The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . with $ 0.25), but lower than the remaining two countries (South Africa with $ 26.27, Ecuador with $ 17.16 . . . period of review in South Africa ($ 26.27 vs. $ 5.46), Romania, ($ 0.08 vs. $ 0.13) and Ecuador ($ 17.16 . . . based on imports of 12,894 kilograms of nitrogen, while the data from Ecuador provides an AUV of $ 17.16 . . .
. . . rescored under the 1994 sentencing guidelines, the trial court could impose a sentence anywhere from 17.16 . . .
. . . According to DEEP, VIZIO’s billable national market share is currently 17.16%. Amend. Compl. ¶ 34. . . .
. . . Judges are state actors in their direct enforcement of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 17.16 . . .
. . . The interest on the CreXus Loan continues to accrue at a rate of 17.16 percent per annum or $6,184.02 . . . $14,598,467.92 that was owing the CreXus Loan as of April 1,2013, interest continues to accrue at a rate of 17.16% . . .
. . . A, § 17.16(a)); Michigan, where Stryker resides and has filed a state court action seeking declaratory . . .
. . . P. 3129.1 17.16 foreclosure fees 1,925.00 escrow advances 1,395.18 Total $29,800.87 IV. . . . P. 3129.1 17.16 foreclosure fees 1,925.00 escrow advances 1,395.18 Total $30,351.55 Y. . . .
. . . , Abrahamson, Vorachek & Levinson (“Abrahamson”), to prepare the fee petition, Rossiello also spent 17.16 . . .
. . . Kienlen, Government Contract Disputes §§ 17.15-17.16(2010); Steven W. . . .
. . . Delafield Ordinances provides that “[appointed officials may be removed as provided in §§ 17.12(l)(c) and 17.16 . . . Section 17.16(3) states “Removals from office for cause shall be made as provided in this section.” . . . Stat. § 17.16, and include a requirement of written notice of the charges, a speedy hearing, and a full . . .
. . . (Id. at ¶ 9; docket no. 229-11, Plaintiffs’ Ex. 17.16.) . . .
. . . . § 17.16.) . . . A § 17.16), but it also contemplates that Nordbank’s counsel will effectively represent the interests . . .
. . . On December 20, 2004, Avaya's stock closed at $17.16. . . .
. . . Pennebaker $17.16 per hour. Defendant raised Ms. . . . Pennebaker’s final hourly rate was $17.16 per hour. . . .
. . . 333 50.00% 341 50.44% AfricanAM Female Operators 9.91% 67 9.91% Total Female Operators 114 17.12% 116 17.16% . . .
. . . There is also a separate provision, ¶ 17.16, which Realty relies on. . . . On the other hand, Realty is entitled to attorneys’ fees under ¶ 17.16, but only for this case, and not . . . Second, I agree with PWC that the natural reading of ¶ 17.16 is that it only applies in legal actions . . . Under ¶ 17.16, then, Realty is entitled to its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs in this case from . . . PWC also argues (without any authority) that ¶ 17.16 is completely inapplicable because under ¶ 17.18 . . .
. . . Create 1.32 acres of waters of the United States (located in the North Channel); • Preserve and maintain 17.16 . . .
. . . The Debtor received a stipend from the state of $17.16 per day per child for the care of each of the . . .
. . . generally the last and definitive commentary on the 1898 Bankruptcy Act, 1A CollieR on BankRuptCY ¶ 17.16 . . . The only hint of such a distinction is found in Collier’s final paragraph of footnote 12 to ¶ 17.16[3 . . .
. . . Cadden) negotiated with Gerhard Schickedanz and his wife, Susan LeAnne Schickedanz (appellees) to sell 17.16 . . .
. . . See id. at § 17.16(2). B. . . . Code tit. 456, § 17.16 (union cannot invoke contractual sanctions against fee objector who has charges . . . Code tit. 456, §§ 17.00-17.16. . . . .
. . . Citing Discovery Proceedings in Federal Court, 3rd Edition, § 17.16 Manner of Production, Dryvit acknowledges . . .
. . . See, for example 1A Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.16[6], p. 1650.1, 14th Edition (not 15th), wherein the . . .
. . . Further, Local Rule 17.16(b), states in pertinent part that a motion for reconsideration may be made . . .
. . . sheriffs work hours as “straight time” or “overtime” is governed by the following provisions: (a) Section 17.16 . . .
. . . Ordinance 72-100 rezoned to RM-3 two tracts of land, one containing about 17.16 acres, and the other . . . As discussed in the last order, tracts 2, 3, and 5, are located within the 17.16 acre and 31.98 acre . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 17.16 (2d ed. 1980)). . . .
. . . Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Edition, Vol. 1A, page 1635, ¶ 17.16, fn. 16 (1971). . . .
. . . In re Homer, 45 B.R. 15 (Bankr.W.D.Mo.1984) (citing 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16, pp. 1638-39 (15th . . .
