Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 6.06 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 6.06 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 6.06 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 6.06

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 6
ADMISSION INTO UNION; CONCESSIONS; STATE BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
6.06 United States may acquire state lands for national forests.—The consent of the state is given to the acquisition by the United States, by purchase, gift, or condemnation with adequate compensation, of such lands in Florida as in the opinion of the Federal Government may be needed for the establishment, consolidation and extension of national forests in the state; provided, that the state shall retain a concurrent jurisdiction with the United States in and over lands so acquired so far that civil process in all cases, and such criminal process as may issue under the authority of the state against any person charged with the commission of any crime without or within said jurisdiction, may be executed thereon in like manner as if this section had not been passed.
History.—s. 1, ch. 8564, 1921; CGL 9.

F.S. 6.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 6.06 on CourtListener

Amendments to 6.06


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 6.06

Total Results: 79  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

United States v. Meier Jason Brown, 441 F.3d 1330 (11th Cir. 2006).

Cited 222 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 69 Fed. R. Serv. 738, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 6052, 2006 WL 587875

(quoting 1 W. LaFave, Criminal Procedure § 6.6(e), at 496 (1984 & 1991 Supp.));
Copy

United States v. Robert Dale Holloway, 290 F.3d 1331 (11th Cir. 2002).

Cited 158 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9044, 2002 WL 970709

” 3 Wayne LaFave, Search and Seizure § 6.6(a), at 391 (3d ed.1996). As illustrated in an oft-quoted
Copy

Frazier v. CitiFinancial Corp., LLC, 604 F.3d 1313 (11th Cir. 2010).

Cited 135 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 8960, 2010 WL 1727446

finding that it was barred under Alabama Code § 6-6-560[4] because the pending arbitration proceeding
Copy

Robert L. Brown, & All Those Similarly Situated v. The Enstar Grp., Inc., Richard J. Grassgreen, Perry Mendel, 84 F.3d 393 (11th Cir. 1996).

Cited 84 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 12547, 1996 WL 254719

is under an obligation to communicate.” Ala.Code § 6-6-102 (1995). There is no evidence in the record that
Copy

Wood v. Marston, 442 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 1983).

Cited 82 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 15 Educ. L. Rep. 616

result reached by the district court. NOTES [1] Section 6-6(c) of the AALS bylaws states in part: The faculty
Copy

Samuel Jones, Jr. v. Preuit & Mauldin, 763 F.2d 1250 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 65 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30695

statute governing suits on attachment bonds, ALA.CODE § 6-6-148 (1975). Instead, the court applied the one-year
Copy

Seibert v. State, 923 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 2006).

Cited 56 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2006 WL 345000

present." 3 Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 6.6(a), at 400 (3d ed.1996). The subsequent search following
Copy

Pamela A. Loftin v. James K. Rush, United States of Am., Garnishee-Appellee, 767 F.2d 800 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 48 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21119

140 (1969); Fla.Stat. Ann. § 77.081 (Supp.1985); § 6-6-457, Code of Alabama 1977, compare Ware v
Copy

Catherine H. Johnson MILAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL Serv., Defendant-Appellee, 674 F.2d 860 (11th Cir. 1982).

Cited 44 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 34 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 493, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19640, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 32, 666, 28 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1387

...y, a Sunday, or a legal holiday. Rule 6(a) “does not provide a general rule of statutory construction which the courts are bound to apply to all time periods mentioned in any statute that may come before the courts.” 2 Moore’s Federal Practice § 6.06[2] (1981)....
Copy

Willoughby Roofing & Supply Co., Inc. v. Kajima Int'l, Inc., 776 F.2d 269 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 42 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23904

