Florida Statute 6.06 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 6
ADMISSION INTO UNION; CONCESSIONS; STATE BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 6.06

6.06 United States may acquire state lands for national forests.—The consent of the state is given to the acquisition by the United States, by purchase, gift, or condemnation with adequate compensation, of such lands in Florida as in the opinion of the Federal Government may be needed for the establishment, consolidation and extension of national forests in the state; provided, that the state shall retain a concurrent jurisdiction with the United States in and over lands so acquired so far that civil process in all cases, and such criminal process as may issue under the authority of the state against any person charged with the commission of any crime without or within said jurisdiction, may be executed thereon in like manner as if this section had not been passed.

History.—s. 1, ch. 8564, 1921; CGL 9.

F.S. 6.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 6.06 on CourtListener

Amendments to 6.06

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 6.06

Total Results: 81

United States v. Meier Jason Brown

441 F.3d 1330, 69 Fed. R. Serv. 738, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 6052, 2006 WL 587875

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 13, 2006 | Docket: 119605

Cited 222 times | Published

(quoting 1 W. LaFave, Criminal Procedure § 6.6(e), at 496 (1984 & 1991 Supp.));

United States v. Robert Dale Holloway

290 F.3d 1331, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9044, 2002 WL 970709

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 10, 2002 | Docket: 1118815

Cited 158 times | Published

” 3 Wayne LaFave, Search and Seizure § 6.6(a), at 391 (3d ed.1996). As illustrated in an oft-quoted

Frazier v. CitiFinancial Corp., LLC

604 F.3d 1313, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 8960, 2010 WL 1727446

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 30, 2010 | Docket: 569977

Cited 135 times | Published

finding that it was barred under Alabama Code § 6-6-560[4] because the pending arbitration proceeding

Robert L. Brown, and All Those Similarly Situated v. The Enstar Group, Inc., Richard J. Grassgreen, Perry Mendel

84 F.3d 393, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 12547, 1996 WL 254719

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 31, 1996 | Docket: 1103479

Cited 84 times | Published

is under an obligation to communicate.” Ala.Code § 6-6-102 (1995). There is no evidence in the record that

Wood v. Marston

442 So. 2d 934, 15 Educ. L. Rep. 616

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1983 | Docket: 468980

Cited 82 times | Published

result reached by the district court. NOTES [1] Section 6-6(c) of the AALS bylaws states in part: The faculty

Samuel Jones, Jr. v. Preuit & Mauldin

763 F.2d 1250, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30695

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 21, 1985 | Docket: 496043

Cited 65 times | Published

statute governing suits on attachment bonds, ALA.CODE § 6-6-148 (1975). Instead, the court applied the one-year

Seibert v. State

923 So. 2d 460, 2006 WL 345000

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2006 | Docket: 1745147

Cited 56 times | Published

present." 3 Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 6.6(a), at 400 (3d ed.1996). The subsequent search following

Pamela A. Loftin v. James K. Rush, United States of America, Garnishee-Appellee

767 F.2d 800, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21119

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 2, 1985 | Docket: 281913

Cited 48 times | Published

140 (1969); Fla.Stat. Ann. § 77.081 (Supp.1985); § 6-6-457, Code of Alabama 1977, compare Ware v

Catherine H. Johnson MILAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee

674 F.2d 860, 34 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 493, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19640, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 32,666, 28 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1387

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 30, 1982 | Docket: 222018

Cited 44 times | Published

before the courts.” 2 Moore’s Federal Practice § 6.06[2] (1981). Other' courts have, however, found that

Willoughby Roofing and Supply Company, Inc. v. Kajima International, Inc.

776 F.2d 269, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23904

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 14, 1985 | Docket: 503642

Cited 42 times | Published

also contained the following provision: Section 6.06. Termination. KII shall have the

State Ex Rel. Martin v. Michell

188 So. 2d 684

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1966 | Docket: 1490528

Cited 42 times | Published

Clemmons, Fla. 1963, 150 So.2d 231. [4] Article V, Section 6(6), Constitution of Florida. [5] F.S.A. § 27.02

Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin

851 F.2d 1321

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 10, 1988 | Docket: 520168

Cited 29 times | Published

In the first and second cases mentioned in section 6-6-41 [where a defendant lives out of state or absconds]

Ellison v. City of Fort Lauderdale

183 So. 2d 193

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1966 | Docket: 1549751

Cited 28 times | Published

August 6, 1963 the City Commission amended Ordinance § 6-6 to prohibit the keeping of horses on land zoned

Palm Beach County Health Care District v. Professional Medical Education, Inc.

