Florida Statute 7.48 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.48

7.48 Orange County.—The boundary lines of Orange County are as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the range line dividing ranges twenty-six and twenty-seven east, with the township line dividing townships twenty-four and twenty-five south; thence north to the waters of Lake Apopka; thence north across the waters of Lake Apopka and along the eastern boundary of Lake County to the north shore of Lake Apopka where it is intersected by the range line dividing ranges twenty-six and twenty-seven; thence north on said range line to the township line dividing townships nineteen and twenty south; thence east on said township line to Wekiva River; thence through the thread of the Wekiva River in a southerly direction to the northwest corner of section thirty-one, township twenty south, range twenty-nine east; thence south on the range line between ranges twenty-eight and twenty-nine east, to the southwest corner of section nineteen, township twenty-one south, range twenty-nine east; thence east to the southeast corner of section twenty, township twenty-one south, range thirty east; thence south to the township line between townships twenty-one and twenty-two south, range thirty east; thence east on said township line to the thread of the St. Johns river; thence southerly down the thread of the said river to the northeast corner of township twenty-five south, range thirty-four east; thence west on said township line to the place of beginning; provided that all of township twenty south, range twenty-seven east, bounded on the south and east by the waters of Lake Beauclaire shall be and are declared to be a part of the territory of Lake County.

History.—s. 10, Dec. 29, 1824; s. 4, Nov. 23, 1828; s. 1, Jan. 30, 1845; s. 1, ch. 548, 1853; s. 1, ch. 1764, 1870; s. 1, ch. 1895, 1872; s. 2, ch. 3177, 1879; s. 1, ch. 3768, 1887; s. 1, ch. 3771, 1887; s. 1, ch. 3944, 1889; RS 41; GS 39; s. 1, ch. 6511, 1913; RGS 42; CGL 44; s. 1, ch. 61-483.

F.S. 7.48 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.48 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.48

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.48

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.48.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.48

Total Results: 15

JEFFREY A HELMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-05-15T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: cell phone registered off a tower in Jupiter around 7:48 p.m. on the night of the robbery. This was around…different areas during the time at question: 7:48 p.m. near Abacoa and Roger Dean Stadium in

MATTHEW WARE v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-11-07T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 258 So. 3d 478

Snippet: Section -7- 48.193(1)(a)7 only extends jurisdiction when a party

League of Women Voters of Florida v. Detzner

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2015-12-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 179 So. 3d 258, 2015 WL 7753054

Snippet: President 51.0% (Obama 49.0% (McCain) Average_'_51.7% _48.3%_ _CP-1 DISTRICT 26 POLITICAL PERFORMANCE_ _Democrat

Gilbert v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-04-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 868 So. 2d 1282, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4297, 2004 WL 689362

Snippet: calls to Gilbert’s cell phone number at 7:46 a.m., 7:48 a.m., 7:52 a.m, and 7:54 a.m. The testimony that

DIV. OF ALCOHOLIC ETC. v. McKesson Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1994-09-07T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 643 So. 2d 16

Snippet: 426 U.S. 229, 237 n. 7, 96 S.Ct. 2040, 2046 n. 7, 48 L.Ed.2d 597, 606 n. 7 (1976), the party named respondent

G. & J. Investments Corp. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-12-29T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 616 So. 2d 459, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13330, 1992 WL 383045

Snippet: payments squarely addressed by Rule 10C-7.48(7)(i). Therefore, Rule 10C-7.48(7)(i) is not in conflict with the… version of Florida Administrative Code Rule 10C-7.48(7)(i) states, “Retroactive payment shall not be … nothing. HRS reasoned that pursuant to Rule 10C-7.48(7)(i), the only way to recoup an underpayment was…underpayment. We find that HRS’s interpretation of Rule IOC-7.48 and the statutes implemented by the rule is reasonable…). The specific statutory authority for Rule IOC-7.48 is section 409.026(1) and (6), Florida Statutes

El Ponce de Leon Convalescent Center v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1987-02-10T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 502 So. 2d 73, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 486, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6699

Snippet: interpretation of Florida Administrative Code Rule 10C-7.-48(6)(i) prohibiting retroactive payments for a closed

Golden Isles Convalescent Center, Inc. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-12-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 500 So. 2d 651, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 95, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11408

Snippet: Care Reimbursement Plan (The Plan). See, Rule 10C-7.48(4)(a)5.a„ Florida Administrative Code. Section III

Greynolds Park Manor, Inc. v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-09-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 496 So. 2d 164, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2009, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9802

Snippet: this are specifically prohibited by Section 10C-7.48(6)(i), Florida Administrative Code, which was in… interpreta*166tion advanced by HRS of Rule 10C-7.-48(6)(i) and concluded that the rule barred Greynolds…DAVEY, KEVIN (Associate Judge), concur. . Rule 10C-7.48(6)(i), Florida Administrative Code, provides in

H.B.A. Corp. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-01-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 482 So. 2d 461, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 195, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5968

Snippet: on “cost report” forms. Fla.Admin.Code Rule 10C-7.-48(4)(a)5(a). To determine whether a claimed cost is

Askew v. Seminole Tribe of Florida, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-08-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 474 So. 2d 877, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2042, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15580

Snippet: Cheyenne Tribe v. Hollowbreast, 425 U.S. 649, 655 n. 7, 48 L.Ed.2d 274, 96 S.Ct. 1793 [1797 n. 7] (1976), that

Gmaz v. King

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-08-19T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 238 So. 2d 511

Snippet: , F.S. 1965, now §§ 49.021 and 49.041, F.S.A. [7] § 48.13, F.S. 1965, now § 49.12, F.S.A. [8] See, e.g

Lynch v. Welan Investment Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1961-01-16T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 126 So. 2d 148

Snippet: HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON, J., concur. . See §§ 48.07, 48.08, Ma.Stat., E\S.A., relating to unknown parties

Rader v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1951-04-16T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 52 So. 2d 105

Snippet: true. Miller v. State, 15 Fla. 577; 41 Am. Jur. 7; 48 C.J. 828. Moreover, the falsity of the material

Keir v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1943-02-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 11 So. 2d 886, 152 Fla. 389, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 921

Snippet: true. Miller v. State, 15 Fla. 577; 41 Am. Jur. 7; 48 C.J. 828. Moreover, the falsity of the material