|
|
The 2025 Florida Statutes
|
|
|
|
|
F.S. 17.1317.13 To duplicate warrants lost or destroyed.—(1) The Chief Financial Officer is required to duplicate any Chief Financial Officer’s warrants that may have been lost or destroyed, or may hereafter be lost or destroyed, upon the owner thereof or the owner’s agent or attorney presenting the Chief Financial Officer the statement, under oath, reciting the number, date, and amount of any warrant or the best and most definite description in his or her knowledge and the circumstances of its loss; if the Chief Financial Officer deems it necessary, the owner or the owner’s agent or attorney shall file in the office of the Chief Financial Officer a surety bond, or a bond with securities, to be approved by one of the judges of the circuit court or one of the justices of the Supreme Court, in a penalty of not less than twice the amount of any warrants so duplicated, conditioned to indemnify the state and any innocent holders thereof from any damages that may accrue from such duplication. (2) The Chief Financial Officer is required to duplicate any Chief Financial Officer’s warrant that may have been lost or destroyed, or may hereafter be lost or destroyed, when sent to any payee via any state agency when such warrant is lost or destroyed prior to being received by the payee and provided the director of the state agency to whom the warrant was sent presents to the Chief Financial Officer a statement, under oath, reciting the number, date, and amount of the warrant lost or destroyed, the circumstances surrounding the loss or destruction of such warrant, and any additional information that the Chief Financial Officer shall request in regard to such warrant. (3) Any duplicate Chief Financial Officer’s warrant issued in pursuance of the above provisions shall be of the same validity as the original was before its loss. History.—ss. 1, 3, ch. 1758, 1870; RS 106; GS 110; RGS 122; CGL 152; s. 1, ch. 24280, 1947; s. 1, ch. 73-148; s. 59, ch. 95-147; s. 30, ch. 2003-261.
| |
Annotations, Discussions, Cases:
Cases Citing Statute 17.13
Total Results: 13
320 F.3d 1289, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2218, 2003 WL 262474
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 10, 2003 | Docket: 75413
Cited 79 times | Published
§ 3182 explicitly.
See
Ga.Code Ann. § 17-13-27 (1997). As we have not held so before, today
285 F.3d 1301, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 4302, 2002 WL 415391
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 18, 2002 | Docket: 238783
Cited 62 times | Published
the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, O.C.G.A. § 17-13-24, even though the state of Georgia had already
490 F.3d 894, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15519, 2007 WL 1859323
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 29, 2007 | Docket: 398940
Cited 27 times | Published
§ 17-16-6 (2005) (current version at Ala. Code § 17-13-3). Plaintiffs contend that the three-percent signature
831 F.2d 946
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 30, 1987 | Docket: 682830
Cited 25 times | Published
See R. Stern, E. Gressman & S. Shapiro, supra, § 17.13.
In its brief, the State argues that as a matter
667 So. 2d 257, 1995 WL 511579
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1995 | Docket: 341474
Cited 22 times | Published
default was taken against it.
[2] We note that section 17.13, Florida Statutes (1985), requires the comptroller
778 F.3d 926, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 2201, 2015 WL 570978
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 12, 2015 | Docket: 2633961
Cited 7 times | Published
election receives a majority of the votes. Ala. Code § 17-13-18. The dates are set by statute at forty-two days
448 So. 2d 1074
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1984 | Docket: 2547049
Cited 6 times | Published
02 when read in conjunction with article V, section 17[13] grants him the authority to independently initiate
774 F.3d 689, 2014 WL 7146021
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 16, 2014 | Docket: 65660917
Cited 5 times | Published
officer in the last general election. AIa.Code § 17-13^40. This is how the Republican and Democratic Parties
188 So. 2d 61
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1966 | Docket: 1490700
Cited 4 times | Published
See Annotation 85 A.L.R. 428; 12 C.J.S. Burglary § 17; 13 Am.Jur.2d Burglary §§ 3 and 4.
Applying the criteria
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 3, 2022 | Docket: 64866355
Published
“reasonable” before a court can
approve it.13 Newberg § 17:13.
Our own circuit’s law tracks our sister
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 12, 2015 | Docket: 2900514
Published
election receives a majority of the votes. Ala. Code § 17-13-18. The
dates are set by statute at forty-two
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 16, 2014 | Docket: 2615629
Published
officer in the last general election.
Ala. Code § 17-13-40. This is how the Republican and Democratic Parties
448 So. 2d 1074, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12361
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1984 | Docket: 64604295
Published
02 when read in conjunction with article Y, section 17 13 grants him the authority to independently initiate
