15.13
Administration of certain laws.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
15.13 Administration of certain laws.—The Department of State shall have general supervision and administration of the election laws, corporation laws and such other laws as are placed under it by the Legislature and shall keep records of same.
History.—s. 7, ch. 28086, 1953; ss. 10, 35, ch. 69-106.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases, 1960–2020 · leading case: Madera v. Detzner
Madera v. Detzner (2018)
“" Fla. Stat. § 15.13 . 10 Under rules the Department of State has promulgated, "[b]allots shall be translated into other languages that are required by law or court order.”
Nancy Carola Jacobsen v. Florida Secretary of State (2020)
“” See Fla. Stat. §§ 15.13 ; 20.10(1), (2)(a). The Secretary is the “chief election officer of the state” responsible for “[o]btain[ing] and maintain[ing] uniformity in the interpretation and implementation of the election laws.”
American Ass'n of People With Disabilities v. Hood (2004)
“117, § IX, ¶ 8; Fla. Stat. § 15.13 . 10. Before a Florida county may legally purchase a voting system, the voting system must be certified by the Division of Elections (DOE) of the Florida Department of State.”
Smith v. Mogelvang (1983)
“1975); 3 Moore's Federal Practice, section 15.13[2] (2d ed. 1982), involving Federal Rule 15(b) which is the counterpart of Florida Rule 1.”
State Ex Rel. Siegendorf v. Stone (1972)
“In view of the necessity for expediency in this matter, privilege of filing rehearing is dispensed with and this opinion shall be effective immediately. Accordingly, the peremptory writ of mandamus should not issue and the alternative writ is hereby discharged.”
Petit v. Adams (1968)
“Section 15.13, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides: “The secretary of state shall have general supervision and administration of the election laws, corporation laws and such other laws as are placed under his office by the legislature and shall keep records of same.”
Sentry Ins. v. Brown (1982)
“2 Long, The Law of Liability Insurance, § 15.13 at 15-28 to 15-29 (rev. ed. 1981) (footnotes omitted).”
Toyota of Pensacola v. Maines (1990)
“1 Larson § 15.13(b), at 4-29. As to the first component, we agree that there exists competent, substantial evidence supporting the presence of a special hazard at the particular place where the accident in question occurred.”
State Ex Rel. Shevin v. Stone (1972)
“Respondent Richard Stone, as Secretary of State, is charged under Fla. Stat. § 15.13 , [3] F.S.A., with "general supervision and administration of the election laws," which laws include Fla.”
Sack v. Sack (1966)
“991-992, it is stated: “The purpose of an amendment to conform to proof is to bring the pleadings in line with the actual issues upon which the case was tried; therefore an amendment after judgment is not permissible which brings in some entirely extrinsic issue or changes the…”
Seabreeze Industries, Inc. v. Phily (1960)
“There are several well-recognized exceptions to this general rule, however, the most common of these being, as expressed in section 15.13, p. 197, Larson’s Workmen’s-Compensation Law, that if the off-premises-point where the injury occurred lies on the only route or at least on…”
Pillsbury Co. v. Chernin & Pila Dairy & Livestock Co. (1973)
“2d 383 ; 3 Moore, Federal Practice § 15.13 [2],”
— 15.13(2) — 1 case
Sack v. Sack (1966)
“991-992, it is stated: “The purpose of an amendment to conform to proof is to bring the pleadings in line with the actual issues upon which the case was tried; therefore an amendment after judgment is not permissible which brings in some entirely extrinsic issue or changes the…”
— 15.13(b) — 1 case
Toyota of Pensacola v. Maines (1990)
“1 Larson § 15.13(b), at 4-29. As to the first component, we agree that there exists competent, substantial evidence supporting the presence of a special hazard at the particular place where the accident in question occurred.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.