...We write here merely to address one contention not considered by the court’s opinion below. In addition to the arbitration clause cited by the district court, see 598 F.Supp. at 355 , the contract in question also contained the following provision: Section 6.06....
...The appellant’s argument essentially is that because any breach of the contract or fraud here *270 arose out of its original termination of the contract, the remedy for such claims must be coextensive with the remedy for termination contained in section 6.06. We disagree. Appellant’s argument fails to recognize the distinction between termination, breach and fraud. The termination of a contract may or may not breach that contract, and similarly, termination may or may not be accompanied by fraud. Section 6.06 gives Kajima the right to terminate the contract at any time and to limit the damages in that circumstance to actual damages....
...Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Constr. Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 24-25 , 103 S.Ct. 927, 941-942 , 74 L.Ed.2d 765 (1983); United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp., 363 U.S. 593, 597 , 80 S.Ct. 1358, 1361 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1424 (1960). Therefore, we refuse to read section 6.06, which by its express terms limits only the remedy for the termination of the contract to actual damages, to also limit the remedy available for breach of the contract or for fraud to actual damages....
...In all other respects, we endorse the reasoning of the district court. AFFIRMED. 1 . Although punitive damages of course may not be recovered for pure breach of contract at any rate, see, e.g., Geohagen v. General Motors Corp., 291 Ala. 167 , 279 So.2d 436 (1973), if section 6.06 applies to breach of contract claims, the actual damages ordinarily recoverable would be further limited to prevent the recovery of "anticipated profits on work unperformed or in materials or equipment unfurnished,” as stated in that section....
...ot breach the contract, even by terminating the contract without cause. We find it difficult to accept the proposition that that section relieves Kajima of any obligation of fair dealing under the contract. But even assuming that to be true and that section 6.06 limits the remedy for breach of the contract to actual damages as well, see supra note 1, this argument fails to recognize the totally independent nature of claims for breach of contract and for the tort of fraud....
...tive damages on the breach of contract claim, upon retrial such damages could be awarded if the jury finds intentional and deliberate misrepresentation with intent to defraud). Therefore, even if the contract could not be breached, we would not read section 6.06 as limiting the damages recoverable in tort for fraud.
Copy

State Ex Rel. Martin v. Michell, 188 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966).

Cited 42 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

Clemmons, Fla. 1963, 150 So.2d 231. [4] Article V, Section 6(6), Constitution of Florida. [5] F.S.A. § 27.02
Copy

Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 851 F.2d 1321 (11th Cir. 1988).

Cited 29 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

In the first and second cases mentioned in section 6-6-41 [where a defendant lives out of state or absconds]
Copy

Ellison v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 183 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 1966).

Cited 28 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

August 6, 1963 the City Commission amended Ordinance § 6-6 to prohibit the keeping of horses on land zoned
Copy

Palm Beach Cnty. Health Care Dist. v. Prof'l Med. Educ., Inc., 13 So. 3d 1090 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Cited 21 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9167, 2009 WL 1940443

provided by the State Constitution or general law", § 6(6); c) the power to "borrow money and issue bonds
Copy

Intercorp, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., Pennzoil Prods. Co., a Div. of Pennzoil Co., Intercorp, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 877 F.2d 1524 (11th Cir. 1989).

Cited 21 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 9 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 454, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10771, 1989 WL 73724

breaches a duty to disclose a material fact. Section 6-6-102 provides: Suppression of a material fact
Copy

Rigterink v. State, 2 So. 3d 221 (Fla. 2009).

Cited 19 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 132, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 151, 2009 WL 217966

also 2 Wayne R. LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(a), at 720-23 (3d ed.2007). The Court eventually
Copy

Akanthos Capital Mgmt., LLC v. Compucredit Holdings Corp., 677 F.3d 1286 (11th Cir. 2012).

Cited 17 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2012 WL 1414247, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 8359

...meaning of its 8 Plaintiffs also argue that because Section 6.05 of the indentures gives the majority the ability to direct the “time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to the Trustee” and Section 6.06(e) of the indentures gives the majority veto power over Trustee actions, the majority de facto controls litigation proceedings....
Copy

Ariail Drug Co., Inc. v. Recomm Int'l Display, Inc., 122 F.3d 930 (11th Cir. 1997).

Cited 15 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

the Alabama Declaratory Judgment Act, Ala. Code § 6-6-220 (1975), the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933
Copy

United States v. Copeland, 143 F.3d 1439 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 15 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 12988, 1998 WL 320128

vacate their convictions for bribery under 18 U.S.C. § 6&6 and § 2, but affirm their convictions on all other
Copy

Ortiz v. State, 24 So. 3d 596 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).

Cited 14 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16858, 2009 WL 3784585

and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 6.6(a) (4th ed. 2004). The emergency aid exception does
Copy

Se. Nursing Home, Inc., a Corp. v. The St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 750 F.2d 1531 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 13 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 27700

pointed to a number of Alabama cases and Alabama Code § 6-6-6 (1975), 5 not previously cited to the
Copy

Jones Jr. v. Preuit & Mauldin, 822 F.2d 998 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 11 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

An action to challenge the attachment under section 6-6-148 may be brought by the debtor before, during
Copy

Sa-pg-ocala, LLC v. Stokes, 935 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 2347369

...ent providing that any controversy or dispute between the parties would be resolved by arbitration, as provided for by the Alternative Dispute Resolution Service Rules of Procedure for Arbitration of the American Health Lawyers Association ("AHLA"). Section 6.06 of such rules provides, in part: [T]he arbitrator may not award consequential, exemplary, incidental, punitive or special damages against a party unless *1243 the arbitrator determines, based on the record, that there is clear and convin...
Copy

State Ex Rel. Hardy v. Blount, 261 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 1972).

