17.11
To report disbursements made.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
17.11 To report disbursements made.—
(1) The Chief Financial Officer shall make in all his or her future annual reports an exhibit stated from the record of disbursements made during the fiscal year, and the several heads of expenditures under which such disbursements were made.
(2) The Chief Financial Officer shall also cause to have reported from the Florida Accounting Information Resource Subsystem no less than quarterly the disbursements which agencies made to small businesses, as defined in the Florida Small and Minority Business Assistance Act; to certified minority business enterprises in the aggregate; and to certified minority business enterprises broken down into categories of minority persons, as well as gender and nationality subgroups. This information shall be made available to the agencies, the Office of Supplier Diversity, the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives. Each agency shall be responsible for the accuracy of information entered into the Florida Accounting Information Resource Subsystem for use in this reporting.
History.—s. 3, ch. 1536, 1866; RS 104; GS 108; RGS 120; CGL 150; s. 5, ch. 83-132; s. 6, ch. 85-104; s. 2, ch. 94-322; s. 1312, ch. 95-147; s. 12, ch. 99-155; s. 7, ch. 2000-286; s. 28, ch. 2003-261; s. 18, ch. 2007-157.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1961–1983 · leading case: Proprietors Ins. Co. v. Valsecchi
Proprietors Ins. Co. v. Valsecchi (1983)
“This theory focuses on the interest of the state involved rather than on the individual. See Cavers, The Choice of Law Process (1965); B.”
DeSilva Construction Corp. v. Herrald (1962)
“3, § 17.11(2), page 1363.) (c) Third, defendants contend that plaintiff cannot prevail, even though the real party of interest, unless the assignment in question confers the right to sue for acts of infringement which took place prior to the execution of said assignment.”
Reese v. Reese (1965)
“In this connection she relies upon the following statement from 2A Nelson, Divorce and Annulment, § 17.11, at p. 58 (2d ed. 1961): "Remarriage of one's ex-wife does not, in most states, automatically terminate the obligation to pay alimony or support money.”
Hildebrandt v. Dade County Board of Rules & Appeals (1961)
“See section 10-21 (c) of the Code of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida (section 17.11(H), ordinance no. 57-25, as amended), which provides for an administrative review of decisions of the various examining boards by an Examiners’ Mediation Board.”
— 17.11(2) — 1 case
DeSilva Construction Corp. v. Herrald (1962)
“3, § 17.11(2), page 1363.) (c) Third, defendants contend that plaintiff cannot prevail, even though the real party of interest, unless the assignment in question confers the right to sue for acts of infringement which took place prior to the execution of said assignment.”
— 17.11(H) — 1 case
Hildebrandt v. Dade County Board of Rules & Appeals (1961)
“See section 10-21 (c) of the Code of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida (section 17.11(H), ordinance no. 57-25, as amended), which provides for an administrative review of decisions of the various examining boards by an Examiners’ Mediation Board.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.