13 So. 3d 1090, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9167, 2009 WL 1940443

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2009 | Docket: 2483586

Cited 21 times | Published

provided by the State Constitution or general law", § 6(6); c) the power to "borrow money and issue bonds

Intercorp, Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, Pennzoil Products Company, a Division of Pennzoil Company, Intercorp, Inc. v. Pennzoil Company

877 F.2d 1524, 9 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 454, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10771, 1989 WL 73724

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 25, 1989 | Docket: 72431

Cited 21 times | Published

breaches a duty to disclose a material fact. Section 6-6-102 provides: Suppression of a material fact

Rigterink v. State

2 So. 3d 221, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 132, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 151, 2009 WL 217966

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2009 | Docket: 58647

Cited 19 times | Published

also 2 Wayne R. LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(a), at 720-23 (3d ed.2007). The Court eventually

Akanthos Capital Management, LLC v. Compucredit Holdings Corp.

677 F.3d 1286, 2012 WL 1414247, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 8359

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 25, 2012 | Docket: 78447

Cited 17 times | Published

for any remedy available to the Trustee" and Section 6.06(e) of the indentures gives the majority veto

United States v. Copeland

143 F.3d 1439, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 12988, 1998 WL 320128

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 18, 1998 | Docket: 211976

Cited 15 times | Published

vacate their convictions for bribery under 18 U.S.C. § 6&6 and § 2, but affirm their convictions on all other

Ariail Drug Co., Inc. v. Recomm International Display, Inc.

122 F.3d 930

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 3, 1997 | Docket: 2037172

Cited 15 times | Published

the Alabama Declaratory Judgment Act, Ala. Code § 6-6-220 (1975), the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933

Ortiz v. State

24 So. 3d 596, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16858, 2009 WL 3784585

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2009 | Docket: 1152396

Cited 14 times | Published

and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 6.6(a) (4th ed. 2004). The emergency aid exception does

Ortiz v. State

24 So. 3d 596, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16858, 2009 WL 3784585

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2009 | Docket: 1152396

Cited 14 times | Published

and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 6.6(a) (4th ed. 2004). The emergency aid exception does

Southeast Nursing Home, Inc., a Corporation v. The St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company

750 F.2d 1531, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 27700

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 24, 1985 | Docket: 484300

Cited 13 times | Published

pointed to a number of Alabama cases and Alabama Code § 6-6-6 (1975), 5 not previously cited to the

SA-PG-OCALA, LLC v. Stokes

935 So. 2d 1242, 2006 WL 2347369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2006 | Docket: 1245570

Cited 11 times | Published

American Health Lawyers Association ("AHLA"). Section 6.06 of such rules provides, in part: [T]he arbitrator

Jones Jr. v. Preuit & Mauldin

822 F.2d 998

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 24, 1987 | Docket: 973713

Cited 11 times | Published

An action to challenge the attachment under section 6-6-148 may be brought by the debtor before, during

State Ex Rel. Hardy v. Blount

261 So. 2d 172

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1972 | Docket: 1358455

Cited 11 times | Published

a constitutional officer (Fla. Const., art. V, § 6(6), *174 F.S.A.) and is authorized by the Constitution

State Ex Rel. Hardy v. Blount

261 So. 2d 172

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1972 | Docket: 1358455

Cited 11 times | Published

a constitutional officer (Fla. Const., art. V, § 6(6), *174 F.S.A.) and is authorized by the Constitution

Harris Corp. v. Kollsman, Inc.

97 F. Supp. 2d 1148, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9686, 2000 WL 633286

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 15, 2000 | Docket: 2209771

Cited 9 times | Published

statutory time periods. See 1 Moore's Federal Practice § 6.06(1)(a) (3d ed.2000). Thus, section 1446(b)'s mandatory

Williams v. City of Dothan

745 F.2d 1406, 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 416

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 5, 1984 | Docket: 66201201

Cited 8 times | Published

by seeking a declaratory judgment under Ala.Code § 6-6-223 (1977), which provides in relevant part that

Kp Meiring Const., Inc. v. Northbay I & E, Inc.

