6.08
Boundary between Florida and Alabama.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
6.08 Boundary between Florida and Alabama.—The line commencing on the Chattahoochee River near a place known as “Irwin’s Mills,” and running west to the Perdido, marked throughout by blazes on the trees, and also by mounds of earth thrown upon the line, at distances of 1 mile, more or less, from each other, and commonly known as the “Mound line” or “Ellicott’s line,” and by these names distinguished from another line above, running irregularly at different distances not exceeding one and a half miles from the “Mound line” and marked by blazes only, and known as the “Upper line,” or “Coffee’s line,” is the boundary line between the States of Florida and Alabama.
History.—s. 2, ch. 165, 1848; RS 2; GS 2; RGS 2; CGL 2.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1995–2010 · leading case: Wireless Towers, LLC v. St. Johns County, Fla.
Wireless Towers, LLC v. St. Johns County, Fla. (2010)
“Section 6.08.12 of this Code and further subject to the following: A.”
Rubano v. Department of Transp. (1995)
“Sackman, Nichols' The Law of Eminent Domain § 6.08[2] (rev. 3d ed. 1995) ("[W]hen there is no appropriation of land .”
Rollison v. City of Key West (2004)
“Young, Anderson's American Law of Zoning § 6.08 (4th ed.1996); 4 Edward H. Ziegler, Jr.”
Wright v. Frankel (2007)
“07, the Commission is then required to either adopt the initiated ordinance as its own or submit the ordinance to the electors, as required by section 6.08 below: Sec. 6.08. Submission to electors.”
Koros v. Doctors' Special Surgery Centr of Jacksonville, Ltd. (1998)
“at § 6.08(a). The appellant has east all counts in the seventh amended complaint as allegations of civil wrongdoing by various partners of SDS (acting in his or its capacity as a partner) or the partnership against the appellant, in his capacity as a partner, for matters…”
Koros v. DOCTOR'S SPECIAL SURGERY CENTER (1998)
“at § 6.08(a). The appellant has cast all counts in the seventh amended complaint as allegations of civil wrongdoing by various partners of SDS (acting in his or its capacity as a partner) or the partnership against the appellant, in his capacity as a partner, for matters…”
School Bd. of Levy County v. Terrell (2007)
“) The School Board of Levy County had a policy, contained in section 6.08(2)(c-d) of its rules, providing that a teacher under a professional service contract who later became a supervisor or principal would be entitled to reassignment to a teaching position if his or her…”
— 6.08(2) — 1 case
School Bd. of Levy County v. Terrell (2007)
“) The School Board of Levy County had a policy, contained in section 6.08(2)(c-d) of its rules, providing that a teacher under a professional service contract who later became a supervisor or principal would be entitled to reassignment to a teaching position if his or her…”
— 6.08(a) — 2 cases
Koros v. Doctors' Special Surgery Centr of Jacksonville, Ltd. (1998)
“at § 6.08(a). The appellant has east all counts in the seventh amended complaint as allegations of civil wrongdoing by various partners of SDS (acting in his or its capacity as a partner) or the partnership against the appellant, in his capacity as a partner, for matters…”
Koros v. DOCTOR'S SPECIAL SURGERY CENTER (1998)
“at § 6.08(a). The appellant has cast all counts in the seventh amended complaint as allegations of civil wrongdoing by various partners of SDS (acting in his or its capacity as a partner) or the partnership against the appellant, in his capacity as a partner, for matters…”
— 6.08(c) — 2 cases
Koros v. Doctors' Special Surgery Centr of Jacksonville, Ltd. (1998)
“at § 6.08(a). The appellant has east all counts in the seventh amended complaint as allegations of civil wrongdoing by various partners of SDS (acting in his or its capacity as a partner) or the partnership against the appellant, in his capacity as a partner, for matters…”
Koros v. DOCTOR'S SPECIAL SURGERY CENTER (1998)
“at § 6.08(a). The appellant has cast all counts in the seventh amended complaint as allegations of civil wrongdoing by various partners of SDS (acting in his or its capacity as a partner) or the partnership against the appellant, in his capacity as a partner, for matters…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.