Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 17.17 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 17.17 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 17.17

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 17.17
17.17 Examination by Governor and report.The office of Chief Financial Officer, and the books, files, documents, records, and papers shall always be subject to the examination of the Governor of this state, or any person the Governor may authorize to examine the same; and on the first day of January of each and every year, or oftener if called for by the Governor, the Chief Financial Officer shall make a full report of all his or her official acts and proceedings for the last fiscal year to the Governor, to be laid before the Legislature with the Governor’s message, and shall make such further report as the constitution may require.
History.s. 8, ch. 8, 1845; RS 109; GS 113; ch. 7342, 1917; RGS 125; CGL 155; s. 60, ch. 95-147; s. 33, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 17.17 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.17 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.17


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.17
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.17.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 17.17

Total Results: 20

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re: Limiting Government Interference with Abortion

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-04-01

Snippet: lives of both the unborn and their mothers. 17 17. See, e.g., Planned Parenthood of Cent. Mo

Byrd, The Florida Senate v. Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute, Inc., Equal Ground Education Fund, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-12-01

Snippet: contrary by Appellants, and is uncontested here. 17 17 Therefore, as discussed in footnote 11, any claim

Kevin F. Tomlinson v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-08-24

Snippet: of the statute in their historical context. 17 17. Tomlinson argues that we should apply the

STATE OF FLORIDA v. JAMELL DEMONS

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-11-09

Snippet: prepare a defense. Glasserman v. State, 590 So. 2d 17, 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Clearly, in the present

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. LISA S. DULBERG DE MORALES

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-12-09

Snippet: to writing.” Rivera v. Dade County, 485 So. 2d 17, 17 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see also Davis v. Heye, 743

Tina Lasonya Brown v. State of Florida & Tina Lasonya Brown v. Mark S. Inch, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-08-27

Snippet: 2d at 908, we deny Brown’s habeas petition.17 17. The other statements that Brown references

Starboard Cruise Services v. Deprince

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-11-21

Citation: 259 So. 3d 295

Snippet: Corp. v. Kimmel & Assocs., Inc., 916 So. 2d 17, 17-18 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), the Fourth District Court

Forthuber v. First Liberty - corrected 11/17/17

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-11-17

Citation: 229 So. 3d 896

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Appellant challenges the adequacy of his attorney’s. fee award, pursuant to section 627.428, Florida Statutes (2010), rendered in this first-party insurance dispute. As the first of two issues raised on appeal, we address whether the trial court erred by refusing to' consider the hours expended by Appellant’s attorney while he was working at a prior law firm—the firm that originated the claim on Appellant’s behalf. The trial court categorically rejected these hours because that

State of Florida v. Brian Mitchell Lee

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-06-01

Citation: 223 So. 3d 342, 2017 WL 2374401, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7886

Snippet: occurred. I do not believe the State met this burden.17 17 Sprouse v. State, 208 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 1st DCA

Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'n v. Sawh

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-06-01

Citation: 194 So. 3d 475, 2016 WL 3065812, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8292

Snippet: Deficiency-Real Estate Taxes for the year 2009 $44,017.17 Escrow Deficiency-Real Estate Taxes for

MYD Marine Distributor, Inc. v. International Paint Ltd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-13

Citation: 187 So. 3d 1285, 2016 WL 1445590, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5614

Snippet: Construction Corp. v. Kimmel & Associates, 916 So.2d 17, 17-18 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Id,.Even though these cases

Shawn Alvin Tracey v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-10-16

Citation: 152 So. 3d 504, 92 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 587, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 617, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 3072

Snippet: result of that search was subject to suppression.17 17. By our ruling here, we do not reach the issue

Egle v. Krinsk

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-07-11

Citation: 141 So. 3d 781, 2014 WL 3377094, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10606

Snippet: added); Cooley v. Cooley, 106 So.3d 17, 17 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). Accordingly, we reverse and

Askari Abdullah Muhammad f/k/a Thomas Knight v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-01-03

Citation: 132 So. 3d 176

Snippet: potential claim and should have been produced.17 17. See § 922.07, Fla. Stat. (2013); Fla. R. Crim

Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc. v. Horowitch

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-01-10

Citation: 107 So. 3d 362, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 17, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 34, 2013 WL 105328

Snippet: Construction Corp. v. Kimmel & Associates, Inc., 916 So.2d 17, 17-18 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), a plaintiff filed a declaratory

Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Rigby

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-09-12

Citation: 96 So. 3d 1146, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15238, 2012 WL 3964978

Snippet: appealable. See Rivera v. Dade Cnty., 485 So.2d 17, 17 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (stating "this court lacks jurisdiction

Taylor v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-06-13

Citation: 958 So. 2d 1069, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9141, 2007 WL 1687676

Snippet: for new trial in Glasserman v. State, 590 So.2d 17, 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), where the defendant was prepared

Chuck v. City of Homestead Police Dept.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-12-15

Citation: 888 So. 2d 736

Snippet: PROSECUTION AND DEFENSE OF FORFEITURE CASES, ¶ 17.02, 17-17 and 17-18, vol 2. (2003), this erroneously creates

Logan v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-04-17

Citation: 846 So. 2d 472, 2003 WL 1883612

Snippet: by counsel.'"); Studnicka v. Carlisle, 567 So.2d 17, 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) ("Petitioners who are represented

Adoption Centre, Inc. v. Marshall

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-12-03

Citation: 627 So. 2d 589, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12018, 1993 WL 495982

Snippet: parental rights. See In re Interest of T.J., 466 So.2d 17, 17-18 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Fla. R.Juv.P. 8.255(e);