761 So. 2d 1221, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8137, 2000 WL 868187

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2000 | Docket: 2360213

Cited 7 times | Published

DCA 1992)). The Indianapolis forum language in section 6.6.1 of the subcontract is the only hindrance to

Jefferson County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Alabama v. William M. Acker, Jr., Jefferson County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Alabama v. U.W. Clemon

137 F.3d 1314, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5999

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 27, 1998 | Docket: 870342

Cited 7 times | Published

the Alabama Declaratory Judgment Act, ALA.CODE § 6-6-220 (1997), and the judges' ability to assert their

Railway Labor Executives' Association v. Southern Railway Company

860 F.2d 1038, 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3092, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15974, 1988 WL 118690

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 28, 1988 | Docket: 495542

Cited 7 times | Published

§ 2, Seventh 5 *1042 and § 6. 6 Thus, Smallakoff arguably does

Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin

851 F.2d 1321, 1988 WL 75928

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 10, 1988 | Docket: 66236445

Cited 6 times | Published

court to issue the writ of attachment (Ala.Code § 6-6-43), these affidavits were presented to the judge

Mathieson v. General Motors Corp.

529 So. 2d 761, 1988 WL 73562

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1988 | Docket: 432437

Cited 6 times | Published

See H. Trawick, Florida Practice and Procedure § 6-6 (1987) (citing Panama Realty, Inc. v. Robinson,

Stancel v. Schultz

226 So. 2d 456

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1969 | Docket: 449626

Cited 6 times | Published

of the State Attorney under authority of Art. V, § 6(6) of the Constitution, F.S.A., rather clearly limit

In Re Mercedes Homes, Inc.

431 B.R. 869, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 189, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 4265

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Sep 18, 2009 | Docket: 1078755

Cited 5 times | Published

related parties. Plan Supplement, Exhibit J, Section 6.06, at 62. "Material Litigation" is defined to

Johnson v. State

800 So. 2d 275, 2001 WL 1219159

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2001 | Docket: 1196475

Cited 5 times | Published

generally Wayne R. LaFave et. al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(e) (1999). These precedents reveal the fallacy in

Eason v. State

546 So. 2d 57, 1989 WL 72736

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1989 | Docket: 1730923

Cited 4 times | Published

warrant is discussed in 2 LaFave, Search and Seizure, § 6.6 (2d Ed. 1987), "Warrantless Entry and Search for

Hill v. DEERING BAY MARINA ASS'N, INC.

985 So. 2d 1162, 2008 WL 2511348

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2008 | Docket: 497982

Cited 3 times | Published

provided in Section 6.6 of this Article"); "Costs for Non-Plaintiff Homeowner Slip Users," section 6.6, "Payment

Theratx, Inc. v. Duncan

234 F.3d 1240, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 33362

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 8, 2000 | Docket: 1072106

Cited 3 times | Published

standing because the registration rights under section 6.6 of the Agreement were not assignable. The Duncan

Jotan Inc. v. Barnett (In Re Jotan Inc.)

229 B.R. 218, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 126, 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1630, 1998 WL 897342

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1998 | Docket: 1109531

Cited 3 times | Published

with such corporation violate the terms of this Section 6. 6.6 During the Term of this Agreement and for

Environmental Trust v. State

714 So. 2d 493

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1998 | Docket: 200928

Cited 2 times | Published

Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Administrative Law Treatise § 6.6 (Supp.1997). In Pope v. Shalala, 998 F.2d 473 (7th

Florida Power Corp. v. Stenholm

577 So. 2d 977, 1991 WL 42699

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1991 | Docket: 1136162

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida Workers' Compensation Law (4th Ed.), section 6-6. Florida Power goes on to urge that the fundamental

Tubbs v. Hudec

8 So. 3d 1194, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3436, 2009 WL 1066297

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2009 | Docket: 1654122

Cited 1 times | Published

third party against the indemnifying party, and section 6.6 states that the indemnification rights of the

Wright v. Frankel

965 So. 2d 365, 2007 WL 2847951

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2007 | Docket: 1509002

Cited 1 times | Published

approval by the City Commission in accordance with Section 6.06 of the City Charter, or by a favorable vote

In Re Lawrence

235 B.R. 498

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jul 2, 1999 | Docket: 1440735

