The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 16
ATTORNEY GENERAL

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 16.52

16.52 Participation in preserving constitutional integrity of state.—

(1) In order to provide for independent action and cooperative participation by the state in a program of concerted action among the states, and independent procedure to oppose any existing or proposed federal legislative encroachments upon constitutional state powers, it is hereby made a duty of the Department of Legal Affairs to make a study of federal legislation—existing and proposed—to determine whether such legislation has resulted, or may result, in objectionable or harmful encroachments upon the constitutional integrity of state governments, and with due regard to this state’s full contribution to the national war effort, in cooperation with the attorneys general of other states, or alone, to pursue that course best calculated to preserve and safeguard the constitutional state powers of the government of this state. It shall furnish to each of the several representatives in the Congress from this state, a written statement giving the reasons for any action being considered, or about to be taken hereunder at the time; and if possible, shall procure the assistance of such representatives therein and therefor.

(2) It shall be the duty of the Department of Legal Affairs of this state to render opinions to the representatives in Congress from this state, on any question arising within the scope of the subject matter of this act.

(3) In performing the duties imposed upon it under the provisions of this section, the Department of Legal Affairs is hereby authorized to employ therefor the services of the Council of State Governments, a national conference organization, or its successors in name or organization, or any other similar organization, in such manner not inconsistent with its powers and duties, as it may deem desirable; provided, that the cost of such employment, if any, shall be paid from the necessary and regular appropriation of the Department of Legal Affairs.

History.—ss. 1, 2, 3, ch. 21679, 1943; ss. 11, 35, ch. 69-106.

F.S. 16.52 on Google Scholar

F.S. 16.52 on Casetext

Amendments to 16.52

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 16.52

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 16.52.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. CANO,, 222 F. Supp. 3d 876 (S.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . CBP officers cut the spare tire open and found approximately 16.52 kilograms of cocaine. . . . SA Medrano searched through Defendant’s phone after CBP officers found approximately 16.52 kilograms . . .

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS v. P. BECKER, J. L. F. R. Jr. R. W. Jr. R. M. Jr. Jr. J. Jr. C. Jr. J. III, L. A. Jr. C. Jr. L. Jr. A. Sr., 371 F. Supp. 3d 1218 (N.D. Ga. 2016)

. . . $143.51 2006 $1,341.20 $0.00 $1,341.20 2007 $43.45 $160.65 $204.10 2008 $18.87 $196.55 $215.42 2009 $16.52 . . .

B. PHILLIPS, v. CITY OF DALLAS,, 781 F.3d 772 (5th Cir. 2015)

. . . Rotunda, Constitutional Law § 16.52(a) (8th ed.2010). . . .

BAKAY v. A. YARNES, A. A. a J. a a B. UBI a B. a UBI a, 431 F. Supp. 2d 1103 (W.D. Wash. 2006)

. . . Once animals are removed by the state under RCW 16.52 et. seq., return of the animals is not a guaranteed . . .

L. RICE v. SUNRISE EXPRESS, INC., 237 F. Supp. 2d 962 (N.D. Ind. 2002)

. . . The total difference between these two initial calculations was $16.52. . . .

STATE v. R. BALDWIN,, 709 So. 2d 636 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . present case, Schram’s actions suggested nothing more than a spur-of-the-moment attempt to shoplift $16.52 . . .

OINESS v. WALGREEN COMPANY, f k a J M d b a d b a a k a, 88 F.3d 1025 (Fed. Cir. 1996)

. . . court’s denial of its motion for enhanced damages and request for prejudgment interest at the rate of 16.52% . . .

AYERS, Jr. G. B. v. FORDICE, W. S. R. A. J. W. J. P. Jr. L. W. S. R. K., 879 F. Supp. 1419 (N.D. Miss. 1995)

. . . The average ACT score for entering freshmen at DSU is 19.79 as opposed to 16.52 at MVSU. . . .

