Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-27
Snippet: nonmovant has had adequate time for discovery.6 6 That is not to say that a movant may satisfy its
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-12
Snippet: fear of bias and impartiality. We reject this. 6 6. The State is correct that Sexton previously
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-11
Snippet: solely on John’s testimony valuing the company at $6.6 million. See 805 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/7.75(d) (providing
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-14
Snippet: proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.6 6 To its credit, Tamiami does not argue that the
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-07
Snippet: federal law from possessing a firearm. See § 790.06(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (providing that FDACS “shall forward
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-07-03
Snippet: denied Combined Services’ motion to intervene.6 6 We agree with Combined Services that “[i]t is
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-04-19
Snippet: subjectively intended to abandon the property.6 6 Of course, if the evidence in a particular
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-02-08
Snippet: particular statutory provision have occurred.6 6. In our discussion of case law from other jurisdictions
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-01-31
Snippet: holding initially contained in a previous order.6 6 Without deciding the issue, we note that Anderson’s
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-01-18
Snippet: been presented to the Court in one proceeding.” 6 6. Currently pending before the referee who presided
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-01-17
Snippet: AFFIRMED. LEWIS and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. 6 6 Judge Lewis substituted for Judge Jay, who
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-11-30
Snippet: the substantial rights of the appellant.[6] 6. In State v. DiGuilio, this Court, considering
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-11-22
Snippet: = Points: M=0.2, 1=0.5, 2=0.8, 3=1.6, 4=2.4, 5=3.6, 6=9, 7=14, 8=19, 9=23, 10=29)
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-11-17
Snippet: behavior based on the conduct in the related cases.6 6 See R. Regulating Fla. Bar 4-3.4(g)
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-10-27
Snippet: Amendment would be seriously circumscribed.”).6 6 It is also worth noting that even though Baxter
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-10-04
Snippet: Art. XII, § 40, Fla. Const. (emphasis added).6 6 The ballot language also clearly provides for a
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-09-13
Snippet: consistent with modern rule 9.130(a)(3) jurisprudence,6 6 See, e.g. Truist Bank, 307 So. 3d at 826 (“[W]e
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-09-08
Snippet: Company has long been dissolved was incorrect. 6 6 To the extent that the City and the Van Dykes
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-07-27
Snippet: of time. - 23 - 6.6 A lawyer should promptly call potential scheduling
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-07-14
Snippet: Company has long been dissolved was incorrect. 6 6 To the extent that the City and the