Cited 11 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

a constitutional officer (Fla. Const., art. V, § 6(6), *174 F.S.A.) and is authorized by the Constitution
Copy

Harris Corp. v. Kollsman, Inc., 97 F. Supp. 2d 1148 (M.D. Fla. 2000).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9686, 2000 WL 633286

...irement." Somlyo, 932 F.2d at 1046. Federal litigants cannot stipulate to ignore statutory time periods established by Congress. Moreover, federal courts may not use Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b) to enlarge statutory time periods. See 1 Moore's Federal Practice § 6.06(1)(a) (3d ed.2000)....
Copy

Williams v. City of Dothan, 745 F.2d 1406 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 8 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 416

...city — whether 14.8% as the plaintiffs assert or 30.2% as the city contends — was significantly less than that which it had paid for Project 30. Property owners in the Project 31 area were charged $23.83 per assessed foot for street paving and $6.06 per assessed foot for sanitary sewer lines....
Copy

Ry. Labor Executives' Ass'n v. S. Ry. Co., 860 F.2d 1038 (11th Cir. 1988).

Cited 7 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3092, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15974, 1988 WL 118690

§ 2, Seventh 5 *1042 and § 6. 6 Thus, Smallakoff arguably does
Copy

Jefferson Cnty., a Political Subdivision of the State of Alabama v. William M. Acker, Jr., Jefferson Cnty., a Political Subdivision of the State of Alabama v. U.W. Clemon, 137 F.3d 1314 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 7 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5999

the Alabama Declaratory Judgment Act, ALA.CODE § 6-6-220 (1997), and the judges' ability to assert their
Copy

Kp Meiring Const., Inc. v. Northbay I & E, Inc., 761 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8137, 2000 WL 868187

DCA 1992)). The Indianapolis forum language in section 6.6.1 of the subcontract is the only hindrance to
Copy

Stancel v. Schultz, 226 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

of the State Attorney under authority of Art. V, § 6(6) of the Constitution, F.S.A., rather clearly limit
Copy

Mathieson v. Gen. Motors Corp., 529 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 73562

See H. Trawick, Florida Practice and Procedure § 6-6 (1987) (citing Panama Realty, Inc. v. Robinson,
Copy

Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 851 F.2d 1321 (11th Cir. 1988).

Cited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1988 WL 75928

court to issue the writ of attachment (Ala.Code § 6-6-43), these affidavits were presented to the judge
Copy

In Re Mercedes Homes, Inc., 431 B.R. 869 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 5 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 189, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 4265

...rs requires the Debtors to represent that, as of the Effective Date, there is no litigation, other than certain disclosed litigation, or "Material Litigation" pending against any of the Debtors or certain related parties. Plan Supplement, Exhibit J, Section 6.06, at 62....
Copy

Johnson v. State, 800 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 1219159

generally Wayne R. LaFave et. al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(e) (1999). These precedents reveal the fallacy in
Copy

Eason v. State, 546 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 72736

warrant is discussed in 2 LaFave, Search and Seizure, § 6.6 (2d Ed. 1987), "Warrantless Entry and Search for
Copy

Jotan Inc. v. Barnett (In Re Jotan Inc.), 229 B.R. 218 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1998).

Cited 3 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 126, 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1630, 1998 WL 897342

with such corporation violate the terms of this Section 6. 6.6 During the Term of this Agreement and for
Copy

Hill v. Deering Bay Marina Ass'n, Inc., 985 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 2511348

provided in Section 6.6 of this Article"); "Costs for Non-Plaintiff Homeowner Slip Users," section 6.6, "Payment
Copy

Theratx, Inc. v. Duncan, 234 F.3d 1240 (11th Cir. 2000).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 33362

standing because the registration rights under section 6.6 of the Agreement were not assignable. The Duncan
Copy

Florida Power Corp. v. Stenholm, 577 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 42699

Florida Workers' Compensation Law (4th Ed.), section 6-6. Florida Power goes on to urge that the fundamental
Copy