J. BARNETT, v. STATE OF WISCONSIN ETHICS BOARD,, 817 F. Supp. 67 (E.D. Wis. 1993)

. . . The Wisconsin gag law provides: No agency, as defined in s. 16.52(7), or officer or employe thereof may . . . University of Wisconsin System and the University of Wisconsin-Miiwaukee are agencies as defined in § 16.52 . . .

SCHRAM, v. STATE, 614 So. 2d 646 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . conviction must be reversed, the state did prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Schram stole beer valued at $16.52 . . .

D. GAINES, v. CITY OF ORLANDO,, 450 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . McQuillin, Municipal Corporations §§ 16.52, 16.68 (3d ed. 1981). . Dade County v. . . . McQuillin, supra note 3, at § 16.52. . . .

UNITED STATES, v. E- K. SCHIAVO, SSN XXX- XX- XXXX, 14 M.J. 649 (A.C.M.R. 1982)

. . . January 1982, willfully damage by breaking the receiver in half, a telephone, of a value of about $16.52 . . .

ALVIN S. HANZLIK, ET AL. v. THE UNITED STATES, 219 Ct. Cl. 718 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . Johnson — the sum of $23,482.65, plus interest at $16.52 per day after November 30, 1978, until judgment . . . Felix Motacek — the sum of $128,482.65, plus interest at $16.52 per day after November 30, 1978, until . . .

COLEMAN MOTOR CO. a v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, 525 F.2d 1338 (3d Cir. 1975)

. . . 6.84 5.71 1964 49.49 24.22 14.25 6.63 5.88 6.16 1965 51.86 22.15 15.26 6.56 4.32 6.41 1966 49.01 24.01 16.52 . . .

SAN ANTONIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v. RODRIGUEZ, 411 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1973)

. . . students, id., §§21.074-21.080; and the power to operate and maintain a school bus program, id., § 16.52 . . .

BROWN, ALCANTAR BROWN, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 348 F. Supp. 723 (Cust. Ct. 1972)

. . . 30 10.50 10.50 10.61 10.61 10.61 10.61 Total Materials and Fabrication 16.17 15.57 16.16 16.16 16.47 16.52 . . . 16.52 16.25 Manufacturing Overhead 3.92 3.79 3.97 3-97 3-97 4.00 4.00 3-98 Admini strative Overhead . . .

V. RAFFERTY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 452 F.2d 767 (1st Cir. 1971)

. . . . $16.52 Office expenses (all in 1965) ... 9.25 The total deductions taken by Teragram over the five . . .

L. GOLD, v. C. SCURLOCK, W. L. E., 324 F. Supp. 1211 (E.D. Va. 1971)

. . . Sloan was ARC’s chief executive officer and chairman of the board — He owned 16.52% of ARC’s common stock . . .

UNITED STATES v. STATE OF TEXAS, Dr. J. W., 321 F. Supp. 1043 (E.D. Tex. 1970)

. . . (See §§ 16.52(a) and 21.062(a), Texas Education Code (1969)). . . .

W. PREISLER, J. St. St. v. MAYOR OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS, St. MISSOURI,, 303 F. Supp. 1071 (E.D. Mo. 1969)

. . . 8,777 - 6.39 23,971 —10.51 11 10,498 +11.97 28,717 + 7.21 12 11,608 +23.80 20,342 -24.06 13 10,925 +16.52 . . .

W. WIRTZ, v. AIRE FRIO, S. A. a, 304 F. Supp. 693 (D.C.Z. 1968)

. . . Samuels 95.48 Aquilino Santa Maria 223.82 Roberto Sevillano 12.65 Elias Sosa 50.58 Guillermo Thompson 16.52 . . .

TORRES v. AMERICAN R. CO. OF PUERTO RICO, 66 F. Supp. 745 (D.R.I. 1946)

. . . He received during the claim period compensation at’ the rate of $16.52 and $16.72 per week. . . .