The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Cunningham, Roanoke County Tax Map Parcel No. 063.00-01-20.03-0000 and being MVP Parcel No. . . .
. . . calculated for Qihang and Xugong, the Department recalculated that margin in the Remand Redetermination to 20.03% . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[4][a][v] (Matthew Bender). . . .
. . . Port of Seattle, 115 Wash.App. 695, 698 n.3, 63 P.3d 830 (20.03). . . . .
. . . Clock Inc., 349 F.3d 1191, 1199-200 (9th Cir. 20.03). . . .
. . . See Robert Bosch, 719 F.3d at 1311; Uniloc, 632 F.3d at 1312; Chisum, supra, §§ 20.03[3], 20.07. . . .
. . . See Brunswick, 36 Fed.Cl. at 219 n.4; see also Chisum § 20.03[4][a][v]. . . .
. . . BACKGROUND On May 15, 20.03, a jury convicted Smith of first-degree murder, two counts of attempted first-degree . . .
. . . See generally 7 Chisum on Patents § 20.03[4][b][iii], pp. 20-343 to 20-344 (2011). . . .
. . . Swan identified a WVSCI score of 41.81 and a GLIMPSS score of 20.03. Pis.’ . . .
. . . Danbury Hosp., 347 F.3d 419, 424 (2d Cir.20.03) (“A court may not replace the terms of a consent decree . . .
. . . . §§ 20.01, 20.03, 20.04. . . .
. . . Oregon Uniform Civil Jury Instruction 20.03. . Oregon Uniform Civil Jury Instruction 20.04. . . . .
. . . See Brunswick, 36 Fed.Cl. at 219 n. 4; see also Chisum § 20.03[4][a][v] 20-316 to 24. . . .
. . . The PossibleNOW analysis also found that: 1.The sample of the 5000 calls from the Dish 20.03-2007 records . . .
. . . Penal Code § 20.03, which criminalizes kidnapping—a state law crime that is considered a predicate act . . . Penal Code § 20.03. . . . Penal Code Ann. § 20.03(a). . . . The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has held that an abduction occurs under § 20.03 where a person is . . . Penal Code § 20.03(a). . . .
. . . Penal Code § 20.03 (prohibiting abduction of another person); Tex. . . .
. . . Penal Code §§ 20.01(2), 20.03(a)). . Coleman v. State, AP-75478, 2009 WL 4696064 (Tex.Crim.App. . . .
. . . Chisum, Chi-sum on Patents § 20.03[7][c][v] (2002) (“A plaintiff who seeks to recover for damages for . . .
. . . violation of Massachusetts General Laws chapter 255B, section 2 and the Division's regulations 209 CMR 20.03 . . .
. . . Chisum, Chi-sum on Patents § 20.03[7][c][v] (2002) (“A plaintiff who seeks to recover for damages for . . .
. . . that the Debtor paid New River Nissan approximately $260.38 on vehicle maintenance or approximately $20.03 . . .
. . . Penal Code § 20.03(a) (providing that "[a] person commits [kidnapping] if he intentionally or knowingly . . .
. . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.03 (3d ed. 1999)). . . . .
. . . Penal Code § 20.03(a) was not a conviction for a crime of violence because Tex. . . . Penal Code § 20.03(a) does not have as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of force . . . Penal Code § 20.03(a) does not comport with the contemporary, generic offense of kidnapping. . . . Penal Code § 20.03(a) was not plain error. . . .
. . . Bank cited sections 8.01, 10.01, 11.01, 20.03, and 21.01 of the Lease. . . .
. . . plaintiff knows one of the defendants is liable, but does not know which one. 4 Moore's Federal Practice § 20.03 . . .
. . . 68 black firefighters from list 7029 were delayed in their start dates, leading to a total loss of 20.03 . . .
. . . "Department” is the principal administrative unit of or within the executive branch, §§ 20.03(2) and . . . (1), and "the individual or board in charge of the department” is the "[h]ead of the department.” § 20.03 . . .
. . . from $17.50/hour to $18.03/hour — “cost of living adjustment ]”); March 9, 2009 (from $18.03/hour to $20.03 . . . had the following decrease in pay: December 4, 2006 (from $14/hour to $12/hour); May 4, 2009 (from $20.03 . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[4][b][vi] (1990) (stating that amount of increase in damages awarded . . .
. . . VI, ch. 20.03. . . .
. . . Chisum, Chi-sum on Patents, § 20.03[7][c][vii], at 20-656 (2002). . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03 (2010) (“[A] strong case can be made for finding culpable mismarking . . . Chisum, Chi-sum on Patents § 20.03 (2010) (“[A] strong case can be made for finding culpable mismarking . . .
