Florida Statute 14.2 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 14
GOVERNOR

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 14.02

14.02 Governor may preserve peace and order by military force.—The Governor may, in cases of insurrection or rebellion, violence, disorder or insecurity of life, liberty and property, support and preserve the public peace and order by the military force of the state.

History.—s. 1, ch. 1745, 1870; RS 69; GS 70; RGS 84; CGL 105.

F.S. 14.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 14.02 on CourtListener

Amendments to 14.02

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 14.02

Total Results: 73

Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.

376 F.3d 1092, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 13492, 2004 WL 1463452

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 30, 2004 | Docket: 693574

Cited 447 times | Published

Erwin Chemerinsky, Federal Jurisdiction § 14.2, at 842-43 (4th ed. 2003); 16 see

Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel

921 F.2d 1465, 21 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1217, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 1126, 1991 WL 1736

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 29, 1991 | Docket: 512060

Cited 379 times | Published

liquidation of House of Travel pursuant to Ga.Code Ann. § 14-2-1430 (1989). Bassett alleged that the company’s

Montgomery v. Noga

168 F.3d 1282, 49 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1961, 51 Fed. R. Serv. 752, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3739, 1999 WL 114487

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 5, 1999 | Docket: 237401

Cited 160 times | Published

605, 613 (S.D.Fla.1966); 4 Nimmer § 14.02[A]; see also Data Gen. Corp. v. Grumman Sys

James T. Williams v. Fred P. Wright, Jr., Individually and as Liquidating Trustee of Wright Pest Control Co. Of South Carolina, Inc.

927 F.2d 1540, 13 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2137, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5883, 59 U.S.L.W. 2664

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 11, 1991 | Docket: 829912

Cited 124 times | Published

court relied on O.C.G.A. § 14-2-293 in making this ruling. However, § 14-2-293 has been replaced by the

Montgomery v. Noga

168 F.3d 1282

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 5, 1999 | Docket: 8976

Cited 105 times | Published

269 F. Supp. 605, 613 (S.D. Fla. 1966); 4 Nimmer § 14.02[A]; see also Data Gen. Corp. v. Grumman Sys. Support

Jimmy Ledford v. Shelby Peeples, Jr.

657 F.3d 1208

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 23, 2011 | Docket: 2905619

Cited 91 times | Published

member’s right to receive distributions”); O.C.G.A. § 14-2-140 (defining "shares” as the “units into which

Turner Ex Rel. Turner v. United States

514 F.3d 1194, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 1782, 2008 WL 215210

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 28, 2008 | Docket: 1403258

Cited 73 times | Published

2006) (citing 28 U.S.C. §§ 2675, 2401(b); 28 C.F.R. § 14.2(a)). The sum certain requirement of § 2675(a) serves

Charles Barnett v. Okeechobee Hospital

283 F.3d 1232, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2870, 2002 WL 261950

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 25, 2002 | Docket: 468308

Cited 64 times | Published

occurred by reason of the accident.” 28 C.F.R. § 14.2 (2001). 5 Accordingly, Barnett must

Donato Dalrymple v. United States

460 F.3d 1318, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20922, 2006 WL 2355585

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 16, 2006 | Docket: 1270836

Cited 62 times | Published

for money damages in a sum certain.” 28 C.F.R. § 14.2(a); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2675, 2401(b). “When the sum certain

Niny J. Motta v. United States

717 F.3d 840, 2013 WL 2256524, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 10484

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 24, 2013 | Docket: 868397

Cited 52 times | Published

occurred by reason of the incident.” 28 C.F.R. § 14.2(a). “When the sum certain is omitted, the administrative

In Re May

12 B.R. 618, 1980 Bankr. LEXIS 4287

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1980 | Docket: 348564

Cited 51 times | Published

be available to a dishonest debtor. 1A Collier § 14.02. While recognizing that the development of the

American Home Assur. v. NAT. RR CORP.

908 So. 2d 459, 2005 WL 1580639

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2005 | Docket: 1397399

Cited 39 times | Published

damage. Private Road Grade Crossing Agreement, § 14.2, Record on Appeal at 53-1172 Ex. A, Nat'l R.R.

Matter Of Munford, Inc.

