Florida Statute 11.02 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title III
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH; COMMISSIONS

Chapter 11
LEGISLATIVE ORGANIZATION, PROCEDURES, AND STAFFING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 11.02

11.02 Notice of special or local legislation or certain relief acts.—The notice required to obtain special or local legislation or any relief act specified in s. 11.065 shall be by publishing the identical notice as provided in chapter 50 or circulated throughout the county or counties where the matter or thing to be affected by such legislation shall be situated one time at least 30 days before introduction of the proposed law into the Legislature or, if the notice is not published on a publicly accessible website as provided in s. 50.0311 and there is no newspaper circulated throughout or published in the county, by posting for at least 30 days at not fewer than three public places in the county or each of the counties, one of which places shall be at the courthouse in the county or counties where the matter or thing to be affected by such legislation shall be situated. Notice of special or local legislation shall state the substance of the contemplated law, as required by s. 10, Art. III of the State Constitution. Notice of any relief act specified in s. 11.065 shall state the name of the claimant, the nature of the injury or loss for which the claim is made, and the amount of the claim against the affected municipality’s revenue-sharing trust fund.

History.—s. 1, ch. 3708, 1887; RS 66; GS 67; RGS 78; CGL 94; s. 1, ch. 13791, 1929; s. 2, ch. 69-52; s. 5, ch. 69-216; s. 1, ch. 78-302; s. 1, ch. 78-307; s. 2, ch. 96-318; s. 9, ch. 2021-17; s. 9, ch. 2022-103.

F.S. 11.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 11.02 on CourtListener

Amendments to 11.02

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 11.02

Total Results: 107

Diamond Crystal Brands, Inc. v. Food Movers International Inc.

593 F.3d 1249, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 786, 2010 WL 100965

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 13, 2010 | Docket: 503388

Cited 271 times | Published

pickup the Splenda in Savannah. See, e.g., O.C.G.A. § 11-2-319(3) ("Unless otherwise agreed of in any case

Prewitt Enterprises, Inc. v. Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries

353 F.3d 916, 57 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 558, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 25724, 2003 WL 22965587

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 18, 2003 | Docket: 212970

Cited 148 times | Published

apply to service on entities specified under § 11(2) of the Austrian Service Act. Dist. Ct. Doc. 87

Newland v. Hall

527 F.3d 1162, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 10433, 2008 WL 2042822

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 14, 2008 | Docket: 155540

Cited 86 times | Published

See Jack Goger, Georgia Criminal Trial Practice § 11-2 (2007). At the hearing, defense counsel may subpoena

Shernita LUCAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of the U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

918 F.2d 1567, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21560, 1990 WL 183561

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 14, 1990 | Docket: 934876

Cited 79 times | Published

impairment did not meet the criteria under section 11.-02 or 11.03 of the Listing of Impairments, the

Alphamed, Inc. v. B. Braun Medical, Inc.

367 F.3d 1280, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8555, 2004 WL 916005

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 30, 2004 | Docket: 693549

Cited 55 times | Published

Alphamed’s recovery. Pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 11-2-708(2), an aggrieved seller may recover “profit

Owen v. State

596 So. 2d 985, 1992 WL 10615

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1992 | Docket: 1295930

Cited 54 times | Published

LaFave & Jerold H. Israel, Criminal Procedure § 11.2, at 8 (Supp. 1991) ("[T]he initiation of adversary

21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1625, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23936c, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 294 Harry L. Hunt v. Hawthorne Associates, Inc., Eastern Air Lines Variable Benefit Retirement Plan for Pilots Trust Administrative Committee of the Eastern Airlines Variable Benefit Retirement Plan for Pilots

119 F.3d 888

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 2023562

Cited 51 times | Published

participation in or their benefits under the Plan." § 11.2 ("Authority [of Pension Dispute Board]")

TRM, Inc. v. United States

52 F.3d 941, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11940, 1995 WL 258682

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 19, 1995 | Docket: 72851

Cited 46 times | Published

Jr., Administrative Law Treatise § 11.2 (1994). 12 . The Eleventh Circuit

Mahon v. United States Department of Agriculture

485 F.3d 1247, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11017, 2007 WL 1365976

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 10, 2007 | Docket: 398916

Cited 42 times | Published

Congressional directive, the agency promulgated 7 C.F.R. § 11.2(b) (2002), which provides that a person “shall

Advanced Bodycare Solutions, LLC v. Thione International, Inc.

