Florida Statute 17.54 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 17.54

17.54 Annual report to Governor.—The Chief Financial Officer shall make a report in detail to the Governor, with a copy to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives as soon after the 1st day of July of each year as it is practicable to prepare same of the transactions of the Division of Treasury for the preceding fiscal year, embracing a statement of the receipts and payments on account of each of the several funds of which he or she has the care and custody.

History.—s. 2, ch. 3563, 1885; RS 122; GS 127; RGS 138; CGL 168; s. 1, ch. 23094, 1945; s. 3, ch. 91-244; s. 70, ch. 95-147; s. 50, ch. 2003-261.

Note.—Former s. 18.05.

F.S. 17.54 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.54 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.54

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.54

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.54.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 17.54

Total Results: 9

Brown v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-04-26

Citation: 672 So. 2d 640, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4283, 1996 WL 200546

Snippet: recommended sentence would increase from 15.24 to 17.54 months, still dramatically less time than that to

State, Department of Revenue v. Adkinson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-01-06

Citation: 409 So. 2d 53

Snippet: valuation while the range is from that figure to 17.54 per cent, in a certain county. The eight counties

Reddick v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-10-05

Citation: 190 So. 2d 340

Snippet: Schaffer v. United States, C.A.Fla. 1955, 221 F.2d 17, 54 A.L.R.2d 820. The factual situation has analogy

Dickinson v. Geraci

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-09-30

Citation: 190 So. 2d 368

Snippet: valuation while the range is from that figure to 17.54 per cent. in a certain county. The eight counties

Campfield v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-08-31

Citation: 189 So. 2d 642, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4798

Snippet: Schaffer v. United States, C.A.Fla.1955, 221 F.2d 17, 54 A.L.R.2d 820. In the case sub judice, it should

Williams v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-06-24

Citation: 188 So. 2d 320

Snippet: Schaffer v. United States, CA 5 1955, (Fla.), 221 F.2d 17, 54 A.L.R. 2d 820. [6] See ante, page 322. [7] See

Burns v. Butscher

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-06-08

Citation: 187 So. 2d 594

Snippet: valuation while the range is from that figure to 17.54 per cent. in a certain county. The eight counties

City of Miami v. Jiminez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-05-15

Citation: 130 So. 2d 109

Snippet: in such establishment pays. (Ord. 5160 § 2, 11-17-54.)" The final decree appealed is in part as follows:

State v. Minge

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1935-03-26

Citation: 160 So. 670, 119 Fla. 515, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1019

Snippet: of Connecticut, 218 U.S. 563, 31 Sup. Ct. Rep. 17, 54 L.Ed. 1151; *Page 527 Board of Education of Kentucky