general . . . Fibre Disintegrating Co. , 2 F.Cas. 78, 79 (EDNY 1868) ; see Atkins , 18 Wall. at 299. . . . Atkins , 2 F.Cas. at 79. . . . Ante , at ----. 2 Perhaps recognizing the weakness of its assertion that the safe-berth clause contains . . .

COMCAST CORPORATION, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AFRICAN AMERICAN- OWNED MEDIA,, 140 S. Ct. 1009 (U.S. 2020)

. . . ." § 2, 14 Stat. 27. . . . defense, but only to stave off damages and reinstatement, not liability in general. 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2( . . . m), 2000e-5(g)(2)(B) ; see also Desert Palace, Inc. v. . . . No. 102-40, pt. 2, p. 37 (1991) ("The Committee intends this provision to bar all racial discrimination . . .

K. KAHLER, v. KANSAS, 140 S. Ct. 1021 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Parsons , 81 Ala. at 586, 2 So. at 859. . . . Code Ann. § 16-3-2 (2019)." . . . Codified Laws § 22-1-2(20) (2017)." . . . Code Ann. § 5-2-301(6) (Supp. 2019). . . . Code Ann. § 5-2-301(6) (2017); Ill. Comp. Stat., ch. 720, § 5/6-2(a) (West 2016); Ky. Rev. Stat. . . .

DAVIS v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 1060 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2), and for possessing drugs with the intent to distribute them, 21 U.S.C. §§ . . . See United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual §§ 1B1.3(a)(2), 5G1.3(c) (Nov. 2018). . . .

GUERRERO- LASPRILLA, v. P. BARR, v. P., 140 S. Ct. 1062 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 1252(a)(2)(C). . . . C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). . . . C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). . . . III, § 2, cl. 2; see also Patchak v. Zinke , 583 U. . . . behind § 1252(a)(2)(D). . . .

L. ALLEN, v. A. COOPER, III,, 140 S. Ct. 994 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Madison , 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 166, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803). . . . or] any other doctrine of sovereign immunity, from suit in Federal court" for patent infringement. § 2, . . .

KANSAS, v. GARCIA v. v., 140 S. Ct. 791 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 274a.2(a)(2) (2019) (establishing Form I-9). . . . VI, cl. 2. . . . VI, cl. 2. . . . Arell , 2 Va. 282, 299 (1796) (opinion of President Judge); 2 T. . . . VI, cl. 2. . . .

SWARTZ, v. RODRIGUEZ, J. A., 140 S. Ct. 1258 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth . . .

MURO, Jr. v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 1258 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth . . .

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, v. CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, 140 S. Ct. 1259 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 The Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

GOAD, v. L. STEEL,, 140 S. Ct. 1260 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Application for stay addressed to Justice Ginsburg and referred to the Court denied. . . .

S. ELAM, v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC,, 140 S. Ct. 1260 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied . . .

L. HAIRSTON, Sr. v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS., 140 S. Ct. 1260 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran denied. . . .

R. MILLER, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 1260 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020. . . .

TORRES, v. CONTINENTAL APARTMENTS,, 140 S. Ct. 1260 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied . . .

RUTLEDGE, v. PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION., 140 S. Ct. 1261 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Motion of petitioner for leave to file Volume II of the joint appendix under seal granted . . .

GOOGLE LLC, v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1261 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae . . .

B. CHIAFALO, v. WASHINGTON., 140 S. Ct. 1261 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Motion of petitioner in No. 19-465 to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted . . .

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, v. BACA,, 140 S. Ct. 1261 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Motion of petitioner in No. 19-465 to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted . . .

THOMAS, v. KENMARK VENTURES, LLC., 140 S. Ct. 1261 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. . . .

UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, v. SIERRA CLUB, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1262 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit . . .

CALIFORNIA, v. TEXAS,, 140 S. Ct. 1262 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020. . . .

TEXAS, v. CALIFORNIA,, 140 S. Ct. 1262 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Motion of 33 State Hospital Associations for leave to file a brief as amici curiae in No . . .

BORDEN, Jr. v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 1262 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. . . .

HUNTER, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 1263 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

PATRICK, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 1263 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

PRESSEY, Jr. v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 1263 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

WILSON, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 1263 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

WILLIAMS, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 1263 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

HOWARD, Jr. v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 1264 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

JIMERSON, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 1264 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

DANIELS, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 1264 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit . . .

C. D. BY AND THROUGH M. D. P. D. v. NATICK PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 140 S. Ct. 1264 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit . . .

WATSO, v. HARPSTEAD,, 140 S. Ct. 1265 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit . . .

SINGH, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 1265 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit . . .

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND, v. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT., 140 S. Ct. 1265 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied. . . .

CHAPMAN, v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY., 140 S. Ct. 1265 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

PENNSYLVANIA, v. R. LANDIS, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 1266 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Office . . .

S. BARTH, v. TOWNSHIP OF BERNARDS,, 140 S. Ct. 1266 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division . . .

SHANDS, v. LAKELAND CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 140 S. Ct. 1267 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit . . .

M. NSEJJERE, v. SMITH,, 140 S. Ct. 1267 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 2, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 denied . . .