615 F.3d 1352, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17742, 2010 WL 3323741

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 25, 2010 | Docket: 263821

Cited 38 times | Published

lots to be separately accepted . . . ." O.C.G.A. § 11-2-612(1). "Whenever nonconformity or default with

ROYAL OAK LANDING HOME-OWNER'S ASS'N v. Pelletier

620 So. 2d 786, 1993 WL 152424

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1993 | Docket: 1387147

Cited 38 times | Published

of sections 11.2 and 13.9 of the Declaration. Section 11.2 provides: No Lot shall be divided, subdivided

Roboserve, Ltd., Cross-Appellant v. Tom's Foods, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Cross-Appellee

940 F.2d 1441, 16 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 987, 20 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1321, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 20568, 1991 WL 157918

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 4, 1991 | Docket: 318431

Cited 36 times | Published

requirements of the Georgia Statute of Frauds, O.C.G.A. § 11-2-201, and should not have been submitted to the

T.W.M. v. American Medical System, Inc.

886 F. Supp. 842, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7231, 1995 WL 319071

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 1995 | Docket: 2448242

Cited 29 times | Published

defendant. 1 White & Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 11-2, at 528 (3rd ed. 1988). The complaint does not

Investacorp, Inc. v. Arabian Investment Banking Corp. (Investcorp) E. C.

931 F.2d 1519

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 29, 1991 | Docket: 66263738

Cited 26 times | Published

603 (1979). . See J. MCCARTHY, supra note 6, § 11:2. . Vision Center v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111

Cramer v. Chiles

33 F. Supp. 2d 1342, 1999 WL 53039

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1999 | Docket: 2382851

Cited 23 times | Published

Developmentally Disabled program. 1996, Fla.Laws ch. 96-417, § 11(2). [2] During the pendency of this action, Plaintiff

Hill v. Hoover Co.

899 F. Supp. 2d 1259, 2012 WL 4510855, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142212

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2012 | Docket: 65985719

Cited 15 times | Published

(citing 1 White & Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 11-2, at 528 (3rd ed.1988)). This Court finds that the

Wilkerson v. Olcott

212 So. 2d 119

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1968 | Docket: 460593

Cited 13 times | Published

to the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, Section 11.02(4), 32 F.S.A. which reads as follows: "(4) Trust

Bonvento v. BD. OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, PALM BEACH CTY.

194 So. 2d 605

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 1967 | Docket: 1494078

Cited 12 times | Published

Article III of the Florida Constitution and Section 11.02, Florida Statutes 1963, F.S.A., a notice of

Bonvento v. BD. OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, PALM BEACH CTY.

194 So. 2d 605

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 1967 | Docket: 1494078

Cited 12 times | Published

Article III of the Florida Constitution and Section 11.02, Florida Statutes 1963, F.S.A., a notice of

CORAL 97 ASSOCIATES v. Chino Elec., Inc.

501 So. 2d 69, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 256

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 1987 | Docket: 538480

Cited 11 times | Published

Trawick, Jr., Trawick's Florida Practice & Procedure § 11-2 (1986 ed.). In these circumstances, Florida Rule

State v. City of Miami Springs

245 So. 2d 80

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1971 | Docket: 1356636

Cited 11 times | Published

concur. NOTES [1] Fla.Con. of 1885, Art. VIII, § 11. [2] Id. at (6).

Pycsa Panama, S.A. v. Tensar Earth Technologies, Inc.

625 F. Supp. 2d 1198, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31457, 2008 WL 1775409

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2008 | Docket: 2268035

Cited 10 times | Published

conditions in contracts between merchants.[38] Section 11-2-207 of Georgia's UCC, which is titled *1250

Bartelt v. Bartelt

579 So. 2d 282, 1991 WL 72015

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1991 | Docket: 2192550

Cited 10 times | Published

McGovern, Kurtz & Rein, Wills, Trusts & Estates, § 11.2 (1988) ("The word `heirs' does not always refer

Hancock v. Sapp

225 So. 2d 411

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1969 | Docket: 1444752

Cited 10 times | Published

judice derives its organic jurisdiction under Section 11(2), Article V, Constitution of Florida, which

St. Vincent's Center v. Memorial Healthcare

967 So. 2d 794, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 556, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1595, 2007 WL 2492345

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 2007 | Docket: 1408395

Cited 9 times | Published

See St. Vincent's, 928 So.2d at 435. [2] Section 11.02, Florida Statutes (2004), provides the notice

In Re PAVCO Enterprises, Inc.