Env't Trust v. State, 714 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Administrative Law Treatise § 6.6 (Supp.1997). In Pope v. Shalala, 998 F.2d 473 (7th
Copy

Constant L. Vermandel & Rosa Vermandel v. Thomas Earl Gray, Jr., Cent. Bank of the South, Garnishee-Appellant, 772 F.2d 738 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 3 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 760, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23356

time of the remedy is sought____ Ala.Code § 6-6-461 entitled “Effect of judgment for plaintiff as
Copy

Wright v. Frankel, 965 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2847951

...e unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holding shall not affect the remainder of this Ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date: The provisions of this Ordinance shall become effective either upon approval by the City Commission in accordance with Section 6.06 of the City Charter, or by a favorable vote by a majority of the electors and certification of the election returns pursuant to Section 6.10 of the City Charter....
Copy

Nieman v. Dryclean U.S.A. Franchise, 178 F.3d 1126 (11th Cir. 1999).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

section 6 6
Copy

United Servs. Auto. Ass'n v. Gillen, 280 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7815

rights of its citizens. 16 Am.Jur. Conflict of Laws § 6; 6 Fla.Jur. Conflict of Laws, § 4. See also Hartford
Copy

In Re Lawrence, 235 B.R. 498 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1999).

Cited 1 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

...Rev.Proc. 98-22, § 1.01; see also Weddel v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1996-36. However, this administrative procedure does not alter the relationship between the debtor and the plan, nor does it seek to bar litigation of other issues. Under Rev.Proc. 98-22, § 6.06, it clearly states that "compliance under these programs has no effect on the rights of any other party under any other law." The debtor argues that this Court should defer to the IRS regarding the issue of tax qualification....
Copy

Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 808 F.2d 1435 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 7 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 27

So.2d 813, 815-16 (Ala.Civ.App.1984); Ala. Code § 6-6-256 (1975). P & M sought payment on repair bills;
Copy

Tubbs v. Hudec, 8 So. 3d 1194 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3436, 2009 WL 1066297

third party against the indemnifying party, and section 6.6 states that the indemnification rights of the
Copy

Ellison v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 175 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 1965).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

Lauderdale made an abortive attempt to amend Section 6-6 of the City Code by adding to the other classifications
Copy

Ariail Drug Co. v. Recomm Int'l Display, Inc., 122 F.3d 930 (11th Cir. 1997).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23204

the Alabama Declaratory Judgment Act, Ala. Code § 6-6-220 (1975), the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933
Copy

Scott v. Bd. of Trs. of the Mobile S.S. Ass'n-Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n Pension, 859 F.2d 872 (11th Cir. 1988).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

declaratory judgment. See Rule 57, Ala.R.Civ.P., and § 6-6-220, et seq., Ala. Code 1975.1 We conclude that
Copy

Conservation All. v. United States Dep't of Transp., 145 F. Supp. 3d 1198 (S.D. Fla. 2015).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157599, 2015 WL 7351544

Section 6.4 (Use of Section 4(f) properties), and Section 6.6 (Evaluation of Alternatives), no alternatives
Copy

Theratx, Inc. v. James W. Duncan (11th Cir. 2000).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

On 24 June 1994, TheraTx 2 Section 6.6 reads as follows: Warburg Shelf
Copy

Theratx, Inc. v. James W. Duncan (11th Cir. 2000).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

$16.50 and $20.126 per share. 2 Section 6.6 reads as follows: Warburg Shelf
Copy

Theratx, Inc. v. James W. Duncan (11th Cir. 2000).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

traded at $19.50. During the next 2 Section 6.6 reads as follows: Warburg Shelf
Copy

Theratx, Inc. v. James W. Duncan (11th Cir. 2000).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

traded at $19.50. During the next 2 Section 6.6 reads as follows: Warburg Shelf
Copy

Theratx, Inc. v. Duncan, 231 F.3d 1315 (11th Cir. 2000).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

standing because the registration rights under section 6.6 of the Agreement were not assignable. The Duncan
Copy

Ward v. Morlock, 218 So. 3d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 1788020, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6362

Fourth, pursuant to section 6 6(2)(a), given that the
Copy

Citizens for Smart Growth v. Peters, 716 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (S.D. Fla. 2010).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54284, 2010 WL 1817332

various traffic volumes." (Feasibility Study Section 6.6, "Levels of Service," at AR 79.) The calculation
Copy