98 F.3d 604, 36 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1673, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27795

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 28, 1996 | Docket: 2039783

Cited 39 times | Published

of corporate assets. 25 Section 14-2-152.1(a)(1) of the Georgia Code requires directors

Jack Rothenberg and Shirley Rothenberg v. Security Management Company, Inc.

736 F.2d 1470, 39 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 744, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20369

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 19, 1984 | Docket: 1431060

Cited 31 times | Published

court to award fees based upon a statute, O.C.G.A. § 14-2-123(f), which provides that “upon final judgment

Nippon Credit Bank, Ltd. v. Matthews

291 F.3d 738, 59 Fed. R. Serv. 316, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9191, 2002 WL 989810

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 15, 2002 | Docket: 397400

Cited 28 times | Published

Georgia Secretary of State pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 14-2-1501(a). 9 . Jurisdiction will not

Price v. Morgan

436 So. 2d 1116

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1983 | Docket: 1701282

Cited 27 times | Published

enough." Trawick, Florida Practice and Procedure § 14-2 at 208 (1980 Edition). Furthermore, in the absence

Alvarez v. DeAguirre

395 So. 2d 213

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1981 | Docket: 1317864

Cited 26 times | Published

enough," Trawick's Florida Practice and Procedure § 14-2 at 208 (1980 Edition) and the "liberality in permitting

Marvin L. Fisher v. State Mutual Insurance Co.

290 F.3d 1256, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 8749, 2002 WL 864216

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 7, 2002 | Docket: 835976

Cited 20 times | Published

basis of Georgia’s “safe harbor” law, O.G.C.A. § 14-2-862, which insulates certain self-interested transactions

Columbus Mills, Inc. v. Doy L. Freeland, Raymond R. Lyon, and Margaret F. Lyon

918 F.2d 1575, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21558, 1990 WL 183565

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 14, 1990 | Docket: 828649

Cited 20 times | Published

of “fair value” pursuant to former Ga.Code Ann. § 14-2-214(b) (1983). Only three shareholders elected

Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Bright Metal Specialties, Inc.

251 F.3d 1316, 2001 WL 539583

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 22, 2001 | Docket: 342029

Cited 16 times | Published

the Subcontract. Specifically, Rogers claims that § 14.2(b) of the Bright/A-1 Subcontract expressly excludes

Omar Reshad Burgess, a Minor by Father and Next Friend v. United States

744 F.2d 771, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17597

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 18, 1984 | Docket: 266997

Cited 16 times | Published

designate a sum certain as required by 28 C.F.R. § 14.2(a) which provides: (a) For purposes of the

Suarez v. United States

22 F.3d 1064, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 14462, 1994 WL 213334

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 13, 1994 | Docket: 64017012

Cited 15 times | Published

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a) and 28 C.F.R. § 14.2(a), because he did not claim a sum certain in damages

Suarez v. United States

22 F.3d 1064, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 14462, 1994 WL 213334

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 13, 1994 | Docket: 64017012

Cited 15 times | Published

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a) and 28 C.F.R. § 14.2(a), because he did not claim a sum certain in damages

Olin's Rent-A-Car Sys., Inc. v. Royal Continental Hotels, Inc.

187 So. 2d 349, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5459

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1966 | Docket: 1768741

Cited 15 times | Published

in 3 Moore's Federal Practice, 2nd Ed. (1963) § 14.02[1], p. 431, as follows: "Although impleader is

National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Associated Press

18 So. 3d 1201, 37 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2400, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14605, 2009 WL 3128743

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2009 | Docket: 374769

Cited 13 times | Published

maintained" to be public records, see N.M. Stat. Ann. § 14-2-6(E) (2009); new york expanded its definition of

Barbara Davis, Cross-Appellants. v. The Hon. John Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the Army, Cross-Appellees

807 F.2d 908, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 970

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 13, 1987 | Docket: 805521

Cited 13 times | Published

requirement of 28 C.F.R. § 14.2 (1986) and 28 U.S.C. § 2675(b) (1982). 28 C.F.R. § 14.2 requires claims against

Mid-Fla Coin Exchange, Inc. v. Griffin

529 F. Supp. 1006, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10002

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1981 | Docket: 2254970

Cited 13 times | Published

Ringel Searches & Seizures, Arrests and Confessions § 14.2 (1980). The right to a hearing on a motion to quash

Van Dusen v. Southeast First Nat. Bank

478 So. 2d 82, 228 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 19

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1985 | Docket: 1484675

Cited 12 times | Published

loss in value of the copyrighted work. 3 Nimmer § 14.02. It is undisputed on this record that Eastern received

Alachua County v. Eagle's Nest Farms, Inc.