172 B.R. 114, 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 176, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 1473, 1994 WL 518932

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 1994 | Docket: 1868407

Cited 9 times | Published

Tenant," which provides inter alia as follows: Section 11.2, LANDLORD'S RIGHTS ON DEFAULT. In the event

The Florida Bar v. Knowles

500 So. 2d 140, 55 U.S.L.W. 2437, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 62, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 3019

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1986 | Docket: 1689435

Cited 9 times | Published

accounts) of the Integration Rule, and Bylaws Section 11.02(4)(c) (failure to apply proper trust accounting

The Florida Bar v. Knowles

500 So. 2d 140, 55 U.S.L.W. 2437, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 62, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 3019

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1986 | Docket: 1689435

Cited 9 times | Published

accounts) of the Integration Rule, and Bylaws Section 11.02(4)(c) (failure to apply proper trust accounting

Pinellas County v. Laumer

94 So. 2d 837

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1957 | Docket: 1412180

Cited 9 times | Published

Bill throughout the Legislature as required by Section 11.02 and 11.03, Florida Statutes 1941, and the Legislature

Alimenta (u.s.a.), Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch Companies,inc., Alimenta (u.s.a.), Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc., Cross-Appellant

803 F.2d 1160

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 26, 1986 | Docket: 966816

Cited 8 times | Published

is whether the Parole Evidence Rule, O.C. G.A. § 11-2-202, provides a basis to disturb the jury’s finding

Pinkney v. State

74 So. 3d 572, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18473, 2011 WL 5600041

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2011 | Docket: 2352233

Cited 7 times | Published

generally 2 Wayne R. LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law, § 11.2 (2d ed. 2003). To constitute the common law crime

The Florida Bar v. Adler

589 So. 2d 899, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 739, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 1989, 1991 WL 238643

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1991 | Docket: 1730774

Cited 7 times | Published

Florida Bar Integration Rule Bylaws, article XI, section 11.02(4)(c)2.c. for failing to maintain, preserve

The Florida Bar v. Hartman

519 So. 2d 606, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 61, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 120, 1988 WL 6026

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1988 | Docket: 1332554

Cited 7 times | Published

client is entitled to receive); and Bylaws Section 11.02(4)(c) (lack of a separate cash receipts and

Walker v. State

483 So. 2d 791, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 390

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1986 | Docket: 1511935

Cited 6 times | Published

supra. See also: C. Whitebread, Criminal Procedure § 11.02, at 213-214 (1980). One such exception to the warrant

Tampa-Hillsborough County v. AGWS

608 So. 2d 52, 1992 WL 235303

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1992 | Docket: 1449381

Cited 5 times | Published

Education Florida Eminent Domain Practice and Procedure § 11.2. Although a jury can certainly award zero damages

Southern Guaranty Insurance Company v. Zantop International Airlines, Inc., and Puritan Insurance Company, and Warren Associates, Inc.

767 F.2d 795, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21118

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 2, 1985 | Docket: 497923

Cited 5 times | Published

Cf. Long, Products Liability Insurance § 11.02 at 11-12-5 n. 2 (in the analogous products liability

Deseret Ranches of Florida, Inc. v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist.

406 So. 2d 1132, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21783

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1981 | Docket: 2539607

Cited 4 times | Published

III, section 10, Florida Constitution, and section 11.02, Florida Statutes.[4] Respondents concede that

Johnson v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company

339 F. Supp. 1178, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14949

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1972 | Docket: 1024221

Cited 4 times | Published

building or floor area served thereby is occupied." Section 11.2. Marking of Exit Ways. "a. In rooms accommodating

Hunt v. Hawthorne Associates, Inc.

119 F.3d 888, 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1625, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 20761, 1997 WL 437161

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 766056

Cited 3 times | Published

participation in or their benefits under the Plan.” § 11.2 ("Authority [of Pension Dispute Board]”). . For

Crocker v. Diland Corp.

