Florida Statute 16.9 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2024 Florida Statutes (including 2025 Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 16
ATTORNEY GENERAL

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 16.09

16.09 Regulations as to the reports of state attorneys.—The Attorney General shall prescribe the time and manner in which regular quarterly reports shall be made to him or her by state attorneys, and they shall comply with the Attorney General’s instructions in this respect.

History.—s. 3, ch. 2098, 1877; RS 91; GS 94; RGS 108; CGL 132; s. 49, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 16.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 16.09 on CourtListener

Amendments to 16.09

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 16.09

Total Results: 26

American Civil Liberties Union v. Barnes

168 F.3d 423, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2761, 1999 WL 89052

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 23, 1999 | Docket: 395081

Cited 236 times | Published

1983 challenging the constitutionality of O.C.G.A. § 16-9-93.1, and seeking to prevent its enforcement.

ACLU of Georgia v. Miller

168 F.3d 423

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 23, 1999 | Docket: 212188

Cited 152 times | Published

challenging the constitutionality of O.C.G.A. § 16-9-93.1, and seeking to prevent its enforcement. See

Agan v. Vaughn

119 F.3d 1538, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22679, 1997 WL 467169

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 27, 1997 | Docket: 1696735

Cited 59 times | Published

any act ----”) (emphasis added); S.C.Code Ann. § 16-9-210 (Law Coop.1976) (“Whoever corruptly

Lindsey M. Scott v. Larry Dixon

720 F.2d 1542, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14468

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 15, 1983 | Docket: 452612

Cited 47 times | Published

section is presently codified at Off.Code Ga.Ann. § 16-9-51 (1982). 2 . Floyd issued the

Brandon, Jones, Sandall, Zeide, Kohn, Chalal & Musso, P.A. v. MedPartners, Inc.

312 F.3d 1349, 54 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 458, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24289

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 27, 2002 | Docket: 342653

Cited 29 times | Published

order, we do not have jurisdiction. 9 U.S.C. § 16. 9 . Both the amended complaint and the

Lazarus v. Faircloth

301 F. Supp. 266, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9950

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1969 | Docket: 1244847

Cited 29 times | Published

in the discharge of their duties, Fla. Statute § 16.09, F.S.A. And, when the constitutionality of a state

Lazarus v. Faircloth

301 F. Supp. 266, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9950

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1969 | Docket: 1244847

Cited 29 times | Published

in the discharge of their duties, Fla. Statute § 16.09, F.S.A. And, when the constitutionality of a state

Beekie v. Morgan

751 So. 2d 694, 2000 WL 126199

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2000 | Docket: 1712571

Cited 21 times | Published

thirty. See Trawick, Florida Practice and Procedure § 16-9; Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.340; Gladman v. Hallam, 104

Hall, Moffett v. Alabama Association of School Boards, Sandra Sims-Degraffenreid

326 F.3d 1157, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 6015, 2003 WL 1590270

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 28, 2003 | Docket: 1942591

Cited 19 times | Published

five years, and a college degree, 1975 Ala.Code § 16-9-2; to have the ability to view all aspects of issues

Cities Service Company v. State

312 So. 2d 799, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14928

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1975 | Docket: 1258368

Cited 19 times | Published

activities must pay their own way (see text at 801; § 16.9 at 933, infra). There is nothing in this reasoning

Myra Holladay Sims v. State Of Florida

862 F.2d 1449, 19 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20600, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 165

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 11, 1989 | Docket: 985653

Cited 18 times | Published

1 (1985). 12 Section 16-9-110 provides that: (a) It shall be unlawful

Sandra Blackford v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

17 F.3d 367, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5935, 1994 WL 78135

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 30, 1994 | Docket: 366568

Cited 6 times | Published

with criminal issuance of a bad check, O.C.G.A § 16-9-20. It is disputed whether and when plaintiff made

D.H. v. Adept Community Services, Inc.

271 So. 3d 870

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2018 | Docket: 8119865

Cited 4 times | Published

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 16:9, at 317 (2018 ed.). The concurring opinion attempts

Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. v. Staples

125 So. 3d 309, 2013 WL 5567497, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16026

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2013 | Docket: 60235833

Cited 4 times | Published

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 16:9 (2012 ed.) (citing cases). . That A-B and Container

Roop v. State

228 So. 3d 633, 2017 WL 4393245

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2017 | Docket: 6163423

Cited 2 times | Published

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 16.9, at 308 (2016 ed.) (“Generally, the appellate court

Polite v. State

933 So. 2d 587, 2006 WL 1627460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2006 | Docket: 1712080

Cited 2 times | Published

R.I. Gen. Laws § 12-7-10 (2005); S.C.Code Ann. § 16-9-320 (2005); Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-16-602(a) (West

Josephthal Lyon & Ross, Inc. v. C & a Financial Programs, Inc.

709 So. 2d 1384, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5610, 1998 WL 251058

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1998 | Docket: 1279350

Cited 2 times | Published

footing than orders granting arbitration. See USAA § 16, 9 U.S.C. § 16. Orders granting arbitration in the

Myra Holladay Sims v. State Of Florida

832 F.2d 1558, 18 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20281, 26 ERC (BNA) 1969, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15790

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 2, 1987 | Docket: 517669

Cited 2 times | Published

1 (1985). 14 Section 16-9-110 provides that: (a) It shall be unlawful

George Harris v. Jon Hixon

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 17, 2024 | Docket: 67473202

Published

Argued: Jun 28, 2023

transaction card fraud” in violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-9-33 on two occasions on January 10, 2019

Citrus County Hospital Board, etc. v. Citrus Memorial Health Foundation, Inc., etc.

150 So. 3d 1102, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 697, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 3322, 2014 WL 5856370

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2014 | Docket: 2597259

Published

Foundation’s annual and operating capital budget — section 16(9); (vi) allow the Hospital Board to order, at

FHR TB, LLC v. TB Isle Resort, LP.

865 F. Supp. 2d 1172, 2011 WL 4914715, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155752

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2011 | Docket: 65981729

Published

other than in strict accordance with its terms (Section 16.9(e)(3)); • The HMA shall be enforceable between

United States v. Ronald Eugene McClain

252 F.3d 1279

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 31, 2001 | Docket: 36203

Published

Garrett were charged with violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-9-1 (Forgery in the first degree); Doe was transported

United States v. Ronald Eugene McClain

252 F.3d 1279, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 11238

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 31, 2001 | Docket: 396670

Published

Garrett were charged with violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-9-1 (Forgery in the first degree); Doe was transported

Sims v. Florida, Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles

862 F.2d 1449

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 11, 1989 | Docket: 66240657

Published

translation. O.C.G.A. § 40-3-29.1 (1985). .Section 16-9-110 provides that: (a) It shall be unlawful

Sims v. Florida, Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles

832 F.2d 1558, 26 ERC 1969

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 2, 1987 | Docket: 66230337

Published

translation. O.C.G.A. § 40-3-29.1 (1985). .Section 16-9-110 provides that: (a) It shall be unlawful

Alliance for Conservation of Natural Resources in Pinellas County v. Furen

122 So. 2d 51, 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2309

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1960 | Docket: 60195464

Published

been waged over it.” The same authority under § 16.09 states: “When a reviewing court determines that