Cited 1 times | Published

litigation of other issues. Under Rev.Proc. 98-22, § 6.06, it clearly states that "compliance under these

Nieman v. Dryclean U.S.A. Franchise

178 F.3d 1126

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 21, 1999 | Docket: 395346

Cited 1 times | Published

section 6 6

Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin

808 F.2d 1435, 7 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 27

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 2, 1987 | Docket: 66222376

Cited 1 times | Published

So.2d 813, 815-16 (Ala.Civ.App.1984); Ala. Code § 6-6-256 (1975). P & M sought payment on repair bills;

Constant L. Vermandel and Rosa Vermandel v. Thomas Earl Gray, Jr., Central Bank of the South, Garnishee-Appellant

772 F.2d 738, 3 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 760, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23356

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 27, 1985 | Docket: 1168656

Cited 1 times | Published

time of the remedy is sought____ Ala.Code § 6-6-461 entitled “Effect of judgment for plaintiff as

United Services Automobile Association v. Gillen

280 So. 2d 52, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7815

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1973 | Docket: 1687401

Cited 1 times | Published

rights of its citizens. 16 Am.Jur. Conflict of Laws § 6; 6 Fla.Jur. Conflict of Laws, § 4. See also Hartford

Ellison v. City of Fort Lauderdale

175 So. 2d 198

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1965 | Docket: 1280822

Cited 1 times | Published

Lauderdale made an abortive attempt to amend Section 6-6 of the City Code by adding to the other classifications

The Alabama Creditors v. Rodney Dixon Dorand

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 14, 2024 | Docket: 67317244

Published

Argued: Mar 6, 2024

form of a creditor’s bill. See ALA. CODE § 6-6-180. The motion argued that even if the

Samantha Elaine Tsuji v. H. Bart Fleet, etc.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2023 | Docket: 67538861

Published

the casualty insurance.” § 733.702(4)(b), Fla. Stat. 6 6. The other two exceptions are: section

CITY OF MIAMI v. YESID ORTIZ AND REYNALDO IRIAS

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2021 | Docket: 59719224

Published

through the grievance procedure.” Agreement at § 6.6 (emphasis added). The Officers acknowledge that

Candace J. Thomas v. Albany Area Primary Healthcare Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 25, 2020 | Docket: 17476741

Published

grant-supported activity of entities are covered.” 42 C.F.R. § 6.6(d). Generally, an entity is covered only when it

Marnika Lewis v. Governor of Alabama

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 13, 2019 | Docket: 16583509

Published

intervene to defend the Act’s validity. See Ala. Code § 6-6-227; Ala. R. App. P. 44. None of that happened here

Ward v. Morlock

218 So. 3d 981, 2017 WL 1788020, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6362

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2017 | Docket: 6061252

Published

Fourth, pursuant to section 6 6(2)(a), given that the

Conservation Alliance v. United States Department of Transportation

145 F. Supp. 3d 1198, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157599, 2015 WL 7351544

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2015 | Docket: 64305408

Published

Section 6.4 (Use of Section 4(f) properties), and Section 6.6 (Evaluation of Alternatives), no alternatives

Gafoor Jaffer and Nina Jaffer v. Chase Home Finance, LLC

155 So. 3d 1199, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 184, 2015 WL 71828

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2015 | Docket: 2621560

Published

DCA 1987) (quoting Trawick, Fla. Prac. and Proc. § 6-6 (1985)); see also Cady v. Chevy Chase Sav. & Loan

Akanthos Capital Management, LLC v. CompuCredit Holdings Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 25, 2012 | Docket: 2904857

Published

for any remedy available to the Trustee” and Section 6.06(e) of the indentures gives the majority veto

PNCEF, LLC v. South Aviation, Inc.