473 So. 2d 257, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1749

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1985 | Docket: 1510544

Cited 12 times | Published

we consider that the requirements set out in section 14.2 are specific enough to be uniformly applied

Lee County v. Exchange Nat. Bank of Tampa

417 So. 2d 268

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1982 | Docket: 1722070

Cited 11 times | Published

remainder. 4A P. Nichols, The Law of Eminent Domain § 14.02 (rev. 3d ed. P. Rohan 1981). In Florida, the right

Beefy Trail, Inc. v. Beefy King International, Inc.

348 F. Supp. 799, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12607, 1972 Trade Cas. (CCH) 74,127

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1972 | Docket: 344700

Cited 10 times | Published

based on § 3 of the Clayton Act, Title 15 U.S.C. § 14,[2] and § 1 of the Sherman *802 Act Title 15 U.S.C

Walton Motor Sales, Inc., Cross-Appellants v. F.H. Ross, Jr., and Ernest Schleussener, Sr., Cross-Appellees

736 F.2d 1449, 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1937, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20368

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 19, 1984 | Docket: 462913

Cited 9 times | Published

of that statutory provision is expressed in section 14-2-140 of the Code, which states: “Subject

AMC/Jeep of Vero Beach, Inc. v. Funston

403 So. 2d 602

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1981 | Docket: 1250114

Cited 8 times | Published

J. Calamari & J. Perillo, The Laws of Contracts § 14-2 (2d ed. 1977). Clark & Funston has utterly failed

Mailman Development Corp. v. City of Hollywood

286 So. 2d 614, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6329

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1973 | Docket: 1408345

Cited 8 times | Published

Nichols on Eminent Domain (3rd Ed.) pp. 69-70, Section 14.2(2). We hold that enactment of a zoning ordinance

Simon v. Simon

123 So. 2d 41

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1960 | Docket: 1234631

Cited 7 times | Published

support her. 2 Nelson, Divorce and Annulment, § 14.02. See Floyd v. Floyd, 91 Fla. 910, 108 So. 896;

Crumpton v. Stephens (In Re Northlake Foods, Inc.)

715 F.3d 1251, 2013 WL 1859118

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 6, 2013 | Docket: 1090308

Cited 6 times | Published

an illegal dividend under Georgia law, O.C.G.A. § 14-2-640(c). Stephens moved the Bankruptcy Court to

City of Kissimmee v. FLORIDA RETAIL FEDN.

915 So. 2d 205, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16665, 2005 WL 2673857

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 2005 | Docket: 1310708

Cited 6 times | Published

incorporated as section 14-2-65(L) of the City of Kissimmee Land Development Code: SECTION L. § 14-2-65 GENERAL

Ledford v. Peeples

605 F.3d 871, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9327, 2010 WL 1796568

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 6, 2010 | Docket: 65659105

Cited 5 times | Published

member’s right to receive distributions”); O.C.G.A. § 14-2-140 (defining "shares” as the "units into which

Starks v. State

223 So. 3d 1045, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3729, 2017 WL 1067815

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2017 | Docket: 4620326

Cited 4 times | Published

also 2 Wayne R. LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law § 14.2 (2d ed.), Westlaw (database updated October 2016)

Burgess v. North Broward Hospital District

126 So. 3d 430, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18011, 2013 WL 5989190

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2013 | Docket: 60236443

Cited 4 times | Published

2006) (quoting Trawick’s Fla. Practice & Procedure § 14-2 at 225 (2006)). Despite the title of “Fourth Amended

Walters v. Ocean Gate Phase I Condominium

925 So. 2d 440, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5070, 2006 WL 888093

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2006 | Docket: 1517007

Cited 3 times | Published

enough." Trawick's Florida Practice & Procedure § 14-2 at 225 (2006). The case has reached "a point in

