Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 7.13 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 7.13 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 7.13 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 7.13

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 7.13
7.13 Miami-Dade County.The boundary lines of Miami-Dade County are as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of township fifty-one south, range thirty-five east; thence east following the south line of township fifty-one south, across ranges thirty-five, thirty-six, thirty-seven, thirty-eight, thirty-nine and forty east, to the southwest corner of township fifty-one south, range forty-one east; thence north on the range line dividing ranges forty and forty-one east to the northwest corner of section thirty-one, township fifty-one south, range forty-one east; thence east on the north boundary of said section thirty-one and other sections to the waters of the Atlantic Ocean; thence easterly to the eastern boundary of the State of Florida; thence southward along the coast, including the waters of the Atlantic Ocean and the gulf stream within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to a point on the reefs of Florida immediately opposite the mouth of Broad Creek (a stream separating Cayo Lago from Old Rhodes Key); thence in a direct line through the middle of said stream to a point east of Mud Point, said point being located on the east line of the west one half of section seven, township fifty-nine south, range forty east, at a distance of two thousand three hundred feet, more or less, south of the northeast corner of the west one half of said section seven being a point on the existing Miami-Dade County boundary line as established by s. 7.13; thence run southerly along the east line of the west one half of said section seven, township fifty-nine south, range forty east, to a point two thousand feet, more or less, north of the south line of said section seven; thence run westerly along a line parallel to the south line of said section seven, through the open water midway between two islands lying in the west one half of said section seven to a point on the west line of section seven, township fifty-nine south, range forty east; thence run southerly for a distance of two thousand feet, more or less, to the southwest corner of said section seven; thence run southerly along the west line of section eighteen, township fifty-nine south, range forty east, to the southwest corner of said section eighteen; thence run in a southwesterly direction along a straight line to the southwest corner of section twenty-four, township fifty-nine south, range thirty-nine east; thence run southerly along the east line of section twenty-six, township fifty-nine south, range thirty-nine east, to the southeast corner of said section twenty-six; thence run southerly along the east line of section thirty-five, township fifty-nine south, range thirty-nine east, to a point of intersection with a line drawn parallel with the north line of said section thirty-five and through the open water midway between Main and Short Key; thence run westerly along a line parallel to the north line of said section thirty-five, through the open water midway between Main and Short Key to a point on the west line of section thirty-five and a point on the east line of section thirty-four, township fifty-nine south, range thirty-nine east; thence run southwesterly in a straight line to the southwest corner of the southeast quarter of said section thirty-four and the northeast corner of the northwest quarter of section three, township sixty south, range thirty-nine east; thence run southerly along the east line of the northwest quarter of said section three to the southeast corner of the northwest quarter of said section three; thence run westerly along the south line of the northwest quarter of said section three to the southwest corner of the northwest quarter of said section three; thence run westerly to a point on the northerly bank of Manatee Creek at the easterly mouth of said Manatee Creek; thence run westerly meandering the northerly bank of Manatee Creek to the intersection thereof with the west right-of-way line of United States Highway No. 1, said right-of-way line being the east boundary of the Everglades National Park and said north bank of Manatee Creek being the southerly line of the mainland of the State of Florida and the existing boundary line between Miami-Dade County and Monroe County; thence along the mainland to the range line between ranges thirty-four and thirty-five east, thence due north on said range line to place of beginning. However, the boundary lines of Miami-Dade County shall not include the following: Begin at the northwest corner of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east, Miami-Dade County, Florida; thence, southerly following the west line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east to the intersection with a line which is two hundred and thirty feet south of and parallel to the north line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east; thence, easterly following the line which is two hundred and thirty feet south of and parallel to the north line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east, to the intersection with the west boundary line of the Town of Golden Beach; thence, northerly following the west boundary line of the Town of Golden Beach to the intersection with the north line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east; thence, westerly following the north line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east to the point of beginning.
History.s. 1, Feb. 4, 1836; s. 1, ch. 1592, 1866; s. 1, ch. 1998, 1874; RS 53; GS 51; s. 1, ch. 5970, 1909; s. 1, ch. 6934, 1915; RGS 58; CGL 64; s. 1, ch. 61-16; s. 2, ch. 78-119; s. 2, ch. 2008-4.

