Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 11.47 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 11.47 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 11.47

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title III
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH; COMMISSIONS
Chapter 11
LEGISLATIVE ORGANIZATION, PROCEDURES, AND STAFFING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 11.47
11.47 Penalties; failure to make a proper audit or examination; making a false report; failure to produce documents or information.
(1) All officers whose respective offices the Auditor General or the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability is authorized to audit or examine shall enter into their public records sufficient information for proper audit or examination, and shall make the same available to the Auditor General or the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability on demand.
(2) The willful failure or refusal of the Auditor General, director of the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability, or any staff employed by the Auditor General or the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability to make a proper audit or examination in line with his or her duty, the willful making of a false report as to any audit or examination, or the willful failure or refusal to report a shortage or misappropriation of funds or property shall be cause for removal from such office or employment, and the Auditor General, the director of the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability, or a staff member shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(3) Any person who willfully fails or refuses to provide access to an employee, officer, or agent of an entity subject to an audit or to furnish or produce any book, record, paper, document, data, or sufficient information necessary to a proper audit or examination which the Auditor General or the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability is by law authorized to perform commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(4) Any officer who willfully fails or refuses to furnish or produce any book, record, paper, document, data, or sufficient information necessary to a proper audit or examination which the Auditor General or the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability is by law authorized to perform, shall be subject to removal from office.
History.s. 7, ch. 69-82; s. 9, ch. 71-136; s. 22, ch. 95-147; s. 27, ch. 96-318; s. 16, ch. 2001-266; s. 3, ch. 2019-15.

F.S. 11.47 on Google Scholar

F.S. 11.47 on Casetext

Amendments to 11.47


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 11.47
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S11.47 2 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL REFUSE TO MAKE PROPER AUDIT - M: F
S11.47 3 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL TO FURNISH INFO TO AUD GENERAL OR OPPAGA - M: F
S11.47 3 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL PROV ACCESS AGNT EMP OFC ENT SUB TO AUDIT - M: F



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 11.47

Total Results: 20

Glen Spiritis v. Julie Botel

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-02-27

Snippet: Dr. Botel returned to the City Clerk’s Office at 11:47 a.m. She filed nearly all of what she believed to

In Re: Judicial Circuit Assessment

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-12-21

Snippet: public hearings, and persons 112 See, e.g., §§ 47.011, 47.021, 910.03, Fla. Stat (2023).

Ashley Knapp v. Brian Knapp

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-02-28

Citation: 266 So. 3d 224

Snippet: 145 So. 3d 955, 957 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); §§ 47.011, 47.122 & 61.13(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (2019), I would

ROBERT ALVAREZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-02-14

Citation: 238 So. 3d 283

Snippet: of text messages between Alvarez and others. At 11:47 p.m. on the night of the crimes, Alvarez sent a

Adam Acevedo v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-07-08

Citation: 200 So. 3d 196, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10461

Snippet: near Baillergeon’s yard for fifteen minutes from 11:47 p.m. on August 23, 2014, until 12:02 a.m. on August

Hall v. Animals.com, L.L.C.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-08-07

Citation: 171 So. 3d 216, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11798, 2015 WL 4660127

Snippet: where the property in litigation is located. §§ 47.011, 47.051, Fla. Stat. (2014). Where venue is proper in

Connolly, Jr. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-07-29

Citation: 172 So. 3d 893, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11352

Snippet: of such offenses.” § 777.011. 47 The second premise

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Mooney

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-07-02

Citation: 147 So. 3d 42, 2014 WL 2965507, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10211

Snippet: County would have even been permissible. See §§ 47.011, 47.021, 47.051, Fla. Stat. (2012) (combining to prescribe

Brown v. Nagelhout

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-05-16

Citation: 126 So. 3d 1093, 2012 WL 1696772, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7832

Snippet: Brown, applying the plain language of sections 47.011, 47.021, and 47.051, Florida Statutes (2009), we reverse

Brown v. NAGELHOUT

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-03-15

Citation: 84 So. 3d 304, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 225, 2012 WL 851033, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 552

Snippet: should apply the plain language of sections 47.011, 47.021, and 47.051, Florida Statutes. Where there

McCarroll v. VAN DYK

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-05-06

Citation: 8 So. 3d 1256, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 4205, 2009 WL 1212246

Snippet: the transaction of its customary business. §§ 47.011, 47.051, Fla. Stat. (2008).[1] In the instant case

Pari-Mutuel Wagering v. Standardbred Owners

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-05-14

Citation: 983 So. 2d 61, 2008 WL 2038400

Snippet: only in the county of its headquarters. *63 §§ 47.011, 47.122, Fla. Stat. (2006); Smith v. Williams, 160

Tobin v. a & F ENGINEERING

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-01-23

Citation: 979 So. 2d 967, 2008 WL 183568

Snippet: Beach County, not Miami-Dade County, see §§ 47.011, 47.051, Fla. Stat. (2006); Nicholas v. Ross, 721 So

Brodie v. Foley & Lardner

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-05-17

Citation: 932 So. 2d 440, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7693, 2006 WL 1330368

Snippet: venue is proper in Miami Dade County. See §§ 47.011, 47.021, Fla. Stat. (2005). Accordingly, we reverse

Symbol Mattress of Fla., Inc. v. Royal Sleep Products, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-12-06

Citation: 832 So. 2d 233, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17835, 2002 WL 31728828

Snippet: Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(A). [2] See §§ 47.011, 47.051, Fla. Stat. (2001).

Rayman v. Langdon Asset Management, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-11-03

Citation: 745 So. 2d 426, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14594, 1999 WL 993083

Snippet: property in litigation is located. Fla. Stat. §§ 47.011, 47.051 (1999). The plaintiffs choice of venue, in

Hanson-Murphy, Inc. v. First Federal Savings & Loan

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-09-17

Citation: 698 So. 2d 1378, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10600, 1997 WL 577790

Snippet: County where that action was filed, see §§ 47.011, 47.051, Fla. Stat. (1995)1; 92 C.J.S. Venue § 19 n

Lathan Construction Corp. v. McDaniel Grading, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-03-13

Citation: 695 So. 2d 354, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2458, 1996 WL 111767

Snippet: Grading, No. 95-1132 (Fla. 5th DCA). . See §§ 47.011, 47.051, Fla.Stat. (1993). . While suit in Orange

Apple Polishing Systems, Inc. v. Palmer

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-04-12

Citation: 652 So. 2d 990, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3624, 1995 WL 170420

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. §§ 47.011, 47.041, Fla.Stat. (1998); Florida Bldg. Inspection Servs., Inc. v.

Maurice Gelina & Associates, Inc. v. Modular Computer Systems, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-07-12

Citation: 639 So. 2d 1060, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6901, 1994 WL 330198

Snippet: where anyone of the causes of action arose. §§ 47.011, 47.041, Fla.Stat. (1993). In an action on a contract