6.05
Transfer of title and jurisdiction over land owned by state.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
6.05 Transfer of title and jurisdiction over land owned by state.—Whenever a tract of land containing not more than 4 acres shall be selected by an authorized officer or agent of the United States for the bona fide purpose of erecting thereon a lighthouse, beacon, marine hospital, or other public work, and the title to the said land shall be held by the state, then on application by the said officer or agent to the Governor of this state, the said executive may transfer to the United States the title to, and jurisdiction over, said land; provided, always, that the said transfer of title and jurisdiction is to be granted and made, as aforesaid, upon the express condition that this state shall retain a concurrent jurisdiction with the United States, in and over the lands so to be transferred, and every portion thereof, so far that all process, civil or criminal, issuing under authority of this state, or any of the courts or judicial officers thereof, may be executed by the proper officer thereof, upon any person amenable to the same, within the limits and extent of the lands so ceded, in like manner and to like effect as if this law had never been passed; saving, however, to the United States, security to their property within said limits or extent. The said lands shall hereafter remain the property of the United States and be exempt from taxation as long as they shall be needed for said purposes.
History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 630, 1855; RS 10; GS 8; RGS 8; CGL 8.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1976–2022 · leading case: DR Horton, Inc.-Jacksonville v. Peyton
DR Horton, Inc.-Jacksonville v. Peyton (2007)
“Under section 6.05 of the City's Charter, the mayor does not possess the authority to veto, among other actions of the Council, "quasi-judicial decisions made by the council.”
MIRACLE CENTER v. Scandinavian Health Spa (2004)
“The procedure for payment of the common area costs is set forth in Section 6.05 of the lease agreement. Miracle was required to give the Tenant a written estimate of the common area costs prior to each rental period, which amount the Tenant was to pay in equal monthly…”
Gulf Power Co. v. Coalsales II, L.L.C. (2009)
“In response, Gulf Power argues that Section 6.05, which refers to Section 9.01, established the price of other sources of coal as the price of the blend of Source A and Source B coal.”
In Re Miami General Hospital Inc. (1988)
“See, Broude, Reorganizations Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, § 6.05(5) at 6-35 (1987 ed.); see also In Re Public Ledger, Inc.”
City of Coconut Creek v. Broward Cty. Bd. (1983)
“Section 6.05(D) of Article VI, amended in November, 1976, sets forth the requirement of a county land use plan to be adopted by the Board and provides that local governments may submit plans for certification also.”
United States v. Franz (1993)
“Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 6.05 (1st ed. 1958). While notice and an opportunity to be heard may be “fundamental to due process of law,” Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v.”
Johnson v. Johansen (1976)
“For section 6.05 provides that the person thus becoming mayor “shall cease to be a councilman during his term of mayor, and his seat on the council shall become vacant.”
F/S Airlease II, Inc. v. Air Florida, Inc. (In Re Air Florida, Inc.) (1984)
“Under Section 6.05 of the Master Lease, Air Florida merely had a duty to repair Engine 880 which it did not do.”
W.E.R. v. School Board of Polk County (2000)
“However, the hearing officer’s recommendation that the appellants be found guilty only of violating section 6.05 and not guilty of violating section 6.”
Warrington v. Patel (2022)
“#1-4, § 6.05.) In 2015, Warrington began discussions with Patel about selling or transferring his shares.”
— 6.05(5) — 1 case
In Re Miami General Hospital Inc. (1988)
“See, Broude, Reorganizations Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, § 6.05(5) at 6-35 (1987 ed.); see also In Re Public Ledger, Inc.”
— 6.05(D) — 1 case
City of Coconut Creek v. Broward Cty. Bd. (1983)
“Section 6.05(D) of Article VI, amended in November, 1976, sets forth the requirement of a county land use plan to be adopted by the Board and provides that local governments may submit plans for certification also.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.