PNCEF, LLC v. South Aviation, Inc., 60 So. 3d 1120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6660, 2011 WL 1775822

pending final adjudication of the parties’ claims. Section 6.6 of the underlying mortgages provides that upon
Copy

Jefferson Cnty. v. Acker, 137 F.3d 1314 (11th Cir. 1998).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1998 WL 138767

the Alabama Declaratory Judgment Act, Ala.Code § 6-6-220 (1997), and the judges’ ability to assert their
Copy

The Alabama Creditors v. Rodney Dixon Dorand (11th Cir. 2024).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Argued: Mar 6, 2024

form of a creditor’s bill. See ALA. CODE § 6-6-180. The motion argued that even if the
Copy

City of Miami v. Yesid Ortiz & Reynaldo Irias (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

through the grievance procedure.” Agreement at § 6.6 (emphasis added). The Officers acknowledge that
Copy

Samantha Elaine Tsuji v. H. Bart Fleet, etc. (Fla. 2023).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

the casualty insurance.” § 733.702(4)(b), Fla. Stat. 6 6. The other two exceptions are: section
Copy

Moran Towing of Florida, Inc. v. Mays, 620 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6763, 1993 WL 225635

Gilmore and Black, The Law of Admiralty (2d Ed. § 6-6) (“except for injury and illness *1091caused by
Copy

Hill v. Deering Bay Marina Ass'n, 985 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 9441

provided in Section 6.6 of this Article”); "Costs for Non-Plaintiff Homeowner Slip Users,” section 6.6, "Payment
Copy

Bliss v. Carmona, 418 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20376

1981); Trawick’s Florida Practice and Procedure § 6-6 (1981). Second, the remaining arguments contained
Copy

Holloway v. Gargano, 657 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7307, 1995 WL 390369

Prevention Code § 602.6.1; Monroe County, Fla., Code § 6.6-6(a) (1995) (adopting the Standard Fire Prevention
Copy

Silvers v. Drake, 188 So. 2d 377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5091

of the ‘R-O’ ordinance are not stated, nor is Section 6-6 of the City Code attempted to be stated, nor
Copy

Jones v. Preuit, 822 F.2d 998 (11th Cir. 1987).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

seq.9 As *1004the district court noted, Ala.Code § 6-6-148 provides that: At any time within three years
Copy

Gafoor Jaffer & Nina Jaffer v. Chase Home Fin., LLC, 155 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 184, 2015 WL 71828

DCA 1987) (quoting Trawick, Fla. Prac. and Proc. § 6-6 (1985)); see also Cady v. Chevy Chase Sav. & Loan
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1977).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

to local government. Section 163.3211, F. S. Section 6.06 of the Broward County Charter provides that:
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1981).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

effective until approved by the City Commision. Section 6-6. This section further provides that the City
Copy

TheraTx, Inc. v. Duncan, 234 F.3d 1240 (11th Cir. 2000).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2000 WL 1804198

standing because the registration rights under section 6.6 of the Agreement were not assignable. The Duncan
Copy

Marnika Lewis v. Governor of Alabama (11th Cir. 2019).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

intervene to defend the Act’s validity. See Ala. Code § 6-6-227; Ala. R. App. P. 44. None of that happened here
Copy

Candace J. Thomas v. Albany Area Primary Healthcare Inc. (11th Cir. 2020).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

grant-supported activity of entities are covered.” 42 C.F.R. § 6.6(d). Generally, an entity is covered only when it
Copy

Jefferson Cnty. v. Acker (11th Cir. 1995).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

the Alabama Declaratory Judgment Act, ALA.CODE § 6-6-220 (1997), and the judges' ability 4
Copy

Jefferson Cnty. v. Acker (11th Cir. 1995).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

the Alabama Declaratory Judgment Act, ALA. CODE § 6-6-220 (1997), and the judges’ ability to assert their
Copy

Akanthos Capital Mgmt., LLC v. CompuCredit Holdings Corp. (11th Cir. 2012).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

...Thus, a written agreement that is complete, clear and 8 Plaintiffs also argue that because Section 6.05 of the indentures gives the majority the ability to direct the “time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to the Trustee” and Section 6.06(e) of the indentures gives the majority veto power over Trustee actions, the majority de facto controls litigation proceedings....
Copy

Bd. of Commissioners of Sarasota Cnty. v. Gustafson, 616 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4238, 1993 WL 114685

in favor of the amendment, which then became section 6.6 of the Sarasota County Charter. The adopted charter

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.