Florida Statute 17.13 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 17.13

17.13 To duplicate warrants lost or destroyed.—

(1) The Chief Financial Officer is required to duplicate any Chief Financial Officer’s warrants that may have been lost or destroyed, or may hereafter be lost or destroyed, upon the owner thereof or the owner’s agent or attorney presenting the Chief Financial Officer the statement, under oath, reciting the number, date, and amount of any warrant or the best and most definite description in his or her knowledge and the circumstances of its loss; if the Chief Financial Officer deems it necessary, the owner or the owner’s agent or attorney shall file in the office of the Chief Financial Officer a surety bond, or a bond with securities, to be approved by one of the judges of the circuit court or one of the justices of the Supreme Court, in a penalty of not less than twice the amount of any warrants so duplicated, conditioned to indemnify the state and any innocent holders thereof from any damages that may accrue from such duplication.

(2) The Chief Financial Officer is required to duplicate any Chief Financial Officer’s warrant that may have been lost or destroyed, or may hereafter be lost or destroyed, when sent to any payee via any state agency when such warrant is lost or destroyed prior to being received by the payee and provided the director of the state agency to whom the warrant was sent presents to the Chief Financial Officer a statement, under oath, reciting the number, date, and amount of the warrant lost or destroyed, the circumstances surrounding the loss or destruction of such warrant, and any additional information that the Chief Financial Officer shall request in regard to such warrant.

(3) Any duplicate Chief Financial Officer’s warrant issued in pursuance of the above provisions shall be of the same validity as the original was before its loss.

History.—ss. 1, 3, ch. 1758, 1870; RS 106; GS 110; RGS 122; CGL 152; s. 1, ch. 24280, 1947; s. 1, ch. 73-148; s. 59, ch. 95-147; s. 30, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 17.13 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.13 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.13

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.13

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.13.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 17.13

Total Results: 20

Gilman v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-05-02

Citation: 245 So. 3d 983

Snippet: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 2, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D17-13 Lower Tribunal No. 11-5978 ________________ Dennis Gilman, Appellant

Gilman v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-11-22

Snippet: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 22, 2017. ________________ No. 3D17-13 Lower Tribunal No. 11-5978 ________________ Dennis Gilman, Appellant, vs. The State

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Etc. v. Beauvais

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-13

Citation: 188 So. 3d 938, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5584

Snippet: on a separate and distinct default); accord LNB-017-13, LLC v. HSBC Bank USA, 96 F.Supp.3d 1358, 1363-64

Christiana Trust v. Taveras

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-02-19

Citation: 186 So. 3d 50, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2464, 2016 WL 672012

Snippet: Corp., 112 F.Supp,,3d 1297 (]VLD.Fla.2015); LNB-017-13, LLC v. HSBC Bank USA, 96 F.Supp,3d 1358 (S.D.Fla

State of Florida v. Frank A. Mosley

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-10-16

Citation: 149 So. 3d 684, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 627, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 3068

Snippet: 14 (1956); Owens v. Fosdick, 153 Fla. 17, 13 So.2d 700 (1943)). 957 So.2d at 629.

City of Sunny Isles Beach v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-10-19

Citation: 88 So. 3d 224, 2011 WL 4949827, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16371

Snippet: under oath to the City that the parcel size was 17.13 acres and its intent to develop a large commercial

Reeves v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-05-17

Citation: 957 So. 2d 625, 2007 WL 1437467

Snippet: Constitutional Law § 14 (1956); Owens v. Fosdick, 153 Fla. 17, 13 So.2d 700 (1943)). The text of the PRR statute

State v. Rubio

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-12-30

Citation: 917 So. 2d 383, 2005 WL 3555898

Snippet: 505 conflicts with Board of Dentistry Rule 64B5-17.013(4). That rule provides that a dentist may enter

In Re Certification for Add'l Judges

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-02-29

Citation: 755 So. 2d 79, 2000 WL 226340

Snippet: 30 Totals 17 13 DISTRICT COURTS OF APPEAL The criteria

State v. Family Bank of Hallandale

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-08-31

Citation: 667 So. 2d 257, 1995 WL 511579

Snippet: was taken against it. [2] We note that section 17.13, Florida Statutes (1985), requires the comptroller

City of Boynton Beach v. State Public Employees Relations Commission

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-05-17

Citation: 543 So. 2d 403, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1217, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2712

Snippet: bargaining unit employees. Fla.Admin.Code Rule 38D-17.013. The petition does not bring the City and Local

In Re Advisory Opinion to the Governor

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-07-14

Citation: 509 So. 2d 292, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 240

Snippet: determines its nature. Owens v. Fosdick, 153 Fla. 17, 13 So.2d 700 (1943); State ex rel. McKay v. Keller

FLA. EXPORT TOBACCO v. Dept. of Revenue

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-06-26

Citation: 510 So. 2d 936

Snippet: 50 Fla. Jur.2d Taxation §§ 11:32-11:35, 15:1-15:17, 13:22-26 (1983). My assumption that all contests relating

State ex rel. State Attorney for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit v. General Development Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-03-23

Citation: 448 So. 2d 1074, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12361

Snippet: when read in conjunction with article Y, section 17 13 grants him the authority to independently initiate

STATE BY & THRO. STATE ATTY. v. Gen. Dev. Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-03-23

Citation: 448 So. 2d 1074

Snippet: when read in conjunction with article V, section 17[13] grants him the authority to independently initiate

Bastida v. Batchelor

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-07-20

Citation: 418 So. 2d 297, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20619

Snippet: (Fla. 3d DCA 1982): 3A Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 17.13[1] (2d ed. 1979), in discussing Federal Rule of

Stanley Fine Furniture, Inc. v. North River Insurance

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-02-02

Citation: 411 So. 2d 210, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19183

Snippet: with directions. . 3A Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 17.13[1] (2d ed. 1979), in discussing Federal Rule of

Department of Revenue v. Leadership Hous., Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-03-03

Citation: 343 So. 2d 611

Snippet: technical procedure." And in Owens v. Fosdick, 153 Fla. 17, 13 So.2d 700 (1943), it was held that a tax on the

State Ex Rel. Dade County v. Dickinson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-11-03

Citation: 230 So. 2d 130

Snippet: West v. Gray, supra; Owens v. Fosdick, 153 Fla. 17, 13 So.2d 700 (Fla. 1943). It is our view that both

Lewis v. Mosley

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-11-13

Citation: 204 So. 2d 197, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3239

Snippet: Tax Assessor, et al v. Fosdick, (1943) 153 Fla. 17, 13 So.2d 700. Undoubtedly, Sec. 10, Art. XII, of the