F.S. 7.13 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.13 on CourtListener

Amendments to 7.13


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.13

Total Results: 15

American Trucking Association, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission

688 F.2d 1337, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24900

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 12, 1982 | Docket: 234393

Cited 26 times | Published

Davis Treatise, supra, at § 7:13, p. 61. 8 . This is true only with

Brooks Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. Suave Shoe Corp.

533 F. Supp. 75, 215 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 358, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16432

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1981 | Docket: 998810

Cited 14 times | Published

marks are said to be `weak'." 1 J. McCarthy, supra § 7:13 at 173. Based on the fact that there is nothing

Cates-Harman v. Stage (In Re Stage)

85 B.R. 880

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1988 | Docket: 1509072

Cited 10 times | Published

Personal Property (W. Raushenbush 3rd Ed. 1975) § 7.13.

White Construction Co. v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

633 F. Supp. 2d 1302, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29467, 2009 WL 961135

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2009 | Docket: 1266875

Cited 8 times | Published

written agreement.") (internal citations omitted). Section 7.13 of the MSA expressly provides that during the

Provenzano v. State

760 So. 2d 137, 2000 WL 674703

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2000 | Docket: 1324640

Cited 5 times | Published

Ann. § 46.04(h) (West Supp.2000); Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-13-901(a)(v) (Michie 1999). Other states have adopted

Palm Lake Partners II, LLC v. C & C Powerline, Inc.

38 So. 3d 844, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8932, 2010 WL 2472490

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2010 | Docket: 1658080

Cited 4 times | Published

See 3 Richard A. Lord, Williston on Contracts § 7:13 at 272-79 (4th ed. 1992) ("[W]here the reservation

Fisher v. Salazar

656 F. Supp. 2d 1357, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91838, 2009 WL 3030736

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2009 | Docket: 940237

Cited 3 times | Published

possible. Escambia County Land Development Code § 7.13.01. TE habitat is defined as: An area that contains

Perfumeria Ultra, S.A De C v. v. Miami Customs Service, Inc.

231 F. Supp. 2d 1218, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21468, 2002 WL 31664695

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 2002 | Docket: 2324692

Cited 2 times | Published

commercial contracts." E. ALLAN FARNSWORTH, CONTRACTS § 7.13 (3d ed.1999). [2] The court in Casa Clara Condominium

The Florida Bar v. Graham

662 So. 2d 1242, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 572, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1865, 1995 WL 677718

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1995 | Docket: 1683483

Cited 2 times | Published

Professional Discipline for Lawyers and Judges § 7.13, at 58-59 (1979). Such a procedure prevents the

Payas v. Adventist Health Sys./Sunbelt, Inc.

238 So. 3d 887

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2018 | Docket: 64674179

Cited 1 times | Published

facts." Philip J. Padovano Florida Civil Practice § 7.13 at 246, 246 (2018 ed.). "It is not necessary or

Cal. Fin., LLC v. Perdido Land Dev. Co.

303 F. Supp. 3d 1306

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2017 | Docket: 64318090

Cited 1 times | Published

Defendants' remedial obligations under the Contract. Section 7.13 of the Contract provides that Defendants "agree[

Donald Frederick Evans & Associates, Inc. v. Continental Homes, Inc.

785 F.2d 897, 54 U.S.L.W. 2582, 229 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 321, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 23620

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 31, 1986 | Docket: 66214417

Cited 1 times | Published

an edition of 100,-000.’ ” 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.13[A], at 7-88 (quoting the Register’s Supplementary

Linda Prentice, etc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2022 | Docket: 63166170

Published

” 2 Fowler V. Harper et al., The Law of Torts § 7.13, at 465 (2d ed. 1986) (footnotes omitted). Similarly

ARMANDO PAYAS v. ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2018 | Docket: 6307728

Published

" Philip J. Padovano Florida Civil Practice § 7.13 at 246, 246 (2018 ed.). "It is not necessary

Ford ex rel. Ford v. Wainwright

752 F.2d 526

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 17, 1985 | Docket: 66203634

Published

(1983); Utah Code Ann. § 77-19-13 (1982); Wyo.Stat. § 7-13-901 et seq. (Cum.Supp.1984). Five states which