60 So. 3d 1120, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6660, 2011 WL 1775822

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2011 | Docket: 60300064

Published

pending final adjudication of the parties’ claims. Section 6.6 of the underlying mortgages provides that upon

Citizens for Smart Growth v. Peters

716 F. Supp. 2d 1215, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54284, 2010 WL 1817332

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 3, 2010 | Docket: 2403903

Published

various traffic volumes." (Feasibility Study Section 6.6, "Levels of Service," at AR 79.) The calculation

Hill v. Deering Bay Marina Ass'n

985 So. 2d 1162, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 9441

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2008 | Docket: 64855203

Published

provided in Section 6.6 of this Article”); "Costs for Non-Plaintiff Homeowner Slip Users,” section 6.6, "Payment

TheraTx, Inc. v. Duncan

234 F.3d 1240, 2000 WL 1804198

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 8, 2000 | Docket: 64073465

Published

standing because the registration rights under section 6.6 of the Agreement were not assignable. The Duncan

Theratx, Inc. v. Duncan

231 F.3d 1315

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 15, 2000 | Docket: 747397

Published

standing because the registration rights under section 6.6 of the Agreement were not assignable. The Duncan

Theratx, Inc. v. James W. Duncan

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 2, 2000 | Docket: 1012664

Published

On 24 June 1994, TheraTx 2 Section 6.6 reads as follows: Warburg Shelf

Theratx, Inc. v. James W. Duncan

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 2, 2000 | Docket: 341381

Published

$16.50 and $20.126 per share. 2 Section 6.6 reads as follows: Warburg Shelf

Theratx, Inc. v. James W. Duncan

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 2, 2000 | Docket: 396261

Published

traded at $19.50. During the next 2 Section 6.6 reads as follows: Warburg Shelf

Theratx, Inc. v. James W. Duncan

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 2, 2000 | Docket: 396258

Published

traded at $19.50. During the next 2 Section 6.6 reads as follows: Warburg Shelf

Jefferson County v. Acker

137 F.3d 1314, 1998 WL 138767

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 27, 1998 | Docket: 64048865

Published

the Alabama Declaratory Judgment Act, Ala.Code § 6-6-220 (1997), and the judges’ ability to assert their

Ariail Drug Co. v. Recomm International Display, Inc.

122 F.3d 930, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23204

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 3, 1997 | Docket: 64039619

Published

the Alabama Declaratory Judgment Act, Ala. Code § 6-6-220 (1975), the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933

Jefferson County v. Acker

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 21, 1995 | Docket: 210653

Published

the Alabama Declaratory Judgment Act, ALA.CODE § 6-6-220 (1997), and the judges' ability 4

Jefferson County v. Acker

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 21, 1995 | Docket: 210646

Published

the Alabama Declaratory Judgment Act, ALA. CODE § 6-6-220 (1997), and the judges’ ability to assert their

Holloway v. Gargano

657 So. 2d 1231, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7307, 1995 WL 390369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1995 | Docket: 64757850

Published

Prevention Code § 602.6.1; Monroe County, Fla., Code § 6.6-6(a) (1995) (adopting the Standard Fire Prevention

Moran Towing of Florida, Inc. v. Mays

620 So. 2d 1088, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6763, 1993 WL 225635

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1993 | Docket: 64697458

Published

Gilmore and Black, The Law of Admiralty (2d Ed. § 6-6) (“except for injury and illness *1091caused by

Board of Commissioners of Sarasota County v. Gustafson

616 So. 2d 1165, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4238, 1993 WL 114685

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1993 | Docket: 64695669

Published

in favor of the amendment, which then became section 6.6 of the Sarasota County Charter. The adopted charter

Scott v. Board of Trustees of the Mobile Steamship Ass'n-International Longshoremen's Ass'n Pension

859 F.2d 872

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 8, 1988 | Docket: 66238529

Published

declaratory judgment. See Rule 57, Ala.R.Civ.P., and § 6-6-220, et seq., Ala. Code 1975.1 We conclude that

Jones v. Preuit

822 F.2d 998

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 24, 1987 | Docket: 66227315

Published

seq.9 As *1004the district court noted, Ala.Code § 6-6-148 provides that: At any time within three years

Bliss v. Carmona

418 So. 2d 1017, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20376

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1982 | Docket: 64591895

Published

1981); Trawick’s Florida Practice and Procedure § 6-6 (1981). Second, the remaining arguments contained

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Feb 3, 1981 | Docket: 3256641

Published

effective until approved by the City Commision. Section 6-6. This section further provides that the City

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jan 25, 1977 | Docket: 3257398

Published

to local government. Section 163.3211, F. S. Section 6.06 of the Broward County Charter provides that:

Silvers v. Drake

188 So. 2d 377, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5091

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1966 | Docket: 64497355

Published

of the ‘R-O’ ordinance are not stated, nor is Section 6-6 of the City Code attempted to be stated, nor