. . . See generally 1A Collier on Bankruptcy §§ 17.01, 17.16[3] (14th ed. 1978) (tracing this history). . . .
. . . See generally 1A Collier on Bankruptcy §§ 17.01, 17.16[3] (14th ed. 1978) (tracing this history). . . .
. . . entire psychic spectrum of perceptions, thoughts, and behavior.” 3 Lawyers’ Medical Encyclopedia § 17.16 . . .
. . . ProC.Ann. art. 17.16 (Vernon 1977 & Supp. 1994). . . .
. . . Rhodes, The Law of Liability Insurance § 17.16, at 17-59, 17-65 (1988). . . . . Rhodes, The Law of Liability Insurance § 17.16, at 17-67 (1988); A. . . .
. . . many—for a partial listing, see 1A Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed. 1978) ¶ 14.34 pp. 1378-1379 n. 14, § 17.16 . . . Collier on Bankruptcy (15th ed. 1992) ¶ 523.08[4], [5]; 1A Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed. 1978) ¶ 17.16 . . . Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed. 1978) ¶¶ 14.34, 14.35, 14.36, 14.39 pp. 1395-1396 n. 9, 17.01[3.1], 17.16 . . .
. . . this dissent was endorsed by a leading treatise on the Act, 1A Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed. 1978) ¶ 17.16 . . .
. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy, para. 17.16[6], p. 1650.1 n. 50 (14th ed. 1978) (1970 Act), with id., . . . para. 17.16[4], p. 1643 (prior state law). . . .
. . . Callman, Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies, § 17.16 (4th Ed., 1981); see also Wrist-Rocket . . .
. . . ‘perfunctory device to be used to contest discharge, ...’”, id. citing 1A Colliers on Bankruptcy, § 17.16 . . .
. . . See Callman, Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies, § 17.16 (4th Ed.1981). . . .
. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy, para. 17.16[6], p. 1650.1 n. 50 (14th ed. 1978) (1970 Act), with id., . . . para. 17.16[4], p. 1643 (prior state law). . . .
. . . Matter of Garman, 643 F.2d at 1257, quoting 1A Collier’s on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.16 at 1636 n. 17 (14th ed . . .
. . . See: In re Paolino, 75 B.R. 641, 648 (Bankr.E.D.Penn.1987) citing 1A Collier, para. 17.16 (14th ed.), . . .
. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy, Section 17.16[6], p. 1650. (14th Ed. 1978); Countrymen, The New Dischargeability . . .
. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy § 17.16[6], p. 1650.2 (14th ed. 1978); Countryman, The New Dischargeability . . .
. . . reductions from each attorney’s time: Barrack Firm: Barrack .30 Gold 19.10 Goodkind Firm: Sternberg 17.16 . . .
. . . intention, ... may constitute a false representation within the exception.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .
. . . See 1A Collier 1Í 17.16, at 1641 nn. 25-26 (14th ed.) (collection of cases). . . . See 1A Collier ¶ 17.16 (14th ed.). . . .
. . . Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice §§ 17.16, 17.26, at 17-189 to 17-191, 17-272 (2d ed. 1986); Tex.Prob.Code . . .
. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16[6], p. 1650.1 n. 50 (14th ed. 1978) (1970 Act), with id., 1117.16 . . .
. . . Ogle-bay, Collier on Bankruptcy 1117.16[6], p. 1650.1 n. 50 (14th ed. 1978) (1970 Act), with id,., ¶ 17.16 . . .
. . . Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16, pp. 1638, 1639 (14th ed. 1976) (Emphasis added.) . . . .
. . . intention, however, may constitute a false representation within exception." 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .
. . . Callmann, Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies § 17.16 (4th ed., 1981); See Wrist-Rocket Manufacturing . . . is such that the article acquires a value by his testimony to its genuineness,” Callmann, supra, at 17.16 . . . National Silver Co., 61 F.Supp. 232, 236 (S.D.N.Y.1945); Callmann, § 17.16-17; Derenberg, Territorial . . .
. . . Davis Administrative Law Treatise, § 17.16 (2d ed. 1980). . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 17.16 (2d ed. 1980). . . . Davis, supra, § 17.16, at 327-30. . . .
. . . however, may constitute a false representation within the exception.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy para. 17.16 . . . impossible is an unduly restricted interpretation of the purposes of the Act.” 1 A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .
. . . non-dischargeable, even though there is no excuse for the subsequent breach.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .
. . . See generally 3 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 17.16 (2d ed. 1980). . . .
. . . bound by the fraud of an agent acting within the scope of his authority.' 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .
. . . however, may constitute a false representation within the exception.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy para. 17.16 . . .
. . . 26.05 16.37 20.93 17.95 29.82 25.62 26.84 5.11 5.76 34.25 9.29 20.00 18.37 3.63 15.28 25.95 21.64 23.75 17.16 . . .