593 So. 2d 1096, 1992 WL 13826

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1992 | Docket: 446491

Cited 3 times | Published

permitted. H. Trawick, Florida Practice and Procedure, § 11-2 (1989). Trawick gives no authority for this conclusion

The Florida Bar v. DeSerio

529 So. 2d 1117, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 503, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 892, 1988 WL 89761

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1988 | Docket: 432332

Cited 3 times | Published

than six (6) years); The Florida Bar Bylaws Section 11.02(4)(c) 2 (Failure to maintain minimum trust accounting

In Re 163rd Street Medical Corp.

47 B.R. 869, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 6378

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Apr 4, 1985 | Docket: 1776384

Cited 3 times | Published

and thereby terminated the Lease pursuant to Section 11.2 thereof. On November 1, 1984 the Summons and

Caves v. State

303 So. 2d 658

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1974 | Docket: 1314165

Cited 3 times | Published

1887, 23 Fla. 281, 2 So. 5. Fla. Const. Art. V, § 11(2), 1885, provided: "The justices of the peace shall

Metropolitan Dade County v. Bannister

683 So. 2d 130, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13154, 1996 WL 229128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1996 | Docket: 466132

Cited 2 times | Published

Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Administrative Law Treatise § 11.2 at 178-79 (3d ed. 1994). This places the federal

In Re Pruner

122 B.R. 459, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 2650, 1990 WL 212895

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1990 | Docket: 1831115

Cited 2 times | Published

debtor was the employer and sole beneficiary. Section 11.2 of the pension plan prohibits the assignment

Alimenta (u.s.a.), Inc. v. Cargill, Incorporated

861 F.2d 650, 7 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1100, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16525, 1988 WL 123565

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 8, 1988 | Docket: 985042

Cited 2 times | Published

preclude reliance on the allocation remedy of O.C.G.A. § 11-2-615, the seller need expressly assume a greater

Alimenta (u.s.a.), Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Gibbs Nathaniel (Canada) Ltd., Cross-Appellant

802 F.2d 1362, 2 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 490, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32516

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 23, 1986 | Docket: 804082

Cited 2 times | Published

assumed a greater obligation and subject to Code Section 11-2-614 on substituted performance: (a) Delay

Matter of Interest on Trust Accounts

396 So. 2d 719

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1981 | Docket: 1447466

Cited 2 times | Published

clients when appropriate; (b) A modification of section 11.02(4)(d) of the Integration Rule is proposed as

Chavous v. Goodbred

30 So. 2d 370, 158 Fla. 826, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 644

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1947 | Docket: 3266672

Cited 2 times | Published

Article III, Section 21, Florida Constitution and Section 11.02 Fla. Stat., 1941, F.S.A., must be published

Ward v. RETIREMENT BD. OF NFL PLAYER RETIRE. PLAN

643 F.3d 1331

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 22, 2011 | Docket: 1889212

Cited 1 times | Published

specifically the Plan's spendthrift provision. Section 11.2 of the Plan provided: "Spendthrift" Provision

Fields v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

751 F. Supp. 2d 1257, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130126, 2009 WL 7115134

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2009 | Docket: 2337666

Cited 1 times | Published

(citing White & Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 11-2, at 528 (3rd ed. 1988)). Plaintiff's complaint

Ahlers v. Wilson

867 So. 2d 524, 2004 WL 352187

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2004 | Docket: 1722589

Cited 1 times | Published

Philip J. Padovano, FLORIDA APPELLATE PRACTICE § 11.2 (2004 ed.). And see 5 Am.Jur.2d Appellate Review

Centurion Air Cargo, Inc. v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE CO.

300 F. Supp. 2d 1281, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1035, 2004 WL 169879

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2004 | Docket: 2428360

Cited 1 times | Published

all Retained Liabilities." Purchase Agreement, § 11.02. It is undisputed that these "Retained Liabilities"

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

858 So. 2d 1013, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 797, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1779, 2003 WL 22410375

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2003 | Docket: 64826361

Cited 1 times | Published

and Jones’ Florida Civil and Criminal Discovery, § 11-2 (4th ed.1997); James L. Underwood, A Guide to Federal

COMPANIA PANAMENA DE v. Gerstein

645 So. 2d 55, 1994 WL 594751

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1994 | Docket: 1654546

Cited 1 times | Published

petitioners. See Lee S. Kreindler, Aviation Accident Law § 11.02[7], at 11-34 (1993) ("The Warsaw Convention only

Geovision, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Geovision Corporation and Geovision Systems, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees

928 F.2d 387, 18 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1560, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5884

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 11, 1991 | Docket: 1001629

Cited 1 times | Published

of a ‘present sale’ that is defined in O.C.G.A. § 11-2-106(1) as ... a sale which is accomplished by the

Simpson v. K-Mart Corp.

537 So. 2d 677, 1989 WL 4182

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1989 | Docket: 2557932

Cited 1 times | Published

provision arguably prohibits such a placement, see § 11.02(3), Metro-Dade County Fire Prevention & Safety

Citi-Lease Co. v. Entertainment Family Style, Inc.

825 F.2d 1497, 4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 842

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 27, 1987 | Docket: 66227940

Cited 1 times | Published

Gilmore, Securities Interests in Personal Property, § 11.2, at 338. Rather, the terms of the agreements themselves

Edmondson v. Northrup King & Co.

817 F.2d 742

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 27, 1987 | Docket: 66225248

Cited 1 times | Published

provisions of O.C. G.A. § 11-1-201(10) and O.C.G.A. § 11-2-302(1) to support its argument that both questions

The Florida Bar v. Carter

502 So. 2d 904, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 102, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1527

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1987 | Docket: 1180937

Cited 1 times | Published

Florida Bar Integration Rule By-laws, article XI, section 11.02(4)(c)(6). Carter's suspension shall be effective

F/S Airlease II, Inc. v. Air Florida, Inc. (In Re Air Florida, Inc.)

44 B.R. 798, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 4517

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Nov 30, 1984 | Docket: 1818995

Cited 1 times | Published

of Ownership of Engine 093 28. Pursuant to Section 11.02 of the Master Lease, Air Florida was required

Town of Palm Beach v. Palm Beach Local 1866 of the International Ass'n of Fire Fighters

275 So. 2d 247, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3020, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4670

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1973 | Docket: 64531173

Cited 1 times | Published

Article III of the Florida, Constitution (.1968) and § 11.02, Fla.Stat., F. S.A. Appellee moved for a rehearing

HUTCHINS v. SCT TRADING, LLC, 8831 W. HILLSBOROUGH AVE, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2024 | Docket: 69021510

Published

Florida, The Florida Bar Florida Appellate Practice § 11.2.C.1 (2022) (observing that "the requirement

Wadley Crushed Stone Company, LLC v. Positive Step, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 24, 2022 | Docket: 63334910

Published

four years. See Ala. Code § 7- 2-725(1); O.C.G.A. § 11-2-725. Starting with the substance of the

THE CITY OF COCOA vs THE VILLAS OF COCOA VILLAGE, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2022 | Docket: 63591356

Published

24 Fla. Prac., Fla. Municipal Law & Prac. § 11:2 (2021 ed.). A request for proposal is used

K.D. v. IN RE: IN THE INTEREST OF P.P., R.P., and L.P.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2022 | Docket: 63180096

Published

Florida Bar, Florida Juvenile Law and Practice § 11.2(C) (16th ed. 2020); see § 61.514(1)(b), Fla. Stat

Midlevelu, LLC v. ACI Information Group

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 3, 2021 | Docket: 59701417

Published

Jr., The Law of Easements and Licenses in Land § 11:2, at 807 (2020); see Restatement (Second) of Torts

Robert Emerson v. Hillsborough County, Florida, etc. & Stacy White v. Hillsborough County, Florida, etc.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2021 | Docket: 59682242

Published

the purpose set forth” in the amendment. Id. § 11.02. The surtax, which had an effective date of January

Kelvin Leon Jones v. Governor of Florida

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 19, 2020 | Docket: 16861481

Published

the authorized sentence”); Tex. Elec. Code Ann. § 11.002(a)(4)(A) (permitting re- enfranchisement once

Corrigan v. Bank of America, N.A.

189 So. 3d 187, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1543, 2016 WL 455718

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 2016 | Docket: 3034022

Published

Myron C. Weinstein, 29 N.J. Prac., Law of Mortgages § 11.2 (2d ed. 2001) (”[T]o hold ... that when one in

St. Joseph Hospital, Augusta, Georgia, Inc. v. Health Management Associates, Inc.

705 F.3d 1289, 2013 WL 258732, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 1620

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 24, 2013 | Docket: 890393

Published

unenforceable under Georgia’s statute of frauds, O.C.G.A. § 11-2-201 (2012) and O.C.G.A. § 13-5-30 (2012).

St. Joseph Hospital, Augusta, Georgia, Inc. v. Health Management Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 24, 2013 | Docket: 2903626

Published

unenforceable under Georgia’s statute of frauds, O.C.G.A. § 11-2-201 (2012) and O.C.G.A. § 13-5-30 (2012).17 HMA’s

Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. National Safety Commission, Inc.

75 So. 3d 298, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15767, 2011 WL 4597503

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2011 | Docket: 60303681

Published

contract may be bilateral, 3 Corbin on Contracts § 11.2 (Rev. Ed.), that is usually because each party

Ward v. Retirement Board of Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan

643 F.3d 1331

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 22, 2011 | Docket: 2906301

Published

specifically the Plan’s spendthrift provision. Section 11.2 of the Plan provided: “Spendthrift” Provision

Advanced BodyCare Solutions v. Thione Int'l., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 25, 2010 | Docket: 2906918

Published

lots to be separately accepted . . . .” O.C.G.A. § 11- 2-612(1). “Whenever nonconformity or default with

In Re Anchor Glass Container Corp.

375 B.R. 683, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 23, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 3136, 48 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 242, 2007 WL 2713388

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2007 | Docket: 1698693

Published

property. Ga. Real Estate Finance & Foreclosure Law § 11-2 (4th ed.) (citing Ga.Code Ann. § 48-5-9; Suttles

Banc One Leasing Corp. v. Everglades Memorial Hospital, Inc. (In re Everglades Memorial Hospital, Inc.)

346 B.R. 223, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 296, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 1454

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Apr 26, 2006 | Docket: 65783054

Published

effective date of this act.” (Banc One Ex. 2 — Section 11(2)). Pursuant to the Act, the rights and powers

Hunt v. Hawthorn Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 74098

Published

participation in or their benefits under the Plan.” § 11.2 (“Authority [of Pension Dispute Board]”).

Scala v. City of Winter Park

971 F. Supp. 528, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21642, 1996 WL 905614

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1996 | Docket: 66015790

Published

governing post-action hearings are found in section 11.02 of the Personnel Manual and provide that “the

Hillsborough Holdings Corp. v. United States (In re Hillsborough Holdings Corp.)

179 B.R. 728, 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 396, 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 295, 75 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1547

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1995 | Docket: 65780995

Published

CFR § 601.201(Z)(2); Rev.Proc. 92-1, supra, at § 11.02. See also Dickman v. Commissioner, 465 U.S. 330

Oceans Four Condominium Ass'n v. Stafford

545 So. 2d 435, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1478, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3402, 1989 WL 63398

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1989 | Docket: 64643286

Published

unit for sale.” The preference is found under section 11.2 which provides for “Approval of Association

Florida Bar v. Newhouse

539 So. 2d 473, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 101, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 142, 1989 WL 21079

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1989 | Docket: 64640846

Published

02(3)(a) and (b), 11.-02(4)(a), (b), (c) and (d); Section 11.02(4)(c) of the Bylaws under the Integration Rule;

Florida Bar v. Johnson

526 So. 2d 53, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 367, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 677, 1988 WL 55628

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1988 | Docket: 64635179

Published

Bylaws Under the Integration Rule, article XI, Section 11.02(4)(c)(2)(f). [[Image here]] The only records

Florida Bar v. Hosner

513 So. 2d 1057, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 527, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2732

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1987 | Docket: 64630107

Published

held in trust for clients, and article XI, section 11.02(4)(c) of the Integration Rule Bylaws,3 which

Florida Bar v. Sharman

504 So. 2d 1236, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 160, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1708

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1987 | Docket: 64626198

Published

account); Integration Rule 11.02(4)(b) and Bylaws Section 11.02(4)(c) 2.f (2.d before June 30, 1984) (client

Florida Bar v. Padrino

500 So. 2d 525, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 71, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1397

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1987 | Docket: 64624239

Published

Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, article XI, section 11.-02(4)(c) of the Integration Rule Bylaws, and Disciplinary

Florida Bar v. Pierce

498 So. 2d 431, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 642, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2892

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1986 | Docket: 64623434

Published

to the attorney; Rule 11.02(4)(c) and Bylaw Section 11.02(4)(c), paragraph 3(c) for failing to prepare

Hatcher v. Allied Products Corp.

782 F.2d 926, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22407

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 18, 1986 | Docket: 66213861

Published

the contract and except as provided in Code Section 11-2-318. (b) (1) The manufacturer of any personal

Florida Bar v. Diaz-Silveira

477 So. 2d 562, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 554, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3914

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1985 | Docket: 64614958

Published

02(4), Disciplinary Rule 9-102(A) and Bylaws Section 11.02(4)(c). The referee recommended that Diaz-Silveira

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Oct 1, 1985 | Docket: 3255692

Published

extinguishment, and control of fires in the district." Section 11(2), Ch. 76-414, Laws of Florida. The Board is

The Florida Bar v. Gentry

475 So. 2d 678, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 490

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1985 | Docket: 1301921

Published

Integration Rule of The Florida Bar and By-Law for Section 11.02(4)(c) effective until June 30, 1984 as to Count

Florida Bar v. Palley

471 So. 2d 36, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 308, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3459

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1985 | Docket: 64612642

Published

Bylaws under the Integration Rule, article XI, Section 11.02(4)(e) and Disciplinary Rule 9-102(A) of the

Florida Bar v. Napier

467 So. 2d 994, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 233, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3020

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1985 | Docket: 64611541

Published

Rule 11.02(4) of the Integration Rule, Bylaws section 11.-02(4)(c) and Disciplinary Rules 6-101(A)(3), 7-102(A)(5)

Florida Bar

432 So. 2d 570, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 2360

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1983 | Docket: 64597374

Published

-*57102(4)(c), the Integration Rule Bylaws, article XI, section 11.02(4)(c), and the Code of Professional Responsibility

Florida Bar v. Barksdale

414 So. 2d 514, 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2424

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1982 | Docket: 64590240

Published

Rule, article XI, Rule 11.02(4)(b) and (c); Section 11.02(4)(c) 4.a. and 2.d. of The Florida Bar Integration

Sheraton Twin Towers v. Casas

397 So. 2d 391, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19336

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1981 | Docket: 64582135

Published

disability.” L. Alpert, Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 11-2 (3d ed. 1978). Alpert also notes that there is

Florida Bar

328 So. 2d 196, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4404

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1976 | Docket: 64552765

Published

27 adopted by the Supreme Court in 1955 and Section 11.02(3) (a) of the Integration Rule of The Florida

DiPaolo v. City of Clearwater

295 So. 2d 349, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7093

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1974 | Docket: 64539349

Published

the Constitution of Florida (1885) F.S.A.1 and § 11.02, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. The order of the trial

Florida Bar v. Zyne

266 So. 2d 668, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3470

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1972 | Docket: 64527610

Published

and in violation of Integration Rule art. XI, § 11.02 (4). (3) Letting the Statute of Limitations run

State ex rel. Lee v. Snowden

263 So. 2d 205, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3593

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1972 | Docket: 64526343

Published

the following ruling of Law: “1. That Article V § 11(2) of the Florida Constitution [F.S.A.] granting

Metropolitan Dade County v. Florida Processing Co.

229 So. 2d 254, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2542

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1969 | Docket: 64512438

Published

(1954); 2 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 11.02 (1958); Cooper, Administrative Agencies and the

Miller v. Davis

174 So. 2d 8, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3414

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1965 | Docket: 64492714

Published

Florida 1961 constitutional in view of Article V, § 11(2) of the Constitution of the State of Florida? 3

Totten v. Okaloosa County Gas District

164 So. 2d 15, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2697

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1964 | Docket: 60221516

Published

constitutional provision is implemented by Section 11.02, Florida Statutes,. F.S.A. We have held that

Robinson v. State

124 So. 2d 714

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1960 | Docket: 60196036

Published

districts * * ” (emphasis supplied), and Article V, Section 11(2), F.S.A., providing in part, “The justices of

State v. County of Santa Rosa

105 So. 2d 365

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1958 | Docket: 60190834

Published

Rosa County. It was published as required by Section 11.02, *368Florida Statutes, F.S.A., and met all the

City of Hialeah v. Pfaffendorf

91 So. 2d 192

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1956 | Docket: 64488608

Published

III of the Florida Constitution F.S.A. and Section 11.02, F.S. 1955, F.S.A., as to Chapter 30807, supra

City of Hialeah v. Pfaffendorf

90 So. 2d 596

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1956 | Docket: 64488539

Published

Section 21 of Article III of the Constitution and Section 11,02, F.S. 1955, F.S.A.In this appeal from the decree