Canida v. Canida

751 So. 2d 647, 1999 WL 1241948

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1999 | Docket: 1712566

Cited 3 times | Published

Code (1998); Title 15, § 901, Vt. Stat. (1998); § 14-2-203, Wyo. Stat. (1998). A small number of states

Bernard v. Calejo

17 F. Supp. 2d 1311, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12871, 1998 WL 484586

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1998 | Docket: 2356683

Cited 3 times | Published

incident." 31 C.F.R. § 3.2(a); see also 28 C.F.R. § 14.2(a). This "sum certain" requirement is a prerequisite

The Gas Pump, Inc., Jack Karesh v. General Cinema Beverages of North Florida, Inc., Coca-Cola Bottling Company United, Inc.

12 F.3d 181, 1994 WL 1272, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 706

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 19, 1994 | Docket: 1031195

Cited 3 times | Published

that is administratively dissolved pursuant to § 14-2-Í421 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated

The Gas Pump, Inc., Jack Karesh v. General Cinema Beverages of North Florida, Inc., Coca-Cola Bottling Company United, Inc.

982 F.2d 478, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 1609, 1993 WL 7697

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 3, 1993 | Docket: 613706

Cited 3 times | Published

business and affairs under Code Section 14-2-1405.” O.C.G.A. § 14-2-1421(c) (Supp.1992). Section 1405

Code Revision Comm'n Ex Rel. Gen. Assembly of Ga. v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.

906 F.3d 1229

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 19, 2018 | Docket: 8054705

Cited 2 times | Published

provision] ... is set out in the Comment to O.C.G.A. § 14-2-86"); Cox v. Fowler , 279 Ga.

Besada v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services

645 F. App'x 879

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 10, 2016 | Docket: 65962189

Cited 2 times | Published

claim for money damages in a sum certain. 28 C.F.R. § 14.2. A claim under the FTCA accrues at the time of

Ledford v. Peeples

630 F.3d 1345

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 23, 2011 | Docket: 1021290

Cited 2 times | Published

member's right to receive distributions”); O.C.G.A. § 14-2-140 (defining “shares” as the “units into which

O'Neal v. Garrison

263 F.3d 1317, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19264, 2001 WL 987043

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 29, 2001 | Docket: 1169306

Cited 2 times | Published

Ga. 43, 287 S.E.2d 203, 205 (1982); Ga.Code Ann. § 14-2-843. Fletcher Cyc. of Corps., § 357

Munford v. Valuation Research Corp. (In Re Munford, Inc.)

98 F.3d 604, 201 B.R. 604

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 28, 1996 | Docket: 765578

Cited 2 times | Published

mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets. Section 14-2-152.1(a)(l) of the Georgia Code requires directors

Munford v. Valuation Research Corp.

97 F.3d 456, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 26468, 1996 WL 543963

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 10, 1996 | Docket: 333319

Cited 2 times | Published

render the corporation insolvent[.] O.C.G.A. § 14-2-91 (1988). Similarly, Georgia’s stock repurchasing

United States v. Proceeds from the Sale of Approximately 15,538 Panulirus Argus Lobster Tails

834 F. Supp. 385, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18764

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1993 | Docket: 65986857

Cited 2 times | Published

offence.... Id. § 14(1). “Legal size” is defined in § 14(2)(a)(ii) as seven ounces. . There is some confusion

Fla. Keys v. Pier House Jt. Venture

601 So. 2d 1270, 1992 WL 147161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1992 | Docket: 1710930

Cited 2 times | Published

of customer fees and charges. Specifically, Section 14(2) mandates that charges shall be `just and equitable'

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. R. Charles Loudermilk, Sr.

930 F.3d 1280

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 22, 2019 | Docket: 15949217

Cited 1 times | Published

does one of three things. See O.C.G.A. § 14-2-824(d) ("A director who is present at a meeting

James Farmer v. State of Florida

268 So. 3d 1009

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2019 | Docket: 15013083

Cited 1 times | Published

(2018); Cal. Fam. Code § 301 (2018); Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-2-106 (2018); Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-20a (2018);

Eagletech Communications, Inc. v. Bryn Mawr Investment Group, Inc.

