CopyCited 236 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2761, 1999 WL 89052
1983 challenging the constitutionality of O.C.G.A. § 16-9-93.1, and seeking to prevent its enforcement.
CopyCited 152 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
challenging the constitutionality of O.C.G.A. § 16-9-93.1, and seeking to prevent its enforcement. See
CopyCited 47 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14468
section is presently codified at Off.Code Ga.Ann. § 16-9-51 (1982). 2 . Floyd issued the
CopyCited 29 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 54 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 458, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24289
order, we do not have jurisdiction. 9 U.S.C. § 16. 9 . Both the amended complaint and the
CopyCited 29 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9950
...nterests may require from time to time. State ex rel. Landis v. S. H. Kress & Co.,
115 Fla. 189,
155 So. 823, 827 (1934). Included in his powers is the direction and supervision of the state's attorneys in the discharge of their duties, Fla. Statute §
16.09, F.S.A....
CopyCited 21 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 126199
thirty. See Trawick, Florida Practice and Procedure § 16-9; Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.340; Gladman v. Hallam, 104
CopyCited 19 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14928
activities must pay their own way (see text at 801; § 16.9 at 933, infra). There is nothing in this reasoning
CopyCited 19 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 6015, 2003 WL 1590270
five years, and a college degree, 1975 Ala.Code § 16-9-2; to have the ability to view all aspects of issues
CopyCited 18 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 19 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20600, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 165
1 (1985). 12 Section 16-9-110 provides that: (a) It shall be unlawful
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5935, 1994 WL 78135
with criminal issuance of a bad check, O.C.G.A § 16-9-20. It is disputed whether and when plaintiff made
CopyCited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida
Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 16:9, at 317 (2018 ed.). The concurring opinion attempts
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 4393245
Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 16.9, at 308 (2016 ed.) (“Generally, the appellate court
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5610, 1998 WL 251058
footing than orders granting arbitration. See USAA § 16, 9 U.S.C. § 16. Orders granting arbitration in the
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 1627460
R.I. Gen. Laws § 12-7-10 (2005); S.C.Code Ann. § 16-9-320 (2005); Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-16-602(a) (West
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 18 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20281, 26 ERC (BNA) 1969, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15790
1 (1985). 14 Section 16-9-110 provides that: (a) It shall be unlawful
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida | 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 697, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 3322, 2014 WL 5856370
Foundation’s annual and operating capital budget — section 16(9); (vi) allow the Hospital Board to order, at
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Garrett were charged with violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-9-1 (Forgery in the first degree); Doe was transported
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 11238
Garrett were charged with violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-9-1 (Forgery in the first degree); Doe was transported
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Argued: Jun 28, 2023
transaction card fraud” in violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-9-33 on two occasions on January 10, 2019
CopyPublished | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2309
...it is governed by the ‘clearly erroneous’ test; findings may be clearly erroneous without being unreasonable. The difference between the two tests is slight, but a number of political battles have been waged over it.” The same authority under § 16.09 states: “When a reviewing court determines that the applicable law is different from what the agency has supposed it to be, and when the agency’s findings have been based upon the agency’s erroneous view of the law, the court often has...
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
translation. O.C.G.A. § 40-3-29.1 (1985). .Section 16-9-110 provides that: (a) It shall be unlawful
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 26 ERC 1969
translation. O.C.G.A. § 40-3-29.1 (1985). .Section 16-9-110 provides that: (a) It shall be unlawful