. . . Hoist & Derrick Co., 895 F.2d 1403, 1406 (Fed.Cir.1990) (citing 5 Chisum on Patents § 20.03[3], at 20 . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[7][c][vii]. . . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[7][c][iii]. . . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[7][c][vii]. . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[7][c][vii] (200.9). . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[l][e] (1999 & Supp.2005). . . .
. . . (Medical Plan at Section 20.03). The other Welfare Plans contain the same or similar provisions. . . . constructions and decisions shall be conclusive for all purposes of the Plan[J (Medical Plan at Section 20.03 . . .
. . . The Amended Complaint alleges that Biovail’s stock price dropped from $25.51 per share to $20.03 per . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[3][b][i] (2005) (citing additional cases). . . . Chisum, supra, at § 20.03[3][b][vi]; see also Fonar Corp. v. . . . Flakt, Inc., 954 F.Supp. 796, 808 (D.Del.1996); see also Chisum, supra, at § 20.03[4][a][v]. . . . England Printing & Lithographing Co., 899 F.2d 1171, 1175-76 (Fed.Cir.1990) (same); Chisum, supra, at § 20.03 . . . considered and declined to embrace the government's proposed taxation plan”); see also Chisum, supra, at § 20.03 . . .
. . . Penal Code § 20.03(a) qualified). . . .
. . . . § 20.03. “ Abduct’ means to restrain a person with intent to prevent [her] liberation by ... secreting . . .
. . . Chisum on Patents § 20.03[7][c][vii], at 20-657 (2002) ("There is little authority on whether continued . . . patents was readily apparent to anyone familiar with the legal term of a patent,” Chisum on Patents § 20.03 . . .
. . . Chiron, 268 F.Supp.2d at 1121 (citing Comark, 156 F.3d at 1191; 7 Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[4 . . .
. . . Chiron, 268 F.Supp.2d at 1121 (citing Comark, 156 F.3d at 1191; 7 Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[4 . . .
. . . Garcia-Gonzalez, 168 Fed.Appx. 564, this court held that Texas’s kidnapping statute, Texas Penal Code § 20.03 . . . Under Texas Penal Code § 20.03(a), a person commits the offense of kidnapping if he “intentionally or . . .
. . . . §§ 20.01(2) & 20.03(a) (Vernon 2003). . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[4][b][iii] (2002). . . . an award of enhanced'damages pursuant to section 284 requires a finding of willfulness. 7 Chisum § 20.03 . . . to increase is triggered only when the infringer’s conduct warrants an exemplary award.” 7 Chisum § 20.03 . . .
. . . . § 20.03(a) (kidnaping); Id. § 29.02(a) (robbery); Id. § 22.021(a) (aggravated sexual assault). . . .
. . . Nicolet Instrument Corp., 807 F.2d 964, 969 (Fed.Cir.1986) (quoting Chisum, Patents § 20.03[4] at 20- . . . See Chisum, Patents, § 20.03 at 325-26 (citing cases). . . . See Chisum, Patents, § 20.03 at 325-26 & n. 75 (citing cases). . . .
. . . Penal Code § 20.03, which is almost identical to New York’s and doesn’t require a risk of injury or involuntary . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[7][b][iii] (2002). . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[7][b][iii] (2005). . . .
. . . Penal Code § 20.03(a). . . .
. . . In support of its position, Inline relies on § 20.03[7][c][i] of Chisum on Patents, which states, “[t . . . Inline referred this court to § 20.03[7][c][i] of Chisum on Patents, which states in relevant part that . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents, § 20.03[7][c][vii], at 20-656 (2002) (“Section 292 requires as an element . . . See Chisum on Patents, § 20.03[7][c][vii], at 20-657 ("There is little authority on whether continued . . .
. . . Chi-sum, Ckisum on Patents § 20.03[7][b][iv] (2001) (“In many instances the appropriate measure of monetary . . .
. . . Penal Code § 20.03(a)(2005). . . .
. . . to present the same evidence twice in separate trials.” 20 Moore’s Federal Practice and Procedure § 20.03 . . .
. . . PeNal Code § 20.03. . . .
. . . PREAMBLE On July 15, 20.03, we filed an opinion in this case holding that there is a reasonable probability . . .
. . . See 7 Chisum ON Patents § 20.03[7][c]. . . . Id at § 20.03[7][c][vii]. . . . ChisuM on Patents § 20.03[7][e][vii]. . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03 (Matthew Bender & Co. 2002) (“Lost profits, in the form of sales diversion . . .
. . . On October 16, 20.03, the Minnesota DHS mailed a violation letter placing Plaintiffs’ licenses on conditional . . .
. . . See EPC’s Reply Brief at 8 (citing CHISUM ON PATENTS, § 20.03[4][c][vii] and cases cited therein). . . .
