Florida Statute 17.13 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 17.13

17.13 To duplicate warrants lost or destroyed.—

(1) The Chief Financial Officer is required to duplicate any Chief Financial Officer’s warrants that may have been lost or destroyed, or may hereafter be lost or destroyed, upon the owner thereof or the owner’s agent or attorney presenting the Chief Financial Officer the statement, under oath, reciting the number, date, and amount of any warrant or the best and most definite description in his or her knowledge and the circumstances of its loss; if the Chief Financial Officer deems it necessary, the owner or the owner’s agent or attorney shall file in the office of the Chief Financial Officer a surety bond, or a bond with securities, to be approved by one of the judges of the circuit court or one of the justices of the Supreme Court, in a penalty of not less than twice the amount of any warrants so duplicated, conditioned to indemnify the state and any innocent holders thereof from any damages that may accrue from such duplication.

(2) The Chief Financial Officer is required to duplicate any Chief Financial Officer’s warrant that may have been lost or destroyed, or may hereafter be lost or destroyed, when sent to any payee via any state agency when such warrant is lost or destroyed prior to being received by the payee and provided the director of the state agency to whom the warrant was sent presents to the Chief Financial Officer a statement, under oath, reciting the number, date, and amount of the warrant lost or destroyed, the circumstances surrounding the loss or destruction of such warrant, and any additional information that the Chief Financial Officer shall request in regard to such warrant.

(3) Any duplicate Chief Financial Officer’s warrant issued in pursuance of the above provisions shall be of the same validity as the original was before its loss.

History.—ss. 1, 3, ch. 1758, 1870; RS 106; GS 110; RGS 122; CGL 152; s. 1, ch. 24280, 1947; s. 1, ch. 73-148; s. 59, ch. 95-147; s. 30, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 17.13 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.13 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.13

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.13

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.13.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 17.13

Total Results: 20

Gilman v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-05-02T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: 5 17-0013 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp

Gilman v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-11-21T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: 5 17-0013 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp

Unknown Spouse of Almonte v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. ex rel. GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-17

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-04-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 225 So. 3d 830, 2017 WL 1372689

Snippet: Trust Company for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-17 13 April 2017 225 So. 3d 830, 2017 WL 1372689

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Etc. v. Beauvais

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-04-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 188 So. 3d 938, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5584

Snippet: on a separate and distinct default); accord LNB-017-13, LLC v. HSBC Bank USA, 96 F.Supp.3d 1358, 1363-

Christiana Trust v. Taveras

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-02-19T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 186 So. 3d 50, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2464, 2016 WL 672012

Snippet: Corp., 112 F.Supp,,3d 1297 (]VLD.Fla.2015); LNB-017-13, LLC v. HSBC Bank USA, 96 F.Supp,3d 1358 (S.D.Fla

State of Florida v. Frank A. Mosley

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2014-10-16T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 149 So. 3d 684, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 627, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 3068

Snippet: 14 (1956); Owens v. Fosdick, 153 Fla. 17, 13 So.2d 700 (1943)). 957 So.2d at 629.

City of Sunny Isles Beach v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-10-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 88 So. 3d 224, 2011 WL 4949827, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16371

Snippet: under oath to the City that the parcel size was 17.13 acres and its intent to develop a large commercial…matter would be “evidence that Publix never had 17.13 acres of land.” Id. The court gave no indications…, this time indicating that the parcel size was 17.13 acres, and the proposed density of the condominium…adequate evidence as to Publix’s ownership of the 17.13 acres of land — because the precise size and location

C.D. v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-09-14T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 82 So. 3d 1037, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14564, 2011 WL 4056214

Snippet: hours.” Royal Palm Beach Code of Ordinances, Sec. 17 — 13(a). It is contained in a chapter of “Offenses and

Reeves v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2007-05-17T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 957 So. 2d 625

Snippet: Constitutional Law § 14 (1956); Owens v. Fosdick, 153 Fla. 17, 13 So.2d 700 (1943)). The text of the PRR statute

State v. Rubio

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-12-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 917 So. 2d 383

Snippet: 817.505 conflicts with Board of Dentistry Rule 64B5-17.013(4). That rule provides that a dentist may enter…817.505, as well as Board of Dentistry Rule 64B5-17.013(4). Section (5)(f) of that rule expressly provides

Schreiber v. Schreiber

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2001-09-19T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 795 So. 2d 1054

Snippet: for the parties' two minor children, ages 17 and 13, respectively, $1,500 per month, to continue until

In Re Certification for Add'l Judges

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-02-28T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 755 So. 2d 79

Snippet: 30 Totals 17 13 DISTRICT COURTS OF APPEAL The criteria

State v. Family Bank of Hallandale

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-08-31T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 667 So. 2d 257, 1995 WL 511579

Snippet: was taken against it. [2] We note that section 17.13, Florida Statutes (1985), requires the comptroller

City of Boynton Beach v. State Public Employees Relations Commission

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-05-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 543 So. 2d 403, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1217, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2712

Snippet: bargaining unit employees. Fla.Admin.Code Rule 38D-17.013. The petition does not bring the City and Local

In Re Advisory Opinion to the Governor

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1987-07-14T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 509 So. 2d 292

Snippet: determines its nature. Owens v. Fosdick, 153 Fla. 17, 13 So.2d 700 (1943); State ex rel. McKay v. Keller

FLA. EXPORT TOBACCO v. Dept. of Revenue

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1987-06-26T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 510 So. 2d 936

Snippet: 50 Fla. Jur.2d Taxation §§ 11:32-11:35, 15:1-15:17, 13:22-26 (1983). My assumption that all contests relating

State ex rel. State Attorney for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit v. General Development Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-03-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 448 So. 2d 1074, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12361

Snippet: when read in conjunction with article Y, section 17 13 grants him the authority to independently initiate

STATE BY & THRO. STATE ATTY. v. Gen. Dev. Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-03-22T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 448 So. 2d 1074

Snippet: when read in conjunction with article V, section 17[13] grants him the authority to independently initiate

Bastida v. Batchelor

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-07-20T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 418 So. 2d 297, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20619

Snippet: Fla. 3d DCA 1982): 3A Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 17.13[1] (2d ed. 1979), in discussing Federal Rule of

Stanley Fine Furniture, Inc. v. North River Insurance

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-02-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 411 So. 2d 210, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19183

Snippet: with directions. . 3A Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 17.13[1] (2d ed. 1979), in discussing Federal Rule of