79 So. 3d 855, 2012 WL 280242, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1346

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2012 | Docket: 60305390

Cited 1 times | Published

(quoting Trawick’s Florida Practice & Procedure § 14-2 at 225 (2006))). CONCLUSION We affirm the trial

Ledford v. Peeples

630 F.3d 1345, 2011 WL 149890

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 22, 2009 | Docket: 1618651

Cited 1 times | Published

member's right to receive distributions"); O.C.G.A. § 14-2-140 (defining "shares" as the "units into which

Barnett v. Okeechobee Hospital

98 F. Supp. 2d 1374, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8576, 2000 WL 776996

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2000 | Docket: 2444029

Cited 1 times | Published

is received by a federal agency. See 28 C.F.R. § 14.2(a); Bailey v. United States, 642 F.2d 344, 346-47

First National Bank in Ft. Myers v. Viola (In re Viola)

3 B.R. 219, 1980 Bankr. LEXIS 5464

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1980 | Docket: 65777727

Cited 1 times | Published

fresh start in life. 1A Collier on Bankruptcy, § 14.02 (14th ed. 1978); see also Lines v. Frederick, 400

IFRAIN BENITEZ v. LAWSON INDUSTRIES, INC., etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2023 | Docket: 67600934

Published

of a material fact. § 14:2. Summary Judgment, 5 Fla. Prac., Civil Practice § 14:2 (2023 ed.) (citations

William R. Deal v. Tugalo Gas Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 19, 2021 | Docket: 59748592

Published

the corporation has refused to do so. O.C.G.A. § 14-2-742. If, following rejection of his demand, the

Emory University, Inc. v. Neurocare, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 25, 2021 | Docket: 41955944

Published

(adopting by direct citation the definition in § 14-2-1110); 14-2-624 (same); 14-2-1131 (same); 33-1-25(b)(1);

United States v. Henco Holding Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 19, 2021 | Docket: 30120297

Published

that corporation’s liabilities, see Ga. Code Ann. § 14-2-622, the Caceres Defendants contend that Leighton

North American Specialty Insurance Co. v. Bull River Marina, LLC

709 F. App'x 623

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 65966351

Published

18. This alone warrants affirmance. See Ga. Code § 14-2-504 (providing for service of process to a corporation’s

Niny J. Motta v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 24, 2013 | Docket: 2903121

Published

occurred by reason of the incident.” 28 C.F.R. § 14.2(a). “When the sum certain is omitted, the administrative

David H. Crumpton v. Richard Stephens

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 6, 2013 | Docket: 2903179

Published

an illegal dividend under Georgia law, O.C.G.A. § 14-2-640(c). Stephens moved the Bankruptcy Court to

Crumpton v. Stephens (In re Northlake Foods, Inc.)

483 B.R. 247

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2012 | Docket: 65516500

Published

recovery of an illegal dividend pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 14-2-640. (Doc. # 1-16). Appellee filed a motion to

Campbell v. HOUSEHOLD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

77 So. 3d 772, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20069, 2011 WL 6258830

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2011 | Docket: 226602

Published

So.2d 536 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963); 1A Couch on Ins. § 14:2 (A "policy is effective from the date stated, not

Ledford v. Peeples

568 F.3d 1258, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14168, 2009 WL 1425256

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 22, 2009 | Docket: 65658915

Published

member's right to receive distributions”); O.C.G.A. § 14-2-140 (defining "shares” as the "units into which

National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Rountree Transport & Rigging, Inc.

286 F.3d 1233, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 4956, 2002 WL 459731

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 26, 2002 | Docket: 212819

Published

regardless of cause.... R53-1172 Exh. A at 14.1. Section 14.2 further provides that KUA “assumes all liability

Employers Insurance v. Bright Metal

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 22, 2001 | Docket: 396738

Published

Subcontract. Specifically, Rogers claims that § 14.2(b) of the Bright/A-1 Subcontract expressly excludes

Okeelanta Corp. v. Bygrave

727 So. 2d 950, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8148, 1997 WL 394473

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1997 | Docket: 64786607

Published

Newberg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions § 14.02 (3d ed.1992). A judgment cannot be entered without

Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund v. Daffron

134 So. 2d 522

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1961 | Docket: 60198911

Published

the answer lies in the proper construction of Section 14(2) in the light of Section 13 of said Act. Section