. . . See also the many articles cited in note 312 (page 20-419) of section 20.03[4][b] of Vol. 7 of Chisum . . .
. . . . § 171.123(1) (20.03). §171.123(3). . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents, § 20.03[4][c][ii] (1999)). . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents, § 20.03[4][c][ii] (1999). . . .
. . . Penal Code §§ 20.01(1); 20.03. . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents, § 20.03(6), at 20-449-459 (1998). . DowChem. Co. v. . . .
. . . for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974”); 68 Fed.Reg. 53,399 (Sept. 10, 20.03 . . .
. . . (citing 5 Chi-sum on Patents § 20.03[3], at 20-142 (1986)). . . .
. . . referring to “failure to disclose” as a “form of inequitable conduct”); see also 1 Chisum on Patents § 20.03 . . .
. . . juries that he was on the apron when he first observed Montes, but he later testified at the June 26, 20.03 . . .
. . . of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit at the close of business on March 31, 20.03 . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[4][a][v] (2002). . . .
. . . Chisum, 5 Patents § 20.03[5]. . . .
. . . See State Industries, 883 F.2d at 1578; 7 Chisum on Patents § 20.03[1]. . . .
. . . See also, 7 Chisum on Patents § 20.03[7][c][iii] (“The courts have approved the common practice of listing . . .
. . . Id. at 1190-93; 7 Chisum, Chi-sum on Patents § 20.03[4][b][v][D], at 20-368 to 20-374 (2002). . . .
. . . only an improvement on or a small part of the product sold by the infringer.” 7 Chisum on Patents, § 20.03 . . .
. . . now seek recovery, in the form of an injunction, from buyers of the products); 5 Chisum, Patents § 20.03 . . . Calco Ltd., 850 F.2d 660, 668 (Fed.Cir.1988); see also 5 Chisum, Patents § 20.03[7][b][iii] (2001) (“ . . . See generally Aro Mfg., 377 U.S. at 501, 513, 84 S.Ct. 1526; see also, 5 Chisum, Patents § 20.03[7][b . . . the liability of other infringers and may trigger the full compensation rule.” 5 Chisum, Patents § 20.03 . . . Corp., 56 F.3d at 1538; see also Aro Mfg., 377 U.S. at 501, 513, 84 S.Ct. 1526; 5 Chisum, Patents § 20.03 . . .
. . . Chisum, Chi-sum on Patents § 20.03[4] [a] [v] (explaining that “the district court has discretion to . . .
. . . . § 20.03. . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents, § 20.03[4][c][ii] (1999). . . .
. . . . § 20.03(11) (“ ‘Agency,’ as the context requires, means a[ ] ... commission .... ”); see also Fla. . . . Stat. § 20.03(10). The Florida Commission falls squarely within this definition. . . .
. . . . § 20.03(11) (“ ‘Agency,’ as the context requires, means a[ ] ... commission-”); see also Fla. . . . Stat. § 20.03(10). The Florida Commission falls squarely within this definition. . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[4][b][v][J] (1998). . . .
. . . .”); Don Campbell et al„ Creditors’ Rights Handbook, A Guide to the Debtor-Creditor Relationship, § 20.03 . . .
. . . ”); Don Campbell et al., Creditors’ Rights Handbook, A Guide to the Debtor-Creditor Relationship, § 20.03 . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[3][iv] at 20-188, 20-189 (1993 & Supp.1997). . . . Chisum, Chiswm on Patents § 20.03[3][b][ii] at 20-184 (1993 & Supp.1997) (industry custom “is rarely . . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[6], at 20-454 n. 11 (1993 & Supp.1997); Brunswick Corp. v. . . .
. . . . §§ 20.03 and 20.04. . . .
. . . Chisum, Patents § 20.03[7] at 20-530 (Rel.46,1993). . . .
. . . In response to Garcia, on April 17, 1986, the Police Department issued General Order 20.03, which proclaimed . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03 at 20-77 (1997). . . . Rosen, 1992 WL 123178, at *13 (E.D.N.Y.1992); 7 Chisum, Patents § 20.03[3] at 20-159. . . . Mobil Oil, 915 F.Supp. at 1354; see 7 Chi-sum, Patents, § 20.03[3][b][ii], at 20-182 to 184. . . . clearly greater if it followed a consistent policy of refusing to grant licenses. 7 Chisum, Patents § 20.03 . . . ’s bargaining power is greater if the would be licensee is a direct competitor, 7 Chisum, Patents § 20.03 . . .
. . . Any such error was harmless, since the remainder, 20.03 kilograms, still warrants an offense level of . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.03[4][e][iv] (“Section 285 authorizes awards of attorneys fees for appeals . . .