Florida Statute 7.14 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.14

7.14 DeSoto County.—The boundary lines of DeSoto County are as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of township thirty-nine south, range twenty-seven east; thence west on the township line dividing townships thirty-nine south and forty south to the southwest corner of township thirty-nine south, range twenty-three east; thence north on the range line dividing ranges twenty-two east and twenty-three east to the northwest corner of section nineteen, township thirty-six south, range twenty-three east; thence east on the section lines to the northeast corner of section twenty-four, township thirty-six south, range twenty-seven east; thence south on the range line dividing ranges twenty-seven east and twenty-eight east to the southeast corner of township thirty-nine south, range twenty-seven east, the same being the place of beginning.

History.—s. 3, ch. 3770, 1887; RS 52; GS 50; RGS 57; s. 1, ch. 8513, 1921; CGL 63.

F.S. 7.14 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.14 on CourtListener

Amendments to 7.14

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.14

Total Results: 15

Kovach v. McLellan

564 So. 2d 274, 1990 WL 103139

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1990 | Docket: 1689139

Cited 11 times | Published

[4] Harper, James & Gray, Law of Torts, Vol. II, § 7.14 (2d ed.). [5] See Prosser Law of Torts (4th ed

Floyd v. Federal Nat. Mortg. Ass'n

704 So. 2d 1110, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 138, 1998 WL 4093

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1998 | Docket: 1706042

Cited 10 times | Published

Legal Education, Florida Real Property Litigation § 7.14 (2d Ed.1996). Some searches require one to make

STATE BY & THRO. STATE ATTY. v. Gen. Dev. Corp.

448 So. 2d 1074

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1984 | Docket: 2547049

Cited 6 times | Published

consistent with the dictates of article II, section 7,[14] particularly where DER has allegedly failed

United States v. McCorkle

143 F. Supp. 2d 1311, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6706, 2000 WL 33311777

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2001 | Docket: 2301204

Cited 5 times | Published

Docket No. 832, Exhibit A at ¶ 7.1(b). [7] Section 7.14 of the Merchant-Security Agreement dated October

Emmco Ins. Co. v. S. TERMINAL & TRANSP. CO.

333 So. 2d 80

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1976 | Docket: 1290952

Cited 4 times | Published

vessels. G. Gilmore & C. Black, The Law of Admiralty, § 7-14, at 424 (1957). This being so, a marine insurer

Medical Association of Georgia v. Wellpoint, Inc.

756 F.3d 1222, 2014 WL 2748101

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 18, 2014 | Docket: 305912

Cited 2 times | Published

systematically underprices claims. Settlement Agreement § 7.14(d). In exchange, the class agreed to release all

Glinton v. And R, Inc.

173 F.3d 1352, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8228

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 29, 1999 | Docket: 2037237

Cited 2 times | Published

HARMONIOUSLY WITH THE CRIMINAL USURY STATUTE, O.C.G.A. § 7-14-18, SO THAT BOTH APPLY TO “PAWN TRANSACTIONS” AS

Linda Prentice, etc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2022 | Docket: 63166170

Published

nondisclosure.’ ” Harper, et al., supra p.11, § 7.14, at 472 (quoting Franchey v. Hannes, 207 A.2d 268

Anthony Troutman v. Seaboard Marine of Florida, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 13, 2020 | Docket: 17155364

Published

Date Filed: 05/13/2020 Page: 9 of 12 § 7:14, at 708 (6th ed. 2018). Where a hazard exists,

Medical Association of Georgia v. Wellpoint, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 18, 2014 | Docket: 2901711

Published

systematically underprices claims. Settlement Agreement § 7.14(d). In exchange, the class agreed to release

Allen v. City of Key West

59 So. 3d 316, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5570, 2011 WL 1485992

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2011 | Docket: 60299679

Published

per unit). City of Key West, Fla., Code, Ch. 35, § 7(14)(b) (emphasis added).

Glinton v. And R, Inc.

173 F.3d 1352

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 29, 1999 | Docket: 2037238

Published

WITH THE CRIMINAL USURY STATUTE, O.C.G.A. § 7-14-18, SO THAT BOTH APPLY TO “PAWN TRANSACTIONS”

Glinton v. And R, Inc.

173 F.3d 1352

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 29, 1999 | Docket: 2037230

Published

violated Georgia’s criminal usury statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-14-18, and the Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations

Melton v. Schwinger

678 So. 2d 470, 1996 WL 464165

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1996 | Docket: 64766726

Published

The Uniform Statute and Rule Construction Act § 7, 14 U.L.A. 57 (1995), states that a day begins immediately

State ex rel. State Attorney for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit v. General Development Corp.

448 So. 2d 1074, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12361

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1984 | Docket: 64604295

Published

consistent with the dictates of article II, section 7,14 particularly where DER has allegedly failed