Florida Statute 7.65 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.65

7.65 Wakulla County.—The boundary lines of Wakulla County are as follows: Beginning on the range line between ranges two and three east where the same strikes the Gulf of Mexico; thence north on said range line to the north boundary of section thirty-six, township two south, range two east; thence due west on the north line of said section thirty-six and other sections to the railroad leading from Tallahassee to St. Marks; thence north along said railroad two sections; thence west on the north line of section twenty, township two south, range one east, and other sections, to the thread of Ochlockonee River; thence southerly and easterly along the thread of said river concurrent with the north and east boundary of Franklin County to a point directly south of the southernmost point of Grass Island; thence along a straight line to the center point of the U.S. 98 (State Road 30) bridge across Ochlockonee Bay; thence east-southeast to a point directly north of the easternmost point of James Island; thence easterly to the boundary line of the State of Florida in the Gulf of Mexico; thence north and easterly along said gulf, including the waters of said gulf within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to the place of beginning.

History.—s. 1, Mar. 11, 1843; s. 1, ch. 414, 1851; RS 22; GS 20; RGS 22; CGL 24; s. 2, ch. 86-288.

F.S. 7.65 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.65 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.65

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.65

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.65.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.65

Total Results: 18

BAUTISTA REO U.S., LLC v. ARR INVESTMENTS, INC.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-07-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 229 So. 3d 362

Snippet: mortgage would secure a $250,000 demand note, plus 7:65% interest, executed by ARR. All of the notes and

Kemp v. Berschback

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-11-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 204 So. 3d 143, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17250

Snippet: under the fee award provision of section 744.331(7). 65 So.3d at 1168. The court observed that there is

Kemp v. Berschback

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-08-10T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: under the fee award provision of section 744.331(7). 65 So. 3d at 1168. The court observed that there

League of Women Voters of Florida v. Detzner

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2015-12-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 179 So. 3d 258, 2015 WL 7753054

Snippet: 54.7 56.5 42.5 45.0 64.7 65.5 50.3 55.0 22.8 62.4 26 CD

Allard v. Al-Nayem International, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-03-16T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 59 So. 3d 198, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3468, 2011 WL 904575

Snippet: that the DOT property comprised 7.65 percent of the total property; 7.65 percent of the purchase price

In Re Forfeiture of $7,065.00 US Currency

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-05-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 37 So. 3d 859

Snippet: 37 So.3d 859 (2010) IN RE FORFEITURE OF $7,065.00 U.S. CURRENCY VICENTE v. STATE EX REL. COLLIER…Fla. Dist. Ct. App. In Re Forfeiture of $7,065.00 US Currency 28 May 2010 37 So. 3d 859

Hogan v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-05-02T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 984 So. 2d 546

Snippet: Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (table); Hogan v. State, No. 07-65 (Fla. 5th DCA Apr. 13, 2007). On September 3, 2007

Blankfeld v. Richmond Health Care, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-05-25T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 902 So. 2d 296

Snippet: whether related to the ward or not."); see also § 7 65.401(1)(a) ("this paragraph shall not be construed

Ching v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-04-14T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 871 So. 2d 981, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5202, 2004 WL 784642

Snippet: score-sheet, which now called for a sentence of between 7.65 years and 12.75 years. Ching was sentenced to 12.75

Ribitzki v. School Bd. of Highlands County

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-05-13T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 710 So. 2d 226

Snippet: Thiboutot, 448 U.S. 1, 9 n. 7, 100 S.Ct. 2502, 2507 n. 7, 65 L.Ed.2d 555 (1980). Accord Hilton v. South Carolina

Polizzi v. Polizzi

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-05-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 600 So. 2d 490

Snippet: the court, the husband in 1989 had an income of $7,065 or about $600 per month. The dissent urges that …Despite the husband's claim that he only earned $7,065 in 1989, the parties wrote checks totalling $38,

Arnesman v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-03-22T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 540 So. 2d 219, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 765, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1516, 1989 WL 25441

Snippet: in the bottom of the bag, a fully loaded Walther 7.65 mm. semiautomatic pistol together with an extra

Kearse v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & REHAB.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-08-20T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 474 So. 2d 819

Snippet: of proposed Florida Administrative Code Rule 10C-7.65. Appellant attacks the rule as being invalid because…non-emergency medical services. Proposed F.A.C. Rule 10C-7.65(8)(c) and (d). After the fact approval may be granted…). Proposed Florida Administrative Code Rule 10C-7.65 does not provide for reimbursement for nonemergency… invalid those portions of proposed FAC Rule 10C-7.65 which require prior authorization for reimbursement…of proposed Florida Administrative Code Rule 10C-7.65 is REVERSED in part and AFFIRMED in part. SMITH

In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, Etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1978-03-15T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 357 So. 2d 172

Snippet: Detroit College of Law Review, Vol. 1977, No. 1, pp. 7-65, Spring 1977. [6] From the remarks of B.J. Masterson

Renedo v. Dade County

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1962-04-10T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 139 So. 2d 698, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3508

Snippet: defendant, Chatham Invest*699ments, Inc., the sum of $7,065. The final judgment for such amounts was entered…Chatham Investments, Inc., as to parcel 48-2, from $7,065 to $5,047. It is from this order of amendment that

Henderson v. Usher

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1935-03-12T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 160 So. 9, 118 Fla. 688, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1763

Snippet: 83, affirmed in 254 U.S. 622, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 7, 65 L.Ed. 443: and Watts v. Alexander, Morrison Co.

Beale, Inc. v. Hawley

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1934-09-10T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 156 So. 529, 116 Fla. 445

Snippet: sum of $579.50, together with the further sum of $7.65 costs of court to be taxed by the Clerk, for all

Barnes v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1903-06-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 46 Fla. 96

Snippet: order payable to Butler Hines for $7.65, and of the value of $7.65; also one money order payable to William