Florida Statute 11.25 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title III
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH; COMMISSIONS

Chapter 11
LEGISLATIVE ORGANIZATION, PROCEDURES, AND STAFFING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 11.25

11.25 Salaries and expenditures not subject to control of executive agencies.—

(1) The Legislature hereby declares and determines that the employees of the several offices, committees, and other divisions of the Legislature are and shall continue to be groups of employees employed by the Legislature to perform such services as may be provided by law, by rule of the respective house, or directed by the joint committee, whichever is applicable. Such offices, committees and divisions are not agencies of government within the intent of the Legislature as expressed in chapters 216 and 287.

(2) Agencies of the executive branch shall have no power to determine the number or fix the compensation of legislative employees or exercise any manner of control over them. The selection of such employees, the determination of their qualifications and compensation, and the establishment of policies relating to their work, including hours of work, leave, and other matters, shall be the sole prerogative of the Legislature.

History.—s. 9, ch. 25369, 1949; ss. 1-4, ch. 29659, 1955; ss. 2, 3, ch. 67-371; s. 18, ch. 68-35; s. 25, ch. 69-52; ss. 31, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 4, ch. 77-104; s. 5, ch. 92-279; s. 55, ch. 92-326.

F.S. 11.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 11.25 on Casetext

Amendments to 11.25

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 11.25

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 11.25.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 11.25

Total Results: 20

Ronald Stuyvesant Boyd v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-06-05T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: error. Rather, the error involves the omission of 11.25 years from that figure. Stated differently, the

LEANTHONY SMITH v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-11-22T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: be on the jury, explaining: MS. LEWIS: At 11:25 this morning when Defense, Mr. Amsel, was questioning

Mark D. Sievers v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2022-11-16T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: he heard the garage door roll up shortly before 11:25 p.m. Wright scrambled to conceal himself in the

In Re: Amendments to the Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to The Bar - Rules 2-13.1 and 3-11

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2020-11-24T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: to Admissions to The Bar - Rules 2-13.1 and 3-11 25 November 2020 Published 7924e1adc35bfd7cf7a5515f1f3160659ed7bcbf

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2018-12.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2019-05-30T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 272 So. 3d 243

Snippet: respectively. Lastly, instructions 25.9, 25.10, 25.11, 25.11(a), 25.11(b), 25.12, 25.13, 25.13(a), 25.13(… In addition, instructions 25.9, 25.10, 25.11, 25.11(a), 25.11(b), 25.12, 25.13, 25.13(a), 25.13(

Bernard Cheremont v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-04-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 217 So. 3d 1181, 2017 WL 1548043, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5941

Snippet: Athias. Cheremont’s testimony ended at approximately 11:25 a.m. Defense counsel requested a short recess to

& SC16-56 Cary Michael Lambrix v. State of Florida and Cary Michael Lambrix v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-03-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 217 So. 3d 977

Snippet: (Fla. 2010); Johnston v. State, 27 So. 3d 11, 25 (Fla. 2010); Glock v. Moore, 776 So. 2d 243, 252

Freddie Lee Hall v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2016-09-08T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 201 So. 3d 628, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 372, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1994

Snippet: WRAT-III Vineland ' DX: Mentally retarded 11/25/08 Age 63 Dr. Joseph Sesta WAIS-IV IQ Testing FSIQ

Citizens of the State of Florida, etc. v. Florida Public Service Commission

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2014-08-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 146 So. 3d 1143, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 519, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 2581, 2014 WL 4257733

Snippet: that FPL’s original request for a ROE midpoint of 11.25%, and a performance adder of .25%, was not supported…notable is that FPL requested a midpoint ROE of 11.25%, negotiated a 10.7% midpoint, and ultimately agreed…Florida investor-owned utility earning a ROE of 11.25%. All of the testimony referenced above supports

Juan Carlos Chavez v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2014-01-31T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 132 So. 3d 826, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 73, 2014 WL 346026, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 436

Snippet: See generally Johnston v. State, 27 So.3d 11, 25 (Fla.2010) (noting that “no specific procedures

Pardo v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2012-12-04T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 108 So. 3d 558, 2012 WL 6935117, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2570

Snippet: L.Ed.2d 105 (2010); Johnston v. State, 27 So.3d 11, 25 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 459,

Cruz v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-01-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 81 So. 3d 501, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 533, 2012 WL 127341

Snippet: ; the officer approved the plans. One night, at 11:25, the officer went to check on Cruz at this location

Wells v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-05-04T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 60 So. 3d 551, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6357, 2011 WL 1681415

Snippet: condition 12, the affidavit states: [0]n or about 11/25/09 the offender had contact with a 1 year old child

Florida Bar v. Shankman

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2010-07-08T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 41 So. 3d 166, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 445, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1112, 2010 WL 2680248

Snippet: ’s share of the fees increased to approximately 11.25 percent of the client’s gross recovery. After the

Keene v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-10-30T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 22 So. 3d 665, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16130, 2009 WL 3485968

Snippet: Background Keene owns property adjoining the Wil-sons’ 11.25-acre tract of land. He is, to put it mildly, a disgruntled…such a facility on the Wilsons’ property. It is an 11.25-acre tract of land that is not designed for or intended… of these requirements: it is nothing more than 11.25 acres with trees, fields, a house, and a barn. Moreover

Lamour v. Deer Run Property Owners Ass'n

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-05-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 11 So. 3d 446, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6040, 2009 WL 1456954

Snippet: unrepresented defendant at 10:55 a.m. for a hearing at 11:25 a.m. the following day. At the hearing the defendant

Klem v. ESPEJO-NORTON

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-06-25T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 983 So. 2d 1235

Snippet: #39;s Estate). See generally Stephens, supra at 11-25. Under this rule, the claim that Miami-Dade County

Marr v. Webb

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-05-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 930 So. 2d 734

Snippet: construction of the homes at an interest rate of 11.25%. The Contractors later advised Marr, by a letter

Wilson v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-04-21T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 873 So. 2d 419, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5448, 2004 WL 840219

Snippet: sentence in case number 94-9233 for a total of 11.25 years. See § 921.16, Fla. Stat. (2003) (“[sentences

Cortina v. Staffing Source, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-05-02T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 843 So. 2d 373, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6218, 2003 WL 2003779

Snippet: given notice at 10:55 a.m. on the day before the 11:25 a.m. hearing. At the hearing, Corti-na told the