Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 16.0155 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 16.0155 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 16.0155

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Chapter 16
ATTORNEY GENERAL
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 16.0155
16.0155 Contingency fee agreements.
(1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Department” means the Department of Legal Affairs.
(b) “Private attorney” means any private attorney or law firm.
(2) The department may not enter into a contingency fee contract with a private attorney unless the Attorney General makes a written determination prior to entering into such a contract that contingency fee representation is both cost-effective and in the public interest. Any written determination shall include specific findings for each of the following factors:
(a) Whether there exist sufficient and appropriate legal and financial resources within the department to handle the matter.
(b) The time and labor required; the novelty, complexity, and difficulty of the questions involved; and the skill requisite to perform the attorney services properly.
(c) The geographic area where the attorney services are to be provided.
(d) The amount of experience desired for the particular kind of attorney services to be provided and the nature of the private attorney’s experience with similar issues or cases.
(3) Notwithstanding the exemption provided in s. 287.057(3)(e), if the Attorney General makes the determination described in subsection (2), he or she shall request proposals from private attorneys to represent the department on a contingency-fee basis, unless the Attorney General determines in writing that requesting proposals is not feasible under the circumstances. The written determination does not constitute a final agency action subject to review pursuant to ss. 120.569 and 120.57. For purposes of this subsection only, the department is exempt from s. 120.57(3), and neither the request for proposals nor the contract award is subject to challenge pursuant to ss. 120.569 and 120.57.
(4) In addition to the requirements set forth in s. 287.059(16), any private attorney shall maintain detailed contemporaneous time records for the attorneys and paralegals working on the matter in increments of no greater than 1/10 of an hour and shall promptly provide these records to the department, upon request.
(5) Notwithstanding s. 287.059(7)(a), the department may not enter into a contingency fee contract that provides for the private attorney to receive an aggregate contingency fee in excess of:
(a) Twenty-five percent of any recovery of up to $10 million; plus
(b) Twenty percent of any portion of such recovery between $10 million and $15 million; plus
(c) Fifteen percent of any portion of such recovery between $15 million and $20 million; plus
(d) Ten percent of any portion of such recovery between $20 million and $25 million; plus
(e) Five percent of any portion of such recovery exceeding $25 million.

In no event shall the aggregate contingency fee exceed $50 million, exclusive of reasonable costs and expenses, and irrespective of the number of lawsuits filed or the number of private attorneys retained to achieve the recovery.

(6) Copies of any executed contingency fee contract and the Attorney General’s written determination to enter into a contingency fee contract with the private attorney shall be posted on the department’s website for public inspection within 5 business days after the date the contract is executed and shall remain posted on the website for the duration of the contingency fee contract, including any extensions or amendments thereto. Any payment of contingency fees shall be posted on the department’s website within 15 days after the payment of such contingency fees to the private attorney and shall remain posted on the website for at least 365 days thereafter.
(7) By February 1 of each year, the Attorney General shall submit a report to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives describing the use of contingency fee contracts with private attorneys in the preceding calendar year. At a minimum, the report shall:
(a) Identify all new contingency fee contracts entered into during the year and all previously executed contingency fee contracts that remain current during any part of the year, and for each contract describe:
1. The name of the private attorney with whom the department has contracted, including the name of the attorney’s law firm;
2. The nature and status of the legal matter;
3. The name of the parties to the legal matter;
4. The amount of any recovery; and
5. The amount of any contingency fee paid.
(b) Include copies of any written determinations made under subsection (2) during the year.
History.s. 1, ch. 2010-7; s. 1, ch. 2011-4; s. 11, ch. 2013-154.

F.S. 16.0155 on Google Scholar

F.S. 16.0155 on Casetext

Amendments to 16.0155


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 16.0155
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 16.0155.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 16.0155

Total Results: 3

Lowe v. Broward County

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-09-20T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 766 So. 2d 1199

Snippet: terminate the domestic partnership relationship. Sec. 16½-155. Maintenance of records; filing fees. (a) The Broward

White v. Pinellas County

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1965-03-24T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 174 So. 2d 88, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4538

Snippet: contract. See 12 Fla.Jur., Eminent Domain, §§ 1-6, 16, 155-159. In an action ex delicto it is essential that

Kantor v. City of Coral Gables

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1944-06-20T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 18 So. 2d 477, 154 Fla. 523, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 750

Snippet: *Page 524 al., v. Wilson Lumber Co., 115 Fla. 16, 155 So. 116 and cases therein cited. The judgment is