Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 17.16 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 17.16 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 17.16

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 17.16
17.16 Seal.The office of the Chief Financial Officer shall have an official seal by which its proceedings are authenticated.
History.s. 7, ch. 8, 1845; RS 108; GS 112; RGS 124; CGL 154; s. 32, ch. 2003-261; s. 2, ch. 2004-390.

F.S. 17.16 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.16 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.16


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.16
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.16.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 17.16

Total Results: 20

Citizens for Strong Schools, Inc. v. Florida State Board of Education

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-04

Citation: 262 So. 3d 127

Snippet: constitutions are less detailed than ours. 17 16. See, e.g., Lobato v. State, 304 P.3d 1132

Masis v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-18

Citation: 245 So. 3d 913

Snippet: trial court could impose a sentence anywhere from 17.16 to 21.67 years in state prison without being required

Abbey v. Abbey

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-08-08

Citation: 235 So. 3d 894

Snippet: L.T. NO.: 17-16 Denied.

Willie Floyd v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-05-17

Snippet: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA WILLIE FLOYD, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D17-0016 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed May 18, 2017. An appeal

Lopez v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-02-16

Citation: 230 So. 3d 850

Snippet: L.T. NO.: 17-16 Denied.

Estate of Cadden v. Schickedanz

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-08-27

Citation: 855 So. 2d 651, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12829, 2003 WL 22014640

Snippet: wife, Susan LeAnne Schickedanz (appellees) to sell 17.16 acres of land. The initial purchase involved 8.9

Franqui v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-10-18

Citation: 804 So. 2d 1185, 2001 WL 1241312

Snippet: 230 Cal.Rptr. at 856 n. 17, 726 P.2d at 534 n. 17.[16] In Geary v. State, 114 Nev. 100, 952 P.2d 431

Brennan v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-07-08

Citation: 754 So. 2d 1, 1999 WL 506966

Snippet: constitutional line should be drawn at age seventeen (17).[16] This is a line we have already purposefully drawn

Griffin v. Griffin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-02-18

Citation: 463 So. 2d 569, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 450

Snippet: and the children of his second marriage were ages 17, 16 and 12. No children were born of Dr. Griffin's

Watson v. Freeman Decorating Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-09-17

Citation: 455 So. 2d 1097

Snippet: Alpert, Florida Workmen's Compensation Law, § 17-16, at 631 (3d ed. 1978). Drawing a distinction between

Citizens of State v. PUB. SERV. COM'N

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-04-12

Citation: 448 So. 2d 1024, 1984 WL 914462

Snippet: Oil-Backout Rule, Florida Administrative Code Rule 25-17.16. The purpose of the rule, which became effective

City of Tampa v. Islands Four, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-09-27

Citation: 364 So. 2d 738

Snippet: As explained in Librizzi v. Plunkett, 126 N.J.L. 17, 16 A.2d 280 (1940) the power to revoke for certain

Goldman v. Goldman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-05-24

Citation: 333 So. 2d 120

Snippet: wife was engaged in bearing three children (ages 17, 16 and 14 at the time of the dissolution) and devoting

Doran v. Doran

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-06-05

Citation: 212 So. 2d 100

Snippet: Custody of three minor children, present ages of 17, 16 and 8 years, was awarded to plaintiff. Defendant

Solomon v. City of Miami Beach

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-05-24

Citation: 187 So. 2d 373, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5469

Snippet: Florida,. 1950, is as follows: $c * * * * * Sec. 17.16. Schedule of fees. * * * * * * “(76) EXTERMINATORS

City of Miami Beach v. Morgan

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1953-04-10

Citation: 64 So. 2d 560, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1203

Snippet: same is hereby, dismissed; “(2) That Ordinance 17.16(117) of ‘The Code of the City of Miami Beach, Florida

State v. City of Miami

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1946-07-16

Citation: 27 So. 2d 118, 157 Fla. 726, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 838

Snippet: Re Petition of the City of Philadelphia, 340 Pa. 17, 16 A.2d 32. There the court said, in part: "Being

Loftin v. Crowley's Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1942-06-23

Citation: 8 So. 2d 909, 150 Fla. 836, 142 A.L.R. 626, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1090

Snippet: Hirst, 30 Fla. 1, 11 So. 506, 32 Am. St. Rep. 17, 16 L.R.A. 631, 38 Am. Jur. 848-9; et seq. Florida

Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. McRoberts

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-07-06

Citation: 149 So. 631, 111 Fla. 278, 94 A.L.R. 376, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1967

Snippet: Hirst, 30 Fla. 1, 11 Sou. Rep. 506, 32 A. St. Rep. 17, 16 L. R. A. 631; Florida Cent. & P. R Co. v. Mooney

Marshall v. C. S. Young Construction Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-06-14

Citation: 113 So. 565, 94 Fla. 11

Snippet: McCrowell v. City of Bristol, 89 Va. 652, *Page 17 16 S.E. Rep. 867, 20 L. R. A. 653; Asberry v. City