Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-02-14
Snippet: retail establishment, in violation of section 812.015(7), Florida Statutes (2022). Because the undisputed
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-08-03
Snippet: court decision.” 15 7. Mr. Jacobs’ Motion further alleges: “The lack
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-05-20
Snippet: counsel (TAB B; p. 13, lines 12-15). -7- Petitioner further
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-02-03
Snippet: device countermeasure in violation of section 812.015(7), Florida Statutes. On appeal, Martinez-Rivero contends
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-01-16
Snippet: meaning of “all terms of sentence.” See, e.g., § 812.15(7), Fla. Stat. (2019) (“The court shall, in addition
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-08-02
Snippet: State argues otherwise, relying on section 901.15(7), Florida Statutes (2017), which permits a warrantless
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-07-23
Citation: 275 So. 3d 846
Snippet: Claimant just as if “he had remained employed.” § 440.15(7), Fla. Stat. (2003). Accordingly, we AFFIRM
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-09-26
Citation: 253 So. 3d 1261
Snippet: clause rendered it void and unenforceable. Section 15.7 states that on review of an arbitration award, “the
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-17
Citation: 245 So. 3d 885
Snippet: committed an act of domestic violence. See § 901.15(7), Fla. Stat. (2015). The officers in this case were
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-09-06
Citation: 227 So. 3d 628
Snippet: which the alleged violation occurred. § 775.15(7)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004). Appellant moved to
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-11-18
Citation: 179 So. 3d 466, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17320
Snippet: See § 775,15(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). Section 775.15(7) provided in relevant part: If the victim of
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-10-21
Citation: 176 So. 3d 389, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15569
Snippet: ON CONFESSION OF ERROR LOGUE, J. On April 14, 2011, Federal National Mortgage Association (“Lender”) filed a foreclosure action against Hector De La Guardia and Dayami Martinez (“Borrowers”). On July 11, 2013, the trial court issued 'a noticé that it would dismiss the case for lack of prosecution. On October 28, 2013, after no party opposed the dismissal, the trial court dismissed the action for lack of prosecutiqn. On or about June 25, 2014, the Lender filed a motion for rehearing
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-09-09
Citation: 198 So. 3d 642, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13438, 2015 WL 5559801
Snippet: date. See Fla. Admin. Code R. 23-21.015. 7 At a June 2013 Commission *645
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-03-26
Citation: 173 So. 3d 19, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 163, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 583, 2015 WL 1343088
Snippet: or Minor Child(ren) (03/15) -7- of, only one of the parties
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-10-15
Citation: 148 So. 3d 545, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16831, 2014 WL 5151324
Snippet: request charge. F.S. 741.29(2) & (3) and F.S. 901.15(7) & (9) are applicable re investigation /arrest/reports
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-09-12
Citation: 123 So. 3d 86, 2013 WL 4859092
Snippet: Tampa General’s trauma center had a net loss of $15.7 million; Bayfront’s trauma center lost $8 million;
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-07-24
Citation: 120 So. 3d 41, 2013 WL 3811766, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11593
Snippet: device countermeasure is prohibited by section 812.015(7), Florida Statutes (2010): It is unlawful to possess
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-11-14
Citation: 100 So. 3d 281, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19607, 2012 WL 5500522
Snippet: probation and sentenced him under the guidelines to 15.7 years in state prison.2 In 2012, Appellant filed
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-10-19
Citation: 77 So. 3d 667, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16345, 2011 WL 4949872
Snippet: Produce Company appeals a final judgment exceeding $15.7 million in favor of its telecommunications-cost
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-02-03
Citation: 61 So. 3d 399, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 50, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 331, 2011 WL 320959
Snippet: a guidelines sentence. Isaac, 911 So.2d at 814-15. [7] Our holding in Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748