Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 6.06 (2025)
United States may acquire state lands for national forests.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
6.06 United States may acquire state lands for national forests.—The consent of the state is given to the acquisition by the United States, by purchase, gift, or condemnation with adequate compensation, of such lands in Florida as in the opinion of the Federal Government may be needed for the establishment, consolidation and extension of national forests in the state; provided, that the state shall retain a concurrent jurisdiction with the United States in and over lands so acquired so far that civil process in all cases, and such criminal process as may issue under the authority of the state against any person charged with the commission of any crime without or within said jurisdiction, may be executed thereon in like manner as if this section had not been passed.
History.—s. 1, ch. 8564, 1921; CGL 9.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2022 · leading case: Sa-pg-ocala, LLC v. Stokes, 935 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).
Sa-pg-ocala, LLC v. Stokes, 935 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). “Section 6.06 of such rules provides, in part: [T]he arbitrator may not award consequential, exemplary, incidental, punitive or special damages against a party unless *1243 the arbitrator determines, based on the record, that there is clear and convincing evidence that the party…”
Harris Corp. v. Kollsman, Inc., 97 F. Supp. 2d 1148 (M.D. Fla. 2000). “See 1 Moore’s Federal Practice § 6.06(l)(a) (3d ed.2000). Thus, section 1446(b)’s mandatory removal period cannot be enlarged by court order, stipulation of the parties, or otherwise.”
In Re Mercedes Homes, Inc., 431 B.R. 869 (Bankr. S.D. Florida 2009). “Plan Supplement, Exhibit J, Section 6.06, at 62. “Material Litigation” is defined to mean any litigation that could reasonably be expected to result in liability for the Reorganized Debtors and its subsidiaries in excess of 0,000 individually or 0,000 in the aggregate.”
Wright v. Frankel, 965 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). “Effective Date: The provisions of this Ordinance shall become effective either upon approval by the City Commission in accordance with Section 6.06 of the City Charter, or by a favorable vote by a majority of the electors and certification of the election returns pursuant to…”
In Re Lawrence, 235 B.R. 498 (Bankr. S.D. Florida 1999). “98-22, § 6.06, it clearly states that “compliance under these programs has no effect on the rights of any other party under any other law.”
Charlong v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. (S.D. Fla. 2020). “” 1 Moore’s Federal Practice § 6.06(1)(a) (2020); see also Sherrod v. Breitbart, 720 F.”
Alonso v. DR. Gladys Y. Alonso (S.D. Fla. 2022). “19, 2011) (holding that courts do not find “good cause” to extend deadlines under Rule 6(b)(1)(A) where the moving party “has been negligent, lacked diligence, acted in bad faith, or abused the privilege of prior extensions”) (quoting Moore’s Federal Practice - Civil § 6.06[2]).…”
— 6.06(1)(a) — 1 case
Charlong v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. (S.D. Fla. 2020). “” 1 Moore’s Federal Practice § 6.06(1)(a) (2020); see also Sherrod v. Breitbart, 720 F.”
— 6.06(l)(a) — 1 case
Harris Corp. v. Kollsman, Inc., 97 F. Supp. 2d 1148 (M.D. Fla. 2000). “See 1 Moore’s Federal Practice § 6.06(l)(a) (3d ed.2000). Thus, section 1446(b)’s mandatory removal period cannot be enlarged by court order, stipulation of the parties, or otherwise.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.