. . . See, e.g., IA Collier on Bankruptcy para. 17.16, pp. 1638-1640.1 (1976), to the following effect: “A . . .
. . . See, e.g., 1A Collier on Bankruptcy para. 17.16, pp. 1638-1640.1 (1976), to the following effect: “A . . .
. . . strengthening the discharge in bankruptcy would be greatly dissipated.” 1 A Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.16 . . .
. . . however, may constitute a false representation within the exception.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy para. 17.16 . . .
. . . The court stated, at p. 371, quoting 1A Collier on Bankruptcy, § 17.16, as follows: “The judgment in . . .
. . . article is symbolized by it.” 3 Callmann, The Law of Unfair Competition Trademarks and Monopolies § 17.16 . . .
. . . legislative mandate, the Commission adopted the Oil-Backout Rule, Florida Administrative Code Rule 25-17.16 . . . Commission approval before the construction of a proposed project, under section (3)(c) of Rule 25-17.16 . . . With regard to the first issue, Citizens contend that Rule 25-17.16, and particularly section (3)(c) . . . essential requirements of the law when it allegedly retroactively applied the amended version of Rule 25 — 17.16 . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 17.16 (2d ed. 1980). . . .
. . . obtaining of money or property by ‘false pretenses or false representations.’ ” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .
. . . . § 17.16, which sets forth the procedure for removals. . . . Section 17.16(3) allows removal for cause “only upon written verified charges,” which implies a limit . . .
. . . .2d 1370 (9th Cir.1975); In re Wright, 515 F.2d 260 (9th Cir.1975); 1A, Collier on Bankruptcy, Par. 17.16 . . .
. . . Syros, 254 F.Supp. 195 (E.D.Mo.1966); 1A Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.16[3] (14th Ed.1973). . . .
. . . intention, however, may constitute a false representation within the exception.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .
. . . obtained the money for himself in order for the debt to be nondischargeable. 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .
. . . .2d 1370 (9th Cir. 1975); In re Wright, 515 F.2d 260 (9th Cir. 1975); 1A, Collier on Bankruptcy, Sec. 17.16 . . .
. . . (Raible, 9 Tr. 795-96) 17.16. No Recourse for Defective Equipment. . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 17.16, at 327 (2d ed. 1980), nor must an agency give them as much . . .
. . . See 1A Colliers on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.16(4), p. 1643 (14th ed.). . . .
. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy § 17.16[6], p. 1650.2 (14th ed. 1978); Countryman, The New Dischargeability . . .
. . . Instruction No. 3 is a modification of Missouri Approved Jury Instructions — Civil (MAI) 17.16 (1973 . . . According to appellants, the rear-end doctrine instruction, MAI 17.16, should be used only when no dispute . . . MAI 17.16 appears as follows: Your verdict must be for plaintiff if you believe: First, defendant’s automobile . . .
. . . See 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16. . . . Id. ¶ 17.16[6]. The Government simply did not do so. . . .
. . . Vol. 1A, Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.16[3] (14th Ed.). . . .
. . . that such representations were knowingly and fraudulently made . . . . ” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.16 . . .
. . . IA Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 at 1635-36. . . .
. . . is an unduly restricted interpretation of the purposes of the Act.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy para. 17.16 . . .
. . . and fraudulently made, and that they were relied upon by the other party.’ 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .
. . . Ogle-bay, Collier on Bankruptcy § 17.16[6], p. 1650.2 (14th ed. 1978); Countryman, The New Dischargeability . . .
. . . Long, Law of Liability Insurance, § 17.16 at 17-21 (1980): “The doctrines of waiver and estoppel cannot . . .
. . . See, 1A Collier on Bankruptcy H 17.16[6], at 1649 (14th ed. 1978). . . . See, 1A Collier on Bankruptcy H 17.16[3] at 1638 (14th ed. 1978) . . . .
. . . See, 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16[6], at 1649 (14th ed. 1978). . . . See, 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16[3] at 1638 (14th ed. 1978). . . .
. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy H 17.16, p. 1650.1 (14th ed. 1978). . . .
. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16, p. 1650.1 (14th ed. 1978). . . .
. . . Iannelli received the money. .Collier supports this latter interpretation. 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . . See 1A, Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.16 (14th ed. 1978); Countryman, The New Dischargeability Law, 45 . . . TA Collier on Bankruptcy, § 17.16 (14th ed. 1978). . . .
. . . nondischargeable, even though there is no excuse for the subsequent breach.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .
. . . In 1A Collier on Bankruptcy § 17.16 commencing at Page 1634 the authority states: “The frauds included . . .
. . . Bank, 165 F. 607 (3d Cir. 1908); 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 14.40, at 1396, ¶ 17.16, at 1634-35 (14th . . .
. . . Collier on Bankruptcy (14th Edition) par. 17.16 at p. 1640; and see, for example, In re Black (E.D.Wis . . .
. . . must have been reliance on the allegedly false representations of fraud. 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .