Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 11.03 (2025)

Proof of publication of notice.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

11.03 Proof of publication of notice.—

(1) Affidavit of proof of publication of such notice of intention to apply therefor, may be made, in substantially the following general form, but such form shall not be exclusive:

STATE OF FLORIDA

COUNTY OF

Before the undersigned authority personally appeared , who on oath does solemnly swear (or affirm) that she or he has knowledge of the matters stated herein; that a notice stating the substance of a contemplated law or proposed bill relating to

(here identify bill)

has been published at least 30 days prior to this date, by being printed in the issues of (here state day, month and year of issue or issues) of the , a newspaper or newspapers published in County or Counties, Florida (or) there being no newspaper, by being posted for at least 30 days prior to this date at three public places in County or Counties, one of which places was at the courthouse of said county or counties, where the matter or thing to be affected by the contemplated law is situated; that a copy of the notice that has been published as aforesaid and also this affidavit of proof of publication are attached to the proposed bill or contemplated law, and such copy of the notice so attached is by reference made a part of this affidavit.

Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this day of , (year) , by (name of person making statement) .

(Signature of Notary Public - State of Florida)

(Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public)

Personally Known OR Produced Identification

Type of Identification Produced

(2) Such affidavit of proof of publication shall be attached to the contemplated law when it is introduced into the Legislature. A true copy of the notice published or posted shall also be attached to the bill when introduced, but it shall not be necessary to enter said published or posted notice, or proof thereof, in the journals. The fact that such notice was established in the Legislature shall in every case be recited upon the journals of the Senate and of the House of Representatives, and the notice published and affidavit of publication thereof shall accompany the bill throughout the Legislature and be preserved as a part thereof in the Department of State.

History.—s. 2, ch. 3708, 1887; RS 67; GS 68; RGS 79; CGL 95; s. 1, ch. 13791, 1929; s. 1, ch. 21635, 1943; ss. 10, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 6, ch. 95-147; s. 11, ch. 98-246.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1943–2021 · leading case: Great S. v. First S., 625 So. 2d 463 (Fla. 1993).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Great S. v. First S., 625 So. 2d 463 (Fla. 1993). · cites it 2× “McCarthy, § 11.03[1] (footnote omitted). [8] KODAK, POLAROID and XEROX are examples of fanciful or coined marks.”

Cox v. State, 219 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969). “2d Evidence § 11.03 and 29 Am.Jur.2d Evidence § 494. By his cross-examination of the victim it must be assumed that he waived any right to object on the ground that these statements were made outside his presence.”

State Ex Rel. Watson v. City of Miami, 15 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1943). “f the fact that the affidavit of proof of publication of notice that apparently accompanied the bill when it was first introduced in the House of Representatives on May 29, 1941, and that was spread in full on the House Journal, is not now filed and preserved with the original…”

Chavous v. Goodbred, 30 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 1947). · cites it 2× “Section 11.03, Fla. Stat., 1941. F.S.A., imports no binding effect because it is suggestive only in so far as the form of the proof of publication is set forth.”

City of Coral Gables v. Brigham, 321 So. 2d 615 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). “07 [requiring building permits] and § 11.03 [requiring approval of a Board of Architects] of the Code declared unconstitutional.”

Robert Emerson v. Hillsborough Cnty., Florida, etc. & Stacy White v. Hillsborough Cnty., Florida, etc. (Fla. 2021). “§ 11.03. Article 11 contains an elaborate scheme with provisions governing the distribution to various entities of surtax proceeds, provisions governing the use by those entities of the funds distributed, and provisions establishing and empowering an independent oversight…”

Zinman v. L.A. Fitness Int'l LLC (S.D. Fla. 2021). “, Moore’s Federal Practice § 11.03 (3d ed. 2010)). “When an attorney files a pleading in federal court, the attorney signs the pleading to certify that, among other things, (1) the pleading is not being presented for an improper purpose; (2) the legal contentions are warranted…”

Thacker v. State, 313 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). “In such a situation, if the facts before the court clearly give rise to an inference that the requisite knowledge or intent existed, the court may accept a plea of guilty after having satisfied itself that the plea was made voluntarily and with an understanding of the nature of…”

Hillsborough Holdings Corp. v. United States (In re Hillsborough Holdings Corp.), 179 B.R. 728 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1995). “The Private Letter does not provide for any contingencies or exceptions to the ruling. Private Letter Rulings issued by the National Office of the Internal Revenue Service are binding on the Service’s district office in its determination of a taxpayer’s liability for the…”

— 11.03(4) — 1 case

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.