Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 7.14 (2025)

DeSoto County.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session Cite as: Fla. Stat. § 7.14 (2025)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
7.14 DeSoto County.The boundary lines of DeSoto County are as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of township thirty-nine south, range twenty-seven east; thence west on the township line dividing townships thirty-nine south and forty south to the southwest corner of township thirty-nine south, range twenty-three east; thence north on the range line dividing ranges twenty-two east and twenty-three east to the northwest corner of section nineteen, township thirty-six south, range twenty-three east; thence east on the section lines to the northeast corner of section twenty-four, township thirty-six south, range twenty-seven east; thence south on the range line dividing ranges twenty-seven east and twenty-eight east to the southeast corner of township thirty-nine south, range twenty-seven east, the same being the place of beginning.
History.s. 3, ch. 3770, 1887; RS 52; GS 50; RGS 57; s. 1, ch. 8513, 1921; CGL 63.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1990–2024 · leading case: United States v. McCorkle
United States v. McCorkle (2001) flmd · cites it 2× “Section 7.14 of the Merchant-Security Agreement dated October 16, 1996, states in full: SECURITY INTEREST IN MERCHANT BANK ACCOUNT, DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS, AND DEPOSIT ACCOUNT PROCEEDS.”
Floyd v. Federal Nat. Mortg. Ass'n (1998) fladistctapp “NOTES [1] A checklist of inquiries for search consisting of 22 items appears in The Florida Bar Continuing Legal Education, Florida Real Property Litigation § 7.14 (2d Ed.1996). Some searches require one to make inquiries outside of an office.”
Kovach v. McLellan (1990) fladistctapp “II, § 7.14 (2d ed.). [5] See Prosser Law of Torts (4th ed.”
DEHK LLC v. MasTec, Inc. (2024) flsd · cites it 2× “Elsewhere in the MIPA, the parties agreed to “the exclusive jurisdiction of the state courts of the State of Florida or the United States District Courts located in the Southern District of Florida for the purpose of any Action between or among the parties (or any of them)…”
Linda Prentice, etc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (2022) fla “This conduct breached a duty that was well established in the common law of fraud: “Though a vendor may have no duty to speak, yet ‘if he does assume to speak, he must make a full and fair disclosure as to the matters about which he assumes to speak.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham Syfert, a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney (Florida Bar No. 39104). For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.