7.13

Miami-Dade County.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

7.13 Miami-Dade County.—The boundary lines of Miami-Dade County are as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of township fifty-one south, range thirty-five east; thence east following the south line of township fifty-one south, across ranges thirty-five, thirty-six, thirty-seven, thirty-eight, thirty-nine and forty east, to the southwest corner of township fifty-one south, range forty-one east; thence north on the range line dividing ranges forty and forty-one east to the northwest corner of section thirty-one, township fifty-one south, range forty-one east; thence east on the north boundary of said section thirty-one and other sections to the waters of the Atlantic Ocean; thence easterly to the eastern boundary of the State of Florida; thence southward along the coast, including the waters of the Atlantic Ocean and the gulf stream within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to a point on the reefs of Florida immediately opposite the mouth of Broad Creek (a stream separating Cayo Lago from Old Rhodes Key); thence in a direct line through the middle of said stream to a point east of Mud Point, said point being located on the east line of the west one half of section seven, township fifty-nine south, range forty east, at a distance of two thousand three hundred feet, more or less, south of the northeast corner of the west one half of said section seven being a point on the existing Miami-Dade County boundary line as established by s. 7.13; thence run southerly along the east line of the west one half of said section seven, township fifty-nine south, range forty east, to a point two thousand feet, more or less, north of the south line of said section seven; thence run westerly along a line parallel to the south line of said section seven, through the open water midway between two islands lying in the west one half of said section seven to a point on the west line of section seven, township fifty-nine south, range forty east; thence run southerly for a distance of two thousand feet, more or less, to the southwest corner of said section seven; thence run southerly along the west line of section eighteen, township fifty-nine south, range forty east, to the southwest corner of said section eighteen; thence run in a southwesterly direction along a straight line to the southwest corner of section twenty-four, township fifty-nine south, range thirty-nine east; thence run southerly along the east line of section twenty-six, township fifty-nine south, range thirty-nine east, to the southeast corner of said section twenty-six; thence run southerly along the east line of section thirty-five, township fifty-nine south, range thirty-nine east, to a point of intersection with a line drawn parallel with the north line of said section thirty-five and through the open water midway between Main and Short Key; thence run westerly along a line parallel to the north line of said section thirty-five, through the open water midway between Main and Short Key to a point on the west line of section thirty-five and a point on the east line of section thirty-four, township fifty-nine south, range thirty-nine east; thence run southwesterly in a straight line to the southwest corner of the southeast quarter of said section thirty-four and the northeast corner of the northwest quarter of section three, township sixty south, range thirty-nine east; thence run southerly along the east line of the northwest quarter of said section three to the southeast corner of the northwest quarter of said section three; thence run westerly along the south line of the northwest quarter of said section three to the southwest corner of the northwest quarter of said section three; thence run westerly to a point on the northerly bank of Manatee Creek at the easterly mouth of said Manatee Creek; thence run westerly meandering the northerly bank of Manatee Creek to the intersection thereof with the west right-of-way line of United States Highway No. 1, said right-of-way line being the east boundary of the Everglades National Park and said north bank of Manatee Creek being the southerly line of the mainland of the State of Florida and the existing boundary line between Miami-Dade County and Monroe County; thence along the mainland to the range line between ranges thirty-four and thirty-five east, thence due north on said range line to place of beginning. However, the boundary lines of Miami-Dade County shall not include the following: Begin at the northwest corner of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east, Miami-Dade County, Florida; thence, southerly following the west line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east to the intersection with a line which is two hundred and thirty feet south of and parallel to the north line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east; thence, easterly following the line which is two hundred and thirty feet south of and parallel to the north line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east, to the intersection with the west boundary line of the Town of Golden Beach; thence, northerly following the west boundary line of the Town of Golden Beach to the intersection with the north line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east; thence, westerly following the north line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east to the point of beginning.

History.—s. 1, Feb. 4, 1836; s. 1, ch. 1592, 1866; s. 1, ch. 1998, 1874; RS 53; GS 51; s. 1, ch. 5970, 1909; s. 1, ch. 6934, 1915; RGS 58; CGL 64; s. 1, ch. 61-16; s. 2, ch. 78-119; s. 2, ch. 2008-4.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 12 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1981–2022 · leading case: Fisher v. Salazar

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Fisher v. Salazar (2009) flnd · cites it 2× “Escambia County Land Development Code § 7.13.01. TE habitat is defined as: An area that contains, or shows factual evidence of, a species that is listed by a federal, state, or local agency as “threatened,” “endangered,” or “species of special concern.”

White Construction Co. v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (2009) flmd “Section 7.13 of the MSA expressly provides that during the term of the Agreement, Martin Marietta shall have the option and right to purchase the assets of White Construction and Limerock Industries at their fair market value.”

Cates-Harman v. Stage (In Re Stage) (1988) flmb “…31.2 (Tent. Draft No. 11, 1988); Drewett, supra; R. Brown, The Law of Personal Property (W. Raushenbush 3rd Ed. 1975) § 7.13.”

Cal. Fin., LLC v. Perdido Land Dev. Co. (2017) flmd · cites it 2× “" This obligation "shall terminate upon receipt of a 'no further action' letter from the [FDEP] stating that remediation has been completed.”

Perfumeria Ultra, S.A De C v. v. Miami Customs Service, Inc. (2002) flsd “Allan Farnsworth, Contracts § 7.13 (3d ed.1999). 2 . The court in Casa Clara Condominium Ass'n v.”

Payas v. Adventist Health Sys./Sunbelt, Inc. (2018) fladistctapp “Padovano Florida Civil Practice § 7.13 at 246, 246 (2018 ed.). "It is not necessary or even proper to allege the evidentiary facts in a pleading that asserts a claim .”

City of Lake Wales v. LAMAR ADVER. (1981) fladistctapp “Anderson, American Law of Zoning §§ 7.13, .17 (2d ed. 1976). In fact, initially, "[a]esthetic considerations were held insufficient to support use of the police power to impose even modest limitations upon the location of [billboards].”

The Florida Bar v. Graham (1995) fla “Discipline, Professional Discipline for Lawyers and Judges § 7.13, at 58-59 (1979). Such a procedure prevents the duplication of time, costs, and expense for all involved in the process.”

Evans Energy Partners, LLC v. Seminole Tribe of Florida, Inc. (2021) flmd · cites it 3× “As explained earlier, section 7.13 appears to contain a limited waiver of tribal sovereign immunity for purposes of arbitrating any dispute about the termination fee in paragraph 2.”

ARMANDO PAYAS v. ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM (2018) fladistctapp “Padovano Florida Civil Practice § 7.13 at 246, 246 (2018 ed.). "It is not necessary or even proper to allege the evidentiary facts in a pleading that asserts a claim .”

Linda Prentice, etc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (2022) fla “, The Law of Torts § 7.13, at 465 (2d ed. 1986) (footnotes omitted).”

Mohammad M Zaman and Nasrin M Khan (2020) flsb “What this Court has determined is that the Plan and Confirmation Order do not bar the prospective enforcement of the Guarantees, and that the Plan and Confirmation Order are not binding on Creditors with respect to (a) the injunction set forth in section 7.13 of the Plan, and…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.